Is Breitbart trustworthy?

>>133182202
It's propaganda.

>>133182202
>kikebart

>>133182202
It's among the outlets worth considering.

>>133182202
no, you fucking idiot

>>133182202
no its fake news

File: breitbart.jpg (36KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 800x533px

>>133182202
>Andrew Breitbart was a researcher for and close friend of Arianna Huffington, and he helped create an early version of The Huffington Post.

What the fuck?

>>133182202
No modern media outlet is

>>133182764
He was also Drudge's assistant before creating Breitbart.

And then the government assassinated him, leading Steve Bannon to take over.

Must have been quite the guy.

>>133182202
>pirpfort

>>133182971
How do you create both Huffington Post, and Breitbart?

Incredibly mediocre, incredibly sensationalist, incredibly biased. Not worth the time. People make fun of CNN but it's 10x more neutral than breitbart

>>133182202
Hell no....their main headline has a group posting there on Disqus to spread division. Caught them numerous times.

>>133183155

huffpo was originally just supposed to be a news site

>>133183155
I forget the history of Ariana Huffington, but I seem to recall it's slightly interesting, and that's where I would start my journey.

Beyond that, I'd say it's a sign Andrew is a guy with a keen mind for the power of media. Or if you prefer Jew playing both sides as usual. *shrug*

>>133182202
No they are a bunch of controlled opposition kikes.

>>133182202
Yes

They are obviously right-leaning, but they don't make up shit like the MSM does

>>133183539
lol reddit.

>>133183539
They use anonymous sources and some of the writers work for the FBI look up Brandon Darby.

It's nickname is ClickBart for a reason

>>133182202
Same as said above, heavy lean to the right but is far more trustworthy than any cable tv network.

File: 1464026958902.jpg (59KB, 655x527px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 655x527px

>>133182202
Relatively, no media is ever completely trustworthy.

>>133183862
/pol/ is the only trustworthy news source desu

>>133182764

He got redpilled? Same way Mcinnes co-founded Vice

>>133182202
If you want a right leaning media source try Newsmax. I think Breitbart is right propaganda with some true news.

>>133183227
>news is good if it's unbiased
what matters is the RIGHT bias

>>133182202
Is any news trustworthy anymore?

And there you have it folks! /thread

File: Truth.png (303KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

303KB, 1080x1920px

>>133182202
no
they fired a journalist just for telling the truth.
fuck kikebart

>>133183742
I've heard people call it BreitFart

>>133182202
YES.

BB is not a great as it could be, but it's better than than bullshit MSM corporate news (CNN, MSNBC, FOX, etc)

It's acutally moved more to the middle right that it was under Steve Bannon.

Lee Stranhan has done many a periscope on this.

Breitbart isn't even asking real questions about re: the DNC servers, Crowdstrike which would blow open the facade that muh Russia hacked the DNC, podesta, etc (Nor are they reporting on Seth Rich of course)

>>133182202
On certain stuff. If it is partisan and a conspiracy piece than probably no.

No, but they aren't any worse than anyone else. Breitbart rarely prints lies, but the facts are sandwiched between heavy-handed editorials. There's no such thing as an unbiased media outlet. The value of journalism comes from being able to think critically about the pieces and separate the factual wheat from the editorialized chaff. Most people are incapable or unwilling of truly critical thinking though and will instead attach themselves to one outlet when instead they should be reading opposing outlets to compare.

>>133182202
No it's biased bullshit.

But I still read it from time to time to get a wider perspective, just like I read CNN.

>>133182202
It's really just an news aggregate. Half the stuff it posts, it has the links to the original article. The thing leftists don't like is that Breitbart puts its own right wing spin on the story.

>>133182202
Is a political advocacy website trustworthy? No.

>>133183384
top. fucking. kek.

File: 1499225990403.jpg (876KB, 1060x1580px) Image search: [Google]

876KB, 1060x1580px

>>133182202
No.

>>133183227
Cnn neutral BAHAHAHAHAHA you must be retarded

I watched a video recently where the host said that trusting organizations is for idiots because they have dozens of different writers with different viewpoints. The key is to find the writers that hate something so you know you when you read them, if they hate it it's probably normal and if they actually like the thing they normally hate it must be really fucking good.

Of course not. You don't have to disagree to know that. It's the huff post of the right.

>>133182202
watch cspan or something if you want actual news. anything else is heavily biased

>>133182764
there's a speech somewhere on youtube he gave where he described his conversion process from liberal to conservative.

>>133183437
he got killed. At some point, people need to stop and think things through when they accuse everyone halfway decent of being "controlled opposition".
If he was controlled opposition, he was very dedicated to his job.

>>133188927
I'd like to see it if someone could post a link?

>>133182202
Yes, its one of the only sources of Real News™ left.

Hey right wingers, can we make an agreement? I will stop taking huffpo, buzzfeed, and ANY other lefty org seriously if you just for once stop taking breitbart seriously and read a few other sources. Deal?

>>133189420
You have to go back.

Obviously it is biased, but in general when MSM says ''A'' and Breitbart says ''B'' it's a safe shot to believe them. On any other info just take it with a grain of salt and try to see what other media says on the subject

>>133184458
At least she said you're.

>>133182202
No. These days it is on some schizophrenic bend - Trump is good because America first
Liberals are bad because of questionable loyalty to Israel.

>>133182202
Jewish controlled opposition.

That doesn't mean they won't tell you the truth, just that they will push some truths and ignore others. Exactly what controlled opposition does.

I just put myself in the jews position, if i controlled much of the worlds infrastructure destroying all opposition is not a smart move, but having someone under your control pretend to be take contrary positions is great method for weakening opposition and causing people like you, right now to waste time trying to figure out if they are honest or not.

it is a jew operation, you won't get anything from them that actually harms the jewish position of control.

>>133182202
It's rightwing newsporn and claims to be nothing more than that so yes, you can trust them to be exactly that.
If a news source is claiming to be objective and unbiased, avoid it like the plague.

>>133187965
I didn't say it's neutral. I said it's neutral relative to breitbart.

>>133189508

not until I "bluepill" some more ignorant racist inbred idiots ^_^

>>133189976
>I said it's neutral relative to breitbart.
Thats not saying much though because Brietbart declares themselves rightwing while CNN declares themselves objective. JewNN my friend.

>>133190304
>CIRCUMCISED NEWS NETWORK

>>133182202
It's a hogwash site. It's the rights buzzfeed, if you will.

>>133182202

Dropped them after they fired the reporter for dropping islam truth

>Is (((Media outlet))) trustworthy?
No (((media outlet))) is trustworthy.

File: 1499411563751.jpg (59KB, 552x774px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 552x774px

>>133182202
More than CNN.

no, it was always fake zionist news. then it got compromised in 2015-2016. it has been shit ever since and won't be around much longer. you can only live off a dead zionist kike's name for so long before your own fake news catches up to you...i own you

>>133191536
The zionism is the big clue. No one can support israel and claim to be truthful, israel doesn't even exist it is merely occupied palestinian land.

File: trump merch.png (247KB, 1093x549px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 1093x549px

>>133182202
breitbart is so biased they even have trump merch. but at least they don't try to hide it like other organizations

>>133182202
(((Breitbart)))

>>133182764
He created Huff Post after he was conservative. His philosophy was that everyone should show their full bias. He told Arianna that he would gladly help her because if the world knew what lefties thought, it would make the right win. Apparently she called him a few weeks later and said, I think you're right.
Breitbart is interesting site. it is fully partisan. In someways there is more honesty that way. But if you don't understand what they are doing, it could be misconstrued.

>>133182764
>Arianna Huffington

She use to be republican.

Andrew Breitbart did help create Huff Po. He talks about it in his book. The idea, at least for him, was to help give the left enough rope to hang themselves with. It worked. Breitbart was an evil genius. As for the website current trustworthiness, that's pretty much gone. Bannon stepped away to go work for Trump, and unfortunately the current editor doesn't have the spine to call out the President's occasional bad decisions or stand up to the left. Some of their best people have left because what Breitbart is becoming.

Fuck no, and all you idiots who worship "base milo" need to understand he's manipulating you and is just as corrupt as the sjw he claims to "hate."

So far nobody in this thread has been able to refute one word Breitbart has ever published. Typical.

File: IMG_2965.jpg (132KB, 800x767px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 800x767px

>>133190099
You're the ignorant one. Facts don't fucking lie. Shitskins are subhuman and prone to rape and violence. Don't hide your head in the sand, take the red pill

File: images.jpg (4KB, 259x194px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 259x194px

>>133190304

>>133195579
Wait, fuck. That's replying to the wrong post.

I need to go to bed.

>>133182202
It's a mouthpiece for white nationalist crypto fascists. What do you think?