Oh my. Who is our "spokesperson"?

>>133413523
They're referring to the 400-lb hacker.

>>133413540
And top kek of course gookmoot wouldn't talk to the media.

>>133413708

I like how they put ((())) in there and have apperantly no idea what the fuck it even means.

>>133413523
Sargon of Akkad obviously

THE 400 POUND HACKER NAMED 4CHINZ

>>133413523
oppossing net neutrality is idiotic unless you just love fellating comcast.

>>133413787
This thoughts of net neutrality??
4chan is a place of much discussion and viewpoints...

>>133413523
>Oh Noes! /pol/ isn't a flock of mindless sheep, think for themselves and speak their minds!!

>>133414014
>discussion
If by discussion you mean shit throwing and temper tantrums then yes

>>133413799
made me laff
but seriously which one of you is this for-chan guy-hacker?

File: 247.png (42KB, 300x100px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 300x100px

>>133414098

>>133414098
try expanding your horizons by lurking other boards and threads other than bait tier shit, anon :^)

>>133413904
What about those of us that want the government not regulating the internet and instead breaking up monopolies as is their job? Are we also fellating Comcast?

>>133413523
>Oh my. Who is our "spokesperson"?

It was me.

I was like "hurr durr derpy derp derp durrr hurrr!"

And they quoted me exactly.

File: 1385339680335.png (420KB, 595x575px) Image search: [Google]

420KB, 595x575px

>>133413540
>(((Internet service providers)))

File: 1480059355917.png (103KB, 440x522px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 440x522px

>>133413540
Who are these (((internet service providers))) they speak off?

File: flat,800x800,075,f.jpg (42KB, 800x682px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 800x682px

>>133413523
Why does /pol/ desperately want to get assraped by greedy corporations? Will you be feeling okay when AT&T blocks your skype and forces you to pay extra for their services? Are you okay with not having access to certain websites your ISP is not okay with? Are you people okay?

>>133413523
>want to shill for whatever
>go post on 4chan promoting it
>all the replies call you a fag but it doesn't matter
>post article saying "EVEN 4CHAN"
>...
>profit

>>133413523
stop memeing

net neutrality is good for US. what, you don't think (((they))) won't jack up prices and censor 4chan?

>>133414208
My only problem with the net neutrality movement is that it has retarded fools droning on about how entitled they are to free and unbridled internet. No, it should be an ideal we strive for, not some entitlement.

>>133414326
You are naive as fuck if you think this will prevent monopolies like comcast att from becoming all consuming.

You libertarian tards have honest intentions but your pipedream does not work in a vacuum, especially with such establish figures starting with massive infrastructure.

So in short, yes, you will be fellating comcast balls deep while gurgling out how great it was that comcast is now free to deepthroat you.

>>133414852
im lolbertarian and even understand the lunacy of opposing net neutrality

File: IMG_1428.jpg (48KB, 388x267px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 388x267px

I am king nigger representing 4chan.

>>133414326
All that the government is "regulating" is that the corporations who you drool for and sure as hell want to regulate the internet don't regulate it.

File: faggot.png (1MB, 720x540px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 720x540px

>>133413540
no one on 4chan talks like that

hold on while I prove it

>>133413523
the silicon valley funded viral marketing firm that's spamming fuckwad threads decided to speak for us

>>133413523
Threads about net neutrality have been pruned all day
Idk what's going on

>spokesperson for 4chan

lol

File: 1499475694266s.jpg (3KB, 125x121px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 125x121px

when will normies stop having expectations from /pol/ jesus fucking christ. It's like they want us to be a personal army

>>133415297
Because it's more than likely that if net neutrality falls a lot of users aren't gonna have acces to 4chan because their ISP say so
>this is what lolbertarians want

>>133414611
Because the first is company to offer unblocked access is going to be flooded with consumers.

>>133413540
How do we deal with (((internet service providers)))?

>>133415226
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/text/hopefully%20%2Fpol%2F%20can%20be%20unanimous%20on%20this%2C%20and%20not%20disagree%20with%20it%20just%20to%20be%20ironic%20or%20edgy/

definitely a plant, probably the journalist himself, now I will check article time versus post time

File: hihg speed rubio.png (522KB, 892x799px) Image search: [Google]

522KB, 892x799px

>>133413523
shills that shitpost here all day and screencap their own shit as proof
it is cnn tier bullshit

>>133415142
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293569A1.pdf

No, what they're "regulating" is whatever they deem "legal content." Remember goy, reading those wikileaks is illegal! And don't even think about opposing your refugee allotment!

>>133415054
>>133414852
who is going to write the legislation
>jews
im aginst it

>>133413904
You can fellate ComCast or you can fellate the Federal Government. Which one do you think will want you to go ass to mouth?

>>133413523
Proper deregulation would allow small, independent ISPs to use the same "utility" pipe as the current ISPs hog and threaten you with "fast lanes" as if they wouldn't be immediately BTFOed by a true open market. Net Neutrality is bullshit based on the system as is which is, of course, a monopoly allowed by regulation giving only a few companies access to OUR fucking pipes. You're idiots for supporting it. I hate you all, I hate the faggots that invaded our beautiful internet, and I wish summer of 93 would fucking end already.
>captcha: 2600 park
heh

>>133415813
since Comcast has proven itself to lobby the govt
you really did not make the point you think you did

>>133415813
Fuck Comcast dude, i don't have any love for the Feds, but god damn ISPs are the scum of the earth

File: 1476798413805.jpg (75KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 640x480px

>>133415579
two hour difference, just the perfect length of time if one were to post it and pretend it wasn't you

ahaha case cracked I am such a genius

>>133416030
This.
As much as I find a lot of what the government does to be cancer, Comcast is super fucking cancer, and anything that fucks them over and prevents them from fucking over consumers is fine by me.

>>133415656
except I can still access all content now...but assuredly will not be able to if this passes.

As you lolbertarian fuck, you need to remember that the MASSIVE infrastructure att/comcast have control over was largely built by massive government subsidies. You just want to hand it all over to some of the most greedy and hated corporations and say, "great now we can all compete against you!" Your are oblivious to the fact that this hands them the keys to monopoly.

And you defend that because "lol in libertarian wonderland monopoly is eventual result"

>>133413904
>instead you should fellate
>(((ZOG)))
>(((Netflix)))
>(((Amazon)))
>(((Faceberg)))
>(((Twitter)))
>(((Reddit)))

>>133416237
>largely built by massive government subsidies
You're high if you think they were built by anything but tax dollars.

>>133416363
>subsidies

duuuhhh

>>133416001
Corporations always lobby the government to benefit themselves and crush their competition. As smart people have already pointed out, a monopoly cannot be maintained without government interference. Markets are better than rulers.

File: image.jpg (93KB, 1199x648px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 1199x648px

>>133416237
Hi R*ddit

Reverse psychology seems effective enough

>>133416237
>except I can still access all content now
Because Net Neutrality isn't in effect yet.
>You just want
No faggot, I want AT&T, TWC, Comcast, etc. to be split up into dozens of companies and give everyone 5-6 ISP choices minimum. Fucking government knob jockey.

>>133416345
>>133416542
>I cant argue so here is a fallacy
>muuh jeeewwss

Fuck they are on both sides of this issue.

>>133413540

Fucking lol they included the Jewish echos

>>133416642
wow you really believe that dont you. Oh my sweet summer child.

>>133414611
/pol/ will meme Zuckerberg into power

>>133416642
>Because Net Neutrality isn't in effect yet.
wut
The problem is that they are going to do away with NN

File: Average female on sonora.jpg (68KB, 658x878px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 658x878px

>>133413523
Not sure, but i'm sure this is how the average north mexican woman looks like

>>133416646
>arguing with someone who unironically believes the following
>Before Title II was implemented in 2015 the internet was LITERALLY HITLER.
>2014
>be me
>wanting to sh*tpost on /pol/ (bad words were a no no)
>call my ISP and ask them to unlock my wifi
>$9.99 has been deducted from your checking account (ISPs had access to your finances back then)
>sit down and put $1 of quarters in my PC to boot it up
>open Firefox
>you are accessing the internet. Proceeding past this point will result in a $4.99 non refundable security deposit. Do you wish to proceed?
>y-yes
>decide to check the news first
>try to go to RT
>do you agree to the $4.99 charge
>yes
>get redirected to MSNBC
>charged $9.99 instead
>hit the back button
>charged another $4.99 for trying to access RT
>redirected back to MSNBC for another $9.99
>read the headlines so I don't get charged $.99 a click
>try to go to /pol/
>$12.99 charge for viewing controversial content
>jk, the liberals are blocking it today and I just lost more money
>turn off my PC
>sit down on my couch to watch Netflix
>try to watch Passion of the Christ
>the liberals are blocking it
>SWAT team raids my house for viewing anti-semitic content
>Such was life back then. We can't go back to those days.
You are to be mocked and ridiculed.

>>133416866
oh my fuck why are you posting this everywhere

>>133413523
me

trips decides what i tell cnn

>>133413540
>(((internet service providers)))
it's been a while since my sides have left the orbit so far behind

BRIAN FUNG GET THE FUCK OFF MY BOARD YOU FUCKING CHINK!!!

>>133416801
That faggot (((>>133416642))) Thinks giving massive corporations taxpayer funded infrastructure and free reign will usher in a lolbertarian utopia. He thinks that IS net neutrality.

>>133416903
did you read any of my posts? are you (((them))) just trying to create confusion and infighting?

>>133413523
The 700# hacker

>>133417075
what a retard

>>133416997
wapo is on this board rn. say something nice to them

>>133416345

All those are for-profit companies and big enough to pay whatever ISPs want without breaking a sweat. I'm more worried about 4chan, 4*2chan, nyaa, and other relatively small, often nonprofit hobbyist sites.

Isn't net neutrality a good thing?
Company blocks something
You are unsatisified customer so do business with a company that isn't a shit
I mean we're only on our providers because we can access whatever so there's not much to complain about
This can seriously hurt them if it passes and that's a good thing
I can see a new company coming out of this

>>133416207
>anything that fucks them over and prevents them from fucking over consumers is fine by me.
then you want less regulation, not more

>>133413523

The internet is gay.

ISPs should be able to do as they please.

They give it to you.

>>133417355
i'm sure it made sense in your head

>>133417355
you have your shit all backwards. The proposed bill will undo NN. Meaning ISPs can fuck you up the ass and there is nothing you can do about it.
Basically this becomes reality >>133416903

File: 1491926443316.gif (1MB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 300x300px

>>133413523
Do you people understand that they 'know' that (((4chan opposes))) the Republican Plan for Net Neutrality BECAUSE THEY WERE LARPING AS ANONS TODAY?

They are the ones (With Shareblue) that started all these threads hours ago. Fuck them.

>>133415579
Yea it was likely a plant because it's so easy to do but your confirmation bias is showing. Two hour difference proves nothing.

File: merkel2.jpg (63KB, 500x501px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 500x501px

>>133417718

>>133417725
your retardation is showing tho

>>133413540
>we

>>133417075
>Some government welfare queen sucks government dick
Color me surprised.

>>133417718
why are they sabotaging their own position by associating it with 4chan?

Net neutrality is fucking stupid.

Do you really think isp's are going to block your favorite sites?

Are you affraid Walmart is going to stop selling coke unless you pay extra or coke pays a fee?

That's how absurd this is.

They are already making their money.

This entire debate is fucking stupid. If they destroy the internet then nobody will want it.

>>133417987
I dont even live in your country anymore you retard.

>>133417718

You don't know the half of it m8. Places like Buzzfeed and Mic have reporters whose job is basically to read 4chan and report (with a heap of moral outrage) about the latest shit the "alt-right" is doing today. If no threads are interesting enough, they probably make their own so they can write articles on it.

>>133417355
ISP's are already a huge cartel. No. This will just empower more collusion to suppress information and limit what consumers can view or obtain.

>your apartment complex of 1,200 people only carries Comcast
>AT&T does not service your BFE area
>Startup Internet which provides fast and affordable internet service while treating all traffic equally and respecting comsumer privacy was bought out by AT&T, you can no longer view amibeingdetained.org and your connection speed to 4chan seems to always run at a trickle, while your connection to SurveillanceBook and PropagandaTube remains unchanged.

Please support net neutrality to help ensure companies must treat all internet traffic equally, even if it would profit them to suppress certain traffic.

>>133414611
>potential assraping by corporations
>versus guaranteed assraping by the government
HMM TOUGH CHOICE

>>133418046
>paid dlc and microtransactions will never take over the industry
>10 years later...

File: give.jpg (45KB, 530x805px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 530x805px

>>133418046
lolzers I'm going to need my loldozer for this one

>americans pay for comcast
>all day every day
>even while they make television shows about how comcast is evil
>they still refuse to stop paying

America is unable to stop itself from spending, they are simply cattle. The notion of not paying for something you dislike is simply impossible.

>>133415656
>goy
You're literally supporting a political act that will put the internet into a position where you're gonna have to pay to have access to certain websites of your ISP's choosing and you call me goy?

>>133418277
>potential
top kek mr Goldsteinbergski

>>133418046
>Walmart is going to stop selling coke unless you pay extra or coke pays a fee?
>walmart decides RC cola is problematic so it doesn't carry it any more
>all other stores start to do the same to keep up the virtue signalling
>can't get RC cola anywhere any more
WTF I LOVE CENSORSHIP

>>133414326
The definition of net neutrality is that all content can be access freely without 3rd parties enabling or disabling specific information, be it government or corporations. Youre litterally arguing that we should not only give control of the internet to rich jews who will be free to control the flow of information but also that we should be paying them more for the honor.

I refuse to believe you arent a shill

>>133418277
The government basically protects your right to access this website you dumbfuck. If net neutrality falls and your ISP doesn't like 4chan you can say goodbye to the website. It's trully ironic how people like you have the audacity to call other people cucks. Ironic.

>>133418460

Rc cola doesn't sell dumbass.

That's like saying an ISP might drop MySpace. OH NO!!! not myspace!!!

Get fucked moron

>>133413523
>media quotes themselves
>anonymous source
kek

>>133418399
Yeah, because you instead will hand that exact same power over to the people that enforce their will with guns. Reminder: they have the exact same plan as the faggots in suits.

>>133413523
>4chan opposes something that would regulate the internet
... this is the main reason they/we are anti-pc (and anti-modern-liberal in the first place)

>>133419001
Well on the bright side your ISP will block 4chan and idiots like you will not post anymore.

>>133413523
1. be shill
2. post your propaganda everywhere
3. have your friend quote your posts as representative of the boards you brigade
4. ?????
5. Profit.

>>133418770
>Rc cola doesn't sell dumbass.
thats kinda the point you fucking retard. They wouldnt hesitate to block low traffic (relative to youtube and jewbook) if they thought there might be dissent there

>>133419001
You flaggots are dumber than rocks.

>>133419279
>low traffic sites

or for that matter, they'll block services from other companies that compete with their own

File: 14593464_10153824188126811_886104765_n.jpg (52KB, 604x538px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 604x538px

Net neutrality just lets the government regulate the ever living fuck out of another private industry it has no business controlling.

Fuck net neutrality, its like you people that support it have no understanding of the concept of private property.

>>133419535
>i love paying $99/month for 5 mb/s internet

>>133419166
Considering I have 3 ISPs in my area, I don't think so. But when the government passes their anti-cyberbullying laws and deems 4chan "illegal content" we'll all be equally fucked without recourse.

>>133419166
Learn how to use a proxy server you fucking moron.

>>133419677
>the gov is more likely to throw the first amendment away than all 3 (((ISPs))) are to block the same site
you're a brain dead retard

File: 1489268633200.webm (612KB, 356x370px) Image search: [Google]

612KB, 356x370px

>>133415226
>>133415579
>>133416096
solid work

The pro-net neutrality shilling has gotten ridiculously out of hand this year.

>>133413523
It's almost like if 4chan isn't just one person from one country.

>>133419790
>enter store
>food ridiculously overpriced because free market
>learn how to steal you moron

>>133413523
>Oh my. Who is our "spokesperson"?
Brian Fung, duh.
Good work Brian.

>>133419653
Net neutrality would not address that. All the Obama-era rules do is give provision under which companies like Google can sue their ISPs if they believe they are being throttled. Under the Obama era rules net neutrality is handled on a case by case not as a set of rules that apply to everyone/

File: image.jpg (798KB, 2200x3400px) Image search: [Google]

798KB, 2200x3400px

Sorry guys it was me. I'm 426lbs and I live with my parents and they probably just assumed from that information that I was our spokesperson.

>>133420263
>i love paying 50$/month for 4k netflix

FUCK YOU LIBERAL KEKS THIS IS A TRUMP BOARD

WE SUPPORT TRUMP. WE SUPPORT EVERYTHING TRUMP DOES. IF TRUMP SUPPORTS THE REPUBLICANS NET NEUTRALITY PLAN SO DO WE. END OF STORY.

ANYONE WHO DOESN'T LIKE THIS CAN FUCK OFF BACK TO THEIR SAFE SPACES ON REDDIT.

>>133413523
If I took a shit on a bun and called it a "Tasty Treat" would you morons eat it? There's nothing "neutral" about the government interfering with the internet, especially if it's to "level the playing field" or some other communist bullshit like that.

>>133417585
Answer me this. With the current laws, why is Netflix currently allowed to pay for a box installed directly with the ISPs that allows faster connections for their trafic, and why is that Net Neutrality?

>>133420536
And if Netflix doesn't sue on my behalf then I'm fucked. Even they do it's a case by case thing so the FCC could still rule in favor of the ISP

>>133413523
>Fung
fucking chinks with their typical chink tricks

File: pearl.jpg (39KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 640x360px

>>133413708
You caught me! Back to New Zealand I go.

>>133420755
>why is Netflix currently allowed to pay for a box installed directly with the ISPs that allows faster connections for their trafic
That sounds like its to overcome technical issues the improve the service. Not because ISP decided "lol fuck you pay me faggot"

>>133413540
Jesus Christ it's been 12 years since 4chan went mainstream how can this STILL be an issue

>>133420850
>Even they do it's a case by case thing so the FCC could still rule in favor of the ISP
how do you figure? As i understand, current rules prevent exactly this type of throttling

>>133419903
They don't need to throw away the first amendment, they just need a good enough cause, like all the CP that floats around.

>>133420978
Yes, but now Netflix's traffic is given more priority than my video streaming service that cannot afford to install such a device. Why is that neutrality?

>>133416646
See
>>133420575

>>133415546
But the first company would probably be harassed out of the business with frivolous lawsuits, lawyer technicalities, negative campaigns, bureaucracy, so on

then bought out so the seller can keep his sanity.

The monopoly is real. bureaucrats, lawyers and paid off legislators are strong.

>>133413540
Except I'm against it because liberals are. Anything shitlibs want is a terrible idea.

>>133421303
>like all the CP that floats around.
what? Is this the "why can't i sell my kids" libertarian argument?

>>133421153
Doesn't matter FCC won't address it under the 2015 rules unless a case is brought to them. And because ISPs are some of the most powerful lobbying groups there are they will be likely to win quite a few decisions.
It really doesn't matter what the FCC says it will do; only what it does and if you think the FCC is going to rule correctly 100% of the time you're in dreamland

>>133421530
don't be that retard

>>133416773
>pol will meme zuckerberg into power
No
But hopefully we can meme him into an oven

>>133418286
Listen to this moonspeaker on this one. He's right. It might sound ridiculous now but we're heavily dependent on the internet and in 10 years time who the fuck knows. People will eat garbage if they're starving to death.

File: 4chanwhois.gif (3MB, 250x333px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 250x333px

>>133413540
>>133413708
>>133413799
>>133414208

>>133416866
Not by a long shot. mexicants are gross dirty stupid little """people"""

File: 1458960233039.png (2MB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1080x1920px

>>133413540
>a spokesman for 4chan didn't immediately respond to a request for comment

FUCKIN EGGY THIS WAS YOUR CHANCE TO MAKE IT BIG AND YOU BLEW IT !!!!

>Know this bill is shit and just ISPs trying to fuck everyone over to make more money
>Want it to pass just to piss off liberals
They've already ruined the internet with the mass normie influx, paid shill squads, and censorship campaigns. This would just be a mercy killing.

>>133421398
thats how the free market rolls. Netflix's traffic might now have effective access to more bandwidth, but it's doesn't have special priority. Bits of data from both are treated the same in terms of priority

>>133421533
No, bootlicker, I'm telling you who will build the roads.

>>133421584
>the current system isn't that great so fuck it
so thats the argument?

How did your internet become like Obamacare anyway? What could you possibly need to start up an ISP and beat the most hated, worst companies that customers have rated? Dunno if to blame regulation, or corporations regulating themselves.
>>133417451
gimme a break, this is Ajit Pai. The corporations will regulate however they want, or deregulate.

The problem here is that the consumer is already paying for their subscription, the content provider are already paying for their networks, but the ISP wants extra money because fuck you that's why.

There shouldn't really be any reason for ((net neutrality)) since everyone is paying for a specific amount of data, at a specified down/up speed. Where you decide to spend your data should be entirely up to you without anyone throttling you for your choices. What will happen if net neutrality is allowed to pass is that anyone trying to host their own content will have a massive disadvantage compared to well established companies who already out compete you. It's just another form of regulation keeping the big fish in the little pond and to hell with the little fish.

>statists will defend this
Surely there aren't any (((special interests))) behind this, right guys? Some faggot identified himself as the spokesperson of 4chan and they believed him, right? Let's go guys, let's fight the ebil corporations with the support of the evil corporations, just like antifa, goys!

>>133422181
what do you do when they tear down your favorite/most needed roads

>>133422207
I'm not sure how you got that from my post. I'm saying that there would likely be many cases like this:
>Netflix suspects it is being throttled
>Launches a Title II suit against ISP
>FCC says "Nah ISP is on the up and up"
>FCC is wrong but they don't care they make the rules

The point of the 2015 rule change is that ISPs were moved under Title II which gives people the right to bring to Title II suits against them. It doesn't set a blanket rules or precedents for how ALL ISPs should act.

>>133422877
>since everyone is paying for a specific amount of data
i swear to god if this happens i'll fucking lose it

>>133413523
Did they even come here to ask?

>>133423115
>precedents for how ALL ISPs should act.
the Title II stuff might not, but the court cases that already happened do right?

File: 1493404539523.gif (2MB, 540x304px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 540x304px

>>133413523
>caring about what "4chan" thinks
lmao fucking normies

>>133413523
"Republican plan"
Autism

File: the-goyim-know-shut-it-down-jew-walkie-talkie.jpg (69KB, 600x929px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 600x929px

>>133413540
(((internet service providers)))

>>133421530
>>133413523

There's nothing wrong with agreeing with liberals for all the wrong reasons.

Quite frankly I think this net neutrality is bullshit.

Let the free market sort itself out.

If Comcast blocks all sorts of shit it will cause incentive for other isp's that don't.

Net neutrality only helps the major players that are already on the scene.

If you allow them to make mistakes it will cause innovation

>>133413523
WRONG. I want choice for ISP and speed not equally shit for all.

>>133423420
Well maybe but you'd have to assume 100% infallibility of the FCC to rule the same every time despite changing staff.

Some FCC regulators will want to uphold prior rulings, some will not. Just look at the 180 they did on net neutrality after a change at chairmen.

My guess is most will rule in favor of the ISPs because the regulators are the ISPs' pockets

>>133422036

Eggbert looks like Stephen Fry the boy-molesting sodomite.

>>133423939
>Net neutrality only helps the major players that are already on the scene.
thats why all the major ISP shill against it right?

>>133413540
Well he's right

>>133424000
>100% infallibility
i know 100% isn't realistic, but i'll take some percentage over a total hands off approach

File: comcastkikery.png (301KB, 584x465px) Image search: [Google]

301KB, 584x465px

>>133423986
This. I don't want to pay 40 euros a month to lurk 4chan. I'd rather get a pack that doesn't include netflix and other shit that uses a lot of bandwidth and ill never use.

>>133424229
Wrong. Pic

File: 1438400566653.jpg (65KB, 422x750px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 422x750px

>>133415392
>>133417718

We are "le racist misogynist virgin basement nerds with 0 influence" when we speak against their shit but we're "internet superhero hackers that shouldn't be provoked" when they need us. Fucking hypocrites.

>>133424229
Well all the major non-ISPs are for it. Google, Facebook, and Amazon are just as much for it are Verizon and Comcast are against it.

By the way it was Google, Verizon and Comcast who voluntarily entered into a net neutrality agreement 5 years before the FCC did jack shit, it would appear that the ISPs are even better at regulating themselves than the FCC is

>>133413540
>2k17
>(((mainstream media))) quotes autists from 4chan

What a time to be alive

>>133421724
Why do all people working for new networks in america seemingly have the urge o do these expressions and gestures in a way so exaggerated that they always look like a sad farce or some really low-tier theatrical actors?

"Net Neutrality" is nonsense market speak to cover up intentions.

ISPs should be designated as common carriers. Full stop. Treat them legally like phone companies. No privileged traffic, not liable for illegal content passing over their network. Both sides of this "debate" are fucked up.

>>133413523
I support what ever hurts the rabid leftist scummies the most. If that means we abolish net neutrality than so be it.

I also think that /v/ should pay significantly more for their posts as 90% of them are redditors and NEETs.

>>133425123
>>133425123
>>133425123
>>133425123

>>133424353
My thought is that.
1. This is exactly how the FCC started with radio and moved into television.
2. What happens when tech giants start using these rulings to try and shut down new startups
>He isn't able to provide Gigabit to all his customers shut him down
Or more and more perverse rules
>New start up challenges Google
>New start up is blocking traffic from Russia shut him down says Google
I've see what the FCC has done to all other services it regulates and I've yet to think "Thank God" for that

>>133415392
truly disgusting. I hate when they come here like "hey fellow poles lets attack cnn because they attacked some retard who didn't even delete his posts ! soical justice is really important cnn isa bully!!!! THE CRUSADE BEGINS NOW AHHHHHHHHH"

>>133413540
>(((internet service providers)))
I lol'd that he would quote that.

But realistically, the Republican plan is far superior to the Osama plan.

>>133414611
With Net Neutrality ass raping is not only guaranteed but government enforced. Even if some billionaire or company has a wild hair and wants to offer a better product for consumers, they no longer can.

>>133423986
Anon, you literally don't have a smidgen of a clue about what this is.

>>133418605
They're already in control over it you geek. There have been many complaints over the past few years over how fucking mismanaged the FCC has been and net neutrality.

>>133413523
well that explains all the shill pro NN threads today

>>133413708

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkAngvkWVkk

HACKERS ON STEROIDS

File: 1359247211892.jpg (19KB, 385x383px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 385x383px

>>133413540
This is the hardest I've laughed at a /pol/ post, and that's saying a lot.

File: Comcast.png (984KB, 1776x1000px) Image search: [Google]

984KB, 1776x1000px

>>133416646
This

But considering the fact that Comcast owns Telemundo no one under any circumstances should do them any favors.

>>133415579

cringe

nobody responded to his thread, so he quoted himself

>>133414611
you buttplugs think this shit is coming from half a dozen anons?
the talking points are exactly the same
and lame

>>133413523
I'd rather burn the Internet than to allow (((leftists))) to have a voice. So you listen here, you leftist degenerates and filthy Jews: /pol/'s way or the highway. Better stop it with all that anti-White shit before you get silenced forever.

>>133415579
Holy cringe batman

I love his "hey fellow whites" tier call out too with "as much as i hate agreeing with liberals" (says a guy who is demanding regulations) and the "(((internet service provider)))" line

Lol, he really wanted to fit in how sad

>>133426848
I know exactly what this is.but do you? Net neutrality forces ISPs to keep constant speeds for all websites/users regardless of bandwidth usage. This raises prices for users overall and cuts competition and innovation in the business. Under the current law enforced by the government Obamas title 2 act ISPs are forced to provide now streaming giants like netflix normalized speeds which carry on as additional costs to ISP customer overall.

The only fgts who support net neutrality are the internet companies unwilling to pay for their bandwidth and users who leech off the system such as using wifi hotspots. Without NN the standard price of internet will go down as ISPs will no longer be forced under law to provide to them. Internet corporations need to pay up for their expansion or die not leech. Sound familiar? Yes Obamacare is the exact same way. White people subsidizing the poor in a unsustainable system. Get fucked commie.

File: 18949869_1889035384689759_841160583188316160_n.jpg (112KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 1080x1080px

>>133415579
just when I thought it couldn't get any better lmao

>>133427448
Every fucking time.

Why, /pol/? Why are the jews behind it all?

>>133415813
>>133416001
>>133416207
>>133417451
You guys keep going back and forth...it's not going to end as a moral or ideological argument.

If the number of ISPs are limited by government(or space for communication lines) then they must also be limited in power. Giving the ISPs power to control the internet is an unaccountable monopoly, no matter how you look at it you're stuck with a monopoly unless ISPs can be created freely. So don't advocate against net neutrality unless the first requirement is met- healthy ISP competition. As long as ISPs are limited in number, they must also be limited in power.

I'm not sure how the neo-con republicans slipped this bullshit through everyone's radar, maybe through deception and withholding information? They can't create a monopoly on internet connectivity then claim they're freeing up the market by giving those handful of ISPs power over that same internet. The US taxpayer created the internet with military funding, corporations have no claim on it.