Wimbledon is the most backwards, racist and sexist Grand Slam

I'd love for them to remove gender-grouped matches. We'd never see a woman there ever again and it would be hilarious watching the feminists cry sexism.

men are scheduled on more important venues because in basically all sports, the market for the male league is larger than that for female league, meaning that the former brings in more money and thus male athletes also command higher salaries

>>133460908
anyone who watches tennis knows this is a golden age for the men. Just because the women don't have the talent anymore doesn't mean it's sexism.

>>133461160
It would already work if they played to 5 sets. 3 sets in a Slam? WTF? What is next? Will women have to just run 25km for a marathon?

>>133461160
I really hope we see a bunch of tranny athletes at the next Olympics for exactly that reason. Except it will be even more entertaining because if they complain about it they'll get called transphobic.

>>133461260
If Wimbledon were interested in money, they wouldn't limit their club membership to 350 and have a racist way to get in new members... but would just auction off memberships to the highest bidder (getting in 20 times more money from members each year).

>>133461385
>anyone who watches tennis knows this is a golden age for the men.
The golden age of tennis (for both men and women) was the late 90s with Sampras, Agassi, Graf, Hingis, Seles etc. still around.

>>133461647
Already happened in tennis.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renée_Richards

>>133461600
If women had to play 5 sets they wouldn't physically be able to continue the tournament after the third round. That said, the women players should keep their mouths shut if they don't want to upset their little gravy train of equal pay (in ITF events), since the fact is they're gerting paid equally for 3/5 the work. Plus the men play at an astronomically higher level than the women. Any D1-level male player would thrash any WTA player dropping at most 2-3 games in best of five (and 1-2 in best of three).

File: 1489569207252.jpg (35KB, 487x457px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 487x457px

>Could enact real change by simply telling more women to watch Tennis, and for more people of colour to join their local Tennis club and start playing

>"Waaaaah make everyone black plz, hire me to commentate and gib money"

>>133461160
this, let women play men.

to do otherwise is sexist.

>>133460908
>Wimbledon is an openly racist club. 98% of its members are white, most are men. You need 4 letters of recommendation from existing members, who only let in "their own" to the club.
That's classism and nepotism you dumb cunt

God I hate jewish women

>>133460908
I'd love to see what would happen if a top10 men's player played a top5 woman.

>>133461752
>The golden age of tennis (for both men and women) was the late 90s with Sampras, Agassi, Graf, Hingis, Seles etc. still around.
i respectfully disagree, anon.
go back a decade and we had McEnroe, Becker, Edberg, Laconte.... far more entertaining that ANY of our current players. Or maybe i'm just old- i dunno.

>>133460908

> 1
Women are less than men, but Wimbledon isn't saying so, you're simply imposing your own ideology on their actions without considering their reasons.

2.
This has nothing to do with anything. You don't even know if they contribute to the sport in other ways, like sponsorships.

3. That's not "openly" racist. You're using that word the same way you do on Trump. It's like "literally", you're using it wrong. Find me one Wimbledon person who will answer in the affirmative to the question, "Are you a racist?"

Besides, disproportionate outcomes don't necessarily come from racism. Find evidence before you accuse.

4.
It's a branding issue. If women were equal to men, they would contribute as much to the brand.

5.
I have no idea who this man is, but if you're insulting him like this he's probably a stand-up guy.

Go convince some women to be roofers and sanitation workers before you expect me to give a shit about fucking Wimbledon.

>>133462300
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Sexes_(tennis)#1998:_Karsten_Braasch_vs._the_Williams_sisters

>>133461752
Actually it was the 80s, with Connors, Borg, McEnroe, Lendl, Wilander, Becker, Edberg, Agassi and Sampras around. (Not to mention other outstanding players like Mecir, Noah, Cash, Gilbert, etc.)

Now with Fedalovic + Muzz/Manislas still playing at an extremely high level and dominating, it's a great era. The younger generations have been complete shit up intil recently, so we're in for a lull when the aforementioned players retire. The next top pkayers will likely be A. Zverev, Thiem, and Kyrgios.

>>133462411
>Boris Becker
>I have no idea who this man is,
So your opinion on tennis can be discarded.

Thanks. Why did you even respond?

>>133460908
makes for spectacular tennis though doesn't it?

>>133462411
>doesn't know Boom-Boom Boris

Fuck off out of this thread faggot

>>133462361
I watched Lendl vs. Chang when I was a 5yr old kid - I distinctly remember that match. I watched becker, Edberg, Laconte... I don't really remember McEnroe.

And I still tell you, in men's tennis, the 90s were the time to watch. Also, the times of Graf were just amazing. Real character tennis.

Today on the women's tennis? Just awful. One Eastern European screamer or fat American after the other.

>>133462300
Man wins in straight sets, probably doesn't lose a single point.

>>133462015
>If women had to play 5 sets they wouldn't physically be able to continue the tournament after the third round.
Is that why women cannot complete a marathon? Is that why women cannot compete in an Ironman.

Give me a break. Tennis players like Serena Williams could not succeed in a Grand Slam... but most other players could.

>>133462635
Graf-Seles was an amazing rivalry. Too bad Graf's no. 1 fan cut it short, else Monica would probably be sitting at around 15-18 slams (and Graf around the same). Hingis was also amazing until her 1999 RG meltdown (thanks to the shit Frog crowd and iron Steffi).

>>133460908
Women's sports sucks though

>>133460908

>implying tennis is not full of trannies

>>133461706
As hard as it is for a jew like you to understand, not everyone is motivated solely by shekels. For many without hawk sized noses, things like quality and tradition actually matter.

>>133460908
>women's sports
im laffin

>>133462711
There's running long distances and then there's sports like tennis which involve sprinting/stopping abruptly while chasing a tiny yellow ball for 3+ hours and pulling off world-class shots which take 100,000+ hours to master all the while fending off extreme mental pressure, and then doing this over the course of two weeks at slams. Fact is most women can't handle this. The level would drop off severely with best of five and the WTA would be reduced to a "last woman standing" show.

>>133462929
>not everyone is motivated solely by shekels.
Yes, Wimbledon is motivated by keeping their club in the hands of royal shills and their buddies. Fact.

You cannot be a member at Wimbledon if you are e.g. a very rich negro loving tennis. You just cannot. You would need to be a royal or white buddy of them... paying some token membership fee instead of the 500,000 pounds that a membership would be worth on the open market.

>>133460908
wtf i love Wimbledon now!

>>133463007
Women play 90min football matches (plus 30min extensions) and do just fine.

Football is a "sprint/stop" sport.

>>133462635
...i probably saw the same match at round about the same age :)

in this 'modern era' i made a small fortune betting on Nadal during his first clay season all the way to the French Open crown and he's an amazing player and all but doesn't have even half the character of say, Gusatvo Keuten who won it twice previous to him.

i beleive tennis is actually too "professional". reckon it went downhill with bolletari's tennis factory in Florida.

>>133462781
>Too bad Graf's no. 1 fan cut it short
Seles came back, but she just wasn't cut out for being a great tennis player.

I have seen a few minutes of Gabriela Sabatini vs. Seles Legends match from last year... Seles looks really really old and worn out. Sabatini (who is older than Seles) looks hot, fresh and amazing and her tennis is better than ever.

>>133460908
Makes me like tennis, honestly.

>>133463076
Not everyone wants their club shitted up with just anyone. Yes, it's elitist. So what? It's their club.

>>133460908
What the hell more do they want, they get paid the same as men, even though they only need to play 2 out of 3 sets while for men is 3 out of 5, the ball they use is also lighter and nobody fucking watch their matches

>>133463133
How many women run a sub four minute mile?

Here, I'll throw you a bone so you'll have an actual argument: the top long distance swimmers in the world are women. It's the one sport in the world in which the top women are better than the top men.

>>133461960
>Richards was born Richard Raskind on August 19, 1934, in New York City, and was raised, as she put it, as "a nice Jewish boy" in Forest Hills, Queens. Her father David Raskind was an orthopedic surgeon, and her mother was one of the first female psychiatrists in the United States, in addition to being a professor at Columbia University.

>>133463249
>Not everyone wants their club shitted up with just anyone. Yes, it's elitist. So what? It's their club.

Elitist? What is elitist about letting only royals and their buddies in at token membership fees? That isn't elitist, that is just having a closed, degenerate club.

Which is fine, if the club gets no taxpayer subsidies at all. But the fact is, the British government pays millions in subsidies and tax benefits to the club. Horrible!

>>133463363
>Be 30% body fat.
Well, it's just buoyancy.

File: IMG_0157.jpg (141KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 600x600px

>>133460908
Is that Adolf Hitler's face in the tennis racket?

>>133463363
>How many women run a sub four minute mile?
Not the point. The point is whether a woman can play a 4 hour tennis match lasting 5 sets.

A woman can do so.

>>133460908
It's called classy, anon

>>133461960
>you will live long enough to see trannies smash every woman's record, humiliate them in every sport, drive away all the fans, make them completely unmarketable, get ESPN to lose even more subscribers, and utterly destroy women's sports once and for all

File: IMG_0424.jpg (20KB, 212x403px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 212x403px

Heil Hitler!

>>133463133
You are underestimating the mental compinent. Soccer/tennis are not comparable mentally. In one you're passing the ball with your whole team for 90 mins (with a large half-time break and coaching during matches), but in the other it's mono-a-mono for 3+ hours with short breaks, no coaching, more on-court thinking, strategizing and problem-solving all the while pulling off extremely nuanced and technical shots (moreso than in soccer). I would even argue modern tennis is more physically exhausting than soccer, but that's beside the point. Tennis is about tactics and technique, not just brute endurance. Sure if we changed the WTA to best of five at slams the players could probably eventually adapt, but the lecel would go way down over the course of the tournament, therre would be more emotional/physical breakdowns and it would become a matter of who simply could last physically/mentally the longest.

>>133463363
>the top long distance swimmers in the world are women
please provide proof

>>133463219
Nah, Seles would've owned the 90's the way she was smacking Graf around as a teen. She was broken mentally after being literally stabbed with a knife by one of Steffi's diehard fans who couldn't stand to see his waifu get sodomized on court grand slam final after grand slam final.

>>133463363
Long distance swimming factoid sounds like complete bullshit. Going to need to see some sources there, friendo.

>>133463506
Yeah? Can she do so consistently and keep her position competitively against men?

The answer is no.

>>133463702
Women can float more easily than men, so it might be true.

>>133463506
She can maybe do it for one match, not over two weeks.

>>133463363
HOLY SHIT AN EDUCATED ANON

Are you an athlete by chance? Nice to meet another on /pol/. I can explain for the uninitiated.

Women LITERALLY have less mitochondria than men. Mitochondria produce ATP, which enables short-term muscle contractions (ie raw strength and power). Because women have less they cannot match men in strength and even skinny manlets can physically overpower the average woman.

Here's the kicker - there is less sexual difference in regards to cardiovascular activity. Often women can compete at the same (cardiovascular) level as men, even though their muscular strength is lower. For this reason in running events, the percentile gap in world-record times decreases significantly as distance INCREASES. Swimming, a cardiovascular activity, favors women for this reason as well as increased body fat.

Cheers - glad someone else here has at least a modicum of athletic knowledge

>>133464219
This is all common sense/pseudo-intellectual circumlocutory inflation of simple concepts until the long-distance swimming claim. Can you cite any study/event/statistic which says women are better in this regard?

>>133463930
I keep seeing people make that claim around here, but records I see show men swimming faster. I have also heard that women can beat men in long distance running, a relative who competes in long distance running even told me so. But the records say otherwise. I suspect that individual races may have female winners due to some sampling error but overall men dominate.

>>133464438
Totally agree. I wonder (((who))) could keep parroting specious sound-bytes such as that on this board? It's almost like they're paid to shill bullshit for a living.

>>133463680
>Sure if we changed the WTA to best of five at slams the players could probably eventually adapt, but the lecel would go way down over the course of the tournament, therre would be more emotional/physical breakdowns and it would become a matter of who simply could last physically/mentally the longest.
Good.

>>133464219
>pseudo-intellectual
No, it is exercise physiology
>women are better at long-distance swimming
No, they can simply match men
>sources
I have lost my original sources which were track and field/ex phys studies done by a few renown coaches. How about reading a book (any book will do) on the topic. Obviously many factors influence athletic performance but mitochondria + testosterone are major ones.

...or look at running world records yourself and look at the trend. Women are at less of a disadvantage the more the cardiovascular system is used. Are you disagreeing simply because "women can't be good at anything?"

>>133464708
meant for
>>133464409

>>133464653
>Good
You could also watch pong for 3-4 hours while playing loud-shrieking lesbian porn in the background for the same effect.

>>133463998
hint: the best long distance swimmers are all men. An aussie would know.

>>133460908
Women's ape hoop is less popular than men's ape hoop. Can we ban them both to be fair?

>>133463619
What a timeline.

File: wimminzsportz1.webm (3MB, 496x280px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 496x280px

>>133460908
Let me entertain you fine gentlemen with a couple .webm

>>133462635
>I don't really remember McEnroe
C'MON

File: wimminzsportz2.webm (2MB, 312x240px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 312x240px

>>133464972

>>133460908
I wonder how many people out there could bring themselves to admit that men's sports are just more entertaining to watch, simply due to the fact that they're more fucking athletic.

File: wimminzsportz3.webm (3MB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 480x360px

>>133464986

Then tell me this, first both men and women singles win 2.2 mil euro for first place. YET Women only need to play best 2 of 3 sets, while men need to win best 3 of 5. So the men have to actually work LONGER for the same paycheck. And you call it sexist. fucking joke.

>>133464708
No, I am saying elite women athletes fall short in every sport to elite-athlete men in the same sport, often by extremely large margins. I have often heard the claim (such as from you) that in ultra-endurance sports, the gap lessens, but the justification often involves theoretical hand-waving (womens have less muscles = less respiration, plus more body fat by default even though an elite athlete male would clearly optimize his level of body fat for the occasion). We are simply throwing out too many variables with that argument, just as one could say the human body can lift several tons if all its muscles cold be used in perfect coordination. Has there ever been a recorded, concrete case of top athlete women matching top athlete men in a single sport?

>>133465063
>So the men have to actually work LONGER for the same paycheck.
but this is feminism's definition of equality. less work, less effort, less risk of death, same pay.

>>133465005
Women's sports are great if the grills are cute, otherwise you might as well just watch men

>>133465288
field hockey is your sport then anon

>>133460908
whinge more cunt, wimbledon is great

the best women tennis player in the world could not compete with some of the worst top men players, so why should they play on center court??

File: 1445950648422.png (248KB, 267x200px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 267x200px

>>133460908
you know what's sexist about wimbledon?
>women get the same prize money as men despite playing 3/5 of the time

>>133465157
don't forget that the only reason women are "the best at extreme endurance swimming" is because only women do the crazy shit, because the men are busy training for prize events.
>>133465328
men are better at field hockey too though.

>>133464986
>>133465006
I've done this. Own goaled in both basketball and soccer. I blame the autism.
>>133464972
And I went to high school with somebody who competed in this event. So proud.

>>133465157
You know what anon you are right and wrong at the same time. Because at these ultra-high distance events (ld swimming and ultramarathons) the nature of the events means no two will be the same. I am a runner so I will talk about what I know. Time records are pretty much useless in ultramarathons (100+ miles) because of weather conditions, course conditions, elevation, competition+strategies of the day, what the person ate for breakfast...so time is useless. But women show up much more frequently in the top 10 of these races than in a 100m dash where any man would dust a woman.

Simply we do not know, but in my opinion any footrace past 50-100 miles is a race of mental toughness, and then it is fair game for men or women. BUT the science suggests the gap lessens, however due to the inconsistency of the events themselves we may never know.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swimming_at_the_2012_Summer_Olympics_%E2%80%93_Men%27s_marathon_10_kilometre

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swimming_at_the_2012_Summer_Olympics_%E2%80%93_Women%27s_marathon_10_kilometre

would you look at that, a 10km swimming event... and the best woman only beats one guy in the field.

and the same applies to the 2016 Olympics...

and the guy that was beat? an Egyptian, who got into the race for being the best distance swimmer in Africa.

>>133460908

the real outrage is that the prize money is the same for men and women. federer, nadal, murray, djokovic. these are all-time greats. and they play best of five sets instead of three, which is more ad revenue and attraction for ticket sales. yet they have bowed to SJWs and offer women the same prize money as men. Muguruza or Rybarakova or whatever other no-name winner from the women, playing in a final that will be watched by a tenth of the people as the men's, should get the same prize money? Lick my penis while I'm farting.

>>133465648
If we're just asking whether a woman could complete an ultra-marathon the same as a man then the answer is obviously yes. If we are comparing them head-to-head then I would still wager that the record are all held by men by fairly large margins. Throwing out any competitive aspect and just asking for either sex to complete the event, then yes the potential gap lessens (though men are still more likely, physically and mentally, to be up for the task). However this seems very disingenuous as we are just forcibly leveling the playing field in order to prop one side up (which often is the feminist/marxist strategy).

>>133465913
>Murray
>all-time great

Anon, I...

>>133465648
no, we already know that isn't the case. with hard evidence. There is no scientific data to back up your claim and thus it is pure bunk.
Even in running the 50k race is hands down in favor of men. and the 48 hour race is won by men as well (who cover at least 70km more)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultramarathon

feel free to run an analysis on this so called "gap closing"

File: 1499148724015.jpg (9KB, 300x168px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 300x168px

You cant understand modern society until you figure out women are men larpers.

>>133460908
is Wimbledon /ourgrandslam/?

>>133460908
The funny thing is the prize money for women is the same as for men even though they only play best of 3 not best of 5. Men work more to earn the same. Muh wage gap

The biggest question in this case: WHY GIVE A FUCK? If you find the place outrageous just don't go there. The best way to kill a beast is to stop feeding it. Plus, if women find the dress code and system sexist why the fuck are they even attending the damn place?

>>133465591
>I blame the autism.
It's a very special kind of autism when you shoot at your own net and manage to convince everyone on the opposing team to go and shoot for theirs.

>>133465913
>murray
>these are all-time greats.

Please...

Federer, Nadal and Djoko have each won over a dozen Slams. Murray stands at 3...

Even Wawrinka has won 3 Slams.

Murray and Wawrinka are the Pat Cashs, Jonas Bjoerkmans and Patrick Rafters of our time. Federer, Nadal and Djoko are the Sampras, Agassi, Lendl, Borg and McEnroes of our time.

>>133460908
God bless tennis

>>133460908
>The BBC continues to employ Boris Becker, a bankrupt, rude, sexist and openly homophobic bum. They pay him a shitton of taxpayer money for his "commentary"! Only because he lives 4 min from the Wimbledon courts. Outrageous really.

oh noes, is baby's little government funded propaganda project backfiring on him? so sad.

Who cares. Cuck the fuck out of tennis. Faggy rich people's game.

>>133460908
nice b8 m80

>>133463133
soccer if fucking gay

>>133466901

Who cares they're all utterly boring cunts totally devoid of any charisma or personality.

Tennis has got be the sport most void of character.

It's like in order to be top class in tennis you have to be as personally interesting as a plank of wood.

>>133460908
>white people have their own things they do with each other since forever
news at 11

>>133460908
You can buy a ticket in the open market for the last Saturday for about 1,500GBP, women's final and mens doubles.

In fact without the mens doubles and the fact it's WImbledon, the price would be even lower for the last Sat.

HOWEVER, it costs about 6 grand, yes, SIX fucking grand, for a ticket on the Sunday for the men's final.

The market has spoken, women's tennis is worthless and it only exists because its lumped together into the Grand Slams. The slams give it visibility which it otherwise wouldn't have. It would be like women's football, zero fucks given by all.

And this pattern is consistent and has been the same ever since I started checking it about 10 years ago.

It's been done before, women were beaten easily. Only the odd hey I'm number 99 odd in men I'm better than women guy has lost and that was against a Venus sister and you tell me she isn't a trannyformer, fella in disguise

>>133472222
she got the same surgeon as obama's """wife"""

File: serena-williams02[1].jpg (82KB, 640x826px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 640x826px

Do you guys think the tennis doping agency has closed its eyes on Serena Williams to further the black is better agenda? I mean she looks like a guy on steroids and there was this known episode where she locked herself in her safe-room when officials rang at her door for a doping test. She later pretended that she was afraid.
https://archive.fo/xUZKT

>>133460908
Maybe they could have booked more women for centre court if Sharapova was playing.

Shock that people don't want to watch some big ambling gorilla play the game when they could watch Sharpo's graceful trot <3

>>133471734
I find pretty brutal that Wimbledon doesn't auction off the tickets, but uses a lottery system, allowing scammers to make huge profits on ticket resales.

Brits are truly the worst when it comes to even tickets. How is there no resale ban going on for the Wimbledon tickets? Just require IDs together with your tickets!

>>133471602
>Who cares they're all utterly boring cunts totally devoid of any charisma or personality.
You must be a special type of idiot, if you think Federer and Nadal are "utteryl boring cunts".

>Tennis has got be the sport most void of character.
Ok, whatever you say. Go back to your football or Paki cricket.

File: 1495152159625.jpg (647KB, 2696x2232px) Image search: [Google]

647KB, 2696x2232px

>>133460908
you realise youre basically a fuckign Kike when you see a group of people doing something and think

"i wanna get in there, subvert that and just fucking ruin it all"

op is 100% woman