Maximizing female utility
17th century Europeans venturing in the
Americas faced a harse struggle- settlers
who survived the harsh environment had to
contend with political resentment from Indians- especially regarding land use/ownership.
For a while, Europeans and Indians shared the land, each benefitting from the land in a different way with minimal interferance. Whites grew crops while Indians hunted. Only when Europeans tried to also claim hunting rights did the Indians become violent.
Today, Indians still cause problems- turns out that exclusion did not work.
We face a similar resource problem today, but with women instead of land. The difference is that while land can't choose who owns it, women can.
The problem is the sole claim of ownership towards women- just as in the 1700s, a peaceful existence only existed while resources were used by Europeans/Indians simutaneously. Problems were few, asides from occasional disease transmission.
Considering White/Black mental/physical disparities, either Whites/Blacks may be preferable to women, and at different times, even for different purposes. Considering White/Black disparities, a woman may want a White man for certain purposes, and a Black man for other reasons. And considering women's differing ability to accomdate White/Black performance in different roles, both White/Black have roles to play for women. A peaceful existance is possible so long as resources are used for multiple roles.
>>133268450
Please post full resolution next time OP
>>133268641
we need a norway resolution bro for asian qts :3333
>>133268641
get it? cuz norway archive bro xD
>>133268641
>Please post full resolution next time OP
"Muh HD" degenerate.
>>133268450
>female
>usefulness
Pick one, you can't have both.
>>133269223
Better pay that $499 goy. We only tolerate 4k here.
>>133268450
Oh look at the leaf saying blacks can be useful and coexist with whites. Id rather be extinct than live amongst these other races.
>>133269176
>>133269216
I know an Aussie when I see one
>>133269353
Forcing someone to pay for something violates their NAP
>>133269353
>Better pay that $499 goy. We only tolerate 4k here.
HD mania is a mental disorder.
>>133268450
>Considering White/Black mental/physical disparities, either Whites/Blacks may be preferable to women, and at different times, even for different purposes. Considering White/Black disparities, a woman may want a White man for certain purposes, and a Black man for other reasons. And considering women's differing ability to accomdate White/Black performance in different roles, both White/Black have roles to play for women. A peaceful existance is possible so long as resources are used for multiple roles.
Do you have any suggestions?
Maybe some races are biologically more suited to different environments (social)? If society sees a biological trait like blue eyes as attractive will the specific trait spread?
>>133274570
>Maybe some races are biologically more suited to different environments?
Anal for Whites. Vaginal for Blacks. Hotter women for all.