>Socialist >right wing How did this nonsense ever come about?

>>133511793

Because it's nationalist, nativist, moralist, preservationist and all it means is taking care of the common national identity denominator: race.

If it is such nonsense, what does explain the leftist plan in motion, laid to destroy fascist states, and activated now, to destroy nativists?

>>133511793
capitalist socialism

File: dubs ain't free.png (30KB, 853x543px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 853x543px

It was called national-socialis because of the state corporation doctrine and minimum wage. It is not socialist in the marxist redistribution of all wealth sort of way.

If you actually bothered to do some research, you would know this.

>>133512377
>socialist but not socialist

Where did this horseshit come from? German National Socialism and Russian Communism share an absurd amount of shit in common. Do people seem to think that companies and corporations don't exist in communist countries?

File: 1423679598104.jpg (38KB, 551x353px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 551x353px

>>133513474
Again, do some research into national-socialism.

You are fucking retarded.

>>133513781
Seriously are you fucking retarded and honestly believe that Hitler and his economic policies weren't nearly identical to those of the USSR? To somehow claim that HURRR ONE IS NATIONAL THE OTHER INTERNATIONAL, TOTALLY DIFFERENT is so beyond the pale retarded that it boggles the mind how you even have the brain power to perform autonomic functions. Tell me how they were totally different, please, no amount of "just do some research" is going to get you out of spewing horse shit like an ignorant leftist cunt.

>>133514251
Hitler's economic policies most Keynesian economics, work programs, and cartel-ism borrowed from Mussolini's fascism. The idea behind Hitler's style "socialism" was to bring the Aryan people together in a common goal. The government was heavily involved in the economy and there was some nationalization of companies, but it wasn't all that different from FDR's New Deal (executed a lot better how ever).

File: had it not been for the laws of this land.jpg (122KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 1280x720px

>>133514251
I already explained it you illiterate fucking burger. I'll explain it once again, read very slowly so that even your ignorant mulatto brain can understand.

National socialism is called national socialism because of the state corporation doctrine and because of their minimum wage laws, just to mention a few. It is not socialist in the marxist "seize all the wealth and redistribute everything equally" way. You are comparing apples to oranges. You are fucking retarded. Read a book.

>>133514251
>burger education

>>133515454
>state corporation doctrine and because of their minimum wage laws

How are you this ignorant of how the Soviet Union worked?

File: burger.jpg (171KB, 1024x605px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 1024x605px

>>133516393
>american reading comprehension and intellectualism
R E A D A B O O K

>>133516393
>>133516670
I apologize that our schools are this shitty

File: scum.png (676KB, 429x599px) Image search: [Google]

676KB, 429x599px

>>133511793
>nationalist
>right wing

>>133511793
>didn't actually genocide the kikes
>still worshiped by stormfags
He was a jewish plant, stop being cucks.

>>133515194
>Hitler's economic policies most Keynesian economics, work programs, and cartel-ism borrowed from Mussolini's fascism.

That's a very unique way of putting it considering that the NSDAP even tried such things as collective farming (maybe they should've just slaughtered pigs, buried them and burned crops during famines like FDR and they'd be lauded as heroes as well?) and seizure of property, patents and equipment from people - the rationale is irrelevant whether it's for 'the workers' or 'the aryan peoples', the methods and results are identical.

>>133516670
Look, if you're going to remain willfully ignorant there's no need to be angry about it.

>>133516393
Holy shit just kys. You are making burgers look bad

File: 423849230840923.png (458KB, 2358x984px) Image search: [Google]

458KB, 2358x984px

>>133511793
Read Mein Kampf.

>>133517529
There was left wing before Marx.

>>133517854
Not an argument. Would you like to try again?

>>133517867
http://www.ub.edu/graap/nazi.pdf
Believe it or not, the Nazis actually privatized tons of shit by reducing their shares in companies to the point where they had little to no say in the affairs of it.

>>133517529
Interesting.

Its just /nu/-males that realize they will be tossed off the cliff with the rest of the liberals after we remove them from their homes for being neets.

File: 1496451591344.jpg (41KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 1024x576px

>>133511793
Traditionalist Socialism=Meritocracy

See pic:>>133517529

File: projektointi.jpg (73KB, 490x333px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 490x333px

>>133517483
You are the one who is firing out loaded questions one after the other, and refusing to acknowledge your clear as day ignorance on Hitler's economic policy. You are a fool and a laughingstock, and there is nothing to be gained from responding to your posts seriously until you yourself acknowledge your own ignorance. True knowledge lies in knowing you know nothing.

>>133518094
Having state-run corporations and Marxist government planned economy is a distinction without a difference when comparing "left wing" and "right wing" economic systems

>>133518542
That is word diarrhea of the highest order.

Assume an individual wants to invent something that isn't "for the common good"? Hitler's gubmint would simply seize it and lock the guy up. Basically the same as if someone in a commie country didn't make his government assigned good.

>>133518942
>still hasn't said anything of merit the entire thread
>JUST OPEN A BOOK

I've never seen someone so proud of their ignorance. Here, I'll even quote laymans shit that even you might understand

>Both German National Socialism and Russian Stalinism sought the establishment of a classless society with equal social rights for all.
>Both Stalinism and Nazism share an ideological vision of creating an ideal "new man", both identified the "bourgeois" world as the old world that was obsolete, and both involved a total rejection of liberalism as well as individual rights and freedoms, in which they sought to create a new, illiberal modern society.
>Anti-capitalist and anti-bourgeois sentiments were rampant among the leadership of both Stalin’s Soviet Russia and Hitler’s National Socialist Germany. Hitler described the forces opposed to Nazi Germany during World War II as the wealthy classes of the capitalist West. On April 6, 1941, Hitler issued an order extolling his past military victories, affirming that “German Armies [had] defeated the legions of capitalism and plutocracy.” Goebbels favored the Bolsheviks over the capitalists, writing in his diary that “it would be better for us to go down with Bolshevism than live in eternal slavery under capitalism.” Goebbels was not hesitant to designate the economic battle lines between England and Germany, arguing in 1939 that “England is a capitalist democracy. Germany is a socialist people's state.”
>After Hitler became the German Chancellor in 1933, he declared May Day to be an official paid holiday and arranged celebrations that saw marches, fireworks, and music under the slogan of “Germany honors labor.” The very next day, Hitler nationalized all autonomous unions. Like the Soviet Union, the National Socialists outlawed strikes, walkouts, and lockouts, adopting the Marxist tenets of prohibiting independent or private institutions. Union membership became compulsory.

>>133519131
The Third Reich wasn't any of those. Actually read the link dipshit, economically they were much more of a free market than the Weimar Republic

>>133511793
>Nationalist
>left wing

How did this nonsense ever come about?

>>133519827
Because left and right are economic.

File: huh bouncing girl.gif (2MB, 330x294px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 330x294px

>>133519530
>That is word diarrhea of the highest order.
You meant to say lowest order.

>Assume an individual wants to invent something that isn't "for the common good"? Hitler's gubmint would simply seize it and lock the guy up

Why and when did this happen? This is communism you're describing, under the strictest enforcement of polcor. That's what national socialism fought against. There's literally no basis for you to think of that example.

Let me guess, lolbertarian seeing horseshoe's everywhere?

>>133511793
Its not real socialism.

File: pol compass.png (18KB, 487x498px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 487x498px

>>133519915
Nationalist is Right wing
but still he is always in centre a bit on right and all way up on political commpas
he had more right wing stances than left wing but its stupid to even talk about left right Hitler he is neither

>pic related is my commpass hitler is slightly above me

File: Political_chart.svg.png (94KB, 2000x2177px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 2000x2177px

>>133520661
>nationalist is right wing

>>133512377
Beatiful.

File: jewshatehimaustrianpainter.jpg (33KB, 415x550px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 415x550px

>>133513781

>>133520661
So Robespierre, Ceausescu,Pol-Pot and Mao were right-wing?

>>133511793
Because cucks/Jews/bluepills/normies think words count for more than actions. It's just a pure coincidence that all of them aren't capable of doing anything of any worth.