Why are "an-caps" so edgy?
>>133083104
Becuz they are suburbanite white boys who like weed but not poor people.
>>133083104
ancap is a childish meme ideology, usually the edgy teens grow out of it by 18 when they start making their own money.
Some ppl never grow out of it. They get rich off writing books and fleecing the next generation of gullible teens.
>>133084141
Little do you know some autists are developing a godlike AI that will enforce the NAP by zapping anyone who violates it
>>133083172
In fairness some of the most left-wing urbanite WHITE stong-holds in the USA are segregated.
White-Liberals are simply more sophisticated in their racism
>>133084141
No one believes in it seriously. It's a funny thought experiment that's entertaining similar to communism but there you have actual followers.
It's too kino for your average /pol/tard; that's why /lrg/ is so good compared to the other generals.
>>133085316
there's a retard below you whos an ancap
>>133085712
Not an argument.
>>133085933
wasnt meant to be. come back when you're 18! This is an adults-only forum.
>>133086456
But you're the one that types like an obvious underaged b&, not me. I smell some really hard projecting, little guy.
>>133086824
the "i know you are but what am I" comeback is really playground-tier, kiddo.
>>133086824
>>133086950
ebin bantz, logically inconsistent retard
>>133086950
>, kiddo.
I cringed. All argumentation aside, there's no need to embarrass yourself by continuing to throw a childish temper tantrum. Just never post again out of shame and it'll probably be okay.
I have only 2 questions for all ancaps here
1. Who is going to enforce NAP?
2. Who is going to defend "capitalistic" part of your anarchy?
Its obvious that any ancap system will degenerate into pure anarchy
Problem with Ancaps is that they are extremely hostile even towards Libertarians. They are never open to arguments and they think they know it all because they read 3 books about NAP philosophy. They aren't different from antifa commies. I still have to met an ancap who is open to a serious argument.
>>133090978
I don't believe it will go full anarchy. What I see is big corps like we have today taking the place of the government, buying land, and renting to people under local laws. "Incorporated" is a good show about it. It based on the future, when govs went extinct and corporations who where responsible for things like agriculture took over. People who worked on those corps had a somewhat decent life. Others couldn't make the cut and then lived in a mad-max style world.