Defeating the "political LGBT"

>>133152286
line all the faggots up and shoot them, lol you guys act like this is a fucking game of chess

>>133152286
oh no, LGBT people scare me, please make the scary gays go away because it triggers my feelings and violates my widdle snowfwake safe space

aw, you precious little bitch. (bless his heart, i think he has a case of mental retardation.

>>133152286
>I've had the odd homosexual thoughts
fag
>>133152824
i am beyond triggered, how dare you

File: gaybugs.png (166KB, 1008x864px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 1008x864px

>>133152538
Problem is brother, Faggots are an ideology, and we cannot really do this if our sons and daughters are being converted into faggotry at the same time : we would be at war forever

We MUST Fight the ideals of the LGBT and combat the idea that people "cannot control themselves" if we want to lower faggot activity in the long term

I'm not against shooting the WORST perpetrators, but this honestly would need to wait until social attitudes are different before it would be a viable option

we must FIRST start with a culture war

>>133152824
Actually buddy, there's indeed things that gay people cause as problems outside "my fee fees".

I guess I would ask YOU, how do you justify your behavior?

And can you defend your point without sarcasm / jokes?

PLEASE NOT, this is indeed a big tactic of faggots too, resorting to mockery, attacks, or jokes : this is because theres no logical argument for it, everything supporting it is an appeal to emotion, authority, or some other fallacy based argument.

File: gaymeth.png (326KB, 414x432px) Image search: [Google]

326KB, 414x432px

>>133153285
I can understand you thinking that, as is shaped by the culture, but this is PART of why the LGBT is so successful

NOT ONLY is it the mainstream LGBT which supports it, but anybody who rejects the idea one can control themselves and their actions

This only ends up CREATING more practicing faggots, as those who struggle with suppressed feelings can find no place to speak about it EXCEPT with LGBT, which then encourages such behavior

This is covered under points 1 and 2 : and these are essential to deal with the problems with faggotry

Remember, all of us have has urges to murder others, but few of us are murderers : so keep this in mind with faggots too, same rule applies.

Pic related : THIS is the problem which is destroying society, not a half second homosexual thought that most people dismiss, similar to people dismissing the urge to steal or kill.

The problem is when people are told they CANNOT stop it, and then lose hope, and fall into the LGBT trap

>>133152824
please respond to the statistics in the graph in the OP.

>>133153285
>>133153364
The Regnerus study was a deliberate, erroneus manipulation of data funded by Christian organizations to make gay people look bad on court with the hopes of denying us adoption and marriage rights. That debunking is only a google search away. The study failed to achieve its aims and the Christian anti-gay movement is further in the fringe than ever. It is weak and impotent and we have won many more battles than you apart from some minor losses in deep states regarding Christians using their religion as a shield from anti-discrimination laws. We have won the war but you can keep fighting these battles in the face of ever-increasing support and tolerance of gays and our rights not to be discriminated against in places of public accommodation, hiring, housing, marriage, and adoption but you will continue to lose 95% of the time because we are defending our own self interest and you are defending your ability to rule over others and one has a much higher burden of proof that faith and scripture alone has failed to meet, time and time again. I suggest moving to Iran for a more favorable outcome against us.

File: DB7WBDKV0AAIzDI.jpg (181KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 1200x1200px

>>133152286
It never ceases to amaze me that men sticking their dicks into each others anuses ,and dressing up like women,is considered "normal" these days.


We all know they're degenerates. We all know they're pedos. Pic related : "8 year old drag queen" being groomed by antifa. Theres also a video of a young boy twerking at a gay pride parade .

>>133152286
Don't let them frame the argument in their view of love.

Keep them talking about Human Physiology and the results of their deviant lifestyles.

I can make homosexuals cringe with proof that anal and oral results in terrible things to the body. No matter how much lube and enemas are used, the rectum will tear (mostly microtears with some fissures). And there is always fecal particles in the rectal cavity; when the tears show up from penile thrusting, fecal matter enters the bloodstream. If semen gets in there, the chemical makeup shuts down some of the immunity functions of that part of the body. So, you end up with feces and semen in your bloodstream for several hours; infecting the body and suppressing the immune system.

There's numerous things at work also, especially cancers, psychological effects, emotional issues, long-term health and safety problems - the list is endless.

>>133154922
Who is this LGB-QT?

>>133154827
>debunk
Which is why you totally cited your source for why its inaccurate, huh faggot?

>tolerance
sorry but faggots are far less tolerant than you act like they are : faggots will try to get you lynched if you disparage their movement.

>defending your ability to rule over others
I'm different than others : I don't care if you have the right to do something, but I should have the right to call you a faggot and call you out for destructive behavior : just like people have the right to drink, and I can call a drunk an alcoholic.

>>133154922
Again, the biggest thing is we MUST normalize the thought that you can resist / control your feelings. This is absolutely essential to reducing this, otherwise anyone who has so much as an urge to be with men in the slightest will turn into a faggot because "well, I can't help it".
I have an idea guys : Lets try trending hashish tag "sexualresponsibility" with posts which indicate having homosexual thoughts, but resisting them for health reasons : Stuff like admitting certain urges but wanting to avoid aids, or keep family strong, ect

I figure if we get a bit of momentum behind this, and tweet this are the right people , we could get momentum going in favor of having less degeneracy, and more responsibility.

So to ANYONE with a twitter, try tweeting a few of these out : Be it usage or porn, homosexuality, or simply not being a whore : try to make it varied with your posts.

>>133156576

>>133156576
Blah im on my phone but a good summation of the academic response to regnerus can be found in a wash post article in the volokh conspiracy series.

I dont care what names you call me as long ad your actions are the same as others and you dont own a business open to the public, an apartment building or another venue where u wish to bully gays.

>88 out of 248 of the respondents that were counted as "Parents are of the same sex" responded that their parents were never in a same sex relationship while they were living with them though they had same sex relationships while they were growing up, ie their parents divorced and they ended up with the straight parent but they were still counted as having parents of the same sex

>>133157146
Source
>http://www.prc.utexas.edu/nfss/documents/NFSS-study-design.pdf
>a. Parents are of the same sex
219 active and 29 withdrawn panelists, from Page 3
>http://www.prc.utexas.edu/nfss/documents/NFSS-codebook.pdf
>S8 Did you ever live with your mother while she was in a romantic relationship with another woman?
40 said no, from Page 4
>S9 Did you ever live with your father while he was in a romantic relationship with another man?
48 said no, from Page 4
Yes, that is the official study results

File: 1499370169260.png (169KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 1200x1200px

>>133152286
Disgusting. Gas all fags now.

>>133152824

This post has aids

>>133157146
Thanks. The study was bullsht funded by an opus dei front group to try to influence the courts. The whole thing was a catholic collusion because if they cant oppress gays than what power does that show god as having. Christian conservative opposition to gays is very weak now and has little influence. Recent surveys show gay marriage support as higher than ever. Germany just adopted it and Australia will likely follow next within a year or two at most. Focus on achievable dreams like border control. Most of us just want love and a family. Im sure you have cherrypicked counter examples but outside of pol nobody thinks one or two articles from the internet of gays turning out to be pedos or kids doing drag or twerking are somehow evidentiary enough to mandate criminalizing homosexuality or taking away our civil rights.

>>133156576
>Again, the biggest thing is we MUST normalize the thought that you can resist / control your feelings.
This is interesting because we all know the left is based on emotions, the "feels", and identity politics . It's being pushed very hard in film/ on tv for a reason. .I doubt it'll be changing anytime soon .


As for changing it? I don't think we can. Honestly I think the best case scenario is having our own ethno state .We can mop up the degenerates/media/politicians/ banks.

>>133157254
they passed their damaged genes to their children, even though they didn't exhibit the behaviors. very sad

File: gayhazard.jpg (63KB, 943x592px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 943x592px

>>133156952
>>133156952
Theres a difference between bullying and asking someone to act responsible

Also, question :do you mean "gays" by people with homosexual urges, or people who act on them?

I've NEVER bullied anyone who was in the closet.

BUT, I've seen countless people with homosexual urges in the closet bullied pretty bad by faggots or faggot supporters.

>>133157653
Doesn't matter who paid for it, matters if its accurate faggot.

>>133155814
Go suck on a tailpipe

>>133157653
>acting like being gay is normal
Hhahahhahahahah... no. You're a degenerate.

File: jesusthatsgay.jpg (48KB, 532x559px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 532x559px

>>133157920
Can't say it can't happen unless you try mate.

I understand how you feel, but mainstream media is being rejected these days : lets capitalize it, push the hashtag "sexualresponsiblity"

>>133157956
Homosexuality is not genetic, its caused by Pavlovian learning which links homosexual acts with sexual pleasure via ones experiences in life. It can be counteracted, but it MUST start with a person trying to be in control

>>133157146
>>133157254
And while I'm taking apart the OP
>Broken households
The study methodology actually doesn't count gay or bisexual father or lesbian or bisexual mother respondents in the single parent group so they aren't dragging down shit. The study carves off those groups from all samples before carving off single parents therefore single parents that were in same sex relationships at any point are counted as LGBT but not counted as single parents.

The study has been autopsied and only actually included children of 2 lesbian couples out of all the LGBT samples. The remaining 246 were labeled as being raised by LGBT parents while either being the children of single parents, being the children of parents who had LGBT affairs, or being the children of heterosexual couples that divorced only for one parent to come out as LGBT, the last group of also includes instances where the child NEVER LIVED WITH THE LGBT PARENT IN AN LGBT RELATIONSHIP which as previously mentioned accounts for over 1/3rd of the children in the gay or bisexual father or lesbian or bisexual mother respondents.

>The sample is faulty
Well, it is. It labels people as having parents of the same sex when they didn't.

>It uses statistics from old studies
It doesn't, you were right. It does however use respondents whose parents were known to be active as LGBTs during a time period when doing so was illegal in many states. But what are the odds society's view of their parent could impact a child's development? You have to keep in mind the study was from 2012 and used respondents aged 18-39. LGBT activities were only legalized in over a dozen states in 2003.

>>133157981
>matters if its accurate faggot.
>built in design error of over 35%

>>133152824
Fags are 19x more likely to die in a car accident than heterosexuals

>>133157981
Denying someone housing or employment solely for their immutable sexuality is bullying. It is illegal in nearly two dozen states for a reason.

The study manipulated data to fit a conclusion they already had in mind. Academics have already repeated analysis of the study excluding erroneous and misleading data and found difference between gays and straights were negligible. Regardless, most judges are intelligent and saw through this religious farce with an agenda as not real science but an attempt to control and deny other people rights. Regnerus has had little positive influence on the courts it was designed to curry favor with.

>being gay is a choice

Having sex is a choice, what you find arousing is not.

>literally worse than single parenting
jesus fucking christ

>>133159325
>believing bullshit you saw on the internet
>especially bullshit that literally tells you it is a lie if you read further

>Some gay people are degenerates so all of them are bad.

By that logic being straight is bad too since there are straight degenerates.

I like cock in my ass


I literally have lost the ability to get turned on by straight porn


What the fuck do you want me to do about it? I wish I was straight so that my parents wouldn't be disappointed but what do I do? Stay closeted to them and they'll forever think I'm just alone?


Of course you think it's just a choice because you wouldn't understand.


Transgenderism is fucking retarded though

>>133159548
fuck off queer

>>133159658
Read the study design and codebook documents, ass-hat.

Gay people are traitors to their fathers, ancestors and the entire human race. Simply put, they're 100% defective humans.

I'd love for these people to have to go back in time to meet their ancestors and explain to them that their legacy will end in some dude's anus or even more degenerately - in a barren inside-out mutilated tranny penis.

These people are [almost] all 100% capable of reproduction and they choose to suck dick and get fucked / fuck another man in the anus. They deserve to be the end of their lineage.

I'm just glad to see things are taking a turn. These people aren't going to end up in camps or gas chambers but at least enough people are starting to wake up to the fact this shit shouldn't be celebrated. Fuck no, you should be ashamed, oppressed and occasionally beaten to death for fucking other dudes in the ass. If I was doing the same faggot shit I'd fully expect it.

I guess faggotwise the biggest reason to not be a fag is to pass on their genes. If you do not reproduce you will literally be the first creature to do so in your specific line going back all the way to the first cell dividing on earth. I doubt any of these fags care about that since they're mostly liberals anyway and just want humans extinct.

File: 1480159682641.jpg (43KB, 680x511px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 680x511px

>>133152286
> (I've had the odd homosexual thoughts, but its entirely different to act on them)

OP is quite literally a faggot.

>>133159866
>What's a brother/sister?

Also sperm banks are a thing

>>133158660
True,there's no harm in pushing back. Online atleast.If you promote these id was n public you will be harassed by the gay mafia.


My best friend was booted out of PTA and told she couldn't come back to school fubctions because she could possibly "make LGTBQIIIII+ kids uncomfortable" . Her crime ? Saying marriage should be between a man and a woman.

Welcome to hell.

>>133159591
did you ever have that ability?

>>133160399
Good on that school! Wasnt that way when I was in school. Even the bigots here just serve to demonstratr life is only getting better and better for gay people.

>>133160410
Yes, when I was a horny teenager

Funny enough, the first porn that I ever watched was gay porn, because I just learned of clearing history so I just typed "penis.com" in the search bar


Maybe that has something to do with me being homosexual


the first sexual thoughts I ever had were about men

File: trannyouting.jpg (599KB, 1280x1522px) Image search: [Google]

599KB, 1280x1522px

>>133159036
>>133159036
Clarity what you are even talking about...

>>133159093
>illegal
Legality =/= morality, and illegality =/= immorality.

>fit a conclusion they already had in mind
So are most studies, the heck is your point?

And you ever consider other poeple re-enacting the study later are fudging it to hide results? LGBT has an immensely huge lobby / political power, and many leaders are criminal rapists / child molesters...so I do not trust them.

>>133159213
Technically true, but you can shape what aroused you.

my ex for instance was on crutches, and so now I have a little thing for girls who are injured. I could make this otherwise if I fit my experiences to make injured girls seem bad, and thus, less sexy

Accepting makes something more likely to be arousing, while rejecting / hating it makes it less likely.

And beyond that, its STILL a choice to take a dick up the ass unless raped : its no different than if a man finds rape erotic, but morally opposes it / rejects such feelings.

>>133159551
Lower rates of degeneracy : you need to examine what common factors are involved in degeneracy, homosexuality, porn, drugs, ect...all factors involved

Straights who wait till marriage for sex, use no porn, drugs, and uphold christian values are virtually unaffected by degeneracy compared to a drug using porn addicted faggot.

>>133159591
My advice to you brother, is abstain : the mind can reset itself over time, and I've been through this myself : being into really nasty porn, going without for a month, and being into much more vanilla stuff

if you give your mind time to reset, things will find their "center" again, but you need to abstain first.

>>133160121
Less of a faggot than people who jerk off to traps =)

You can say I'm a faggot, but I'm not the one sucking dick.

>>133160399
Amen brother, this is why I'm saying to push the hashtag people. Sexualresponsibility. Get it trending, and make people realize they can indeed make choices

>>133160826
okay thanks, I'll try


Should I try to start watching lesbian porn? To try to only associate sexiness with women?

>>133160544
Besides the aids, the rape, the molestation, the homelessness, the drug addiction, the suicide, the cutting, the alcoholism, the mental illness, the family rejection, the anal health problems, the infections, the abuse, the lack of life planning, lack of responsibility, ect....

.....Besidies all those right?

But you cannot really blame those on others those are pretty direct symptoms for being a PRACTICING homosexual (IE, a faggot)

Life has NEVER been bad for men in the closet, and if it has, its because faggots like YOU harass them

You DO NOT want accountability for your actions, your basically a "dindu nuffin" except with buttsex.

See, you people don't give a rats about the quality of life of closet homosexuals : you just want more people for your faggot club.

>>133160826
>Clarity what you are even talking about...
>>133157146
>>133157254

>>133152286
>lvl. 62 dick poking mage

>>133160826
That as the other dude pointed out over a third of survey participants included in the raised by same sex category didnt actually live with a same sex parent growing up. The study measures outcomes of single parent vs married two parent families and of course gay or straight single parents do worse. We wont have actual data in large enough numbers of how kids raised by gay married parents vs straight married parents did until 2030 at the earliest.

>>133161471
Life has always been horrible being stuck in the closet. Plenty of evidence shows gays allowed to marry and be open about their sexuality are happier and healthier.

>>133161429
If you CAN end up getting aroused to it, that might work : I'm honestly not against porn if it makes possitive changes : But one cautionary thing, DO NOT self project yourself as the girl : This will lead to TRANS thoughts, and you DO NOT want those

Instead try and appreciate the female form : the softness, the curves, ect....

Focus on them, and imagine what you could do, prodding with your fingers, exploring, feeling, groping them, ect.

And do not let guilt be a factor : one huge thing is that gay men commonly feel bad about being aggressive / have mommy issues, so sex with women feels immoral : reject those ideas, for now, till you can get comfortable feeling an attraction to women.

>>133161567
Are you trying to say having a lesbian mother, if you live with your straight father would not effect you?

Because you know, who cares if that effects children, we need more rights for people who make their own decisions to not suffer consequences!

>>133161583
>1 third
what about the other 2 thirds?
And again, just because you don't live with them doesn't mean it effect you : I didn't live with my lesbian mother, but she was still in my life dude.

>>133161663
Citation dude.

Also happier does not mean its good : someone smoking meth all day would be happier than someone sober, doesn't mean its good to smoke meth all day

Also, I bet you aren't including shit like abuse / disease rates when you say that

>>133152538
top fucking kek

>>133161583
The 88 respondents aren't aren't gay single parents.

They were divorced straight single or remarried parents that were counted as gay couples.

The remaining 160 samples were also polluted with
>single LGBT parent households (because the "single parent households" were only excluded from the group that remained after the LGBT parent households were excluded into their own groups)
>households where a heterosexual couple remained married and raised the children, but one member of the couple was having an LGBT extramarital affair
>and households where a heterosexual couple divorced and the LGBT parent only received partial custody
to a degree that studies of this study have shown that only 2 of the 248 same sex parent households were actually stable 2 parent households

The study was deeply flawed by design.

>>133152286
you niggers ignore my asking for statistics on no family(orphanage) every single time. theres no excuse for that.

>>133162897
Even with that, would the damage of proximity to LGBT stuff not be a factor? I think it is.

File: God Killing Fags.png (761KB, 996x511px) Image search: [Google]

761KB, 996x511px

LGBTQ = Let God Burn Them Quickly

Burn fags on the stake to get them ready for the fires of Hell.

proof of God killing fags: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DBSIs2bHi5g

Can’t stop having sex with strangers even when in a relationship: http://advindicate.com/articles/3022

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DiqtFAKQHlk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4heEpQh9Zw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ICTsqE4Fjs

Roses are red
Violets are blue
God hates fags
And so should you

Romans 1
26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;
29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,
30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,
31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:
32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.

File: 05b4b44f25f4415ea8a28f4a08c8551a.png (137KB, 1920x1636px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 1920x1636px

>>133152286
>(I don't support genociding them, I think this can be cured)
this is cute as fuck, how do we stop this thing?
you answered your own question. invent a cure and it will sort itself out. but there is none, you only worship the psuedoscience rabble of your peers with your zap factories and prayer groups. Lets be brutally honest, if you wanted to get lgbt people off the left you would accept them but encourage them to act normal in all ways not related to being gay or a faggot. You wont do it because you are our enemies pure and simple, compromise is not an option for you, you must control, kill, and eradicate. You feed the very movements you hate with that black and white thinking.

>>133152286
>Defeating the "political LGBT"

AIDS

Specifically encouraging the new gay fashion for bugchasing and 'gift' giving HIV so faggots can belong to the inner circle of fagness. Traps in particular should be made know they are not proper traps until they have the hiv bug fairydust in them so they can try and give it to drugged up straight guys cos they hate them.

Yes these are all real things and why faggots must not be tolerated. You were warned.

>>133157146
>>133157254
>>133157653
Do you even read? All your criticism is addressed in the picture.

>>133163157
I can't find stats on that, feel free to share.

http://www.pandys.org/articles/lesbiandomesticviolence.html

Stats on lesbians being more violent.

Also, to any homosexuals reading who feel hopeless, remember our feelings tend to sway with what we experience / chose. If you feed the "homosexual dog" in your mind, it will grow stronger. If you want to gain control, you must starve the dog : no porn, no sex, no fantasizing about it. These all keep it normal, and keep the neural pathways wide open.

>>133152286
>parents divorced when I was 4.
>from age 4-12 Mom had a "partner"
>stepped in when my mom was depressed and lost. provided emotional support and convinced mom they were real feelings.
>grew up with two moms never thought there was a problem
>"Partner" was the butch. Strict. Drilled me. Never had freedom. Couldn't be a kid. I was always jumpy and afraid to speak.
>tested into school districts gifted program for high IQ
>finally thought she'd ease up (she had tender moments here and there)
>once i began thinking for myself, she got angrier... meaner... I couldn't be controlled. 11 years old in high school level courses.
>she got meaner to us. fighting with my mother and me constantly.
>started hitting me when I got fed up with bullshit.
>reached out for help - no one believed me
>one day at 12, told her to fuck herself and went at her.
>>thrown across a room into a table

My mother immediately kicked her out, never saw her again, and to this day, denies she was ever gay being married to my wonderful, supportive stepfather.

Gays play fucking games, and one preyed on my mother's moments of weakness from not having a supportive family in her time of need.

Fuck the entire LGBT community and the fuck parades they force down our throats.

>>133162389
>Are you trying to say having a lesbian mother, if you live with your straight father would not effect you?
Are you trying to say that a mother simply being a lesbian would negatively impact the child even in situations where the parents divorced only slightly after the child was born and the child only learned of the mother's sexuality in adulthood?

The answer to that question is not yes or no. It's sometimes. More to the point, the study is used as evidence against the effectiveness of LGBT childrearing. If the lesbian wasn't raising the god damn child you have no fucking business using the child ending up fucked up as evidence against lesbians being able to raise children.

A dishonest person would point out that a bunch of kids removed from their LGBT parents ended up fucked up, so the problem is disallowing LGBT parents from raising their children.

Realistically though the study is just a fucking mess with no conclusions to be drawn because of how badly sorted the family archetypes were.

>>133163769
>Are you trying to say that a mother simply being a lesbian would negatively impact the child even in situations where the parents divorced only slightly after the child was born and the child only learned of the mother's sexuality in adulthood?
Not the case in the study, you obviously didn't even read the image

>>133163217
so you think it is. glad you mentioned that, we can all go home everyone, this person thinks its true so he must have gotten it right.

LGBT
they tied an anchor to themselves when they added the "T"
Transgender issues will face increasing amounts of resistance as its apparent its an ideology that's infiltrating science (biology is not able to just let this one go and maintain itself as a serious field of study) and harming children

Body mutilation in transgender operation, transgender suicide rates, and inclination towards degenerate behavior all stack up against the "T".

When the "T" sinks, the LGB will sink with it- somewhat.

>>133162389
>what about the other 2 thirds?
What about them? If someone came to you with a study about survival rates from peanut allergy reactions, but 1/3rd of the samples were actually gunshot victims that had no peanut allergies whatsoever, would you give that study the time of day?

Acceptable error in a normal study is 5%. This study has a 35% absolute methodological error rate before accounting for other factors, of which there are many.

>>133163660
>feel free to share
why would I share stats I dont have? your entire arguement is flawed. I didnt even know the study was shit and was assuming it was at least half accurate, but the point is if children who are orphaned have worse statistics than gay people, and you straight breeding fags wont adopt them, you are denying them better standards of living just because gay parents aren't perfect. instead of comparing it just to straight people, you need to compare to something called a fucking control group, something the people invovled with didn't give a shit about because the family research council is among the quack jobs that want to destroy evolution in science classrooms and otherwise turn america into a christian theocracy.

Real talk. get some numbers on the rammifications of being an orphan, compare it to the gays, if the gays come out on top, there is no excuse for keeping gay adoption illegal.

>>133163459
enjoy your gift from your gift giver. You'll be special then. All rotting slowly and signed up for doom while you spread death. hiv. all yours

>>133159093
>Denying someone housing or employment solely for their immutable sexuality is bullying. It is illegal in nearly two dozen states for a reason.
Fuck off socialist fag

>>133163648
>All your criticism is addressed in the picture.
Actually none of it was
See
>>133158713

>>133163972
>(biology is not able to just let this one go and maintain itself as a serious field of study)
just because you where asleep in biology along with all the crackpot leftie pronoun people doesn't mean gender isn't a spectrum. every single feature of a living being is a spectrum, sex and gender aren't exceptions you twat monger

>>133164098
Based on the statistics alone, that third that wasn't actually raised by homosexuals is actually improving the average of homosexuals, because straight single parents have a far better score.

It's akin to saying that you have:
Group A (pure) with a 70% score
Group B (1/3 pure and 2/3 rancid) with a 35% score
Chances are the problem is the 2/3 rancid

>>133164170
I dont indulge in hook up culture, so I dont have to worry about aids thanks. And in all other cases I very much enjoy being alive, and muslims aren't knocking on the door of the country I live in.

Step one has to be regaining control of the schools to stop that faggotry from being taught to impressionable children.

The next step after that is to get into elected offices and start cutting off their benefits for any reason you can think up, mire their benefits in bureaucratic red tape, and use CPS to hound them.

Concurrent with that either control or discredit the media so that reports of this happening don't get out.

The communist tactics work, let's use them.

>>133164134
hiv hiv

bugchasing and your gift. all wrapped up.

>>133164301
XX
XY
biological differences are insurmountable

leave the spectrum to wavelengths of light

>>133163474
Aids helps, but only so much if people think they cannot help but be faggot whores

This is why you need to prevent the feelings

Also, homosexuals are more predatory, with a taste for converting heterosexuals : this needs to be stopped too.

>>133163674
Dear lord, sorry you had to go through that brother. I had something similar, I hated when my mother and her lover called me "their" child : I lashed out and said the other woman had nothing to do with me, and wasn't my mother or father.

Glad you eventually got a good family setup

Course, don't be hateful : that only fuels faggots who use this as an excuse to claim martyrdom. Instead, push the hashtag, and the idea that its a CHOICE.

>>133163769
Yes. Children NEED a mother and father figure, to tell them how men work, how women work, and how women work together

2 women means theres no way for a boy to learn from them how men and women work, which can lead to a kid being homosexual or trans very easily, because there's no positive interactions with men and women for the boy to go off of : intact its likely the kid will only see hate for men, which will effect the boy.

As for a girl, she will not have examples of what good men are, and how they should treat her, so theres a good chance she will become a massive whore searching for her "daddy figure"

>kids removed from LGBT end up fucked up
Do you think maybe having them there fucks them up too? Sure, the treatment sucks, but you guys refuse prevention. Its like complaining setting a bone is painful and shouldn't be done, but not examining how much worse it would be having a broken bone.

>>133164511
repeating a meme only crazy shitheads are involved with doesn't mean I'm among them.

>>133162389
Google happier married gay. You can do it. If 1/3 of your results have to be thrown out than the existing study conclusions are not apt.

>>133164268
I just read your post, and everything you mentioned was already addressed in the pic.

>>133164379
>I dont indulge in hook up culture
thats the thing. you don't have to. just whoever you catch it from has to. Nothing speaks of the utter degeneracy of lgbt more than giftgiving.

>>133164628
>durr what are mutations on DNA
Great the right is so fucking stupid they don't even understand what an X and Y is made of, let alone how simple mutations can completely fuck how they interact with a body, and nevermind that the mother's imperfect womb and her own genes are another vector.

god damn this is basic shit.
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/924996-overview

>>133163830
>you obviously didn't even read the image
I read the study, dipshit. The image gets some shit just factually wrong about the study methodology itself. For instance, as previously addressed, the study starts with a pool of all respondents, carves off one LGBT parent into one group a piece, then carves off single parent households from the remainder that includes single parent and intact bio families, thus leaving in all LGBT single parents in the LGBT groups, so the LGBT get drug down by single parents, but not vice versa, despite what the OP's pic claims.
>Kids raised by homosexual and bisexual parents.
They weren't 35% of the time despite what the study would have you believe. Stopped reading there.

>>133164646
BUT BUT i LOOOOVE YOU ANON SO i GAVE YOU the gift SO WE CAN BE TOGETHER

Enjoy your aids from some demented faggit

>>133164678
>dating a cheater
lol okay.
you're more likely to get aids than me, from banging your coalburner

>>133164629
>I can't think of anything so i'll just ignore the dissenting evidence.
yeah okay, glad you made it clear you only care about the evidence in so much as it helps you. you never gave a shit at all. you grabbed anything that looked like it would help against something you decided was your enemy from the very beginning

>>133164841
That 35% where the homosexual parent wasn't the main parent (still probably was on weekends) actually improved the average of the homosexual category

Explained here:
"It's akin to saying that you have:
Group A (pure) with a 70% score
Group B (1/3 pure and 2/3 rancid) with a 35% score
Chances are the problem is the 2/3 rancid"

So if anything, homosexuals are even worse than the study claims

>>133152538
Anyone can be a fag anon, you can't genocide it.

>>133165024
repeating something doesn't make it true. this is science not armchair psychology

>>133152286
Let them be.

Never interrupt an enemy while they're making a mistake.

>>133165424
It's basic mathematics, the "fault" that you found with the study logically helps the homosexual score, it doesn't hurt it.

The study conclusively proves that homosexual parents are terrible.

>>133165302
not just that, but being a faggot is part of being trans, Ie its a mutation, so even if you could genocide all the gays, you couldn;t genocide all the gay recessive traits, which will inevitably result in more gays, especially when they must socially breed to preserve the white race.

>>133165516
you can't use the study itself to say that the homosexual scores lower, and then say that because they score lower, the stuff we added doesn't count. you need two studies. This is how science works nigger. improve or get the fuck out of the way.

>>133164098
>gunshot wounds

Irrelivant, a better comparison would be if 1/3rd was infact only TRACE amounts of allergies, like M&M's being produced in a place working with peanuts, giving someone with a peanut allergy problems. Maybe that just shows the allergy is VERY severe.

Again, the only way you can think the way you do is if you think things only effect a child if they LIVE with it : so a little girl being anally raped has no effect unless she LIVES with the rapist. Is that your logic?

>>133164134
>I don't have stats
Then why the fuck are you on about orphans? You complain I don't show stats, but don't show them either, your worse than myself : you are a hyporcrit, complaining for something not being there when you dont try to provide it.

Your argument is also fallacious : you argue if being with gay parents is LESS damaging than being an orphan, that gay parents ARENT damaging : this is entirely ignoring the higher damage rates

We are looking for what is IDEAL, and LGBT parents are NOT ideal..

Also, by your logic, if beating up gays prevents gay murder, then beating up gays is ok.

>>133164301
OP here, I admit genders a spectrum, but this doesn't mean you cannot MOVE YOURSELF AROUND on the spectrum, and it doesn't mean certain areas in the spectrum are healthier.

Why should we promote men being on the female end of the spectrum, or women on the male side?

Is there ANY benefits to outweigh the costs?

>>133164633
They are MASSIVELY disproportionately involved with aids

most people with aids are gay, and gays are less than 5% of the country....let that sink in

>>133164809
hermaphrodites are extremely rare, and an anomaly.

Also, you need proof on an individual basis per person that someone INDEED has a genetic difference or chromosome problem, but you fags would hate a study of this, as it would show most trans do not have chromasone issues.

>>133165302
Being a fag is a choice : nobody is forced to take it up the ass unless its rape.

These threads are why I always carry a gun. I do some pretty degenerate shit with consenting adults behind closed doors. I don't talk about it with random-ass people, I don't bother with Pride parades, and I pay my fucking taxes.

Fuck with me the way you people are LARPing, however, and I will put you in the ground.

File: explained graphically 2.png (18KB, 865x409px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 865x409px

>>133165685
It's pretty damn obvious that homosexuals score lower...

>>133164388
These all sound like great ideas. I will let the 1950s know.

>>133164351
>because straight single parents have a far better score.
See
>>133162897
The study doesn't compare stable LGBT two parent homes with stable heterosexual two parent homes, but pretends to do so.

When 99.2% of a dataset is pollution, no shit the study is fucked. The only thing polluting the intact bio pool are heterosexual affairs not resulting in divorce.

Oh, and 51.8% of the "single parent households" actually had parents that remarried while they were growing up. The single parent household respondents are only those that EVER lived with ONLY ONE BIOLOGICAL PARENT due to death, divorce, military service, separation, or any other reason between the ages of 0 and 18. A remaining 8.6% lived with their parent's lover while their parent wasn't married to them.

Your mommy died in a car wreck the day before your 18th birthday? Single parent household. Daddy off fighting in Desert Storm? Single parent household. Mommy died in childbirth and daddy remarried before your first birthday? Single parent household.

I can't stress this enough. THE STUDY IS BULLSHIT.

>>133166256
Russia, China and the whole Muslim world is anti-LGBT
Barely above 50% of the Western world is pro-LGBT and rapidly changing

You are delusional if you think the year means anything

>>133165528
>mutation
citation needed that ALL fags and trans are mutations

>>133166020
Thanks for clearing this up.

>>133166111
OP here. I don't support the idea of lynching, but I think you should indeed be held accountable, and should be aware of the damage you could be doing to yourself and others

Consent doesn't necessarily make things right, people could "consent" to being cannibalized, being pimped out for meth, ect : this doesn't mean this is right.

>>133166034
>Again, the only way you can think the way you do is if you think things only effect a child if they LIVE with it : so a little girl being anally raped has no effect unless she LIVES with the rapist.
Are you equating 1 rape with 18 years of rape in terms of developmental impact?

>>133166379
The arrangement is pretty simple (see: >>133166137) and can be conclusively drawn that homosexual parents are worse than straight parents.

It's nowhere near as complicated or faulty as you make it.

>>133166137
>muh obvious
dipshit. its litterally circular arguement. TWO studies, if you're right, you'll be right. if you aren't, you wont be. but if you are so confident, just write two god damn studies where it proves what you are saying. stop jizzing all over someone who couldn't even do their own math to prove their point. this isn't how science works, you make the claim, you do the work and you check that work.

wont change my point of view. I'm still waiting on >>133164134
because until that is shown the numbers are fucking meaningless anyway.

>Then why the fuck are you on about orphans?
because you are saying gays should not adopt. in order to adopt, there must be orphans you stupid fucking shit, and if you don't adopt, they STAY orphans you stupid fucking shit. and if being an orphan sucks and being with gay parents is better, then it is criminal to keep gays from adopting. pure and simple you dumb nigger.

>>133166387
Change has been the most rapid of any civil rights movement in history. It hasnt come to all countries but it certainly has come to the most wealthy and influential.

>>133166034
>We are looking for what is IDEAL, and LGBT parents are NOT ideal..
god you are so fucking stupid. jack off to your ideal all you want. every straight person ever wants their own genes and blood kid, and so do half the gay people. We don't make laws for ideal situations, we use them to help society, and your arguement that gays shouldn't adopt kids because they are worse parents than straight people is meaningless if the actual altnerative is not straight parents but infact no parents.

>>133165024
>still probably was on weekends
No, not on weekends.

Not ever. 35% NEVER LIVED WITH THEIR LGBT PARENT WHILE THAT LGBT PARENT WAS IN A RELATIONSHIP, BUT SAID LGBT PARENT WAS IN A RELATIONSHIP WHILE THEY WERE GROWING UP.

Unless you're saying none of those relationships lasted longer than 5 days.

>>133166256
Things were properly ordered in the 1950s. Your (((current year))) argument isn't going to work.

I can tell you're scared. There's not enough of you marxist faggots to occupy every school board, every city council, every state government office. Normal people outnumber you ten thousand to one. The day of the vote is coming.

>>133166751
Notice how aggressive they get when you debunk their propaganda?

I already conclusively explained how the 88 cases where the main parent is straight actually helps the homosexual score. We know the scores of straight single parents to be statistically significant superior.

>>133166991
>never lived
Protip: when you are the weekend parent, you aren't "living with them".

Also, like explained in the picture, the relationships were notorious, or otherwise they wouldn't have been reported by the children (all the more so since they didn't live with them)

>>133166933
Gays shouldn't adopt children because about half of them are pedophiles. It's very cut and dry. Fuck off with your degeneracy.

>>133167006
Vote for what? Gays occupy more elected offices than ever before. Head of government of Ireland, Luxembourg, and (on the dl) France. You are delusional if you think we are on a trajectory of greater rejection of homosexuals from society at least in majority White countries.

>>133166034
>OP here, I admit genders a spectrum, but this doesn't mean you cannot MOVE YOURSELF AROUND on the spectrum, and it doesn't mean certain areas in the spectrum are healthier.
actually you can do that middle thing, thanks to medicine, thats what makes it a spectrum and not a boolean value. for example, someone born with no working ovaries might take estrogen to supplament her lack of female hormones, of course not all of these mutations are healthy. if only there was some kind of like, agreed upon and well tested method of treatment that is effective at treating the problems.

>promote men or women crossing sides
this is only what jews do, the only promoting we need done is an understanding of actual biology, so when cleetus and you lot encounter someone who didn;t win the genetic lottery you don't lynch them or curb stomp them.

>They are MASSIVELY disproportionately involved with aids
you are SO FUCKING STUPID read, learn to FUCKING Read, its not that hard to read something and figure out what someone is talking about before you open your dumb mouth and insert a million stramen arguements.

>hermaphrodites are extremely rare, and an anomaly.
you already agreed that gender is a spectrum, bitching about the rammifications is starting to make you look fucking schizo.

>Also, you need proof on an individual basis per person that someone INDEED has a genetic difference or chromosome problem,
no see, actually, we don't. because you don't require those things for them, you only require these things for trans people because they offend your fucking fee fees. you can't have your cake and eat it too, YOU have to do those background checking if you want to put your foot down on this, its not us who have to prove it to you when a significan portion of the population doesn't.

you also blatanty ignored the potential vector of the mother, which supercedes many genetic issues, you are so FUCKING stupid you can't even read the whole post.

>>133166379
Would love to see a study of this, pretty sure it would show the kids in that are still fucked, and have elevated rates of being trans.

Also gay adoption is amazingly rare soooo... its hard to study it. But good job trying to throw out the entire study just because one hyper-specific demographic isn't shown.

Also your crap about single parent households makes no sense : I agree that all the things you listed could cause those problems

>>133166569
Don't straw man : I'm saying you cannot DISMISS something because its not "severe enough". Obviously 18 years of rape is worse, but you cannot tell me rape 1 time would have no effects.

>>133166831
Change is because you people use terrorism, bullying, lobbying, and other stuff : you guys don't use truth, you subvert it.

>>133166933
Your counter argument is "You is stupid!"?

Whatever faggot.

>>133167006
Amen. Sometimes things get worse in the future, and were better in the past

You guys cannot just say current year is better "cause current year". This is ignorant as fuck.

>>133167014
Hahaha, very true. I encounted this at a pride event once, a lady tried to get a black guy to beat me up by claiming I was racist when a stat on homosexuals mentioned blacks

Black guy told her I was right, and she got butthurt

was great =)

>>133167014
So redo the study to prove that. Your assertion is not supported by existing evidence. You cant just say well if the study wasnt conducted how it was it would prove my point even more withoiit any actual evidence of that. Another thing I remember reading that over half of the participants in the study were minority so that probably adds to he negative effects of the non-married categories. Again the study mostly compares broken homes to married intact families. It isnt much about sexuality and more about whether a child was raised mostly, somewhat, ir very little to not at all with two parents vs one. If anything it demonstrates the need for gay marriage to encourage gays to remain in stable two parent partnerships for the sake of rearing children.

>>133167369
Citation needed

>>133166507
>durrr cite me a study that all trans and fags are mutations
no dumbass, that burden is on you, because thats how all of biology works. you want to overturn evolution, you better get ready to be slamming the scientific body with evidence. You are absolutely schizo. flailing wildly as you agree to random concessions, erect straman, and by all means make it clear you have no idea what you even believe let alone what constitutes actual scientific research

>>133167692
Gay adoption is not that rare now that it is legal.

>>133167800
It's so simple: You have two groups of broken households. The only difference is that in one group at least 1 parent is homosexual (in 66% of the cases, this is the main parent) and the performance is significantly worse. If you don't understand basic math, too bad for you.

I don't have to redo anything. The study is fine and clear as it is, no matter how much propaganda and strawmen about it you encounter on far-left websites.

>>133167692
>your arguement is your stupid
your arguement is responding to tone? yeah thought so, we're degenerate deadbeat aid poze's but you can't handle being called a moron for acting like one. jesus christ you are a delusional piece of shit.

Russia is extremely homophobic and they have one of the lowest birthrates in the world.
Israel has the highest birthrate in the developed world and it's one of the most pro LGBT countries in the world.

I think it's more to do with leftism. Russia still has the socialist influence. In Israel almost everyone is right wing and even the atheist college graduates start families and have many kids.

>>133168055
No there are differences because the single parent grouo includes families who remarried or one parent left for war or they separated and got back together. Having two vs one parent raising a kid is a significant confounding factor to just looking at the impact of sexuality on child rearing outcomes.

>>133168055
>I don't understand science
yeah okay, good for you, glad we don't have to put up with ancap shit heads in our actual studies that don't understand how measuring things work.

>>133168228
That's simply not true, as you are comparing broken household against broken household. It's clearly explained in the picture. The only difference is, again, that one group of broken households involves homosexuals and performs far worse.

>>133168256
I understand science just fine. Just for curiosity, have you ever taken university-level courses of calculus, probability, mathematical analysis, etc.? I know I did, and maybe that's where your confusion comes from, your inability to grasp mathematical concepts.

>>133167692
>>133167006
nothing dumber than another 1950s fag. you shit heads complain constantly about the 1950s like its some golden year when it was an unsustainable boom period of american history. Its a fucking christmas cactus. it was pretty and produced a lot of great cultural things and plenty of not so great cultural and financial things, and it certainly wasn't a model for society to live by becuase it immediately fell apart with little prodding right after the decade was out.

File: 1355278881.jpg (12KB, 379x113px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 379x113px

>>133164809
you're fact-fitting biology to your spectrum narrative, because you apparently can't read

literally from your link
>chromosomally male individuals

Biology knows it cannot hide from XX and XY sex determination. It cannot be changed. The simple size difference between X and Y chromosomes alone makes the genetic differences between XX and XY sexes insurmountable. Everything that happens afterwards is all made-up classifications and naming.

It's always been ironic to me that clueless transgender-isn't-an-illness brigade individuals like yourself always promote the so-called gender spectrum, whose existence literally depends upon classic stereotypical descriptions of male and female. The gender spectrum is not a real thing. There simply are boys(XY), girls(XX), boys(XY) who wear dresses, boys(XY) with their penises cut off, and so on. Some of these things are significantly more damaging to health than others- XY may be more prone to certain diseases than XX, and those with their penises cut off may be prone more emotional and mental health issues.

Trying to redefine anything from what it is to anything other than what it is is hogwash. Pushing for body mutiliation, degenerate lifestyle, and not treating mental health issues leading to higher suicide rates under the guise of "equality" WILL be rejected publicly. Especially when it also tries to rope in biology, which has nothing to offer but cold science, to fit the narrative.

>>133154922
wtf I love antifa now

>>133168440
see >>133168228
dumb ass. Incase it wasn't clear, I washed my hands of you because you don't understand the complexity of taking demographic studies.

>>133168768
You keep repeating a lie: that "only the group with homosexuals includes broken households (proceeds to list examples of broken households)" whereas there's a control group of broken households that don't have homosexual parents and perform significantly better, conclusively proving that the one variable that lowers performance is homosexuality.

>>133167671
>You can do the middle
You can also inject your face with herion mixed with bleach : doesn't mean its a good idea. Being metrosexual means less confidence, less social acceptance, and other problems.

As for people with legit PHYSICAL problems, sure, treat them, but don't conflate them with trannies who are mentally ill.

>curb stomping gays
I'm against that : I'm for shaming them and calling out behavior which is bad, and is a choice

>YOU STUPID
not an argument faggot. Aids is disproportionately in homosexual communities by a LONG SHOT

Facts don't care about your feelings

>spectrum
Hermaphrodites are an issue of physical organs being different and abnormal : both a penis and vagina

This is not the same as a man whos girly as shit and wants to become a woman.

>you only require these things for trans people because they offend your fucking fee fees
The LGBT claims that trannies are the way they are becuse issues with internal organs. I do not believe this is true. If you want to convice me, find proof this is the case, otherwise I WILL assume its just a mental illness

just like if someone said there was a bug inside their arm crawling around : I want proof, or I'm going to think your psycho.

>>133167831
are you one of those folks who assume pedophiles have no gender preference? Pretty sure people into little boys are also into twinks and traps.

>>133167853
>burden of proof is on you
You are claiming homosexuality / trans is because a biological mutation, and not a mental illness

You have no proof.

Therefore I'm ignoring it, because your making a claim without proof.

>>133168016
This only happened recently, a study will take more time to come out.

Studies take a few years, at least.

>>133168063
No, my issue wasn't about tone, it was your only argument was an insult. Theres no facts behind it. Just a subjective insult having nothing to do with anything

>call me degenerate deadbeat aids pozes
your words not mine faggot.

>>133168317
The guy explained it in his other post that the single parents category includes remarried parents to the tune of nearly 60 percent but you ignore that. This just measures one parent vs two parent families.

File: 976D28CA-69BF-4648-B05D-AFEC590FCF42-5747-000017A24AEC9341.png (145KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 400x400px

>>133152286
Add a P and get a wife, you buffoons!

>>133168931
They perform better because the majority of them remarried. What part of that is unclear?

File: IMG_0096.jpg (41KB, 480x320px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 480x320px

>>133152538
That's what the Jews want us to do, Mr. Breivik.

>>133169198
I do assume if someone is sexually into kids they are not likely looking for adult relationships.

>>133168562
>you're fact-fitting biology to your spectrum narrative, because you apparently can't read
no, thats you dipshit. my beliefs only reflect the science.

>biology knows it cannot hide from xx and xy sex determination it cannot be changed
actually, it can be, and I already linked to a condition that shows it pretty fucking clearly. singe mutations can have very dramatic effects on how a chromosome is expressed you dumb nigger
>Everything that happens afterwards is all made-up classifications and naming.
at least you got that right.

>It's always been ironic to me that clueless transgender-isn't-an-illness brigade
transgender is a mutation, weather or not you want to consider it an illness is fucking irrelevant, there are no biological mutations that are inherently illnesses. they become illnesses becuase they don't have a biological neche, even if you had an illness from a biological trait that caused you to die and not reproduce, this would be an advantage in an overpopulated species that isn't smart enough to not outstrip its resources. nature is fucking merciless and discussing weather something is an illness or part of a spectrum is a false dichotemy, one is an environmental construct and the other is ironclad science.

>whose existence literally depends upon classic stereotypical descriptions of male and female.
no dumbass, those stereotypical features are arbitrary, theyre whats in vogue evolutionarily speaking now, but are not at all definitive of what female or male must be, as you can see by hundreds of unqiue and quirky species who's sexes behave very differently from ours. this is what people mean when they say gender and sex are social constructs (if they aren't retarded science denies, which is a fair chance) .

>>133169322
I didn't ignore him, I explained the errors in his reasoning and he stopped replying. You still haven't understood the methodology of the study, and keep showing it in every one of your posts.

>This just measures one parent vs two parent families
It measures two parent families, broken households (straight), broken households (at least 1 gay, in 66% of the cases this being the main parent)

>>133166507
I'm a Nihilist, moral arguments are irrevelent to me. I don't do anything illegal, nor do I play BDSM games with anybody who does not understand the the full spectrum of what is acceptable for play.

I'm also not trying to weasel my way into an argument that I'm a normal person. I know I'm fucked up, the people I play with are also pretty fucked up in their own ways. Nor am I begging for /pol/'s approval, as I don't really give a fuck what anybody thinks of me.

What I do care about, hovever, is dealing with the legal fallout if any of these cunts on here ever pull their balls out of their purse. I'd rather not have my S&W out of my custody while the authorities determine I legally took a life.

Don't you hate penis

>>133169626
By the way, to further prove my point:

From the other guy:
>"...remarried parents that were counted as gay..."

You just implied that remarrying helped straight scores, yet the guy was saying that they helped gay scores. Hmm...

File: E055239D-B55A-4EB1-B2CE-94C047BB4B7A-5747-000017A3B2918EAB.jpg (123KB, 720x1080px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 720x1080px

>>133152824
I-is that a g-girl? Hold me /pol/! I-I don't want to have a w-wife! I-I want to be a v-virgin forever! Please don't call me a p-pedophile!

>>133152286
How big was the sample size for this study? I can't imagine there are very many adults who have gay parents since it hasn't been socially acceptable for very long.

>>133169626
But it doesnt use the same metric for gay vs broken straight households in that a majority of the broken straight ones are remarried couples.

>>133168562
Because everything you consider male or female is only an amalgamation of the things that worked for the human race during tribal society. The gender spectrum is not a real thing in the sense that it is an idea not a thing, but what it describes is very real, and it doesn't go away just because another fake idea called "two genders" gets memed hard enough. Gender is a spectrum in the scientific theory of evolution describes the traits we consider to be related to sexual dimorphism being granular and variable from person to person. it is a fact of nature. and aspects of it can be changed by medicine, as recounted by trans people who's sexualities changed with the application of hormones their bodies don't naturally produce, to say that these traits cannot be changed even temporarily by humans is bullshit, to say nothing of the enormous effect the mother who has her own genes, that may or may not completely ignore the genes of the person being born.

>trying to redefine a narrow concept invented by cavemen
would not have to happen if you morons weren't so preoccupied with ignoring the contents of your biology class, shilling creationism in schools, and trying to obsfucate the fact that gender and sex like every other fascet of humanity are subject to mutation and change, and that part of your daily lives you will encounter people affected by this. How you will treat them is up to you, the law, and me. And the government rightly recognizes that my right to be safe sane and healthy supercedes your right to lynch, enforce shock therapy, and deny medical attention or other human rights, because it has serious implications for your shitty religion or fee fees.

>>133152286

i'd tell you, but i'm pretty sure you're cucked.

>>133167692
>Also your crap about single parent households makes no sense
No shit it makes no sense. It's the NFSS. The study isn't supposed to make sense.

Literally the only semi appropriately named sample is intact biological family. It is made up entirely of respondents that never weren't living with both their biological parents between the ages of 0 and 18 and who never had either parent have an LGBT affair.

If that sounds like an ideal home life, it turns out it is.

File: IMG_0275.jpg (100KB, 1440x810px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 1440x810px

Gas the Kikes! Pedo Power!

>>133152538
for the politicians we can we burn the to the steak?

>>133152286
Do you want the government to stop you from being gay, Op?

>>133170727
How would you even know who is gay? Maybe you could clip off the 20% most flamboyant gays but there are new gays born every day and plenty would not let it be known they are gay if theu knew their could be violent repercussions and you would never be able to tell that they were.

>>133168228
Why do you not count these as broken households?

And how does this relate to homosexuals?

>>133169476
Having a divorse and getting remarried still causes problems

Also, what is the number on those who got remarried? Doubt it can be high.

And how does this excuse the high problem rate with homosexual parents?

>>133169568
>Because pedophiles cannot be into adults too, for any reason

fuck off

>>133169618
>condition
those are called hermaphrodites, and THOSE are conditions you ARE born with.

>trans is a mutation
what is there proofing all people who are trans have physical mutations???

>male female must be
Its not must, its what they TEND to be

Men tend to be stronger, more facial hair, wider shoulders, bigger hands, ect

women tend to have softer features, wider hips, ect

doesn't mean you cannot find a wide hipped man or a woman with facial hair, but these are rather rare, and abnormal.

>>133169728
Moral arguments are based entirely on what you want to uphold / create in your society.

I don't hate you, to be clear : yes, you are fucked up, I am too a bit : but its more having social responsibility to know what you will be sowing in society

I would even go out on a limb to say you should be protected, as long as 1 : you do not promote these things to outsiders openly, and 2: you do not try and corrupt others with it

I also think it should be outside law entirely, and more a social thing : meaning I can call you a sicko, and you can call me a prude, and thats about it. I think degeneracy would be by and large prevented if stigma was allowed, and even then, people like you could live in peace for the most part, as even with stigma, your life wouldn't be much different.

Is all that about fair to say??

>>133170109
Fair point, but are you saying we cannot study something until its mainstream? Smoking meth isn't mainstream, but we know its bad....

>>133170154
So you think being divorced at all has a negligible effect on a child?

>>133169198
>As for people with legit PHYSICAL problems, sure, treat them, but don't conflate them with trannies who are mentally ill.
having a brain "enriched' by estrogen during natal development is a physical problem you fucking dualist retard. theres no distinction between mind and body when speaking of evolutionary mutation, which is also a part of a long list of why your shock therapy and "repression" therapies are all bunk as fuck.

>I'm against that : I'm for shaming them and calling out behavior which is bad, and is a choice
good for you, We do the same thing to you fags, you may have gathered that this isn't getting either of us anywhere.

>facts don't care about your feelings
which is exactly whey you are stupid, go back and read my posts that guy responded to and tell me why you're wrong to reply with that shit to me. or kill yourself. behaving the way the other guy did as you are now doing in real life is actually a crime, called libel/slander.

>Hermaphrodites are an issue of physical organs being different and abnormal : both a penis and vagina

>This is not the same as a man whos girly as shit and wants to become a woman.
actually it is you moron, because they are both caused by mutations and they are both the same category of mutation; sexual dimorphism related mutations.

>The LGBT claims that trannies are the way they are becuse issues with internal organs. I do not believe this is true. If you want to convice me, find proof this is the case, otherwise I WILL assume its just a mental illness
wow, so stupid you don't know that brains are internal organs. just stop breathing senpai.

>You are claiming homosexuality / trans is because a biological mutation,
I am claiming this,
>mental illness
this is not related to any arguement about science. as I have said some 5 times now you illitearte shit eater.

>Studies take a few years, at least.
glad even your damaged brain can understand something so simple. yet you already have made your conclusions.

>>133169198

>No, my issue wasn't about tone, it was your only argument was an insult.
no, it was the tone, because I have an iron clad arguement that you are ignoring to latch on to the insult about how stupid you are.
which you are.

>>133169618
you know without a doubt in your heart that all those labelled transgender are not experiencing mutation.

>there are no biological mutations that are inherently illnesses
cancer.

literally

READ

your beliefs don't reflect science and those in science are getting sick of the bullshit

File: dau (2).jpg (240KB, 982x654px) Image search: [Google]

240KB, 982x654px

>>133152286

If I my views are considered hard right and I stop homosex, does that make me stop being homo?

I am not really interested in females, I just dont have much use for men anymore either. The idea of a male/male relationship seems silly to me anyways.

I'd think about trying harder to assimilate and make a family if I saw more heteros pulling their weight.

I just think perhaps it would be better if I stay benched. I support families as such, I just dont feel qualified heading one.

On one hand, I feel like a hypocrite not pulling his weight of social responsibility. On the other, many would say I am unfit and so few straights actually bother with 'straight' values anymore anyways.

Its a weird place to be in.

__________

PS- good post OP. You are largely correct. The politicization of a vice as normal and equivalent is simply another lobby for the unapologetically mad.

It is somewhat natural, like masturbation, but not what would be called the optimal prime of choices. What I mean is that you cant exactly remove homosex feelings, but you can make a choice. Likewise, one shouldn't focus on *not* liking the same sex. But rather, a more holistic approach of *gaining* appreciation for family and females.

The spike in homosex has several causes. But among them is also that the benefits of family simply arent being "sold" anymore. You have to "sell" it, as they say.

Cant reply but will read

>>133152286
Classical liberals like me joined the left we assumed that they just wanted equality under law. Never thought they would start pushing degeneracy, 100+ genders bullshit, and suing anyone who doesn't play along.
We need the tradcons back, with no real check on the left they are running amuck.

>>133171076
>>condition
>those are called hermaphrodites, and THOSE are conditions you ARE born with.
everyone can be born with the conditions being discussed nigger, they can also be born with a propensity for a condition that happens later. jesus you're dumb.

>what is there proofing all people who are trans have physical mutations???
its almost like you didn't even bother to fucking look into it. if you can;t even read a wikipedia article and catch up on the most basic differences, you should just kill yourself. because you've made the arguement that your opinions are backed up with sciencitic research about lgbt that you actually never did. you just read a fucking image cap meme in a redpill thread.

>Its not must, its what they TEND to be
wow you once again prove you are so stupid you will stare at a single bug on a small section of a fallen branch and pretend that because thats all you're looking at there isn't a forest all alround you. what a dumb shit

>I don't hate you, to be clear : yes, you are fucked up, I am too a bit : but its more having social responsibility to know what you will be sowing in society
none of which you have because every action you suggest be taken worsens the lives of the community, devalues individuality, and worse still, obsfucates science and medicine for superstition and religious cults. all while hiding the worst parts of gay society from view, and making gay genes even more prevelant as they pretend to be straight to escape your brutal tyranny.

>>133171218
>durrr
illnesses aren;t inherent nigger, theyre an idea. having shitty health may such for the person, but it says nothing about the effecacy of the genes in question. this is why invading frogs in fucking australia all have stupidly long legs and bad hips, those hips help them breed and outcomete their rivals over long distances, and also gets them dead fast after they've had a few babies. illnesses have no bearing on a discussion about evolution because no trait is inherently good or bad, they depend on the outcome for the species and the environment. having a 99% of your species be infertile sounds like a nightmare to you but for the ants it works just fucking fine. fuck off back to whatever rock you crawled out of.

>>133170208
I mean that you saying all those things ...
>Your mommy died in a car wreck the day before your 18th birthday? Single parent household. Daddy off fighting in Desert Storm? Single parent household. Mommy died in childbirth and daddy remarried before your first birthday? Single parent household.
All those would fuck a child up. So it makes no sense to claim those throw off the study.

Of course those would hurt a child

So what is your point?

>>133170727
Hey, a rare flag!!!

Neato. Glad this thread is getting attention too.

Try and push the hashtag guys : sexualresponsibility.

I do agree though, I have pity for faggots, but not for politicians pushing faggotry,

>>133170959
Change the culture, and people who come onto other men would be reported, and dealt with

Iran does this, except I wouldn't hang them.

>>133171085
>having a brain "enriched' by estrogen during natal development
And I'm pretty sure this can be counteracted. Also, this is neurochemical, not physical. Also I doubt this is a mutation, so much as the mother having a shit diet meaning more estrogen in the kid.

Also, I've never seen a study showing ECT didn't work.... EVER.

>not going anywhere
you need to first start by saying its a choice

remember buddy, flying that rainbow flag and sitting on that dick is a choice : YOUR choice

dont blame anybody but you.

>kill yourself
Tolerant, loving LGBT person for you, folks.

>Mutations
Do you think someone who has skitzophrenia is mutated? You seem to think anything which effects the mind is mutated. And you have no evidence all of them have physical mutation

Keep saying mutation, maybe it will make it true =D

>stupid
brains are counted as mental, neurological, ect : yes, they are physical, but calling them physical is misleading, because mental is far more accurate a word. Its a question of if it can be changed with consoling or controling ones self, if urges can be reduced

If so, its entirely mental.

>claiming this
proof?

>>133171076
The point is the guy picked a bunch of different categories thst complicate his data beyond just comparing single parents gays and married straigjt parents. He added a bunch of erroneous quotes questions like whether one parent or both adopted a child to try to make it seem like this was about u conventional families in general and not just Christians shaming gays. I believe thru yuroposters analysis close to 60 % of the people included in the single non gay parent category remarried. I know that only 2 people, out of the thousands surveyed were gay parents who TOGETHER raised a child from 0-18 and none were males. At most the sample size is under 250 for gays and very few of the people surveyed lived with their gay parents for very long. This tells you if anything the need for gay marriage so gays can raise children with the partners they love rather than have to marry a straight person to have kids then leave or be left when they fool around with the same sex on the side. This study would have only made sense with far fewer complications and a higher rate of kids who were actually raised by two or even just one gay parent for a period of over 2 years which was only half the respondents who indicating having a gay parent.

>>133171773
dumbass thats just the jews. they want the lgbt right brigade to fail, so they co-opted it and funded the most retarded of them all, all conviniently in easy view thanks to the internet. It'd be like if the only white people anyone ever got to see was fucking hipsters, we'd all assume the white race should be nuked from orbit too.

>>133152286
Get louder.

It's just another progressive movement they exploit to normalize mental illness, and pedophilia, and Islam (political system)

>>133171500

I hope this kid is rotting in prison or dead.

File: 1499450174083.jpg (193KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 500x500px

>people should live an unsatisfied and unhappy life because I think dudes loving dudes and chicks loving chicks is gross even though everyone involved is a consenting adult

I wish you'd resist your urge to post you flaming fucktard burger.

File: artsy-fartsy.jpg (369KB, 640x779px) Image search: [Google]

369KB, 640x779px

J E W Z

>>133172373
cancer
is
a
mutation
literally
that
causes
death.
(and the vast majority of mutations are immediate failures and immediately cause death)

you have a serious comprehension error to believe that no mutation is inherently bad for the subject. this isn't some kind of evolution in action. before you can even move forward to understand that the best way to treat such a *rare* functional mutation that could lead to gender dysphoria is most definitely NOT to parade it around as completely healthy under the banner of equal treatment.

but it doesn't matter that YOU are flat out clueless and wrong.

The public won't stand by to see children harmed by this nonsense.

>>133171085
>not sciency
What do you think a mental illness is?

Define it for me....

>made conclusions
off the studies out now?

yes.

>>133171152
Iron clad argument being?

>>133171500
I would argue yes : homosexual urges do not make one a faggot IMO, just as someone with an urge to rape a girl occasionally is not a rapist

Faggot is as faggot does.
Dont do as a faggot does, and being a faggot, you aren't =)

>>133171773
Don't feel bad mate, I pushed it too when I was younger, I just went along with the "they are just people" bs too.

>>133171859
>born homosexual
proof this is true?
>lel born homosexual meme

>you didn't do research
this is a fallacy : even if I didn't you could easily claim I didn't read xyz, and xyz could infact not exist

Either provide proof yourself, or don't =) and I do not count a mental illness as a mutation, because a few chemicals in the brain are different...

>wow stupid
holy shit, saying wow and calling me stupid? What a devastating argument.

>community, individuality, gay genes
Community can exist and be healthy without homosexuality, as can individualism. Gay genes have no evidence for existing, they are a meme.

>>133172574
>He added a bunch of erroneous quotes questions like whether one parent or both adopted a child to try to make it seem like this was about u conventional families in general and not just Christians shaming gays

The heck does this even mean?

>sample size 250 gays
hard to get a big sample size on a minority.

>need gay marraige
how do we know homosexual couples would be better if """married""?

>>133172711
Amen, please push the hashtag. Sexualresponsibility

>>133172569
>And I'm pretty sure this can be counteracted. Also, this is neurochemical, not physical. Also I doubt this is a mutation, so much as the mother having a shit diet meaning more estrogen in the kid.
diets always depend on evolution you dumb nigger, they define not only what you can eat, but how you develop your eating habits, what you need more of, what you need less of, and no diet is not the only factor to female natal care either. the health of wombs varies too, even among very young women. Genes nigger, pick up a book and read

>ect didn't work
wow!
have some google you dumbfuck
http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/abn/81/1/60/

>you need to first start by saying its a choice
Indeed, its a choice you have to think you have a right to police who I love and marry, and your choice is leading you to war with people who could be moderated if you compromised on behavior and standards instead of arbitrary descrimination.

>Tolerant, loving LGBT person for you, folks.
I am not tolerant, and I am not loving. especially not people who want to kill me, either by forcibly pounding my head in the concret or pretending their hands are clean when they make it legal for my boss, my landlord, and the guy i buy bread from, all refuse to deal with me and I starve to death on the streets because your fee fees where hurt that I kissed a girl and liked it.
>Do you think someone who has skitzophrenia is mutated? You seem to think anything which effects the mind is mutated. And you have no evidence all of them have physical mutation
they have a mutation. something in their genes that allows something to become the way it is if it is not inborn, or a trait that makes it inborn, or the mother had the trait. or a trait that was deactivated became activated through diet and polution. welcome to the real world nigger. evolutionary cause and effect is complicated, but just because it takes effort you fags aren't willing to put in doesn't mean we're going to felate bullshit instead

>>133173755
Sorry phoneposting. He added a bunch of extraneous categories to make the survey seem like it cared about how parents adopted kids even tbough the survey has only ever been cited widely by religious anti gay groups especially in court cases. He added a bunch of confounding factors that he didnt need to if he just wanted to compare single straight parents, married straight parents, and gay parents.

>>133172569
>>stupid
>brains are counted as mental, neurological, ect : yes, they are physical, but calling them physical is misleading, because mental is far more accurate a word. Its a question of if it can be changed with consoling or controling ones self, if urges can be reduced
you made the distinction a big lie technique number of times that brains and trannies by proxie are not subject to mutations in the genes becuase these conditions are mental illnesses. you are a moron, brains are physical, they are subject to the physical world and all the effects their in. thats why when you eat a drug that affects brains, it can radically alter your behavior or perception.
the question is, is having someone talk to you better than someone talking to you and eventually perscribing hormones and surgery if you feel you need it? the science says the latter. you scream the former despite all evidence to the contrary.

>>133173690
>you have a serious comprehension error to believe that no mutation is inherently bad for the subject.
you have a clear mutation that makes you incapable of reading and everything you say is nothing but projecting nonsense that makes it clear you didn't read anything I wrote.

>>133173755
>What do you think a mental illness is?
a mental illness is something designated to cause harm and distress to the individual through the mind and mental behavior. its completely irrelevant to evolution because evolution takes no prisoners, and weather or not something is a mental illness or even a regular illness doesn't fucking matter, what matters is survival and spread of dna, long term and short term. this affects the gene pool in a veriety of ways anywhere from dying early to stop overeating the food supply to longer legs to fuck bitches that are father away then getting eaten by an eagle because you can't move from all the hippity hoppity i'm on your property.

>>133173755
literally 90% of the post you ignored. here you go you lazy shit
>you are so fucking stupid
>ack off to your ideal all you want. every straight person ever wants their own genes and blood kid, and so do half the gay people. We don't make laws for ideal situations, we use them to help society, and your arguement that gays shouldn't adopt kids because they are worse parents than straight people is meaningless if the actual altnerative is not straight parents but infact no parents.

Gay parents often adopt which brings in its own set of issues.

If you're gay and have a kid, the mother / father relationship is dysfunctional and not working at all which causes extra strain on the children. Also a break up seems logical to happen at some point.

>>133175321
thanks for all the bumps you disgusting degenerate faggot.

Now please do the world a favor and kill yourself

>>133173755
>Community can exist and be healthy without homosexuality,
no it cant actually, because you're stuck with homosexuality. we aren't leaving, killing us will just make us hide and resent you and everything you stand for. forcing us to marry against our will to procreate will spread our genes,
>gay genes are a meme
you're retarded, stop pretending you know anything about science

>>133175431
And what percent of kids of straight parents have divorced parents or parents who cheat?

>>133175012
you're literally a stuck up idiot who refuses to listen when reality doesn't meet your neat little beliefs

LBG were fucking themselves when they adopted support for the T. it's not the same thing. there's going to be blowback on the LBG (and on the dudes who just like to wear heels) when we could have just left sleeping bears lie (with each other)

>>133175482
follow your leader,

>>133175763
>you're literally a stuck up idiot who refuses to listen when reality doesn't meet your neat little beliefs

no thats you you fucking science denying moron, you're also so fucking petty and pathetic that you refuse to listen to reality when its something as asinine and low key as what the squiggles on a post say in a mongolian horse archery forum.

>>133175770
enjoy your aids you useless fag

>>133174621
>diets depend on diet
>lolzers, I am eating mexican food today look guis, I'm evolving into a mexican!

You sound like a transnigger

I was saying that if the mother eats shit food, the child will suffer : this has fuck all to do with evolution

>link to study
finally something productive, jesus christ.
>No clear difference was found between the treatments on the penile circumference measure. On suppression of subjective measures of sexual arousal, however, covert sensitization appeared to be more effective than contingent shock.

How the heck were they using covert sensatization to prevent homosexual actions? Also this doesn't say ECT DIDNT work, it said this technique worked better : would love to know exactly what they did.

>I am not tolerant, and I am not loving
Exactly
> especially not people who want to kill me
not me
> pretending their hands are clean when they make it legal for my boss, my landlord, and the guy i buy bread from, all refuse to deal with me and I starve to death on the streets
Isn't this exactly what you faggots do to """homophobes"""?

LGBT confirmed for violent mafia

>they have a mutation. something in their genes that allows something to become the way it is if it is not inborn
Pretty sure not all people are born with schitzo, and its a mentally developed thing.

>>133174688
What cofounding factors, and why do they matter? Aren't gay couples also counted?

Also as for counting unmarried gay couples, ever consider that it was only made legal recently??

>>133175012
what did he not read?

Also, resorting to insults AGAIN

>>133175321
Rather than bitching about me ignoring it, bring up the relivant information and why you think its important. I ignore most of many posts because I care about facts, not YOU ARE A BIGOT WHO WANTS TO KILL ME REEEEE bs. Anything remotely like that I WILL ignore because its a bunch of bs

>>133175431
this

>>133175482
Id rather he repent and show others truth than an-hero, for the record.

>>133175763
We never picked t to play along they picked us. I think trans is a more radical approach to gay rights by saying that all rights women have should be conferred upon gay men. My issue is that we are less likelooking to adopt laws banning discrimination in housing or hiring for gays if such laws also include provisins for gender identity. I dont really think trans people are somehow just waiting to stalk womens only spaces in a pervy way but it definitely is a more radical approach.

>>133176179
that would require me to have promiscuous unsafe sex. I'll just be over here enjoying none of that shit and instead laughing that a dumb nazi thinks hating me is actually fighting the jews

>>133159591
Live a chaste life. Relationships and sex are nice but not necessary. Be a great family member and help take care of your community.

>>133176181
Confounding factors like how long kids lived with their gay parent, whether they had one or two gay parents, and whether they were raised mostly by one or two parents and how long of each. The study to me would only make sense comparing unmarried gay parents to unmarried straight parents or married gay parents to unmarried straight parents. There are tok many variables at play in he regnerus study and too small of a sample to get meaningful data from so many categories with at most 250 kids reporting at least one same sex parent (note study didnt ask if parents identify as gay).

>>133176527
>be unsatisfied and lonely to please strangers

No and you cant make me?

>>133160826
Learn science faggot, 35% of 'confidence' is not accurate.

>So are most studies, the heck is your point?
If your study cannot be replicated then is a shit study and you are a shit scientist. Fuck man, you are talking "WE WUZ" level pseudo shit.

>Technically true, but you can shape what aroused you.
Really? How? You could help the NEET community in being aroused with themselves and make the world happier.
>Less of a faggot than people who jerk off to traps =)
>You can say I'm a faggot, but I'm not the one sucking dick.
You're still a self-hating faggot

>>133176181
>You sound like a transnigger
you honestly don;t sound human at all, I've ran into bots that read and understood more things than you have.

The food a mother eats and the food she needs are all moderated by genes dipshit. Even the food she thinks tastes good are moderated by genes.

>it doesn't say it didn;t work
no it says exactly that it didn't work.
>Isn't this exactly what you faggots do to """homophobes"""?
no dumbass, we don't. you making a cake for us when you are OPEN TO THE PUBLIC is a contract you agreed to. don't like gays? make your restaurant/store membership only.

as for violent mafia.
everyone in america is a litigating asshole, gays are human too, join the fucking asspain club. maybe if you white tradcon niggers stopped trying to meme america into a litteral theocracy (hint, thats exactly what the people who did the research in the op are aiming for) we wouldn't feel so inclined to hate you shits.

>Pretty sure not all people are born with schitzo, and its a mentally developed thing.
they are born with something that allows them to become schizo in the first place. genes nigger.
you can't have a brain without genes, genes decide what kind of brain you have, if your plan for mental plasticity has faults, you're going to wind up with bad problems senpai.

>what did he not read?
responding to tone AGAIN
while hurling insults yourself, hypocrit 101 I guess, human race/10
what he didn't read was the part where I very clearly told him hes a fucking idiot because traits that harm an individual don't matter for evolution if they help the group. IE shit that kills you is only bad if it stops you from effectively spreading your genes, which may depend on how likely you are to eat all the food you need to survive before any can grow back. He litterally took what I said and pretended I said the complete opposite thing and threw a fucking tempertantrum like you are doing.

>>133176181
>bring up the relivant information and why you think its important.
I did you fucking moron, I litterally just told you why its important. its the most concise sentance that contains all the information you need to understand theproblem, why its a problem, and what you do to fix the problem. this is why I call you an idiot. a 10 year old child could understand a sentance this simple.

>>133152286
Zyklon B

>>133167369
They don't want kids. They don't want families. They're not even monogamous. Pushing gay "marriage" is just a way to destroy Western culture by encouraging low birth rates and disease.

>>133152538
t. Ahmed al Saladin Muhammad

>>133175521
>stuck with homosexuality
This had nothing to do with anything : I can be stuck with having green eyes and be part of a blue eyed community. And again if you repress , its not any different
>killing us
I'm not talking about that. I haven't for ANY of my posts, short of maybe rapists or child molesters. STOP assuming just because I criticize your life I''m out to kill you, paranoid faggot

>retard
want to provide proof of a gay gene then?

>>133175556
Less than gays, I'd figure. Homosexuals are more promiscuous, and straights have a higher bond with each other when married with a kid, particularly if they waited till marriage for sex.

>>133175770
Leader of the nazis is in argentina mate.

>>133176532
Ok...and whats wrong with putting those all under the umbrella of "has some interaction with a gay parent figure?"

how do you figure this is misleading?

What would be making the gays look worse on paper, in your opinion?

>>133176616
Its more for yourself buddy. Being straight will improve elements of you life : at least you won't be bullied as much, right faggot?

>>133176641
>35%
referring to what again?

>replicated
this is very difficult if the LGBT tries to ban studies of the LGBT, or rejects studies by christian institutions who refuse to give into LGBT protections

>Really? How?
Pavlovian psychology.

Demonize things and make mental correlations with bad things / discomfort to make things less erotic, make things corelate with comfort, fun, pleasure, ect, to make things erotic.

Just focus on what you feed in terms of behavior, and how you consciously think.

>>133176641
>self hating faggot
Faggot implies I'm doing something

Also I don't hate myself, I love myself : just you faggots think you cannot change "self" and if you ever resist anything , you aren't being yourself

Tell me, if I resist the urge to stab a tranny, am I "not being myself?"

Even if so, why the hell is this bad?

>>133177592
no shit we dont want marriage, families, and good living, for centuries the very people who had that have been burning and abusing us. It's almost like humans are predictably contrarian and when you shock, beat, kill, and hurt someone, they'll come to associate your entire way of life as a cancer and throw the baby out with the bathwater.

>>133177592
there are numerous minor and major legal rights tied to marriage within the legal system

the desire for supported gay marriage is certainly nothing so malicious as you suggest

>>133177707
>This had nothing to do with anything : I can be stuck with having green eyes and be part of a blue eyed community. And again if you repress , its not any different
>be like us or we'll kill you
actually it very much has to do with everything.
>I'm not talking about that. I haven't for ANY of my posts, short of maybe rapists or child molesters. STOP assuming just because I criticize your life I''m out to kill you, paranoid faggot
if you are out to make the only way we can live is to hide ourselves entirely from your eyes your goal is murder one way or another. one is a slow death on the street or to live a life of crime, the other is a curb stomp. If you threaten my job, home, and source of food, all based on an inborn trait that commits no crime and doesn't affect my ability to work, that is murder.

>>133177707
>Leader of the nazis is in argentina mate.
I don't see a flag.

>Tell me, if I resist the urge to stab a tranny, am I "not being myself?"

individuality my dumb meme man. heres how it works, if you want to repress, not take vaccines, and tell fags theyre going to hell because your personal religion says so, go ahead. your rights end when you try to; make others stop taking vaccines because muh farmacy, denounce proven treatments and insist the replacement of those treatments with unproven and even destructive ones, enforce litigations that damage science in the name of religion (secular country senpai). and force kids to not be adopted when you can't prove that being adopted by gays is worse than being adopted by nobody

>>133177707
>>133177707
Well the study counts kids who were raised by straight parents in the gay category but mainly that the study confounds single parents with gay parents without neatly separating the categories. This is the issue with choosing a representative sample as well as that the data collected is at its oldest 8 years okd now you cant get enough gay married parents to compare. If gay people werent the ones primarily raising these kids and there arent enough examples of two gay people raising kids in the study then I find that misleading if this study is supposed to compare gays and straights as
Parents.

>>133152286
>I've had the odd homosexual thought but I've never acted on it
LOL nigga you gay

>>133177120
>ur a bot
Wow....

>The food a mother eats and the food she needs are all moderated by genes dipshit
Genes don't dictate that you WILL eat a diet full of vegies, organic meat, and lots of healthy stuff. And people still end up eating total shit, and eating total shit is typically a choice. And what you END UP eating has different results, NO MATTER WHAT your genes are.

>Even the food she thinks tastes good are moderated by genes.
Theres still an element of choice. The mother can choose to eat whole foods and health stuff, or can eat KFC and cheetos the entire pregnancy. This isn't genes, this is poor decision making
>inb4 genetically incapable of fried chicken
transnigger indeed.

>>133177120
It didn't though, it said it was less effective than covert sensitization. This doesn't mean it had no effect, it just means something else was more effective. Just like hot water is less effective than hot soapy water at cleaning, but it doesn't mean hot water is useless.

> gays are human too
Gays are humans who make bad choices, just like drug addicts or rapists

>they are born with something that allows them to become schizo in the first place
Right, its called a brain =)

>what he didn't read was the part where I very clearly told him hes a fucking idiot
maybe thats why he didn't read it...
>traits that harm an individual don't matter for evolution
Was the dude even talking about evolution, or were you the one bringing that up??

>>133177285
>ask for clairification
>tons of insults
This is why people hate you faggots

>>133177913
>humanity burns and abuses us
>fuck humanity
This could apply to rapists, child molesters, serial killers, and tons of other groups.... Also your abuses aren't as wide spread as you say, faggot crybaby.

>>133178306
Its a choice, though : you are choosing not to go with it.

More importantly, theres no upsides to chosing to rebel, or being different other than "feelings".

You are LITERALLY putting your feelings above anything

File: aids.jpg (150KB, 490x662px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 490x662px

>>133152286
This shit started in the '80s. The religious right tried to warn us about it, but the kool kids thought it would be more fun to laugh at the bible thumpers. Now here we are.

>>133179116
>Genes don't dictate that you WILL eat a diet full of vegies, organic meat, and lots of healthy stuff.
actually they do. based on what you can even eat or palate at all you dumb nigger.

>people end up eating total shit
indeed, its almost like evolution is a process that takes thousands of years.

>no matter what your genes are
haha, no, your genes play a big role dumbass. they determine what you can eat, what nutrients you can eat, and even if you can;t eat something you need to be healthy.

>theres still an element of choice
even the element of choice is a product of genes dumbfuck. A mother wont choose between kfc and cheetos and whole foods if something in kfc and cheetos tastes so foul that it doesnt register as food to her.
>inb4 genetically incpable of fried chicken.
most animal species don't know how to fry chicken, many human beings are alergic to bird flesh, your move creationistnigger
>it says there where changes
>Treatment effects were monitored by measurement of penile circumference changes during slides presented prior to treatment sessions, and by daily subjective recording of sexual urges and fantasies as well as masturbation and sexual acts. No clear difference was found between the treatments on the penile circumference measure.
no changes other than ""subjective"" changes.
it doesn't work senpai
dick still gets hard
>Gays are humans who make bad choices, just like drug addicts or rapists
except the only bad decisions gays make aren't because being gay is wrong but because being gay is hard to adapt to our inborn traits for courting. IE for men, fuck everything that moves and for women, find someone fast and make them provide for you. do you have any idea how fucking unbalanced this becomes when there isn';t someone having completely different motivations on the other end of the relationship? We're already seeing the effects of guy slutdom enabling female slutdom now that we get to have rights too. Homosexuality itself is harmless.

https://www.reddit.com/r/TiADiscussion/comments/6mca0q/im_not_transphobic_but_im_really_really_concerned/

Redpill these people, boys. They are on the right track, but they still hold on to degeneracy

>>133178306
>if you are out to make the only way we can live is to hide ourselves entirely from your eyes your goal is murder one way or another
my goal is for you to change your actions. This does not involve murder anymore than wanting people not to fap in public is murder.

>>133178705
>flag
never said I was hitler, but I bet you would love that huh?

> if you want to repress, not take vaccines, and tell fags theyre going to hell because your personal religion says so, go ahead. your rights end when you try to; make others stop taking vaccines because muh farmacy, denounce proven treatments and insist the replacement of those treatments with unproven and even destructive ones, ect ect
Repressing works, vaccines are OK IF they are not poluted with mercury, aluminum and other crap (most are) and I'm not removing anyones rights by telling them they shouldn't do XYZ. Its if I physically stop them or threaten them that I take away their rights

You just think its taking rights because you are mentally ill, and paranoid.

Why would it bother you if its "not true"?

>>133178804
Ok, so what would the study need to do different, and what do you think the results would be? Do you think married gay couples would be identical to married straights?

How does this discount the overall higher rate of problems of homosexuals across the board?

>>133179036
Gay is as gay does : I don't do gay shit.

>>133179779
Sad, but true...

still, we gotta try right??

>>133179779
If only we had listened and burned all the gays back when all the war vets were still alive

>>133179116
>Right, its called a brain =)
no dumbass, its called a human brain.
See fish
>maybe thats why he didn't read it...
then he can very well make no comment on something he didn't bother to read AND maintain the expectation that others wont blow him the fuck out for saying some dumb shit about something he didn't even read.

>Was the dude even talking about evolution, or were you the one bringing that up??
he was talking about evolution and trying to equate mental illnesses to evolutionary traits to say that mental illnesses are inherent, when illness and disabilities as a concept are irrelevant to genetic evolution without some kind of environment to define them in.

>>133179116
>This is why people hate you faggots
yeah its almost like when you get on your high horse and pretend to be better than us, theres this in built expectation that you'll preform that superiority and when you fail so dramatically it becomes clear you can;t understand something a child could you get insulted for wasting everyones time.

>>133179116
>This could apply to rapists, child molesters, serial killers, and tons of other groups.... Also your abuses aren't as wide spread as you say, faggot crybaby.
it applies to everything. they made a whole science studying this shit its called sociology. its as chaotic as you'd expect trying to quantify a bunch of lunatic monkeys and their different fee fees.
and our abuses aren't as wide spread as we say is also irrelevant when we are discussing the future world you wish to create where your ideas are reality. It's like saying "oh goy, we haven't gotten rid of all the white people _yet_. you aren;t as oppressed as you think"

>>133179116
yes we are "choosing" to not go with your arbitrary bullshit idea of a society where you get to starve anyone who kisses another girl or boy.

its not like we've been drenched in survival instinct for longer than mammals have existed.

>You are LITERALLY putting your feelings above anything
no dumbass, I'm putting my right to eat, sleep, have a home, and see my love in a hospital over your rediculous unsubstantiated belief, that I am hurting you by existing because I spread daaaangerous ideas like people should be able to love and form lasting partnerships with people of the same sex, and that you shouldn't kill and starve these people just because they exist and having committed no crime.

>>133152286

Remind people that the transgender agenda is being pushed to reduce birth rates in all who are a part of the western civilisation. And agreeing with the transgender movement is a big contributor to the destruction of civilisation as we know it.

>>133181115
https://www.reddit.com/r/TiADiscussion/comments/6mca0q/im_not_transphobic_but_im_really_really_concerned/

Good, now redpill these faggots

>>133180035
>actually they do. based on what you can even eat or palate
Which is everything between cheetos with soda, and whole cooked healthy meals

Genes don't dictate that you WILL NOT eat cheetos, faggot

>indeed, its almost like evolution is a process that takes thousands of years.
Its almost like your whole thing of calling women eating shit and having shitty kids genetic was grasping at straws. Makes sense when you lunge for the throat of "me" when you represent me as a strawman =D

>they determine what you can eat, what nutrients you can eat, and even if you can;t eat something you need to be healthy.
like i said, genese do not gaurentee you will eat healthy, and thus genes have no point in the conversation : you are derailing faggot

> A mother wont choose between kfc and cheetos and whole foods if something in kfc and cheetos tastes so foul that it doesnt register as food to her.
you realize people eat shit all the time that kills them, and don't throw it up right?

Are you trying to say we are incapable of eating shitty food?

>most animal species don't know how to fry chicken
I'm talking about humans, faggot
>bird allergy
so if you don't have a bird allergy, you won't get morbidly obese from eating a 20$ kfc bucket every day?

>no changes other than ""subjective"" changes.
Subjective is opinion. One could argue a person ceasing all homosexual acts is subjective. Unless you list exactly what was subjective, then your omitting information, which makes it dishonest.
>dick still gets hard
it doesn't say that
>but muh circumference measure
You know some people get hard without their dicks widening right? Typically it gets longer, plus, measuring it would be a turn off, and make it smaller anyways.

>Homosexuality itself is harmless.
besides aids, anal cancer, pedophilia, mental illness drug use, alcoholism, rape, abuse, ect ect

Also, its a choice to do so, and all the above makes it a BAD choice.

>>133180400
>fish brain
fucking lol.

Gonorrhea.

>>133180215
>my goal is for you to change your actions. This does not involve murder anymore than wanting people not to fap in public is murder.
you are more then welcome to hide straight couples from existance along with us if you feel public displays of affection should be eradicated down to the wedding ring and hand holding. doing it just for gays is predjudice and indeed murder.

>never said I was hitler, but I bet you would love that huh?
I would actually. I'd love to talk to the guy, I want to hear all about the pinapple upside down cake blitzkrieg. People who dehumanize hitler are fucking idiots.

>Repressing works,
so do placeebos.
we don't prescribe placeebos when we have working medicine.

> IF they are not poluted with mercury, aluminum and other crap (most are)
no idea bout murcery, but a lot of actual additives such as mouse brains are fucking essential in vaccines you tard, they stimulate the immune system to action. etc. and preform vital functions.

> I'm not removing anyones rights by telling them they shouldn't do XYZ
You are if you are forcing them not to. wave your picket signs all you want.

>Its if I physically stop them or threaten them that I take away their rights
and the right to physically stop gay people from having jobs and buying food is the aim of your movement.

>why would it bother you if its not true
why would starving to death not bother me? context please.

I mean I don't think you're THAT stupid.

>>133180215
>Ok, so what would the study need to do different, and what do you think the results would be?
clear seperation of all categories. including controls for wealth, equal length of marriage, equal age of kid, adoption on both straight and gay ends, and a section for natural surrogate gay babies. thats to start. I'd also want longer duration and control for hatred of homosexuals. that last stuff is really all bonus stuff to make shit more accurate, this is science (or at least this process we are discussing and not the family research council is science) so multiple studies will eventually be done to repeat these results and peer review them. Conclusions should be blatant that the information has nothing to say about if gays should adopt or not unless information concerning prognosis of orphan children is added and compared.

>>133180400
>make no comment
don't be rude if you want people to take you serious

>>133180400
I don't think he said that crap. Quote him please

>>133180475
>better than us
Well, I don't go telling faggots to go kill themselves or go on about rants about being a "victim"

Also you missed my point : if you act like an asshole, people won't like you. You are making people dislike you BECAUSE you are being an asshole, not because you like dicks

>>133180824
You said fuck humanity because they don't like you : can you honestly expect humanity to like YOU when you do that???

>>133181099
No, your are choosing to take a dick up the ass.

That is your choice, and you have nobody to blame but yourself for the repercussions.

>no dumbass, I'm putting my right to eat, sleep, have a home, and see my love in a hospital
Right, and those are all provided : and any problems you have are DIRECTLY because your actions : you simply want to do terrible things and not be blamed for it, you want special privileges. This is your feelings above anything.

>>133182031
>hiding shit
nobodies asking you to hide it, we are asking you to not do it

I don't ask pedophiles to hide their child molestation, I ask them TO NOT MOLEST CHILDREN, faggot.

>wedding ring and hand holding
Wedding rings don't cause aids as far as I know

> doing it just for gays is predjudice and indeed murder.
Is it murder if I ask a child pedophile not to molest children?

>repressing placibo
Funny you bring that up, they both use the same principle : belief

if you believe in something, it makes it more likely to happen

course, you faggots REFUSE VIOLENTLY to try believing you can be straight, so can you REALLY say it doesn't work?

>no idea bout murcery, but a lot of actual additives such as mouse brains are fucking essential in vaccines you tard, they stimulate the immune system to action. etc. and preform vital functions.
They are very different from years ago.

>>133162389
>Are you trying to say having a lesbian mother, if you live with your straight father would not effect you?
No he's trying to say that the study is no conclusive on the subject.

>>133177707
referring to what again?
>>133159036
Btw, I read about the trace but that means that is a 70% range of frequency.
>this is very difficult if the LGBT tries to ban studies of the LGBT, or rejects studies by christian institutions who refuse to give into LGBT protections
But not impossible. Btw, show evidence about the banning of LGBT studies.
>Pavlovian psychology.
At least they'll turn you assexual. And probably depressed.
>Faggot implies I'm doing something
No, it simply means homosexual. I think if you open to yourself you'll be happier. I don't want you to do anything you don't want (or do anything to anyone against their volition).

File: 1489076267879.jpg (251KB, 912x300px) Image search: [Google]

251KB, 912x300px

>>133181201
>linking to reddit.
is it really worth trying to help educate people that stupid?

>Which is everything between cheetos with soda, and whole cooked healthy meals

>Genes don't dictate that you WILL NOT eat cheetos, faggot
yes they do faggot, genes build your tongue, they build your brane and the dopamine system. the genes in the bacteria in your gut help moderate your seratonine and dopamine receptors. all dependant on your genetic traits that decide what foods you are able to eat. Horses can drink all they want in pregnancy. their genes, for example, make them able to tolerate alcohol.

>Its almost like your whole thing of calling women eating shit and having shitty kids genetic was grasping at straws
yes, it is genetic. having responsability for your actions doesn't mean that the choices available to you are not moderated heavily by genetic factors you creationist fuckwad.

>like i said, genese do not gaurentee you will eat healthy,
Genes don't usually gaurentee anything because theres this thing around the genes called an environment that also is a factor. but genes objectively AFFECT your likelyhood to eat healthy by a very large ammount respective to your genetic heritage, and your species. this is not derailing, its objective fact. IF you don't like the fact that some people love cilantro and some people think it tastes like soap you can cry to god along with your tears over adam and steve.

>you realize people eat shit all the time that kills them, and don't throw it up right?
I'll do you one better nigger. there are entire species of mammals that cannot throw up. horses are one of them. Even food that kills you doesn't matter as long as you successfully pass on your genes effectively enough.

>Are you trying to say we are incapable of eating shitty food?
are you so stupid you can't read? I said what you are able to eat and how you percieve the taste of food is moderated by your genes. I didn't make a conclusion you dumb nigger, I stated a fact.

>>133181099
Its nothing personal. But When food resources become scarce I would refuse to feed you and let the single mother with child eat so that the society can grow. The only sin is that gays cant reproduce and thus are purely a negative drain on a collective state. Like I said nothing personal, just wont waste resources to aid you continue the lifestyle. Like you said. Survival Instincts and arbitrary (check that definition) judgements depending on social conditions. As it stands, you have a right to eat and sleep within our economic system. Should conditions change, I will be subject to revoking that "privilege" you refer to as an entitled "right". The only thing you have a God given right to is repentance. Also, I will be taking back that rainbow. Your dangerous idea is that Love is solely expressed by sexual activity because that perversion can only fathom love as sex and not any other manifestation of the word. The danger of what you wish to promote is that kids are sponges and face vulnerable consequences for what adults do that is seen as socially acceptable. Bringing me full circle to the point that a society should emphasis traits which promote social/familial/economic growth. Failure to Reproduce is a Failure to Grow is a Failure to Exist beyond Death. No Offspring/No Future. Dead End for Spiritually Dead Men. You made the choice. You face the consequence. I won't pass judgement on you but I won't feed your sin and promote your lifestyle. Time will judge you like the rest of us by the fruits of your labor called love left after death. Bad Seeds don't produce good Fruit. Gay Seeds produce none at all.

>>133181429
>so if you don't have a bird allergy, you won't get morbidly obese from eating a 20$ kfc bucket every day?
no dumbass, if you DO have a bird allergy, you wont get morbidly obese FROM eating 20$ kfc buckets every day, instead you'll get dead.

>Subjective is opinion. One could argue a person ceasing all homosexual acts is subjective.
you aren't wrong. which is why its worthless for scientific analysis unless they are made objective somehow. you'd have to purchase the full study to know what the hell theyre talking about. This science thing really is alien to you huh?

>it doesn't say that
thats exactly what it says

>You know some people get hard without their dicks widening right?
the apperant size of a dick is not its true size. obviously if the study is not worthless they'll use something elastic that they can measure that compresses the flesh so it actually can be measured, otherwise measuring that peramiter is worthless and not even worth mentioning in the study, and calls the whole study into question for being published at all. Since it's published, its safe to assume they weren't retards

>besides aids, anal cancer, pedophilia, mental illness drug use, alcoholism, rape, abuse, ect ect
way to not fucking read dipshit.

>Also, its a choice to do so, and all the above makes it a BAD choice.
none of the shit you said is related to being attracted to and having a healthy relationship with the same sex individual.

not sure why you keep trying to meme pedophilia. people rape kids because theyre easy targets, not because theyre attracted to men. theyre also usually their own children. which suggest far more than homosexuality at play. out of all of these its the most most not correct.

>>133182031
>You are if you are forcing them not to. wave your picket signs all you want.

Except you faggots don't want this : you faggots want me to not even be able to call a faggot a faggot

Besides, we also don't have the right to murder or rape, because we KNOW its a risk to society.

>and the right to physically stop gay people from having jobs and buying food is the aim of your movement.
Do you mean gay people as in people with homosexual thoughts, or practicing homosexuals? Theres a big difference.

I don't think they shouldn't have jobs at all, or no food, I just think companies should have the right to not hire them : doesn't mean they cannot get work.

>>133182213
Thats a lot of stuff to control for, and you might end up skewing data by diving data which is already small into even smaller groups

as for hatred of homosexuals, this is normal, and are you honestly going to push for thought control in the population rather than 1 person controlling their actions?

>>133182765
>not conclusive
this is a subjective statement, you could argue no study is conclusive.

>refering to what
god damnit, quote some of my text so I know what you are on about =(

>>133183236
>GEEEEEEEEEENEEEEEEEES
are you arguing some people are incapable of eating cheetos, that choice doesn't matter, or theres no such thing as acquired taste?

>HEAVILY GENETIC
....with a side of CHOICE. And choice can over rule genese, because anyone can put anything in their mouth if they chose, like dick.

>Genes don't usually gaurentee anything
Diet is something it also doesn't gaurentee

TO BE VERY CLEAR : yes, you are partially correct to say genes have an effect, they do, but choice is FAR MORE of an effect : and to then say a mother having a shitty diet is "a genetic issue" is incredibly dishonest, because its implying choice was little, if ANY influence in what happened.

So stop saying that is genetic if someone decides to eat completely shit food. It was THEIR decision

>>133152286
I'd be willing to bet that if you broke this down by beliefs, that the more tradional gay men do well and that most of this is just liberalism being cancer.

>>133182729
>don't be rude if you want people to take you serious
indeed, I wont take people who dont want to kill me or make me starve to death for existing seriously, theyre very rude people who's delusions about science and homosexuality are almost if not as bad as the left's delusions about them.

>I don't think he said that crap. Quote him please
why are you asking me to go quote something for you that you could easily go read yourself? its almost like youre a lazy piece of shit who doesn't know how to research anything so much as a 4chan post let alone a scientific topic.

>>133173690
>you have a serious comprehension error to believe that no mutation is inherently bad for the subject.
here you go you dumb nigger

remember to read a book.

>>133165424
That's how religion works
>>133184101
>this is a subjective statement, you could argue no study is conclusive.
Yes it is, but also means that other studies are more conclusive that others.
>god damnit, quote some of my text so I know what you are on about =(
I forgot a >
my bad

>>133183462
>Its nothing personal. But When food resources become scarce I would refuse to feed you and let the single mother with child eat so that the society can grow.
the situation you are describing is anarchy so I'm well aware that violence would happen.

> The only sin is that gays cant reproduce and thus are purely a negative drain on a collective state.
learn to evolution senpai, but if everyone starving to death and not just a bunch of oppulent fat scooter rednecks bitching about having to share a food court with me, not being able to have kids is a pretty shitty thing. I doubt most gays would be unwilling to reproduce in post apocalyptic scenarios, but we would do so through surragacy, which you may also despise for some petty reason or other.

>Survival Instincts and arbitrary (check that definition) judgements depending on social conditions
no they depend on the environmental conditions, of which social factors play a key role.

>As it stands, you have a right to eat and sleep within our economic system. Should conditions change, I will be subject to revoking that "privilege" you refer to as an entitled "right".
there wont be any such thing as rights or privilages in the world you are describing. it's unironically a return to the rules of nature, morality at that point doesn't exist because the heirarchy of needs isn't being met.

>The only thing you have a God given right to is repentance.
neat. i'll keep that in mind when you're feeding my legs to your dogs.

>Your dangerous idea is that Love is solely expressed by sexual activity because that perversion can only fathom love as sex and not any other manifestation of the word.
actually my very understanding and experiance of love and commitment to one another is so molded by that idea that I can barely comprehend why you christfucks and tradcons equate kissing and hugging a girl or boy to be the same thing as fapping in public.

>>133183997
>bird allergy
minority of people, has nothing to do with people who get fat off KFC, as you just admitted

>you'd have to purchase the full study to know what the hell theyre talking about.
I wont, and that is inconclusive in a pretty big way : if your going to claim something isn't important, I really need to know what it is, since calling it unimportant or subjective is very much opinion

Facts are FAR more important, and facts in my op were far more objective.

>thats exactly what it says
Literally where does it say the penis still gets hard

>obviously if the study is not worthless
debatable

>way to not fucking read dipshit.
You said faggots weren't harmful.

>none of the shit you said is related to being attracted to and having a healthy relationship with the same sex individual.
and I was not talking about being attracted to a same sex individual, I was talking about risk factors for having homosexual acts done.

>people rape kids because theyre easy targets
>Lel its easier to rape a little kid and risk being raped in prison than to find some tranny slut on grindr

>>133184237
You may have a point, though this doesn't solve the aids / anal cancer issue.

>>133184465
>killing and starving gay people meme

>asking me to quote
Ok, so we will drop the topic. I'm too lazy to be arsed to read it, and half the time you faggots are lying.

give me a direct quote or fuck off

>>133184768
Thats also how LGBT rights work (GAY PEOPLE ARE HARMLESS, KEEP SAYING IT)

>Yes it is, but also means that other studies are more conclusive that others
Thats an opinion

>my bad
shit happens.

>>133185230
>neat. i'll keep that in mind when you're feeding my legs to your dogs.

Blowing shit out of proportion aside, you chose to do homosexual acts knowing they have no redeeming value, and that people hate them

blame yourself.

>kissing
if its disproved, and provides no merit, why do it?

File: maximum dykeshit.png (279KB, 698x416px) Image search: [Google]

279KB, 698x416px

>>133183462
just like I dont understand you christfags and tradcons insinuation that all we care about is sex when gay marriage itself is not needed when all you care about is sex. its sole purpose as a state given right is to allow you to form close bonds and do things like have your lover visit you in the hospital. None of these things will be needed in a society with no food and rules because anyone who keeps me from my lover who's getting treatent in the healers tent is getting a mouth full of buckshot.

>that kids are sponges and face vulnerable consequences for what adults do that is seen as socially acceptable.
including and up to indoctrination into your little cult.
Religion is far more damaging, and actually libel to kill, when indoctrinated.

>Bringing me full circle to the point that a society should emphasis traits which promote social/familial/economic growth
I agree, which is why I am against idiots who think killing a bunch of gays until everyone lies about it under pain of death, spreading their genes and having gay sex on the side and forcing gays who wish to remain traditional to search in the lowest depths of society for anything approximating another human being who they can love back as much as they love them is all terrible for society and merely blindfolds you to a poison instead of treating it. commited relationships are the lifeblood of civilization and your constant denial of my people of this is what drove them to the jew in the first place.

> Failure to Reproduce is a Failure to Grow is a Failure to Exist beyond Death. No Offspring/No Future. Dead End for Spiritually Dead Men.
Unless you suspect jesus had a child, you better take back those words, the actions of those who do not reproduce can have powerful impacts on families for centuries to come you dumb christfuck. A virtuous gay only needs a family who will not disown them in order to lift them, and lacking that, they will chose a new family, literal or figurative.

if only we could make electro shock theropy look cool to them....

>>133186111
Bronies still exist?

Thought that shit was dead since like 2013..

File: 1482638049446.jpg (231KB, 1200x859px) Image search: [Google]

231KB, 1200x859px

>>133186111
god damn, trips as well, and they add up to 3,
Thankyou kek.

anyway, thats enough out of me for a night. fuck anyone who hasn't listened to my wisdom. It's something all of you should have had if you paid attention in science class. Even my emo ass was able to do it. I have work tomorrow. Sleep tight mlpol.

>>133152538
Start with yourself and OP.

>>133186552
okay okay one more post. you need to check out some recaps of april first.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cx1MA6ousJE
fuck this thread. get on that now.

>>133152824
Nothing even slightly scary or intimidating about you. You are gross and annoying, not frightening.

>>133186722
After reading this thread I'm convinced you're intentionally ignorant

>>133152538
Hi Agent Johnson

>>133152538
fpbp this and with camps too

File: 050.jpg (23KB, 168x300px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 168x300px

>>133156952
>bully gays

File: 1497159383634.jpg (34KB, 471x335px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 471x335px

>>133157653
>civil rights

>>133189152
>1 out of 3
maybe in san francisco

Also depends how you count "gay"

Do you count it as
-ever having a homosexual urge
-ever doing anything with a man ever (meaning sucked off by a guy when desperate for sex)
-actively fucking and seeking men

Depending on how you count that, I'd say its between 50% and 4% of the population.

File: 032.jpg (55KB, 564x551px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 564x551px

>check out muh gay statistics which rationalize me getting muh pooper pumped and eating cum laced with shit

File: pgfdes.png (39KB, 1000x893px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 1000x893px

Three K's a day keeps the niggers away.

If you're 100% European descent aka white and you hate filthy niggers, dirty spics, kikes, arabs, furfags, gayfags, commiefags and all other scum on the earth as much as we do, you should join the Moon Central Discord Server. Introduce yourself in #introductions and answer our questions to get unkiked!

https://discordapp.com/ - invite/ - YvZen6k (Remove the - )

1, 2, 3, 4 I declare a race war!

Sieg Heil

>>133186111
Nobody gets gay married without having sexual activity, it simply does not happen.

>visit you in the hospital.
You can do this if they let you in, already...

> getting a mouth full of buckshot.
Good job reinforcing the stereotype that faggots are psychopaths

>including and up to indoctrination into your little cult.
Religion is far more damaging, and actually libel to kill, when indoctrinated.
Citation fucking needed


>gay sex on the side
the whole point is avoiding gay sex

Its like you faggots have 0 self control, isn't that a mental illness?

>Jesus
jesus healed people, provided things, and did a lot for the world besides children
99% of faggots don't iimprove the world in any way.

>>133186843
>not differentiating a person who has ever had a homosexual urge and a practicing faggot

have fun killing off half the population...