>Before arranging a meeting with a Kremlin-connected Russian

File: 1496244688631.jpg (92KB, 691x653px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 691x653px

It's over for Drumpf.

File: 1478915948959s.jpg (11KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 250x250px

>>133226952
Curiously, the Times does not provide the email. Nor has it actually seen the email. Its source: “three people with knowledge of the email.”

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/07/10/new-york-times-never-read-russia-email-donald-trump-jr/

you idiots fell for the MSM CIA blog again!!

HAHHAHHAHAHHAHHAHAHHA

File: BWhNEwd.jpg (112KB, 1199x490px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 1199x490px

>>133226952
>Unless there is more (and this is worthy of investigation), I see nothing close to treason or a crime in this account. That obviously does not fit with the breathless accounts given the story but the criminal code is not a code of political etiquette.

https://jonathanturley.org/2017/07/10/was-the-meeting-between-donald-trump-jr-and-the-russian-lawyer-really-treason-or-the-smoking-gun-of-collusion/

BAHAHHAHHAHHAHHAHHAHA..

>>133226952
NATALIA: I WAS NOT FROM KREMLIN!

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/russian-lawyer-who-met-trump-jr-i-didn-t-have-n781631

False narrative destroyed again!
BAHAHHAHHHAHAHHAHHHAHAHA.

inb4 THE"EMAIL" turns out to be fake news!

>>133226952
Nice source on the email, why don't you go ahead and show it to us?

>>133227025

Yeah I'm sure it's completely bogus.

Just like the Comey memos.

Jut like Trump's sharing classified information with the Russian ambassador.

Just like Flynn being a paid agent of Turkey.

Yup, just some more of the ol' fake news. Fucking liberals right?

cucked by son,drumpf cant catch a break

AAHAHAHAHAHAHA

File: ghjj.jpg (41KB, 558x592px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 558x592px

DRUUUUUUUUUUUMMMMMMMMMMPFFFFFFFFFFF

File: 1494549329256.jpg (486KB, 800x1150px) Image search: [Google]

486KB, 800x1150px

>>133227234
Now you're getting it, dipshit. It's all a false narrative.

File: kijanka.jpg (8KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 320x320px

>>133227025
Meh, the liberals need something to distract themselves with what better way to further demoralize them with false hope and promises that will never come to fruition, they believe everything the tv tells them anyway.

File: trump_jr.jpg (40KB, 885x516px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 885x516px

sup bra

Lawyer has denied she is connected to the kremlin.
lawyer said everybody in the meeting was pretty much bored with her and she had nothing of value for them.


end of story.

Jane Sanders, Andrew McCabe, and Loretta Lynch are still going to prison.

The media is definitely slanted towards globalists/leftist-centrism and they are sometimes wrong but they don't make up stories out of nothing like breitbart, they do have reputations to protect.

inb4 you like me some NYT op-ed where they call someone a white supremacist who's actually just a white separatist, or some dumb shit like that.

All of their other leaks have turned out to be completely true so far.

Notice nobody in the WH is denying the story, only trying to talk around it, mitigate it, distract from it by bringing up Clinton, etc.

File: sRBfBvjW.jpg (24KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 400x400px

>Its source: “three people with knowledge of the email.”

ITT: we ponder who these people are.

Rick Wilson? Mench?

>>133227553

You really trust these people.

It doesn't matter whether the meeting was in fact "boring" or not, three of the top people in Trump's campaign met to meet with someone who would ostensibly provide dirt provided by Russian spying operations.

That is the story. Trump Jr's best defense right now is literally that he was "naive", which is the tack his lawyer is taking.

Also the idea that Trump sr wouldn't have known about a meeting involving his three closest guys is risible.

>>133227651
NYT retractions are more reliable than their first print stories. I will give the nyt credit. Even though they hype the intial incorrect story for all they can get out of it and then bury the retractions as deep as they can, published once and never mentioned again, they do still feel obligated to disown their own reporting.

Trump is about to let go of the slingshot. Meeting was about an 'adoption' agency that operated in both Russia and US. The lawyer said it was afaoul of government in Russia and probably US.

Inb4 it was run by some clinton crony with shady trafficking ties.

File: 1493250137392.png (241KB, 501x499px) Image search: [Google]

241KB, 501x499px

>>133227651
Everything you wrote there is complete bullshit.

GTFO

17 INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES AGREE!!!!!!


^^^ top of the page for months and months


*actually it was 3 agencies not 17


^^^^ page 35 lower right corner under the affordable psychic ad.

Post the e-mail.

>>133227912

Here's a page with all of the NYT's retractions. Point me to one that's actually big or proves that they are fake news.

https://www.nytimes.com/section/corrections

>>133227651
Like the time the New York Times told us 17 different intelligence agencies confirmed Russian interference when in fact it was only 4, all headed by Obama appointees? That wasn't a lie?

File: z58708877665.jpg (114KB, 640x637px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 640x637px

>>133227234
drumpfkins are in complete denial, even when presented with documentation.

>>133228135
Archive please
https://archive.is/sOy9P

>>133228135
see
>>133228146

>>133228070

>17 INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES AGREE!!!!!!

17 intelligence agencies did agree but only 4 were directly involved with the investigation. They're both true statements bro.

>>133228214
False, they issued a retraction

File: ht_paul_ryan_time3_jef_121011_wmain.jpg (22KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 640x360px

>>133228135
I'm just taking Comey's word, brah.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jun/8/james-comey-outs-new-york-times-fake-news/

>>133226952
Fake News!

>>133227234
how many more videos do people need to get of people on the inside of these news organizations laughing at you retards for hanging on their every word before you fucking wake up?

File: shills.jpg (54KB, 640x884px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 640x884px

>>133226952
The meeting was about human trafficking.

File: shills_more.jpg (755KB, 2008x1882px) Image search: [Google]

755KB, 2008x1882px

>>133228444

>>133226952
Donald Trump has now announced through his attorneys, and again through a White House press briefing, that he had no idea his son Donald Trump Jr. met with a Kremlin representative during the campaign to discuss dirt on Hillary Clinton. But in what essentially amounts to a public confession in hindsight, during a public speech just before his son’s meeting, Donald Trump bragged during a speech that he was just days away from having dirt on Clinton.

File: IMG_1309.jpg (50KB, 274x540px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 274x540px

Its over for you Drumpf. The time of intersectional golf course ownership has come to end and organic poetry will prove your a racists sexist homophobe anti-muslims who raped your bankruptcy lawyer.

>>133228272

If you actually read what he said and didn't run to your T_D talking points: The retraction was for saying that the 17 agencies worked on gathering the intelligence and verifying its validity. That was wrong.

The 17 agencies are part of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Which put out a consensus report agreeing on the validity of the intelligence that the 4 agencies presented to the body. Such a report is the official stance of all 17 agencies.

>>133228777
>That was wrong.
So they lied?

>>133228884
They lied.

>>133226952
>>133227234
>>133227264
>>133227651
>>133227769
>>133227813
>>133228195
>>133228135
>>133228214
>>133228706
>>133228777

>old news that's already been retracted and BTFO

Sweetie, no. Just.

It was a setup by Fusion GPS. Funded initially by Bush and Romney, handed over to Hillary. This ends up biting a lot of Dems, neoCONs, and deep state pedophiles in the ass BIGLY.

https://www.circa.com/story/2017/06/09/politics/a-battle-is-brewing-between-the-firm-behind-the-salacious-trump-dossier-and-sen-grassley

"The entire meeting may have been part of a larger election-year opposition effort aimed at creating the appearance of improper connections between Trump family members and Russia that also included a now-discredited intelligence dossier produced by a former British intelligence agent named Christopher Steele who worked for a U.S. political firm known as Fusion GPS."

"We have learned from both our own investigation and public reports that the participants in the meeting misrepresented who they were and who they worked for. Specifically, we have learned that the person who sought the meeting is associated with Fusion GPS, a firm which according to public reports, was retained by Democratic operatives to develop opposition research on the President and which commissioned the phony Steele dossier."

>>133228967
Fake news confirmed

>>133226952
she wasn't with the Kremlin.
saged

>>133227651

White House is confirming NYT. Trump Jr was baited into this.

It is all about Magnitsky sanctions, Putin was pissed because it affected his personal wealth.

too much putin shilling in this thread

>>133229185
NYT is fake news, as proven by them lying in the 17 agency report. You wont deny it, you just don't want to acknowledge it. NYT and WaPo are CIA propoganda, not real news sources.

>>133228884
>>133228967
>>133229000


>The fact of what that guy said and the report aren't facts because the writer of the report misunderstood how DNI reports work and the paper did its job and corrected it.


Cool.

>>133229364
>tions, Putin w

how is the weather in moscow, comrade? Comrade Putin thanks you for your efforts.

>>133228214
>17 intelligence agencies did agree
>only 4 were directly involved with the investigation
pick one you fucking retard

>>133229436
misunderstood is what we are calling propaganda now? otay buckwheat.

>>133229477
You write like a communist.

>>133229436
>misunderstood
LMAO
Funny how the media keeps "misunderstanding" things involving Trump huh.

>>133229477
I live in Michigan cunt.

File: 1499268205878.gif (817KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

817KB, 200x200px

>>133227025
to the lefts own logic, if any of the three persons with knowledge of the email were to be Russian, there should be treason charges brought to whoever met with them to get this information.

>>133229564
Hillary said 17 intel agencies during s speech so it must be true

-former anchor Scott Pelley

>>133226952
fake news!

>>133229603

So your entire shtick is that it's obvious how DNI reports work and anyone who misunderstands them is pushing propaganda then? Okay.

So explain this guy:
>>133229564


Again for the mouth-breathers:

The DNI represents all 17 agencies officially and its reports are representative of the official stance of all 17. The report that the DNI put out was based on the intelligence gathered by 4 of the agencies.The reporter claimed that it was gathered and reviewed by all 17, this was the error and it has been corrected.

Did the reporter use said language to stress how many agencies support the intel in a way that was not correct for them to do? Likely. Does that make the facts of their report disappear? No.

>>133230003
>They reported literal fake news
>But it's okay, they just """"misunderstood""""
CIA nigger leave

>>133228989
Why don't your quotes exist in the article you linked?

>>133226952
Trump jr: "got any dirt on Hillary?"

Russia: "yea probably."

CNN/ liberal media: "OMG TRUMP RUSSIA COLLUSION TRUMP ELECTION PUTIN BAD! OOH OOH AAAAH AAAAAAH!!!"

Smug liberal 16 year old faggot who just watched Jon Oliver: "Before arranging a meeting with a Kremlin-connected Russian lawyer he believed would offer him compromising information about Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump Jr. was informed in an email that the material was part of a Russian government blah blah blah blah"

File: 6c3a118d3e47bd95c9e148fd0632933cf02eb7b2c9916d1e9577e091c0bfb611.jpg (51KB, 853x480px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 853x480px

Is this fair to say?

>>133229981
>Scott Pelley

I HATE THAT FAGGOT SO MUCH

The man did a story on a prep school having a problem with whiteness and putting nothing but minorities in fixed it when it's bullshit. They were all there on sports scholarships.

File: download.jpg (101KB, 628x627px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 628x627px

>>133226952
>NYT has three unidentified sources with knowledge of the email form Mr. Goldstone.
You're finished this time Drumpf.

>>133227025
But muh magination!

>>133230270

Efficiency.

>>133230212

>People in this very thread are misrepresenting how DNI reports work without putting out retractions for their bullshit
>But its cool when they do that but the reporter's outlet has to get the facts straight because I like the narrative they are pushing better.

Fuck off back to T_D.

>>133227234
Yup, fucking liberals. Lowest form of subhuman scum. Nice to know you're starting to own up to it.

>>133229364
What % of NYT stories are fake news?

Out of hundreds of Trump-Russia stories, how many have been found to later be false and retracted? 1%? 5%?

Even if 5% of NYT's stories were false, that still means 95% of what they write is true. Why are you giving MORE trust to members of the Trump campaign - ones who have been caught lying over and over and over and over than to the journalists who report their lies?

DJT was caught in three lies just yesterday. Yet you trust him?

>>133229364
ever got something wrong? ever?

you lied.

you are fake. Everything you say is fake and lies. please shut up, we don't want to hear anything from you ever again, you faker and liar.
that sound reasonable? Because it sounds like you...

>>133227813
Neat. Is that illegal?
Nope.
Did anyone that's part of Trump adminstration neglect to mention this meeting on their security forms?
Nope
>Bu but Don Jr.
He's not an adminstration official

Thanks for playing.

>>133230502
>to T_D

Confirmed Shareblue faggot
KILL
YOUR
SELF

>>133227813
Who gives a fuck? Seriously. WHO GIVES A FUCK??? You spent the nickel on the Russia story. It is literally nothing.

You faggots never learn. Nothing will come of this and you will probably end up with looking like dumbasses again. Go outside and talk to regular people they fucking hate you and think democrats have gone fucking nuts. Some might not like Trump but they hate you guys way worse. Think about that next time.

>>133229668
You write like a Dadaist

File: Quaky.png (200KB, 556x579px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 556x579px

>>133230725
Stop making sense frogoloid!
>It rustles their jimmies if you know what I quack

F A K E
N E W S

>>133230912


>Sticking to the facts and telling T_D faggots that want to suck Trump's dick to go back where they belong makes you a paid poster.

If only.

>>133227234
>Jut like Trump's sharing classified information with the Russian ambassador.
The president gets to decide what is and is not classified and who is and is not cleared to view it. Even if he did share classified information, there's nothing wrong with him doing so.

>>133229940
>there should be treason charges brought

nope.

Treason has a very specific meaning - you would have to show this was indeed treason.

technically russia is not an enemy, so can't be treason to give them comfort.

learn to law (like educated Liberals do)

>>133231075
>The president gets to decide what is and is not classified

Murication at its best

>>133230003
>and anyone who misunderstands them is pushing propaganda then? Okay.

Funny how you have zero expectation for the reporters to actually ask Clapper about it before publishing thousands of pieces based on it for 3 months

>>133230725
>Out of hundreds of Trump-Russia stories, how many have been found to later be false and retracted?

How many have proven to be true?
0%
Burden of proof is on you shills and interns

Collusion- Disproven
Obstruction of justice- disproven

Russian meddling?
Where is the evidence?
How did they meddle?
What effect did it have?
Who knew what and when?

But please stick with you MUH RUSHA narrative do nothing else it serves my side perfectly

>>133227553
They are backtracking because there was nothing illegal on this meeting. If she explicitly stated that she was a Russian government official prior to the meeting, than this could be harmful to DJTJr. But she would also have to prove that claim as well.
People confuse Russian = Russian official. Its like saying Johnny Cochran was an American official.

>>133230502
Yes in fact I expect reporters to get the facts straight CIA nigger

File: pic_related_121813_Pajama-Boy-The-Obama-Machines-Id.jpg (49KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 200x200px

>>133230725
>My wife only sucks black cocks 5% of the time. That's why I trust her

>>133230786
Hi NYTimes

>>133230725
It's hard to disprove a story when your only evidence is anonymous sources.

>>133230786
I'm not the fucking news dip shit. I don't have to be 100% accurate, they do.

>>133231170
It's true

>>133227162


Muahhaha

Finally she speaks out

Remember if this woman would have leaked stuff FROM the DNC Server, she would be DEAD.

>>133231172
>you have zero expectation

Wrong. I clearly stated what the reporter messed up and cited the retraction on the grounds of what they messed up.

If you want my personal stance on the matter: The reporter in their haste to cite the DNI report as damning damaged their reporting credibility and in doing so has added an inch of daylight that let's mouth-breathers shout "FAKE NEWS!" on the entire report despite the truth it's grounded in.


An example out of Fox News just in the last 24 hours. The Fox News reporter that put out an article on the reports that 50% Comey's memos possibly contained classified information; but the reported added "Top Secret" to that report without evidence.

Fox News put out a retraction of this wrongfully added point on the article promptly. Does that mean that Fox is "FAKE NEWS!!!"? No. Does that mean that the report on the classified nature of Comey's Memo is inherently invalidated and false? No, that is not how it works. But people in this thread and of the Alt-Right and T_D would like you to think that's how it works when it suits them well.

>>133226952
You dumb bastards would believe somebody if they said their dog would speak to you in french if you let it shit into your mouths, just so long as said dog is also claimed by some random journalist to be a secret agent super-spy of 50 Agency X's that have proof of Trump's ties to Russia.
TL;DR I hope a dog shits in your mouth.

File: Salute.gif (872KB, 404x402px) Image search: [Google]

872KB, 404x402px

>>133231360
Versus The president that would by analogy suck black cocks 95% (of which 20% straight ass to mouth)

>>133231455
NYT is now using 4chan to defend their fake news. LOL

>>133231170
That's how it works, you dumb nigger. The president of the united states can arbitrarily classify or declassify any bit of information he pleases for any arbitrary reason he pleases.

He could, if he so chose, have his breakfast menu classified, and have the nuclear launch codes declassified. He's not stupid enough to do the latter, but he has the authority to do it. These classifications aren't devised by a governmental body, they're a power of the president.

>>133231358

They did, that is by definition what the retractive correction was for.

File: NodCanDance.gif (639KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

639KB, 320x240px

>>133231509
Yeah, JFK did such a good job at it.

>>133231578
They would rather have children shit in their mouths. You are talking to PEDO's after all...

>>133231572
Yes, they are all fake news, you daft cunt

And telling a lie to millions then retracting to a few hundred is still fake news

Fucking Acosta was still running with the 17 agencies meme even after the buried retraction came out. That's how fucking buried it was

Kys faggot

The left feeds the media machine even more shekels on muh russia narrative to keep it running. This is fucking hilarious

The NYt is so above the fray that in their reports now, when they summarize events so far, like they di yesterday in this very article, they wrote "Comey testified that Trump pressured him to end the Flynn investigation" when IN FACT Comey never fucking said that at all. so they SPIN shit to fit the narrative they want. thats even worse than "misunderstanding". thats deliberate spin doctor shit that didnt really happen but COULD be spoun that way if you splice enough words meanings to mean what you want them to mean.
Congress: did trump pressure you?
Comey: i cant say but i felt uncomfortable
NYT: comey says Trump pressured him while under oath.

typical leftist faggotry

>>133231193
We won't know the truth until the investigations have concluded. Until then all we can do is enjoy the show.

Do you trust the Trump campaign more than the NYT?

When DJT claimed he had no contact with any Russians during the election, did you believe him?

When DJT claimed he didn't know what the meeting with the Russian lawyer was even about, or who she even was, did you believe him?

File: 1494647884689.jpg (29KB, 809x590px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 809x590px

>>133231584
>Your wife sucks black cocks

.

>B-but Gromald Grumph sucks black cocks too

>>133231360
How often do you think about black cocks, anon?

>>133230901
DJT was a member of the Trump campaign.

>>133231790
In all honesty I hope they keep running with the Russia thing right into the midterm. The last thing the Republicans need is for Democrats to stop screaming about Russia and form an actual economic policy that can create jobs and wealth for the middle class.

2018 will roll around with unemployment the lowest it's ever been in our history and the stock market through the fucking roof. It'll be a slaughter.

>>133231872
HELL YEAH I TRUST TRUMP MORE THAN THE GODFORSAKEN NYT!!! ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME??? ITS A NO BRAINER!!!!

>>133231753
>Yes, they are all fake news, you daft cunt


Oh, you are that guy. Cool.

Cite your news sources that you depend on and that in their entire tenure has never had to print a single retraction. I can wait.

Oh and if you are saying that all news reporting is FAKE NEWS: The US and any functional democratic society depend on a separate and protected press, it is the first move of petty dictators to abolish such a thing. This is a thing that Republicans and Democrats agree upon as it is so fundamental to how the US works.

>>133231980
Usually just before I let your wife go down on me

File: neuronFiring.gif (2MB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 320x240px

>>133231938
>I didn't begin with analogizing the black cocks

Do you know what an analogy is?
Pretty sure you claim you do, but that is typical:
MURICATION.

>>133231075
That's not the point. The point is that the NYT broke the story that Trump shared classified information with the Russian ambassador.

>FAKE NEWS! DIDN'T HAPPEN! NO PROOF! (((((((((NYT))))))))
>Oh, that actually happened? Who cares?

So many previously denied stories have now been proven true. At this point we're just playing the odds. I'm not sure why anyone would trust the Trump administration over the NYT at the moment.

>>133227162


Wow did she gain 100lbs between 2016 and 2017? She looks nothing like what the MSM photos have published?!!!

>>133231980
A campaign is a private organization, not part of the government and not subject to the same rules or codes of ethics. Really the only thing they're bound by is funding sources and the same laws that apply to regular citizens. They literally could have walked into the meeting with ex kgb members and traded intel on Hillary for pure cash and it still wouldn't be illegal.

Go home.

>>133232110
iM ASSUMING YOU WILL NOT DENY THAT OVER 50 MAINSTREAM JOURNALISTS WORKED DIRECTLY WITH THE DNC AND ITS PEOPLE TO WRITE NEWS STORIES EVEN SUBMITTING THEM TO THE DNC FOR THEIR ADVANCE APPROVAL????????


FUCKING QUEER MOTHERFUCKER LYING FAGGOT PIECE OF SHIT.

>>133232227
>So many previously denied stories have now been proven true.

Such as... ?

File: 1453745577184.jpg (23KB, 230x250px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 230x250px

>>133232110
>Cite your news sources that you depend on and that in their entire tenure has never had to print a single retraction

Lol. I'm not going to pilpul with you

>>133232063
Can I ask you why? Even after all the lies?

>>133229940
>>133231298
>>133231422
>>133231569
>>133231578
>>133231642
>>133232248
>>133232246
>>133232236
>>133232227
>>133232210
>>133232110
>>133232063

>>133230560
>>133229551
>>133229029
>>133228531
>>133228423
>>133232038
>>133231980
>>133231872
>>133231819
>>133231790
>>133231753
>>133231707


Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire
Kiev officials are scrambling to make amends with the president-elect after quietly working to boost Clinton.

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446

>>133232227
>previous stories proven true

You win today's Complete Fucking Bullshit award, son.

Seriously, you guys need to stop. You're worrying your family with this obsession.

File: Pepe.jpg (6KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 250x250px

>>133226952
>Mr. Goldstone
Sure thing Rabbi.

Also does anyone notice the disgusting thing they push here?
Its not about Hillary Clinton, or that these emails revealed vote Fraud and other crooked shit.
They spin it, so that the Crime is the revealing of said Emails, and these fucks eat that shit up.

>>133230915
>CNN moron admits that CNN has no proof of russian collusion with the trump administration, as if they would
>take this sound bite and run with it, as if this is some admission by the entire media that not only did russia not interfere in the election but that no collusion happened at all.
>"If CNN doesn't know about it, it doesn't exist!"

>>133231872
>reddit spacing
>that flag

Fuck off shill nigger

>>133232227
The president decides what is and is not classified so sharing that information is neither a crime nor is it news worthy. In fact it probably saved lives.

Why is that bad again? The bigger story is why does a reporter know what the classified information was and that it was shared? Sounds like somebody is leaking classified Intel which is the actual crime.

>>133232248

The incestuous nature of reporters working too closely with political parties is a known factor and cuts both ways. Right now an RNC-affiliated entity is buying up local news station and running stories mandated by corporate that slant hard for the Republicans. I for one advocate less brinksmanship on the issue and more press separation.

>>133232322

>He didn't cite a single outlet and bitched out with an intellectually dishonest jab

Cool, didn't expect much from you anyway.


Cool, didn't expect much from T_D anyway.

>>133232377
The lefts lies? Trump is sound.

File: 1490292904097.jpg (92KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 960x720px

>>133231117
educated liberals are commenting on the NYT article abt this, and I've concluded after reading 100% of them that they're all simultaneously and orgasming while still managing to type out "muh treason" and "muh conspiracy" and "should somebody let muller know about this?"
the only foreplay they need is a five-degrees from-Kevin-Bacon-style Kremlin-connected lawyer and a someone from the trump campaign, and all the other exculpatory details just fade away. they just fade away

>>133232377
Every dipshit liberal is obsessed with this idea that Trump lies. And to my memory, he has lied about very little. I can't think of one as I sit here.

Hillary, on the other hand, has to be the fucking world lying champion of the Universe and I can think of at least fifty of the cuff. How can you support her?

/pol/ is in the first stage of grief: denial.

>>133231642
See
>>133231683

>>133232038
Democrats are balls deep in identity politics and russia to do any policy reform. Thank god because that party needs to die as quickly as possible

>>133232695
Holy fuck. You can't be this stupid, can you?

>>133232506
IT'S OVER. YOU LOST.

And the worst thing for you assholes is that Trump is a pretty damn good president as it turns out. THAT'S the thing you dumbfucks really can't handle.

>>133227234
Lmao, you are taking msm memes too literally m8

File: aliensPossible.gif (2MB, 480x271px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 480x271px

>>133232824

>>133232907
>>133232884
>>133232824
>>133232803
>>133232749
>>133232695
>>133232671
>>133232648
>>133232646
>>133232613
>>133232561
>>133232506
>>133232472
>>133232435
>>133232377
>>133232322
>>133232312

The DNC was not hacked. I will prove it.

For one thing, we can cross-reference the actual authors from the Wikileaks dump. 1.doc is in the "verified" Wikileaks release as the attachment which can be downloaded from here which has the original author of "Lauren Dillon." So, wait, who is Warren Flood et al? Each of these documents had a creation date of June 15, and were modified by "Фeликc Эдмyндoвич" a few minutes later.


In Office 2007 format specification, there is a certain stylesheet template which dictates overall formatting for the document. In three of the documents by Warren Flood, we find the identical metadata.

{\s108\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\contextualspace \rtlch\fcs1 \af1\afs20\alang1025 \ltrch\fcs0\f1\fs20\lang1049\langfe1049\cgrid\langnp1049\langfenp1049\sbasedon0 \snext108 \slink107 \sqformat \spriority1 \styrsid11758497 No Spacing;}

>>133232613
It's bad because he had no idea what he was doing or the repercussions that could follow. He was just showing off like the egotistical retard he is.

>>133232824
>>133232803
>>133232749
>>133232695
>>133232671
>>133232648
>>133232646
>>133232613
>>133232561
>>133232506
>>133232472

The above line appears across all three of Warren Flood's documents. styrsid11758497 is an unique identifier that is session-associative. The fact that it does not appear in the other documents indicates it's associated with Warren Flood and not Фeликc Эдмyндoвич.


Why is this important? Well, the \langfe1049 portion is a setting saying that Russian language should be used as the default language for the document.


Had Фeликc Эдмyндoвич been setting the "watermark," it would be the same across all documents. But instead, distinct watermarks were created for each document creator, suggesting inconsistent application or three different creators applying their own watermark.
In other words, document creators set the document properties to use Russian language and created three distinct so-called 'watermarks' in doing so, not 'Фeликc Эдмyндoвич.'


Also, cross-reference to Wikileaks shows that Warren Flood did not author any of the documents. And given that the timestamps are all on June 15th, this is the sequence of events:


A worker using a computer registered to Warren Flood opens a DNC document, copies it, and pastes it as a new document to his computer.
A worker using a computer registered to Warren Flood sets the theme language to Russian in some way (this process is different for all authors).
A worker using a computer registered to Warren Flood modifies the document's author to Фeликc Эдмyндoвич.
The modified document is then uploaded to the Guccifer website and publicly published a short time thereafter.

>>133226952
According to an email no one has seen.

>>133232506
>Interfere
I'm what way? Running propaganda stories on RT? By phishing John podeesta for his Gmail password through a link his it team told him not to click so they could expose the truth of how fucked up the DNC's inner operations were?
No votes got changed so I honestly don't care. If North Korea wants to hack into my elected officials and out their corruption, I welcome it. Eat shit.
>Collision
There's literally no proof of this and it's wishful thinking on the part of people that can't accept that they ran a shit candidate and lost to somebody that any dumb shit Democrat could have won against. Even assuming there were collision, it's not illegal and there's nothing you can do to avoid the next 4 to 8 years.

C O P E
O
P
E

File: 1499364669784.png (98KB, 960x768px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 960x768px

>>133227162
>>133227025
>>133227200

>>133232995
>>133232944
>>133232907
>>133232884
>>133232824
>>133232803
>>133232749
>>133232695
>>133232671
>>133232648
>>133232646

Who is Warren Flood?
Warren Flood is a high-ranking technology official for Democratic operatives, having worked for Obama for America, DNC, and Joe Biden. It's a unique name.


His name does not appear in any of the Wikileaks emails, meaning that he appears to be a third party as far as the DNC email leaks are concerned.

Other than his (professional Internet) profile, he is a virtual social media ghost, never having made any Tweets nor any evidence of real social media activity.

The pertinent point is that: the metadata forensic proof is irrefutable that Warren Flood, or someone who used a copy of Word registered to Warren Flood, shoehorned in obvious "Russian" fingerprints all over the documents.


UPDATE (5/27): The owner of g-2.space suggests it was not Warren Flood who personally did poisoning of document with Russian metadata, but a far more sinister agent of DNC using Word applications registered to him, possibly for the express purpose of creating rationale for unmasking: http://g-2.space/jb/

Guccifer 2.0 is none other than a botched DNC creation to create a false flag for Russia.

File: 33797686.jpg (343KB, 1595x1052px) Image search: [Google]

343KB, 1595x1052px

>>133232995
>He said work zero proof or incite into the motives if the president

File: 1498817330062.jpg (96KB, 635x600px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 635x600px

>>133232824
>Did you wipe the server?
>Was Benghazi about a video?
>Did you sell Uranium to Russia?
>Did you get debate questions in advance?
>Did you say that shit about the child molester and the polygraph?
>Did you intimidate Kathleen Willey, Juanita Broadrick, or a hundred other Clinton cockjockeys?
>Is Chelsea's father actually Webb Hubbel?

Shall I go on?

>>133230786
No, asshole. No. That isn't how thinking works. Let me explain how not being retarded is, alright?
Now, say I did happen to have got something wrong. Okay.
Say for example... I dunno, I think my neighbor is cooking methamphetamine because I see smoke coming out of their roof. Some example, wtf ever.
So I call the cops, per se. They investigate, and turns out either no he isn't and he's actually just lighting a fireplace, or he actually is and I'm not crazy. Say he wasn't. Well I'm a dumbass in that case, but I wasn't lying. I shouldn't be trusted on such matters anymore, YES. But not lying.
~
NOW. Say I dislike my neighbor, he got me all butthurt some day, I'm a little slave to my emotions and I REEEEEAAAALLLY want him to be a meth-head, so that I can feel all superior, and he can go to jail in my deranged brain.
So I just flat-out lie, call the cops and tell them my neighbor smokes meth on his back porch every evening, and cooks that shit up, I can see the cloud, my other neighbors told me they can see the fumes wafting out of his place, and my damn grandmother walked by that house just yesterday and passed out from the fumes.
Hell, why not go further and I convince my own damn self to actually believe that he's a meth head. I could even get some dumbasses in the neighborhood to believe my blatant lies, too.
See, in that case I wouldn't of merely gotten that Wrong, you twit, I'd of just been a lying piece of shit unworthy of common respect. DAMNED WELL Yes, you ass, I wouldn't be someone to be trusted in that case if I behaved in such a vile manner.
That is essentially what the media is doing with the Trump Russia bullshit. It's a quite apparent flat-out lie, for idiots and dumbasses to accept as their new religion. Because herpa derp I no like Trump.
You're delusional bastards, all of you.

>>133232695
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/06/23/opinion/trumps-lies.html

I know it's an op-ed from the (((NYT))), but after a cursory glance you really don't think Trump has a problem telling lies?

Secondly, I also believe Clinton is a corrupt liar. But she's not the President and I'm not discussing her right now. I also never supported her.

>>133233006
*yawn*

>>133233017
From an anonymous source who may or many not have spoken the NYT.
Journalism is dead.

>>133232561
I'm

going

to

post

like

this

from

now.

Are

you

upset

my

friend?

_____________________

Sent from my iPad.

>>133233341
>New York Times

I would prefer to see actual credible media sources please. I don't want to read the CIA's propaganda.

>>133230786
None of us work for news outlets, Muhammed.

>>133233272
Insight*

>>133227025
>breitbart

>>133233637
>Ad hom

>>133226952
It's 2017 time to get over your KGB paranoia

>Goldstone

>>133233464

Kindly cite which sources are reliable according to you.

>>133233115
Ive thought for awhile that the dnc actually leaked its own stuff to wikileaks through seth rich then killed him to protect the sham russia story. they had real polling. they knew all along she couldnt win. so they started the trump swift boat plan.

File: 1309219311090.jpg (29KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 250x250px

>>133228195
This is fucking hilarious, well worth the read.

>>133230385
He's such an asshole. Very condescending and elitist.

Trump campaign knew for a long time they were being spied o by the system under Obamas control. Knowing they were being spied on why would they have public meetings with an email trail, or use unsecure phones to chat with russians?

the left is just plain stupid. ive never seen anyone rolled like this since the good ol rickroll days.

>>133233464
Which news organization do you use? Im curious. I'm sure they've reported on some of this too.

Broflakes don't know how to defend Trump Jr. yet, still waiting on their marching orders from Alex Jones

>>133234044>>133233888>>133233856 >>133233818>>133233749>>133233709

Impact of Guccifer 2.0 being a DNC creation
The "Russian influenced the US election" campaign all started from the DNC leak.


Allegations of Russian influence was built on a completely fabricated foundation of lies.


In hindsight, we now know that Obama administration unmasking of US campaign officials on the pretext of "Russian interference" started in June 2016, same date as when Guccifer 2.0 began. The implications that the unmasking all was predicated on a DNC psy-ops is staggering.

Who cares why the DNC did it?
Because it proves that "Russian interference" started as a total DNC fabrication that persists to today. The whole Russian campaign started before Trump made his infamous joke about Russians getting Hillary’s emails.


Illegal unmasking of Trump campaign officials over Russian interference began June 2016. Was this predicated on Russian interference with the DNC hacks? If so, this means that the leaks not only implicate DNC and plague President Trump himself, but also implicates Obama administration officials and all the involved intelligence agencies.


Why did DNC leak their own documents?
It’s right in Guccifer 2.0’s blog. Pertinent quote: "The main part of the papers, thousands of files and mails, I gave to Wikileaks. They will publish them soon." The DNC knew they were having their documents leaked to Wikileaks, and wanted to make sure a Russian hacker took credit for the leaks.


How did the DNC know Wikileaks was going to release the DNC emails?
Great question. It’s hard to imagine them knowing without assistance from intelligence agencies – and indeed unmasking of campaign officials started in June 2016.


This is, of course, highly illegal, and would mean that the Russian disinformation campaign wasn’t just a DNC operation, it was also created from collusion with the Obama administration using highly illegal means including violations of the Fourth Amendment.

>>133233295
bad analogy because you shouldve said you called the cops to report your neighbor but refused to let the cops investigate the possible crime scene yet insist they launch an investigation anyways and amazingly they do.

Can we stop talking about Russia?

We need to talk about the WALL,

>>133229364
Why did you post that response when I trailed off in the middle of one sentence?
lol I'm drunk posting and barely make sense and the thing you decide to point out is the NYT?

Anyway, Trump and co saying that the NYT is fake news works better when they don't confirm NYT reports constantly on twitter or press conferences.

>>133234002
And he says "Hwhite" all the time.

He's so smug like the rest of the CBS crew. Glad he got fired though, couldn't stand his face.

>>133230725
What % of russia-Trump stories have been false?

Close to 100%.

So what the fuck are you talking about with your 1% or 5%.

Almost 100% of their stories have been false

>>133226952
>Mr. Goldstone
fucking rofl mr noseberg says, no Jew is credible about anyting

>>133234282
>>133234424
>>133234533
>>133234735
>>133234754
>>133234735
Since Guccifer 2.0 was a botched operation, that might make the continued existence of the real leaker who might draw scrutiny that much more precarious…

What about Crowdstrike report?
The metadata I described above can be independently verified by a non-technical person with access to any text editor like vim (which is available on Mac OS terminal command line). It does not require special forsenic analysis to identify. There are only two explanations: staggering incompetence, or DNC collusion.


I cannot say if Crowdstrike is competent, but I can say that their co-founder and CTO, Dmitri Alperovitch, is a senior fellow with the Atlantic Council, a think tank whose policies could be termed as anti-protectionist.

>>133234754
>Close to 100%.


[Citation Needed]

>>133232403

funny how the media doesnt mention or talk about that

and it was in fucking politico

>>133234262
Defend him from what? He's not a government official and he didn't do anything illegal.

>>133235072
What solid proof is there that Trump colluded with Russia? None? Ok then that makes the entire narrative false and just wishful thinking from people still unable to cope with the election results.

>>133235088

The guy who reported it is flabbergasted at the hypocrisy and lies.

>>133235222


Yeah, that's not how literally anything of the like works.

The vast majority of the reporting done so far are on factual things that happened and have been verified to have happened.

If you want to call Keith Obermann 100% false for telling liberals that Trump will be locked up any day now? Go right ahead, but that is why he is a commentator not a journalist or reporter of any note.

But to claim that because it has not been proven in an ongoing investigation as of yet that Trump himself colluded with Russia means that every report on shady dealings that the Trump team had with Russian actors is 100% false is intellectual dishonesty at its highest.

Trump Jr. isn't even denying the substance of the report in question at this time, just re-framing what his meeting turned out as.

>>133235647

Tick fucking tock, sharia blue.

Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire
Kiev officials are scrambling to make amends with the president-elect after quietly working to boost Clinton.

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446

>>133235647
>Have been verified
Literally every story is sources say. And every story that attempts to tie a Trump associate to some wrong doing quickly gets blown the fuck out as blatantly false or not illegal in any way. It's been nearly a year and they're still riding this supposition wave.

Like I said, please don't stop. It'll destroy the party and let one of the third parties take their place. This is all good. Stay retarded please.

>>133236021
It's actually Tick Tock, suck my fucking cock.
>because the other I use for rubbing

>three people with knowledge of the email.
They figured one anonymous source no longer made a convincing case, so they got three. I'm convinced.

>>133226952
Everyone ITT already has their mind made up about this one way or another and no story will ever change that

everyone is brainwashed one way or another

>>133235469

Trump should tweet the article out

Get max exposure

File: 572A95D6-B1FA-4C5B-811B-06A1F8FEC22D-272-000000C1448BD713.gif (3MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1280x720px

>>133236577

He's not sweating it. The don jr. report is a trap set for mccabe, dws, comey. Big happenings are imminent.

>the meeting never existed!
>the meeting was about adoption!
>here is the transcript

>>133236774
>i-it's all fake
That's the only reply you'll get from drumpfkins

>>133236240
what about the one that led to the resignation of General Flynn?

>>133236769
yep. mccabe is going to get nailed so hard. idk who else goes to prison but mccabe is being left as acting fbi director for the express purpose of the fbi restoring much of their credibility when they actually arrest their own director in his office. mccabe is mostdef going to get the book thrown at him. i also think jane sanders goes to prison as a lesson to everyone thinking they could also rock the dnc boat from within.

>>133236962
looks like the nyt acquired them so he posted the chain as a way to get out ahead? he clearly isn't the smartest trump

what

>>133236969
You mean the one Trump fired him for?

>Hey these guys are saying you did something behind my back. I know they're shills but I gotta check
No sir.
>Hey I saw the documents that showed you lied about something trivial and not illegal. Get out.
Ok

yeah cause the Russians would title an email: Damaging information on Hilary Clinton from Russian Government

>>133235222
For instance, Trump asked the Russians to find her missing emails during a stump speech.
He claimed he was joking. He's nominally protected by expansive 1st amendment interpretations of political speech. If a Msofts CEO said 'please Russia hack apple' and Apple got hacked, the DOJ would likely investigate Msoft even if they claimed it was a joke. For normal people(nonpoliticians), calling for a third party to commit an illegal act in public and that act occurring would be prima facie probable cause for investigation.

Still, I'm fairly sure Trump is innocent because he's a loudmouth and no one would intentionally involve him in a criminal conspiracy. There are a shit ton of acts by his team worth investigating.

>>133237141
He's probably going to try to jump ship and let Kush and Daddy take the brunt of it

>>133237310
Even if his entire team literally hired a private Intel firm located within America staffed entirely by ex kgb agents that claimed to have dirt in Hillary, it's still not illegal.
And that is why this Russia thing does nothing but kill the Democrats. And the worst part is that I'm a fucking liberal but these idiots have pushed me away from the party towards libertarian because they can't get their shit together. All of the social liberal issues I cared about have been granted so there's really nothing besides dude weed left. I just want economic security at this point.

But they won't talk about that. Why? Because muh Russia. Burn in hell.

>>133237280
It's blackmail 101 to get a person to do doing something clearly illegal. Now in addition to a quid pro quo for sanctions relief, they have further leverage in the form of knowledge and documentation of a crime.

It's not like a Russian diplomat will go to a US prison for this. There isn't really a downside for them.

File: IMG_0607.jpg (280KB, 1536x1594px) Image search: [Google]

280KB, 1536x1594px

>>133237141
>>133237212
>>133237280
>>133237310
>>133237428
>>133237667

RIP NYT.

File: 432945667.jpg (29KB, 348x235px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 348x235px

Let me guess, this is gonna be another HOLY SHIT DRUMPF IS FINISHED shitshow that lasts for a little over a week and then is dropped and forgotten when it turns out Trump still isn't impeached?

File: 1427417647211-2.jpg (147KB, 405x412px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 405x412px

>>133238002
>the Crown prosecutor of Russia....offered to provide the Trump campaign with documents
This actually confirms the NYT's story

>>133237212

The level of mental gymnastics here is astounding.

>>133227025
djt Jr posted it his Twitter you moron

he's a traitor

File: IMG_0609.jpg (410KB, 1536x1941px) Image search: [Google]

410KB, 1536x1941px

>>133238193
>>133238344
>>133238104

RIP DNC.

>>133238344
How so? Trump fired him. He wasn't impeached and the investigation is ongoing. If he did something illegal I hope he gets a cell next to Hillary. Doesn't change how little I care about Russia.

>>133238002
the nyt called him and asked if he had any comment on the wordage he used in the emails so he got scared and posted them himself as if that would somehow negate their article

clearly btfo, don't know how they will ever recover

it's like trump jr peed his pants and somebody took a picture and said they will post it, so he took a picture of himself and tweeted it like he meant to do it

>>133238365
All shitposting aside, the email is actually pretty damning. Maybe not for Trump personally but certainly for people around him and it's going to spark a deeper investigation

>>133228884

But I guess Trump has never lied huh? Never said one thing when something else was true? Huh?

Fuck you.

>>133238104
Get used to it, three and a half years to go of the same shit.

>>133238654

if nothing else it breathed entirely new life into a dead narrative.

>“This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government's support for Mr. Trump," reads one of the emails from Rob Goldstone to Trump Jr.

>>133238607
More like somebody says they're going to run a story about how you raped some woman and they wanted a comment from you.
So in a "panic" you release hidden footage of her chasing you down, sucking your dick and then you telling her to leave because it was no good.

>>133238532


You are saying that 100% of the reports on Trump Team dealings with shady Russian actors are false. Even reports which have seen people fired and or brought up on investigation on the substance of the reporting in question and again: Forget the other 99.99% of reporting:

The very report that this thread is on has already panned out as based on truth as Trump Jr. has admitted to holding the meeting the report is on.

So while you tell us that 100% of reporting on this is false you are doing it in a thread where even the current report is based in fact.

So again: Call any report that says that Trump clearly colluded with Russia without backing it up false but claiming that all the stories even tangentially related are false because you say so is intellectual fuckery.

>Todd and Clare
Todd and Clare
>Todd and Clare
Todd and Clare
>Todd and Clare
Todd and Clare

>>133239041
Which investigating? FBI doesn't disclose who is and is not under investigation. That is part of the reason Comey was fired. It's all conjecture with zero proof on a topic I don't care about.
Economy!

>>133227025
Trump Jr. just released the e-mails to cut off the Times who was about to publish them. Which confirms EVERYTHING.


HA HA HA, WRONG AGAIN /pol/

Junior is a such a slack-jawed fuck. He really needs to stop posting on Twitter before he gets his stupid ass sent to prison.

>>133239240


>Robert Meuller is investigating why water is wet and the House and Senate Committees are investigating why do birds suddenly appear every time you are near.

Cool.

>>133239268
>before he gets his stupid ass sent to prison.
For what?
No, really, for what? That's what I don't understand about any of this. What are the actual laws he's accused of breaking? Because everything he's accused of is standard practice in campaigns. Hell, Clinton took MONEY from Russian interests.

>>133226952
So the Clinton campaign sources oppo research from Qatar Saudi UAE and some mi6 cosplayer with a pee fetish. Dems are now admitting the camel jockeys are ISIS funders cos trump met them but used their intel to strengthen a campaign
>Completely above board
One of the hardy boys gets a raging clue that a Russian lawyer may have handy information and apparently gets an email from a (((((guy)))))) saying she may be linked to the Kremlin but he meets anyway as Dems are meeting foreign governments for info as well. Plus Russia is a US ally now so it's not like red under the bed should be completely acceptable
>Bigger than Watergate
The media has been pushing this can't trust Russians or Trumps everything they say is a lie narrative for 2 years now they're running with a he said she said story where they've told you both sides are lying. No wonder no one trust the media they've become that spotty prick every school had who started shit grassed everyone up and had an uncle who worked for Nintendo or is media just where those troglodytes end up?

>>133230421
>>133231422
>>133236519
>>133227025
>>133227769

see

>>133238002

Looks like the email was real and the NYT sources were correct, yet again.

>>133227025
you mean the emails he just released himself?

>>133238448
>only 10% of the files copied were released
>cherrypicked by someone after they were copied
>irrefutable
its completely refutable. Bunch of morons not even reading that wordpress analysis, just the shitty blog articles written ABOUT the wordpress analysis obvious written by people who didn't read it well in the first place.
These people think they're doing the 'real' journalism but they're jumping from one desperate maybe to another.

>>133238002
I checked Donald Jr's twitter. Looks like the fourth page he posts verbatim confirms that he
1) Thought the meeting was with a Russian government lawyer and not a private citizen
2) Specifically involved gaining sensitive info on Clinton.

How is this exculpatory? He at the very least just incriminated himself on violations of US law regarding political campaigns and foreign nations.

>Donald Trump Jr. met with the Kremlin representative on June 9th, 2016, according to the New York Times. The Kremlin rep had told him in advance that they meeting would be to discuss dirt on Hillary Clinton. Two days before that meeting, on June 7th, Donald Trump said the following during his New Jersey primary victory speech: “I am going to give a major speech on probably Monday of next week and we’re going to be discussing all of the things that have taken place with the Clintons. I think you’re going to find it very informative and very, very interesting” (transcript: Time Magazine). The “Monday” in question would have been June 12th.

No way Trump Sr. didn't know about the meeting.

>>133230003
17 agencies have consensus based on the only evidence being the crowdstrike report handed to the FBI after they were denied access to any servers or the server logs.

You probably are waiting on WMDs in Iraq, aren't you?

>>133239511
>I've got no proof so I guess I'll just jump from an investigation into Russian interference and infer that the Trump campaign funded said hack.

Look at it this way. Russian agents could have hacked the DNC and packaged it all for Don Jr in that meeting and it's still not illegal. Why? Same reason journalists can publish classified information and not do jail time. It's the act of taking those items that's illegal. If you end up with them legally there isn't shit to be done.

>>133238607
You see, he's only pretending to be retarded and peeing his pants is 4D watercoloring.

Does Junior not have a lawyer? Who would advise him to tweet that?

>>133239820
It's not exculpatory, they're just trying to pretend it is. They know that they're boned so they're posting something that proves they're boned and telling everyone it proves the opposite. Stupid people will eat it up.

>>133233115
Is Warren Flood a real person or just a pseudonym used by the DNC for registering software products?

What location did Warren Flood work from? Were pc with registered software moved from location to location?

Who are the people that worked closely with Warren Flood, that would have access to his log in info?

>>133227025
I called CNN news tip line and offered to tell them my story about how Trump would let me play free Golf if I let him smell my asshole.

I was surprised how much credibility and respect they gave me.

>>133239820
Care to post the statue in question? Unless they commissioned the gathering of that Intel, which from the contents of the email they very clearly did not, then there isn't shit.

Unethical?
Absolutely. But it's par for the course in politics.
Illegal?
Doesn't look like it.

>>133227813
>Russian Spying
Did she say "Hi I am a Russian Spy with knowledge gained from illegal espionage that can hurt the Clinton Campaign"?

Did she actually have knowledge gained from illegal espionage? Was she also representing the Russian Government? Was that information provided to Trump jr.?

>>133240012

The DNI report was based on 4 agencies' investigation, much of which is still classified

>Trots out the most desperate of Anti-Intelligence Community talking points

Was wondering who would bring that canard to the table, congratulations.

The office of the DNI was specifically founded on the basis of how Intelligence from the 17 IC organizations was mishandled and misrepresented by the Bush Administration as it relates to the events of 9/11, now you will use events tied to that to shit on the DNI itself? Have fun.

>>133230003
Okay, so when do you get to the part where the DNC has blocked any effort from any agency to see the actual servers, and everything relies on a report from a private company, paid by the DNC?

Sounds like a front page story to me.

3 people told us about an email they have heard about

>>133240915
Not going to happen

>>133240035
Some forms of info obtained by journalists would be illegal if there weren't specific 1st amendment protections for confidentiality. This is why the US government wants Assange back in the USA because they think they can prove an espionage case in relation to the Manning leak.

Don jr has no right to invoke confidentiality. Nor is he protected by executive priv. If his dad ever pardoned him, he then couldn't invoke the 5th. In addition, he can be prosecuted even if Congress refuses to impeach his dad. So lol.

>>133240844
This this and this.
And unless the Trump campaign commissioned it, there's nothing. Especially since we know the entire thing was set in place by DNC operatives looking to push exactly this message.

>>133234044
So maybe this was set up by the RNC in hopes that Obama's gang would unmask them, proving a 4th Amend violation before Trump took office?

>>133240888
Are you staying that the organizations that brought us into the Iraq war based on false Intelligence wouldn't lie again?

>>133238448
podesta himself hired seth rich? wowza...wow. nothing to see here and im so sleepy now. fuck. the sleep bug bit me. shit.

File: Goldstone email 88d12b33-41ad-4a78-b3ae-ba627ea4eebc.png (174KB, 793x275px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 793x275px

>>133240051
he was pre-empting NYT, who was about to publish them

>>133240844
>>133240928
>3 people told us about an email they have heard about
well 4 if you include him

>the crown prosecutor of Russia offered to provide the Trump campaign with official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia
>obviously very high level and sensitive information
>is part of Russia and its government's support for Mr. Trump
>I can send this info to your father but it is ultra sensitive

>>133226952
You know nothing is going to happen from this?

Zip, 0, nothing.

It's a punchline now .

>>133240035

It is not illegal to work with Russians, it is illegal to work with any foreign nation in directly influencing US elections and/or working as an agent to influence US politics without declaring that you are a foreign agent. Its why Flynn's lies got him in hot water.

Have these things been definitively proven for multiple notable Trump team members? No, but they are currently under investigation.

>>133241175
>Prove
They can't prove shit and they don't have to because muh Patriot act. Assange is just inconvenient which is why the UK still threatens to arrest him even though all the bogus charges were dropped.

Those protections for publishing classified documents still apply. The crime is mishandling classified documents, not having them without clearance. Basically the person that leaked or hacked is in trouble. Not the person that obtains them.
Was deep throat sent to prison?

>>133226952
Literally no crime was committed. If this was a crime then Clinton should be under investigation as well for this: http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446

The only people that believe this Russia BS are people who don't matter in the 1st place. People like you leftist cucks. MSM doesn't even believe their BS & you think that the people who got him into office will? You have got to be a share blue shill.

>>133240928
Lol
>b-but the NYT fabricated the emails
>Don jr posts the emails and confirms the meat of story is true.
>Wow NYT is fake news!
Kek

>>133241528
Deep throats identity wasn't officially confirmed until sometime in the 2000s.

Part of me wishes they will try to impeach him, or do something incredibly insane like try to hurt Trump .....

After that 60 million people will probably rise up and give up the political process all at once.

>>133241568
this

>>133241491
>Influence
That word means nothing and those statues only apply to government employees. Jr is not one. If any of that were true, why is nobody in the Clinton camp in jail for the huge donations they got from the Saudi Royal family to the tune of nearly 30 million dollars? I'd say money is influence.

>>133241568
This so much!

This post is full of win and based Kek!

Stay calm and keep MAGA'ing on, fellow pedes!

>>133241796
So he wouldn't have to kill himself. Were any of the wapo journalists involved jailed for their involvement?

>>133241423
So... was this information illegally obtained? If they were documents being provided by the Russian Government then I assume the Russian Government has the authority to release them to whoever they want.

Was there actual information provided?

>>133241583
Shut the fuck up you little fake white baby bitch. Go suck on a fat black cock you little libtard cuckold faggot.

>>133240915

How is that relevant to what I am discussing? Did you mix up your talking points?

>>133241282
>brought us into the Iraq war

That's not how the IC works and either you know that and are being intentionally dishonest or you are an idiot that speaks of things you do not know.

The IC presents its findings to relevant political bodies and the White-House, sometimes with a stance on what the intel means.

The Bush administration twisted these reports and threw the CIA under the bus when it came time to explain why they ignored some intel and magnified the ones that they liked.

The DNI was founded SPECIFICALLY DUE TO THIS.

>>133241866
The Clintons disclosed that money, as required by law.

>>133242104
Anon, who wrote the law?

When do we get the pee pee video?

No doubt it's out there.

>>133241425
>an FBI investigation involving the current president and the kremlin in a complex political collusion scheme would have wrapped up by now if it was going anywhere.
lmao anon how delusional are you
>trumps son, son in law and campaign manager meeting with someone to accept opposition info they believed to be directly from the russian government is nothing and will result in nothing
That delusional i guess

>>133241491
If you're working for your own campaign that's not acting as a foreign agent. You'd have to be working to support Russian interests. Does the fact that Russia preferred Trump to Putin imply that everyone who supported Trump, donated to Trump, worked for the campaign and voted for Trump are Russian agents?

>>133242036
>little white baby bitch
Do you not like white people?

>>133242104
https://transition.fec.gov/pages/brochures/foreign.shtml
>The Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) prohibits any foreign national from contributing, donating or spending funds in connection with any federal, state, or local election in the United States, either directly or indirectly. It is also unlawful to help foreign nationals violate that ban or to solicit, receive or accept contributions or donations from them. Persons who knowingly and willfully engage in these activities may be subject to fines and/or imprisonment.

>She admits to committing a crime so it's not illegal

>>133233281
But, actually, she didn't lie about any of those things. Do you know what constitutes "lying"?

Treason.

>>133242192
Who wrote the tax law for non-profits and who wrote the FECA and its auxillary acts? Is that what you're asking?

>>133242299
Only the baby bitches who bitch about fake news all day.

>>133242053
Yeah, the CIA wuz good bois. They dindu nuffin.
You know we're talking about an organization that funds terror groups, runs illegal blacksites where they torture people, runs drug(and likely human) trafficking in several countries, overthrows democratically elected governments, illegally spies on US Citizens and stuff, right?

>>133242017
I don't think it even matters. He was willing and eager to accept it.

Even if there wasn't, Trump & sons have been going out of their way to label this as bullshit since the election when it clearly isn't. How can anyone with a brain believe that Trump fired Comey for legitimate reasons now?

how could Kushner not disclose this on his clearance forms? It's one thing to forget and revise but he now was clearly just lying about it considering he was cc'd these emails.

and that's just going off of public info. We don't know what happened at that meeting or any subsequent communications, all we have is the word of a proven liar admitting to it being a conversation about sanctions at best.

>>133242431
Donations to a non-profit arn't legally considered to be donations to a campaign. Anyway, put her in jail if she committed a crime, anon. Fine by me.

The topic of this thread is what Don jr did and I don't see how the acts of a sad old lady are relevant to him unless you are the kind of person that drunk drives because 'other people get away with it.'

File: jew.gif (776KB, 450x450px) Image search: [Google]

776KB, 450x450px

Good Goys. Good Goys. Stay distracted. Pay no attention to the Clinton emails or other issues. Good Goys.

>>133243228
>intelligence agencies cannot be trusted
>the media cannot be trusted
>only Donald Trump, the man proven to be a constant liar and man without any real guiding principles other than personal profit, revenge, and popularity can be trusted
Where does it end, anon?

>>133226952
(((Goldstone)))

>>133243277
Any reason to fire Comey is a legitimate reason. He served at the pleasure of the Attorney General, whose boss is the President.
Obstruction doesn't hold up. It's not like Comey was the only person keeping the investigation open and firing him has done nothing to hinder the investigation.
Every single person on both sides of this are proven liars. The CIA are proven liars. The NSA are proven liars. The Clintons are proven liars. The NYT, Washington Post, and CNN are proven liars.
You've lied before, I've lied before.
And we know that there was no dirt because no dirt got released. Why go through the trouble of acquiring "incriminating info" on Hillary and never release it?

>official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia
Is this even a bad thing? Yet again it draws attention to Hillary's dodgy dealings and makes me wonder what the incriminating information might have been.

>>133243505
Why are you fucking shills still talking about Hillary Clinton every moment of every day
>if you pay attention to whats actually happening with the actual president you're playing into the jews hand
Sounds like something the REAL jews would say, anon.
... Hey /pol/ watcha doin?

File: 1407956140562.jpg (121KB, 400x546px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 400x546px

>>133228196
thank you Nordchan

>>133243505
Trump controls the DOJ and Sessions could appoint a special investigator for Clinton if he wanted. Why not email the Whitehouse and ask them to do that rather than meming the thread?

>>133243719

With his dick in their eyesocket and them asking for more.

>>133243277

You are literally blaming an organization for an event where they were wrongfully thrown under the bus and the suggestion of the judiciary was that to prevent it from happening again they should form the DNI to make sure that they could not be thrown under the bus again.

That's akin to someone saying that the Firefighters in their area are corrupt and ineffective because a decade before the Fire Department was founded in your city your house burned down and they decided to build the Fire Department in response to your house burning down.

It's the worst sort of circular bullshit (((logic)).

File: 1494019585017.gif (3MB, 377x372px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 377x372px

>>133243411
The point is that they had this information (which it turns out they didn't have) before every contacting jr. So they clearly did not commission it. Another part of the feca act allows for voluntary action by those individuals.

>Generally, an individual may volunteer personal services to a federalcandidate or federal political committee without making a contribution. The Act provides this volunteer "exemption" as long as the individual performing the service is not compensated by anyone.11 CFR 100.74. The Commission has addressed applicability of this exemption to volunteer activity by a foreign national, as explained below

>Have a meeting with somebody that says they'll give you dirt
>Take the meeting
>They have no dirt
>Leave and give them nothing
Again you've got nothing.

File: IMG_20170711_092150.jpg (170KB, 1242x1276px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 1242x1276px

There's always another punchline...

>>133243981
So basically you follow links with
1) a html code individualized to the current thread
2) to a foreign website that can track your IP if you arn't a proxy fag and cross reference the thread
3) the current thread has info about your typing style and political preferences
4) /pol/ is known for being data mined heavily by political groups and foreign govs.

Hmmm. Thanks indeed nordposter.

>>133243719
When did I say I trust Donald Trump?
You're the one swallowing manufactured narratives about "MUH RUSSIA HACKED THE ELECTION". Even Obama said only an idiot would think this was possible.

You do realize that if everything you think is true, you're basically saying Trump and the Russians colluded to gain access to private documents on the DNC servers, which were then released to the public, and that influenced enough people to vote Trump over Hillary to swing the election.

So you are saying that by exposing the truth about the DNC and their corrupt, shady, and illegal dealings they changed the outcome of the election. This is fundamentally an improvable claim, first of all. You can't measure the number of votes switched. Second of all, you're saying that transparency in Politics is a bad thing and the government should imprison people who expose politics for what it really is even when Obama promised to increase transparency in government.

There is no story here. Even if what you believe is all true, you're basically saying Russia told us the truth about Democrats. How is that a problem?

>>133243828
Trump admitted to firing him to squash the investigation. That's literally the only reason he couldn't legally fire him.

>Kremlin connected
>Ties to the Kremlin

I'm fucking sick of this shit.

SOUNDS LIKE GREMLIN SO SCARY

I went to the White House on a field trip when I was 13. Do I have "ties to the White House?"

>>133226952

Why did this take a year to come out? It's like someone sat on it or was digging through everything they could view with a SAP until they found something.

>>133243828
>Any reason to fire Comey is a legitimate reason.
No. Firing people investigating him was why Nixon got impeached. He can do it, obviously, because he did, but that does not make it legitimate.

>It's not like Comey was the only person keeping the investigation open
correct

>and firing him has done nothing to hinder the investigation.
False. You don't know what the ramifications were.

>Every single person on both sides of this are proven liars.
So you agree that you can't take his word for it that nothing happened in the meeting? Ok

>And we know that there was no dirt because no dirt got released.
Are you fuckin kidding me? 1) Not even close to true, 2) like I said, and which you did not disagree with, I don't think it matters because he was willing to. His description of the meeting is being disappointed with her trying to get something too valuable in return (Magnitsky sanctions)

>>133244446
>Proof. But it proves there was no crime.

>>133244795
the whole story seems to have come out because Kushner had to revise his clearance forms and include this meeting

>>133244726

No he didn't.

>>133244355
>Look, officer, I thought you were a drug dealer but now I see these drugs are fake. No drugs, no crime. AM I FREE TO GO?

>>133244618
Archiv.is is not individual to the thread. The point is to remove ad revenue from shills that post their dumb ass articles on one of the most popular websites on the internet.

You think I care that they know I shitpost? I'm a phone poster anyway. No fucks given.

>>133244618
I don't think you're polled for your political preferences or asked for a writing sample on that right wing archiving site.

>>133245019
Damn, you got us. If only there were video evidence of Trump explaining his reasoning for firing Comey.

Ironic that NYT are not focusing on how dirty Clinton is in those emails.

Its like punishing a whistleblower.

File: 1466217432640.jpg (86KB, 642x554px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 642x554px

>>133226952
>Russia providing the American people with the transparency that Obama promised

HItlary was teasing another Cold War, of course they didn't want her to win

>>133226952

what was illegal? Someone offered Don Jr. information that Hillary Clinton was corrupt, a criminal, or a Russian agent.

He got offered info by a whistleblower.

Has anyone ever explained why Putin, former KGB officer during the tense cold war era, and Head of state for Russia, a rival of the USA, would ever reveal to any American, no matter how much they suck Putins cock, any information Russia has on a potnetial and likely USA President? Im not a spy or President but I know damn well i would sit on the info and use it for real leverage if she had won. I would use it for leverage to get sanctions lifted so my people could improve their standard of living and could use USA banking again, for example, or use it to force the USA to, lets say, do NOTHING when i annexed Crimea or proxy war in ukraine. Thats what i would do. I bet putin is even shrewder than i am though. but its close desu.

File: 1493334960917.png (131KB, 737x601px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 737x601px

>>133245040
What a terrible analogy.

>It's illegal to take foreign money or pay foreign Nationals for services in an election unless said national has a green card
>Meet with this person about some Intel
>Make no promise of payment
>Get to meeting and they have nothing to offer
>Leave and don't give them anything
Reach for more straws my dude.

For reference, you could sit down with an undercover officer with the intention of buying drugs from them but there's no crime until money changes hands.

Cope harder

File: lead_960.jpg (159KB, 960x645px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 960x645px

welp ride's over, it was fun lads... i was going to bin the cnn but now im a subscriber for thriving new york times

>>133244821
He said he fired Comey for his errors in the Clinton investigation. He shouldn't have usurped the role of the DoJ when Loretta Lynch got busted for colluding with Bill on the Tarmac in Phoenix. That decision should have been left to a Special Prosecutor.

File: IMG_7276.jpg (191KB, 790x952px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 790x952px

So. He's not elected to anything.

>>133245091
No doubt it denies the main website of views.
But the bot is generating the link. Not you. And that's how it can build individual profiles over multiple threads.

>>133245040
But she didnt even have fake news (drugs). There was no exchange at all. this is called a nothingburger.

>>133245640
I guess we will have to wait and see, anon.

>>133245436
>Im not a spy or President
then stfu. you know fuckall about how any of this works. sit the fuck down.

>>133245528
>Profile
What identifying information do you think comes through the open api 4chan provides? It's literally just your post content. Everything you can see publicly if what the bot pulls. It just looks for certain link domains, throws it at an archive and does an automated response with the new link. Nothing nefarious.

>>133245528
Your data is mined by Facebook, Youtube, Amazon, fucking Pornhub etc too. Your data is mined by your cell company and credit card company too.
The market for that data is almost exclusively advertisers who want to sell you shit. Not much else can be done with it.