Blumpfth BTFO!

>>133314127
Do they really want to win this one?

The best thing that can happen from their perspective is Twitter becomes labelled a monopoly and is subject to (Trump's) governmental regulations...

It's a personal account, not the POTUS official account. These people are tards looking for a payday.

File: IMG_6273.jpg (18KB, 200x176px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 200x176px

>>133314603
It doesn't matter because he uses it as a political platform. If he was using it solely to post things like "Having delicious eggs for breakfast! They're the best eggs, from the best chickens." and "Just saw Marley and me. Sad!" then he could block whoever the fuck he wants.

But since he uses it to post about political issues, then blocking anyone who disagrees with him, he as an elected government official is violating the first amendment by preventing only some citizens to allow to be heard.

You didn't see Obama blocking people.

>>133315142
>he as an elected government official is violating the first amendment by preventing only some citizens to allow to be heard
you might want to read twitters terms of service, they are not the same as the US constitution

>>133315142
The 1st amendment doesn't mean you have a right to go into mcdonalds and yell about tendies.

>>133315142
>Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances

wtf does that have to do with twitter?

>>133314127

That's not how blocking people on twitter works. They can still post on twitter, it's just trump himself who they can't communicate with

File: flat,800x800,075,f.u1.jpg (94KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 800x600px

>>133316038
>The 1st amendment doesn't mean you have a right to go into mcdonalds and yell about tendies.
Delet
I got my GBP fair and square

>>133315142
Nigga freedom of speech doesn't come with a platform nigga sheeeeeeeeeit

File: 1482990717350.jpg (150KB, 1012x1024px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 1012x1024px

>>133315142
Log out and read what Trump just tweeted or create a new account and read what Trump just tweeted, or look on CNN to see what Trump just tweeted

This is frivolous and grasping at straws

>>133314127

The pettiest shit ever.

>>133314127
>Blocking people on Twitter is censorship
>Banning and taking down user content is not

>>133314348
>The best thing that can happen from their perspective is Twitter becomes labelled a monopoly and is subject to (Trump's) governmental regulations
lel this timeline

File: Comfy.jpg (220KB, 650x830px) Image search: [Google]

220KB, 650x830px

>>133314127
>Fucking LOL
>Even in the REMOTE chance of a win.
>Twitter and every other social media outlet will have to remove BLOCK features since the precedent will be set.
>You sure you want this win bubble boy?

>>133315935
If you spammed "nigger", you'd got blocked

>>133315142
eyaahahahahaha

this is the fucking end for his twitter
say good-fucking-bye orange nigger

>>133314127
So can we then sue reddit when they ban us on our raids

>>133315142
>can always view the tweet when no signed in
hmmmmmm

>>133316968
>obama blocks retards that spams hate speech and insults with zero content
>trump blocks people for voicing out their opinions
fuck the orange bitchy pussy free speech hating nigger

>>133317170
>hate speech
It's called free speech you dumb nigger loving commie faggot

>>133317046
can reddit sue 4chan and take /pol/ down because you raid them so much?

>>133317170
there's a reason it's called free speech and not "some speech". it's either all ok, or none of it is :)

>>133317232
uh no fuckface leaf curry nigger
spamming nigger nigger nigger is hate speech if you direct it at a black person
theres a reason why your account got banned because you acted like a stupid racist fuck

>>133317170
Hate speech is free speech.

>>133317398
>theres a reason why your account got banned because you acted like a stupid racist fuck
Because there is no onus on a private company to give you a soapbox to assert your 1st amendment rights.

>>133317398
>implying I'd ever sign up for twit-ter
Keep being a dumb nigger dixie flaggot

>>133314127
>Blumpfth BTFO!
This suit will never even see a courtroom. The judge will throw it out because it's completely retarded. Even if it somehow won, that would just mean the same suit would be taken up by tens of millions of conservatives against millions of libtards who blocked people to protect their "safe space."

You're fucked, libtard.

SAGE

If this is true then it is illegal for Twitter to ban people from using it.

I will let the liberals have this if it brings back fellow based pede Milo

>>133314127
Nothing will happen.

Why can't libtards accept this?

ill fuckin sue that faggot as well. doesn't mean my suit will get past whatever jamoke works under the judge

>>133317643
You arent gonna do shit, faggot.

>>133317527
>Hate speech is free speech.
no its not kangaroo fucker
go spam nigger nigger at a black person on twitter get your account banned and go sue twitter for "free speech" with your real face and name for banning you and see what the fuck happens

>>133314127
>twitter a private company
>1st amendment applying to it
then why did anthony cumia get suspended?

>>133314127
If that's true then it is unconstitutional for twitter to block right wing people from twitter.

>>133317770
Twitter ToS is not the first amendment.

>>133317770
>being this retarded
>a flaggot
checks out

>>133317759
fuck you man, you're so fuckin sued

>>133317770
>go spam nigger nigger at a black person on twitter get your account banned
As previously stated by multiple people (including the post you are responding to) you have no 1st amendment rights on Twitter.

>>133317772
not sure. have you asked him yet to sue twitter for banning him?
he can use that post where he said "I hope you Fucking die bitch cunt transfaggot degenerate." as defense

File: 845945965.jpg (34KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 600x600px

>>133317170
>implying that the verified idiots spamming Trump's Twitter feed are posting content

File: 1487216657765.jpg (191KB, 653x477px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 653x477px

>Blocking on Twitter becomes illegal
>Brianna Wu's feed fills up with "YOU HAVE A BEENIS LOL!"

>Congress shall make no law [...] abridging the freedom of speech
We had to burn freedom of speech to save freedom of speech

>>133317930
Oy vey, I'm a lawyer, I'll help you sue m8, it'll be just $1000 to begin starting the process

>>133314127
This will be the end on Zumpf!

>>133318094
guess who else is about to get sued? YOU. reduce your fuckin price or ill see your ass in court

File: digits.png (21KB, 670x800px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 670x800px

>>133314127
wut lol

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=70E9KA48Sic

>>133314127
Does POTUS not have immunity from suit while he's in office?

Save Antwan Kumiya! He has a 1st Amendment right!

https://twitter.com/AnthonyCumia/

File: 1436849831295.jpg (14KB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 480x270px

>>133318057
What a fucking time to be alive

>>133317964
twitter is a communications platform and trump uses his account to communicate to the people.

dont use your retard kangaroo fucker logic on me btw

>>133317235
you wish /qa/ nigger

>>133318180
>reduce your fuckin price or ill see your ass in court
Oy vey? Reduce my price?!? But sir, the court cost are immense. In fact, the $2000 needed is barely enough to cover the $4000 interim fees, before getting to the actual cost of suing, which is $8000

The $1000 covers my preliminary review of your case

>>133316968
Nigger nigger jigger nigger igger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nogger

>>133314127
This is so stupid that Columbia University should lose it's accreditation.

>>133317170
Come on leaf, remove the flag. I can smell you.

>>133315142
Using his position to compel Twitter to ban his political opponents would be a violation of 1st Amendment rights. Blocking people from seeing/responding to just his account doesn't.

>>133315142
log out and see all of his tweets you stupid idiot

>>133318426
Yup, the dixie flag with the nigger talk is a give away desu

>>133314348

the best thing that happens is if the Supreme Court decides Twitter is a public forum and therefore subject to 1st amendment protections. opening the floodgate of the internet frogs.

>>133318518
lel cumia needs to ride this shit

>>133314127
>Blumpfth BTFO!
IF Don moved formats, twitter would Die.

>>133314127

Lawl they can get fucked.

>>133318553
Realistically speaking, Twitter and Facebook should be declared monopolies, the internet is still the wild west though.

>>133316863
this. a million times. please make it happen.
it will be glorious to see the normies meltdown when the PC twatter dikes are removed, and anyone can twit back at them
LET'S DO IT

>>133315142

Its not stopping them from speaking. He doesn't have to give them his platform. He doesn't have to let people make speeches from the white house lawn does he?

They can get fucked.

>>133317170
>>trump blocks people for voicing out their opinions
yeah, faggots posting condescending crap on his feed are "voicing their opinions"

>>133318680
>Twitter and Facebook should be declared monopolies
Google should be declared a monopoly.

>>133314127

Twitter is a private company that requires its users to create and register accounts which have a ToS that must be accepted before registering. Blocking users is part of its platform. Forcing the President to unblock critics also forces Twitter to change its rules.

This is no different than saying the President must meet with every person who hates him and wants to file a grievance. The White House is under no obligation to respond to abusive letters or emails.

>>133318844
The six corporations that control all media should be declared monopolies.

>>133317770
what if spam cumskin ?

>>133318844
The way they run YouTube at a loss is the basic definition of a monopoly, it would be virtually impossible to start a competitor to YouTube.

>>133318844
Google is merely a subsidiary of Alphabet.

File: cnnlmao.png (449KB, 597x554px) Image search: [Google]

449KB, 597x554px

>>133318518
>CNN being so fake they'll get themselves banned for harrassing lmao

>>133319034
its kinda amazing how few people outside of active investors know of that company.

>>133319071
>implying anyone left leaning ever gets banned.

File: 1499300240820.png (156KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 900x900px

>>133317170
Confederate my ass, more like a maple nigger. Day of the rake will not be soon enough.

>>133319034
I know that, it's just easier to refer to Alphabet as "Google". Plus, Alphabet has subsidiaries that are in no way monopolistic.

>>133318992
Lots of companies run things at a loss.

>>133318965
Agreed. Give Time Warner the AT&T treatment first.

>>133319112
No one ever went broke over-estimating the stupidity of the average citizen.

>>133314127
It's kind of an interesting question in theory. Imagine if he blocked legitimate questions regarding his policy. However, I suspect that in reality, he is blocking idiotic comments.

>>133319185
Google literally isn't a monopooly tho.
>yahoo
>bing
>duckduckgo
>starpage
etc etc

what would happen if the suit succeed? would anyone that blocked anyone on twitter be liable for 1st amendment violation?

>>133319185
>Alphabet has subsidiaries that are in no way monopolistic.
its almost like thats helpful to ward off the sec

>>133318765
do any of those lib posts have the word nigger in them i wonder?
no theyre all properly constructed and used to voice out a legitimate opinion
fuck off

>>133319185
>Lots of companies run things at a loss.
ok

>>133319130
>kid goes full an hero
>cnn has to do a public apology
hmmm who could be behind this

>>133316039
Something something ethnic kekistani religion, something something god emperor

>>133315142
Hes shown his dick to Melania at least once, and a few other people. Is he barring the rest of the world from seeing it? He is a politician now so his dick is politics related. Should we demand to see his dick?

>>133314127
Is this real? If so, that gaggle of retards no idea what the first amendment is.

>>133319482
>Should we demand to see his dick
Yes definitely yes, because if it's tiny many keks will be had and if it's yuuuuge many niggers will be btfo

>>133319396
>Lots of companies run things at a loss.
They do, when they're big enough to make it up on something else.

Usually done to control market share against competition

>>133318680

i don't really care about it being a monopoly as long as it's considered a public utility. that pretty much stops them from jewing jewishly.

>>133314127
I so hope this gets through, just imagine the possibilities of what we can do in our autistic crusades once the precedent gets set.

>>133318553
This. If Trump can't block people then nobody can.

>>133314348
>Leftists throw shit fit about trump blocking people on twitter.
>They "win" the case and now nobody can block anyones political views, or just can't block anyone
>leftists can no longer censor twitter and it becomes right wing

M E M E
A
G
I
C

File: 1498017453862.jpg (14KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 225x225px

>>133315142

>>133315142
Completely incorrect.
Blocking someone doesn't prevent them from posting. In fact, the claimants continued to exercise their right to free speech well after Trump had blocked them and they continue to do so.

>>133319298
You have no idea how big Google actually is. Well, to be fair neither do I, since they don't like to tell anyone how big they are to begin with. But they're big. Google is less about the search engine itself, and more about the infrastructure behind the search engine. Google doesn't like to tell us anything about their infrastructure.

>>133319337
Good point.

>>133314127
It's an account own by a private entity, Twitter. He can do as he pleases. These people are thirsty. Fucking Summer.

>>133319655
>Usually done to control market share against competition
And when you have virtually 100% of the market share this makes you a text book monopoly.

>>133314127
I am going to sage, hide, and report this thread. I expect everyone else to do the same.

>>133317170
>hate speech ™

>>133320016
if twitter removes his account due to abuse and hate speech he will demand the white house to force twitter to give the account back to him.
the account is owned by the american people and he has no right to censor anyone that's not abusing it.

>>133319910
I meant purely from a perspective of an accountant / politician looking at it.

Google is smart enough to have divisioned things as to avoid the inevitable "monopoly" anti-trust term getting thrown on them like MicroSoft had to deal with in the 90s.

However yes, I slightly aware how much larger it is than most are aware...

Having done a network mapping of their servers, I can tell you it's one impressive fucking system they've got

>>133314127
Schfllumphfthph is truly, eternally, and irrecoverably BTFO!

>>133320085
>And when you have virtually 100% of the market share
Show me some stats of them having near 100% market share for search engine results, email hosting, or web-page analytics.

They have majority, but no where near monopoly... yet. ;)

File: newyorkpostcover-thumb.png (352KB, 424x498px) Image search: [Google]

352KB, 424x498px

>>133319645

I'm betting huge. Pic related.

This lawsuit is a scam. Here's how:
1) File bogus lawsuit. It only costs $400 to file a suit in federal court.
2) Issue press release. Send news to media and let them foam at the mouth.
3) Collect thousands of donations from retarded lefties.
4) After a few months, quietly drop lawsuit before motion for Rule 11 sanctions.
5) Profit!

>>133314127
I'd rather see Twitter ban Trump and watch the shitty platform burn. All of the virtue signalling faggots would be in a permanent circle jerk with no target.

File: 1466211127724.jpg (81KB, 450x675px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 450x675px

>>133319645

>>133319298
https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/research.google.com/en//pubs/archive/43837.pdf

>Our datacenter networks run at dozens of sites across the planet, scaling in capacity by 100x over ten years to more than 1Pbps of bisection bandwidth.

1.3 Petabits per second, per datacenter, in 2012.

>>133320175
>Having done a network mapping of their servers, I can tell you it's one impressive fucking system they've got
That sounds slightly difficult, considering Google is anycasted out the arse. For me all traffic to 1e100.net goes to a server in Sydney. They must have a large datacenter.

>>133320297
Sorry, this chain was in regards specifically to jewtube.

umm sweetie you can make a new account

>>133320338
god.. i wish i was this scummy.. and could rake in free money..

>>133315142
>But since he uses it to post about political issues, then blocking anyone who disagrees with him, he as an elected government official is violating the first amendment by preventing only some citizens to allow to be heard.
No such law exists and the constitution doesn't offer protection to follow the president on twitter. Just that the congress can not pass a law limiting your right to expression, a free press and so on.

You have no positive right to harass the president on twitter.

>>133320417
>3 wives
>5 kids
>countless girlfriends between wives
The Don's packin'

>>133320444
>1.3 Petabits per second, per datacenter, in 2012.
Then add what Facebook + Microsoft + Oracle + Yahoo + etc etc etc etc etc are all doing on their servers

>That sounds slightly difficult
T'was done as a labor of interest and curiousity

>They must have a large datacenter
Fuggin' yuggeee

File: IMG_2021.jpg (81KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 1280x720px

>>133314127
I kekd so hard Kekd.

>>133314127
They must be literally retarded. The first amendment states that Congress won't pass laws limiting freedom of speech, religion, or press. Trump blocking you on twitter is a not a law limiting your freedom of expression.

File: 1487383445639.jpg (164KB, 800x522px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 800x522px

>>133317170

File: fuck.jpg (130KB, 420x420px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 420x420px

>>133320491
Well yes then that's correct, they lose a shit ton on that.

That's straight "control the media, control the narrative, control the mind" shit there

>>133319559
We're American. We don't know what rights we have.

>>133315142
The first amendment prevents to the government from making any LAW that infringes upon the freedom of press, the right to assemble, and the freedom of speech.

Donald trump blocking people on twitter is not him creating a law abridging anyone's freedom of speech.

It's quite the opposite,really. Those people trying to sue are the ones abridging donald trumps freedom of speech, through law.

File: 1498243594319.jpg (67KB, 768x433px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 768x433px

>>133316856
I think the goal of the left is to be so astronomically distracting that Trump can't get anything done.

>>133315142
Except you can view the tweets so long as you're not logged on in Twitter. It blocks TWITTER accounts, not IPs.

>>133318271
You can see his tweets without being logged in

>>133320491
>>133320818
>specifically to jewtube
+thought: Seeing certain videos delete down the memory holes over the years told me exactly what the agenda was

Blocking is actually built into the platform though--is there a universal bill of forum rights that supersedes a site's tos?

File: 1499782496377.jpg (875KB, 1500x1001px) Image search: [Google]

875KB, 1500x1001px

>>133320912
That's some sweet hilldawg campaign logo artwork design in the back desu

>>133315935

Except he did.

>>133314127
Sonething's happening for once. Finally

>>133315142

It's a private platform, it's not subject to first amendment.

Anyone can be banned from the platform, anyone can block anyone else on the platform.

If you want it to be governmentally regulated, we can go that route. But that will not turn out well for you.

>>133314127
lol, no. This isn't a government channel, it's a private service. That's why Twitter can get away with manipulating posts to shape a narrative constantly, those fucking faggot niggers.

You can't sue the POTUS for not accepting your call, retard.

>>133315142
>preventing only some citizens to allow to be heard
He's not preventing anyone from being heard, they still are completely capable of tweeting out whatever they want. He's just not listening to them, which isn't illegal.

>>133314127
Does this mean we can spam those advocacy group's twitters and sue them if they block any of us?

File: IMG_1207.jpg (613KB, 2442x3148px) Image search: [Google]

613KB, 2442x3148px

>>133314127
Yeah. Let's just say they say that access to twitter is a protected right. It's not. But let's pretend.

Twitter would have to unban everyone that has been banned for anything, except threats and crimes. Twitter would hate that. Twitters lawyers won't let this go very far.

>>133321495
those are private entities not government

>>133320153
Twitter is a company that to use you have to agree to its terms and conditions.

>>133314127
Can we just build trap doors into courtrooms so that when cases like this come before a judge they can just drop the faggots into a spike pit or something?