5G technology discussion threads needed

>>133547885
I once looked into this extensively, what I found was that the frequency had the ability to force open special filters between the brain and the rest of the body in smaller animals due to heating up that part of the body. But then they tried using cellphone frequency on dogs, and nothing happend because the larger animals have far better heat venting pathways at the cellular level then rats. So nah, unless the frequencys are smaller then ultraviolet rays, there shouldn't be any harm to genetic material, and any effect it has on heating up portions of the brain can't outpace heat displacement mechanisms that the human body has.

File: 4c757ff86d6710635eebe813210a3fdd.png (1MB, 1272x720px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1272x720px

>>133547885
I'm here for you buddy. My dads really into this kinda stuff, smart meters, wireless signals and stuff. I honestly can't say anything concrete because there has to be research done for a LENGTHY amount of time and the rate at which we're progressing 3g-4g-5g it's basically impossible. "One difference will be that 5G may move wireless signals to a higher frequency band, operating at millimeter-length wavelengths between 30 and 300 gigahertz (GHz) on the radio spectrum." Find out what other types of things run around that wavelength.

File: 300007-metropolis_productionstill_300dpi_09.jpg (331KB, 1600x1165px) Image search: [Google]

331KB, 1600x1165px

Bump

>>133548853
That's less energetic than visible light

Don't most wifi rotors now output 5G?

File: fukushima_radiation_nuclear_fallout_map.jpg (25KB, 594x329px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 594x329px

>>133547885
Watch the cancer numbers go up once this shit goes live. It's going to be worse than Fukushima.

>>133547885
Basically non-ionizing radiation can only present a risk if the structures that are exposed to the frequency start to become disrupted by heating up, but everything I have seen has suggested that human tissue/organs can expel heat in an efficient manner to the point where little to no change occurs in health. If you think about the resilience of the human body, we can handle a sizable amount of actual radiation(sunlight/xrays) before the damage becomes an issue

flying in an airplane presents more radiation risk then cellphone use

>>133550038
Do you think energy=damage?

>>133550385
Yeah