Refugees hurt our econo...

>>133239621
MSM says it so it must be true

It's not. Kikes being kikes.

The research presupposes that they become functioning members of society. But we already have Sweden acting as a litmus test for that. They've been flooding their country with refugees for decades and virtually none of them contribute whatsoever and now their economy is strained beyond reason. There's no reason to suspect that the refugees here would behave any differently.

>>133239621
Well Macron tells me that africans need to stop having kids and that african civilization doesnt and hasnt ever existed.
Thats why we dont want them here

Oh nice, more cheap labor. I can fire everyone who works for me

Asian immigrants, generally speaking, are great for the economy. Just look up stories of 2nd, 3rd-generation asian doctors. Notice how these studies never control for race and use the term immigrant as a substitute for African (or for a religion i.e. Islam). I would bet a fortune that when you control for race, American Asians provide a net boon for our economy. Africans and or Muslims (looking at you Somalia) would prove to be a net drain on our economy.

>>133239621
America can have our refugees. We don't need them.

>>133239621
Moar people means higher gdp
>What is gdp per capita?
>What is general well being
>What are crime rates

>>133241052
>the USSR had a good economy

>>133240696
We don't need no one.

>>133241101
>what is an argument

File: 1469354979752.png (351KB, 473x414px) Image search: [Google]

351KB, 473x414px

>>133241052
/thread

>refugees may be good for the economy, official sources familiar with the subject claim

>>133239621
That is implying they take on jobs. But they won't.
Most people only read the title and take it for granted. Fuck hate these "news articles".

>>133240129
Even in the event of them becoming functioning members of society it's still only good for cheap labor. The people competing with the refugees don't have it better

>>133241264
that is an argument, have you seen the obviously falsified GDP numbers for the USSR?

>>133239621
Even if it is, its still not a good enough reason to replace an entire race.

>>133241052
/thread

>>133239621
They have been saying this for more than 10 years now in the media. You should kill yourself

>good for our fiat ponzi scheme

>>133240696
You'd be surprised. Immigrants from West Africa tend to be highly educated and despise African Americans. Somalis and other east Africans tend to be a net negative.

>>133239621
>immigrants coming from a lawless broke shithole they themselves created through centuries of neglect and stupidity will somehow magically boost our orderly and productive societies into *finally* becoming orderly and productive societies, a result only made possible through immigration

Leftism is a mental illness.

>>133240655
This.
Sjw are wild capitalists

>>133239621
the (((economy))) can never be propserous using a fiat currency. There is no such thing as your utopia you beg the question of

What they are REALLY referring to is the ELITES welfare by economy, that gets better, a little bit over time

>>133239621
'May Be'

File: 1498109301412m.jpg (97KB, 1024x781px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 1024x781px

>>133239621
Fuck the economy and fuck you, you filthy sodomite

>>133239621
It's pretty much universally accepted among economists that immigration to high-GDP countries is good for the economy.

Then why is Germany trying to distribute refugees to other countries, if not to reduce their own burden?

>>133244496
However, I'd point out that there are some people, like me, who value things like high trust and homogeneity over the economy.

>>133239621
>538
>May

>>133244440
Where is this pic from?
This is one of the best nazi pics

WE

CAN

WORK

ON

OUR

FUCKING

ECONOMY

YOU

FUCKING

IMBECILE

>flag check outs, fucking fag

>>133239621
Hey shareblue, could you come back to your shitty thread?

1 post by this id. Sage goes in options

>>133241101
yeah cuz USSR were stealing from other eastern bloc countries like Poland