what does this flag mean im too lazy to read on wiki

>>133102075
True freedom

>>133102075
Google it you fat fuck

File: a26291f2-d08b-4b11-881e-85e5b866dece.jpg (21KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 320x240px

Don't tread on me

Potholes ahead

File: 1498229382374.gif (2MB, 390x277px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 390x277px

>>133102075
You still gonna get fugged by the rich.

File: IMG_0195.jpg (108KB, 1024x574px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 1024x574px

>>133102075
Physical removal.

File: 1499391561075.jpg (25KB, 480x531px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 480x531px

FREE MARKET SOLUTIONS TO FOR YOUR EVERY NEED AND WANT

THOSE ARE THE BEST KIND OF SOLUTIONS

RADICAL

>>133102490
Aren't libertardians against the declaration of Martial Law that would be required for such activity, Anon.?

>>133102781
there's a special clause in the NAP that states that commies are inherently at odds with an ancap/libertarian society and they should and will be PHYSICALLY REMOVED as soon as possible

>>133102075
It's the flag adopted by the right leaning transgender movement TRANSCAP

>>133102075


Anarcho-Capitalism.

It's an ideology that has the same fatal flaw as Marxism: it's utterly incompatible with human nature.

If you want to learn about /pol/ approved libertarianism, read Democracy The God That Failed or any other book by Hans-Hermann Hoppe.

File: 23.jpg (41KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 500x500px

>>133103000
Anon., I find libertardians a joke because whenever they see tanks rolling down the street, even for a brief week-long or month-long police exercise, they pee their pants. Then they try and talk all tough about "removal" when in their case it's clearly nonsense. They haven't the character to endure the brief discomfort of a declaration of Martial Law to achieve their supposed aims. I consider them to be silly people.

>>133103604
Ok

>>133102075
>too lazy to read on wiki
>would rather make a thread
>wait for a reply
>get a bunch of shitposts
>will end up reading wiki regardless

>>133102075
basically this >>133103414

it's anarchy where you assume that somewhow people will willingly cooperate and don't exploit each other as much as possible(slaves, etc.). Its communism tier bullshit.

>inb4 muh... NAP!

File: 1499231055495.jpg (54KB, 640x656px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 640x656px

>>133102615

Anarcho-capitalism: The idea that we should replace all the governments of the world with smaller, State-capitalist, countries.
Or at least, that's what would happen.

>>133102075
one of the great anarchist ideologies

>>133102075
The yellow represents gold.
The black represents black gold.

>>133103414
>>133104962

>it's utterly incompatible with human nature.
>assume that somewhow people will willingly cooperate

Obvious strawman is obvious: it's genius is in the fact that it does not require trust. What happens when you put your faith in an organization is the state. Everyone gets fucked. With market anarchy, you have options: you can decide who gets to defend you rather than being forced to pay for "defense" and receiving buttrape from the monopoly that is government.

These assholes either don't understand how it works or are intentionally detracting from the main point.

>>133105241
>State-capitalist, countries.

Yeah, no. People in the same geographic area can elect different providers of protection. There are no taxes, people pay willingly for such services or go without protection. They are free to switch providers, ergo not a state.

>>133102384
>You still gonna get fugged by the rich.

It's more expensive for the rich to fugg you in anarchy because they have no way to externalize the cost like they do now with the state.

>>133102075
It means look out! selfish, greedy, spoiled man baby ahead.

>>133105035

See

>>133102615


Children are incapable of entering contracts because they lack the capacity for informed consent. Therefore, they are not allowed to work in the sense that you describe. That doesn't stop anyone from allowing a kid to mow someone's lawn for some spending money if the child so desires. After all, the child would have to be old enough to push a mower and cut in a straight line.

>>133108292
Whats stopping a business from doing that anyways?

>>133102075
You and only you are entitled to the fruits of your labour and can trade them with anyone without any restrictuions. Derive from that.

File: IMG_20160825_184544.jpg (114KB, 1207x850px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 1207x850px

>>133102288

File: 1495393331773.jpg (32KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 480x480px

>>133103414
OK national socialist