US losing net neutrality

>look mom
>I posted it again

>>133062535
>falling for the cyber jew

>>133062535
Trump will veto it don't worry

>>133062535
How does it feel not knowing what a VPN is?

>>133062535
Good.

Ron Paul said don't cede power over the internet to government. He was right about a lot of shit so I'm rolling with don't tread on my internet.

TOR network would be fast when everybody's a relay.

>>133063000
Waste of a good trips.

Just admit trump was wrong on this one instead of having to resort to muh vpn. tons of VPNs actively sell your data and log your shit.

>>133065068
TOR is operated by the us gov

>>133062535
Why cant americans just admit that they fucked up?
Trump is an utter fucking failure. He is cutting your so beloved "freedom" and your civil liberties, wont abolish NAFTA, the wall is going to be some small fence just to satisfy the reactonary right wing, his approval rating is at a record low, criminals like hillary clinton wont get indicted, he hired a bunch of goldman sachs members for his cabinet, your infrastructure is still a disaster, he called himself a nationalist and globalist, his daughter converted to judaism.
The only thing where he is amaster of his trait is nepotism.

>>133065656
because one of the biggest problems with americans is that they hate taking responsibility for their actions and admiting that they are wrong in certain parts. their ego is wayyyyy up there when it should not be

>>133062535
Well, at least CNN won't be the only group doxing internet users.

>>133063076
4 chan will die with this. Hope you are happy.

>>133065656
fix your own disaster of a country first before talking shit, muhammed.

>>133062535
And I suppose the un would do a better job

>>133065656
It's been 5months...let that set in. 5, fucking months. Let's see that's less than 10% of his "allotted" time.

Wake me up in 2019 and tell me all the things he hasn't done. schwuchtel.

>>133065656
Trump is just another Globalist. Part of the Bush/Clinton group of elites that lie smile and fuck you up the rear. Conservatives ARE REALLY REALLY EASY to trick. It's because they are really fucking stupid. But it's not like we had a choice after they fucked over Bernie and shut all other parties out of the debates.

>>133062535
That bill was put in place by Obama just a few years ago, why wasn't the net neutral before then?

File: 1496903715959.jpg (7KB, 228x225px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 228x225px

>>133062535
>They will also be able to collect and sell your Internet history to anyone.

They already can and do, dumbass.

Other than that I agree, net neutrality shouldn't be taken away. But you seem about as informed on this issue as the legislators who want to remove it.

>>133066852
*just over*

>>133065656
>americans fucked up
were not the ones destroying Europe for a 3rd time. neck yourself kraut

File: 1489784080702.png (210KB, 581x581px) Image search: [Google]

210KB, 581x581px

Stop replying to shitposts and reply to this one >>133066899
or I'll SCREAM

>>133066899
For whatever reason people still get disarmed by the titles. They can't get past the surface of things. Hey the Patriot Act was patriotic and NAFTA is about free trade (you're not against free trade are you?). Hey even North Korea is a democracy and a republic!

>>133065656
NAFTA might as well get demolished if trades arent in our favor. The wall is being built(A WALL) Approval rating is meaningless when Trump himself is not here to appease the masses but the republic, Goldman Sachs whine is warranted, Hillary whine is warranted, Infrastructure bill is coming but it takes time, Trump just wants to get along with everybody nationalist/globalist and dis daughter i dont care.
>>133066886
Bernie really? Socialism is why Europe is so shitty no thanks.

>>133065197
You want the governments of the world to have complete control over what you see on the internet? You want them to have a permanent record of everything you say or do on the internet? Get V& and thrown into reeducation camps?

>>133065656
I guess it's just easier to say America is wrong and doomed than it is to try and fix your own country in any way.

>>133067486
>You want the governments of the world to have complete control over what you see on the internet
Has nothing to do with neutrality
>You want them to have a permanent record of everything you say or do on the internet?
They already have that
>Get V& and thrown into reeducation camps?
kek

>>133066458
>says the american

>>133062535
>America, how does it feel knowing your republican government is going to let companies regulate your Internet?
Pretty good actually. Businesses should control the market. It's fucking bullshit when the government decides to price out certain products through regulation or taxation just because they feel like it.

File: china-flag.jpg (15KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 800x533px

You want the government to regulate the internet? Pic related

1. Get a VPN
2. Problem solved

Fascist faggot NN is a fraud , gas yourself

>>133062535

>he hasnt heard of the free market

So, do we have to spell it out to you what happens to the companies that do limit your access or sell your browsing history?

Do you think they'll be in business long, or maybe a competitor will offer an unlimited plan like only sprint did
....and now everyone is?

>>133065656
They're cucks

>le get vpn xD ez

>>133068574
Yeah now we get to rely on buisnesses doing a years worth of research and calculations to find out how within a .00000001 percent they can fuck us over with the maximum possible price people will tolerate before turning to one of their "competitors"

Good, keep the internet as far away from the fucking government as possible.

At least with a corp, you can seek redress. Someone can make a competing product, or you can sue them.

Good luck trying to get the government to do something it doesn't want to do.

>>133068646
They banned all gay shit from being shown online.

I'd rather have that desu

>>133068646
>its fine as long as its a private entity doing it

>>133069200
"Please enjoy our monthly 40gb youtube package* *overage charges alotted @ 25 dollars a gb"

Ahhhhh the smell of free market capitalism!

>>133068492
I'm sorry if you're too poor to understand introspection.

>>133069501

Better than Uncle Sam censoring every porno site except blacked.com tbqh.

And that's more likely to happen than your fantasy YouTube package.

File: 5b8fd7331f.jpg (38KB, 461x346px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 461x346px

>>133062535
Keep listening to your masters

File: CNN0.jpg (72KB, 490x325px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 490x325px

>>133066473

>>133068838
>unlimited plan
>*unlimited (4gb/month)

>>133069632
>if you want access to the internet u are a CNN shill

Ky retard.

File: ctr_shareblue_tactics.jpg (587KB, 1629x2269px) Image search: [Google]

587KB, 1629x2269px

>>133062535
>posting in a shareblue divide and conquer thread

Character assassination is when you try to make a person irrelevant because you destroyed the perception of their personality. You try to make it so nobody likes them anymore, so nobody listens to them anymore. You do it when you see that person as a threat.

You can spot it when there's clear spam about a certain person, and asking who benefits from that spam. e.g. /pol/ doesn't benefit from abandoning Lauren Southern. She is starting thousands of normies down the redpill path.

Shareblue/antifa does benefit. This is a shareblue character assassination attempt, using stuff they think will get /pol/ to hate her. Lying about her being jewish is one way. Calling her a slut/racemixer is another. Calling her a coward or weakling is another. etc. etc.

It's to shareblue's benefit if every alt-light and alt-right personality gets entirely discredited so /pol/ no longer has any big voices on their side, and normies stop getting redpilled, which is why they do it.

You cunts are here to try to neutralize /pol/ and the other places you brigade before the 2018 and 2020 elections with your retarded divide and conquer tactics.

All that means is that nationalism is going mainstream, something that should be encouraged at all levels, and it also means you commie pieces of shit are losing bigger than shit.

Die in a fire.

File: winnie the pooh who cares.png (68KB, 506x226px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 506x226px

>Obama administration put through the change in classification in 2015
>absolutely nothing changed
>opponents attempt to get the classification changed back
>"YOU'LL DESTROY THE INTERNET AS WE KNOW IT!"
Given that we've seen the before and after shot - and absolutely nothing is different - why should we care? Why didn't the internet doomsday these faggots caterwaul about occur pre-2015? Is it because none of this actually fucking matters and it's just another partisan pissing match?

>>133069631
>being this delusional

File: IMG_0197.jpg (197KB, 940x627px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 940x627px

>>133069973
>2017 ad
>using share blue meme still

File: comcast.v2.png (38KB, 1200x627px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 1200x627px

>>133069632
Sure, and you keep listening to yours.

>>133069984
Are u retarded? Do Americans really believe this shit? When you sites are censored by being unable to load and you pay packages to visit sites don't blame us Clintonn voters. We warned u.

>>133062535
So

Shill how does it feel to make the same thread all day?

>>133069424
>its fine as long as its a NON-JEWISH private entity doing it

>>133062535
Fuck you OP for using my UN flag to shitpost about MUH MURICA

>>133069631
So, you think it's more likely that the U.S. government will get all the states together and repeal the first amendment so they can ban porn instead of a private company deciding to ban porn?
You're delusional.

>>133062535
All these doomsayers and yet nothing happens. Your image is fake and your hysteria is ridiculous.

>free market

Yeah BECAUSE FOUR FUCKING COMPANIES CONTROLLING THE INTERNET IS FREE

File: LISTEN HERE NIGGER.png (213KB, 442x341px) Image search: [Google]

213KB, 442x341px

>>133070142
I swear if comcast so much as jokes about fucking with my anime I'll burn them to the ground

This site will be the first to go. And I will laugh.

>trump has appoint Comcast lobbyists to the FCC.

>>133062535
>1 post by this ID

YOU RETARDS KEEP FALLING FOR THIS OBVIOUS SHILL SHIT.

KNOCK. IT. OFF. SAGE AND IGNORE.

>>133065237
Please tell me this is bait
Yet still, trump didn't over turn obongos legalization and funding of fake news yet, nor has anyone from the left or right addressed that as a problem, and that does kind of make trump a faggot like everyone else

It's funny how commiefornians and Seattle fags have this issue while states with more free market ideas never have this crap.

File: I was only pretending.jpg (1MB, 680x1671px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 680x1671px

>>133070233
>LARPing as retarded
Whatever makes you happy, dude. Tipped your hand a little too much, though.

File: 1485367939981.jpg (993KB, 1182x1581px) Image search: [Google]

993KB, 1182x1581px

>>133062535
I route all my traffic via tor nodes and a VPN server I setup myself with open source software. It's just our normies who don't give a shit about their privacy.

>>133062535
Wow, that's a lot of BS. gg

>>133062535
Reminder it's the REPUBLICAN party that's against net neutrality! looking at you drumpkins

>>133070746
>HATES JEWS
>WORSHIP JEWISH CAPITALISM

EXPLAIN THIS SHIT.

File: 1492868638478.png (14KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 200x200px

>>133062535
Alright fuck it, I guess I'm gonna rant.

Net neutrality is shit and the market knows it. Here's and example, say you just bought a new motherboard the MSI B350 Tomahawk. It, and many other boards come with a thing they call gaming Ethernet which basically routes gaming packets with a higher priority than all others so your downloads don't affect your game.

You could apply this on a larger scale so people who need lower latency can get it without Stacy's Netflix stream of 13 Reasons Why sucking up all the bandwidth or we can go the route of net neutrality and all suffer.

The fact that any gamer advocates for net neutrality is pants on head retarded. Packets have priority for a reason, the internet has never been neutral and should never be. The gaming servers should be served before the download ones as they don't use much bandwidth and need low latency.

Those who advocate for net neutrality are either highly ignorant or just sadistic.

When the left admits that it was king niggers 2012 ndaa that cause the fake news problem from outlets like npr and cnn, ill afford you a little more respect than a retarded crack smoking pedophile. But until then, ghost yourself faggot

File: samurai jack evil shrug.png (1001KB, 1372x917px) Image search: [Google]

1001KB, 1372x917px

>>133070962
I don't hate Jews, though.

>>133069631
All appealing net neutrality will do is put a price tag on knowledge and entertainment again. It will kill websites that rely on traffic like 4 chan and force people to go outside. The internet is unique to other media outlets in that the user can share and produce content for free. Its definitely in the USAs best interest to appeal it but will you give up your freedoms so others can make money?

>>133062535
>republican government is going to let companies regulate your Internet
will end up better then the government regulating the internet.

Retard don't. know what natural monopolies are. It's not free market if we got four companies running all our internets. You will never have your libertarian bullshit fairy tale.

>>133070233
>Don't blame liberals.
>Literally the, "PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN AND BAN THINGS!" party.

>>133070238
The entire internet community should be up in arms about this but nobody really cares. I guess we all want to get off the internet and work for those jew bucks after all.

We were fucked as soon as Obongo gave up US control of the internet.

>>133066899
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/FCC_Open_Internet_Order_2010

Before that the Internet was too small to smother without stifling startups and such

>>133070578
Yeah and all the liberals will love it as they can circle jerk on their paid to access reddit. All the right wing retards will love it as they can pay to access Breitbart.

>>133071146
Literal terrorist and savages. Even worse, communist and feminist.

>>133062535
First, Trump only removed the Obama EO that gave FCC regulatory power, this is not the same as end net neutrality, and shame on you for your alarmist misinformation

2. Companies already work around this. I've worked in content delivery for video so I know. Basically sites will approach network operators that have peering agreements with other operators and make deals for estimated traffic at fixed prices and performance service levels. Many of these operators have privately owned cables and networks that they run their traffic on. This allows hosts to get desired bandwidth and latency for delivery, and sites who don't use this use the public network (ISP owned) and have less bandwidth and worse latency generally.

>>133068838
The free market wasn't working, which is why ISPs had to be classified as Title II.

File: 1488976089168.gif (2MB, 202x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 202x360px

>>133071399
>Before that the Internet was too small to smother without stifling startups and such
>2010

File: 6b172a558cb77342ae8f3cc883ee4f68.jpg (166KB, 990x619px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 990x619px

>>133062535
Wasn't it Obama that sold the internet to the UN back in October? Oh yeah, that's right.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fv1Wo9Eg40k

But we'll just blame this on Trump and hope everyone forgets about this little detail.

File: j92bkp0t1viy.jpg (74KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 960x540px

>>133072340
Worst. President. Ever.

>>133071782
Thanks anon. This helps a lamen like me. So much alarmist nonsense just to push an agenda I thought we were better than this. But most people would rathey role play doom Paul then educate and truly red pill people.

>>133062535
>They will also be able to collect and sell your Internet history to anyone.

Sorry to say but this has been going on since the beginning of the internet.

I had a email when I was a teenager in the late 90s. Iv obviously signed up to something and given my home number.

18 years or so later my parents are still getting phone calls weekly from "Investment firms" looking for me.

The few times iv spoken to them they have sounded like shit skins who are calling from London.

They ask you for crazy amounts of money over the phone and when I asked how the hell they had so much information on me they said it was from an email that I hadn't used for nearly 20 years.
Companies will sell your information to criminals without a care in the world.

>>133072340
Those apples are not at all like these oranges.

>>133072695
>Literally the same subject.
>"Here's a thought terminating cliche!"
k buddy

Gobeement good corporation bad. Me leik gomunism and sonig.

>>133070989
The thread should of ends here.

People ignorant of networking will give the government a foot in the door to an regulatory capture dilemma.

>>133062535
>They will also be able to collect and sell your Internet history to anyone.

They've always been able to do this, this is nothing new you gigantic nigger.

>>133062535
They do this anyways, no laws were in place to stop them. If you don't want people knowing what traps you fap to then there are ways to hide it. Fucking underage retards.
>>133065197
>not making your own VPN
Jesus fuck all these plebs.
>>133065656
>german talking about fucking up
wew

if i'm not getting robbed or fired because of it, then there is no reason to panic.

>>133070681
He's not wrong though. A massive number of Tor exit nodes are run by the gubbermint (mostly the Navy IIRC). Owning so many exit nodes, as well as who knows how many relay nodes, makes it much, much easier to trace the path of an arbitrary packet to its source. Tor is not safe and hasn't been for years.

>>133073447
TOR is one layer of "security" you can use, relying on any one technology is doomed to fail.
Really though the only way to be safe from (((them))) is to go off the grid.

>>133071463
It wasn't that long ago when the left believed everything on CNN and the right believed everything on Fox News.

The Internet is consolidating. We'll get back to that point again, and people will trust the MSM like they always did.
The left/right didn't become geniuses all of a sudden. They'll revert back as the internet becomes entirely controlled.

>>133073531
or just not give a fuck. It's worked for me so far.

>>133062632
fpbp

>>133072829
They are literally two different things. ICANN has fuckall to do with net neutrality.

>>133074139
>ICANN has nothing to do with net neutrality.
Sure, buddy.

File: IMG_7597.jpg (79KB, 720x516px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 720x516px

>These retards are still on about it

>>133070989
Yep this guy gets it - Can always count on my fellow /pol/ to know whats going on.

The fucking idiot leftist think the I.P control everything about your precious internet - NO the LOCAL Government controls the ground work not the Internet Providers.

My data cap was 2 tb before N.N. N.N happened it went down to 1. I never had my Internet Provider slow down my internet or doing anything behind my back. I do like the rule that if any internet provider fucks with your data or speed they should be fined. I got no complaints on that.

People dont realize that N.N makes it harder for other companies to get into your region for more competition. If everyone has the same speeds then how are other companies going to compete in that region.

Technology is advancing fast, let the free market decide. If you only have one cable provider in your region, give it time, more will come. N.N slowed the hell out of this process. Now expect more competition to come.

>>133062535
BUT LE EPIK TRUMP FOR THE FTW?!! XDDDD
GOD LE EMEPEROR SUPREME MEME SAVIOUR OF THE CHOSEN PEOPLE RACE X)))) HE'S PERFECT AND BEST PRESIDENT EVER HAHAHAHA XDDD

>>133067066
Always deflecting. That is the only thing Americans are good at here on /pol/.

Also, the Democrats are the ones pushing for net neutrality, and since it's axiomatic at this point that Dems never do anything that benefits Americans, I would oppose net neutrality for this reason regardless.

hows it going in somaliland nigger

also they already do just shut the fuck up this changes nothing

Trump is a old boomer fagot who doesn't know or care about internet protections


Prove me wring. Why did he appoint Comcast to FCC?

>>133062535
niggers tongue my anus

>>133068574
What about when one company has a monopoly over your entire city? Can't exactly start up your own mom-and-pop ISP in the hopes of competing.

File: 7691264_1_l.jpg (60KB, 600x386px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 600x386px

>>133065656
He is deporting Mexicans. He has already stripped regulations. He cut welfare significantly. Gorsuch is on the supreme court. He has stopped muslims from coming in.

I'd say a job well done so far.

File: 1R7XXkJ.png (57KB, 625x656px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 625x656px

>>133074139
>ICANN has fuckall to do with net neutrality

I'm so sick of these queers from r the Donald coming here shilling for their gay ass president. We hate you. Stop posting here. We don't support this.

>>133068574
Except it's a monopoly here. You only have two choices in the US.

>>133068838
there is no free market in us.
isps havr a cartel.

god you people are stupid as niggers

>>133077512
>Except it's a monopoly here.

Just like the internet but these fags scream muh freedom.

>>133068646
Net neutrality is not a dictatorship like China is. It basically means the government makes sure information goes to and from an area that is it.

>>133068749
>Problem solved

If internet connections were not ass and had to rely on data caps with surcharges that would be great.

>>133069631
Government is tied to upholding the Constitution and banning, removing, controlling the Internet would break 1A.

No such worry with private corporations.

You people arr so fucking stupid that you deserve to lose Internet

File: 1485220056431.jpg (10KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 250x250px

>common sense rules that say 'hey you aren't allowed to go 'pay us more for access to these sties' and turn the internet into the same shitfest quagmire that cable and satellite television is where the only goal is to jew you out of every last cent they can while providing the barest minimum of service they legally need to
>'lol u fukken jew shill leftists'

>>133062535
So Obama passed a bill protecting NN in 2015. Why didn't any ISP try tiered access prior to that?

FYI, the first picture of any tiered access dates back to 2009, so no, it's not just a recent idea.

>>133062535
>Visiting YouTube
>Ever

A widely-cited example of a violation of net neutrality principles was when the Internet service provider Comcast was secretly slowing (a.k.a. "throttling") uploads from peer-to-peer file sharing (P2P) applications by using forged packets.[6] Comcast didn't stop blocking these protocols like BitTorrent until the FCC ordered them to do so.[7] In 2004, The Madison River Communications company was fined $15,000 by the FCC for restricting their customer’s access to Vonage which was rivaling their own services.[8] AT&T was also caught limiting access to FaceTime, so only those users who paid for the new shared data plans could access the application.[9] In April 2017, an attempt to compromise net neutrality in the United States is being considered by the newly appointed FCC chairman, Ajit Varadaraj Pai.[10][11] On May 16, 2017 a process to roll back Open Internet rules, in place since 2015 began. This rule making process includes a public comment period that lasts sixty days: thirty days for public comment and thirty days for the FCC to respond.[12]

>>133077888
Don't bother the r the d fags will never stop sucking trump's dick. Same retards who supported bush with Iraq war. We areFUCKED

File: kosh_vs_right.jpg (2MB, 1687x3008px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1687x3008px

>>133069631
You fucking Kosher Conservative. You are the problem with America.

"Net Neutrality" is really just internet communism. The government should not be forcing companies to host genericjavporn.org or piratecompanymovies.org at the same speed as their own company website or whatever website they can get a good deal out of.

The real problem is these companies don't get sued for false advertising or for faking speeds on purpose without making it clear.

>>133077888
>common sense rules
like dont steal from the taxpayer to create a beauracracy that sucks dick? or does common sense nor apply

>>133062535
>1 post by this ID

/pol/ has been shlonged again

>>133078313
Funny how are these trumpfags were the same ones critizing kosher nationalism and cuckseratives previously to 2017. Amazing what carrying water for a pOliticans does to people.

>>133068838
Reminder AT&T had a monopoly that needed to be broken up. If this passes we need to open up the competition floodgates at the least.

>>133078668
Deal with it FGT. The internet is a utility with free information and exponential growth.

>>133062632
Yep, third time today.

Sage.

>>133062535
explain to me please. at one time, liberals get all excited when the government tracks down le ebil raycissts and jails them. at another, they pretend to like net neutrality. so what do you fuckers actually want?

>>133078311
you obviously know what you are talking about
tell me what bohemian grove is

>>133062535
>America, how does it feel knowing your republican government is going to let companies regulate your Internet?

its not

You are fake news.

File: op3.jpg (23KB, 474x473px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 474x473px

>>133062632
fpbp

File: 1499120939017.png (101KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 300x300px

>>133062535
That's for the lecture schlomo

>>133065237
No it's not you retard. They have some exit nodes to spy that's for sure but they don't run it.. God how are people this dumb

>>133062632
fpbp

>>133066578
>4 chan will die with this.
KEK no it won't. It will come back better, stronger and BIGGER! Just in a different form.

>>133066578
4chan would die with Net Neutrality. Once all data is considered the same what prevents the government from deciding what content is acceptable to view. The law of unintended consequences.

>>133080149
Yeah another chan will emerge with low bandwidth and without access to the free flow of information. We back in the AOL chat room days boys!

Reminder we warned you. Partiot act 2.0 here we come.

>>133062535
As if Google and Facebook don't do all of that already.

>>133080334
>Governments
Except Government in this case would not control it, but corporations if they were free to mess with priorities.

File: Net.jpg (58KB, 594x504px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 594x504px

>>133062945
LOL you're kidding right?'
You keep thinking that.

https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/532608358508167168?lang=en

But you keep believing that.

>>133080717
The corporations have controlled it for 15 years without issue. Much rather have nice fast and free internet than DMV style internet.

File: compiler.png (49KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 1366x768px

>>133070766
>2017
>Using MS compilers to create Windows programs
Also, how to VPN?

File: Slide033.png (83KB, 1000x563px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 1000x563px

>>133080784
>Without issue.
You have data caps, high prices, shit infrastructure, now they want to power trip and grab even more control.

>fast and free
you really think there iis not going to be a price hike for different packages, like YT package? and your internet isn't fast, it's pretty shite.

>>133062632
>s-stop talking about it! I'm not listening! nananananalalala can't hear you!

>>133062535
Use VPNs and fuck you ISP. It's that simple. Free market has solved this statist problem even before it became a talking point.

>>133070766
Noice!

>>133062535
Fucking cucked nation

>>133081242
ISPs can screw over your VPN usage if they want to.

>Free market.
ISPs in U.S. have a cartel.

>>133062535
there will be some companies that will say in contract they don't collect zip, others that will for lower internet prices. This is freedom, to choose your own internet.

>>133081080
I don't see Malta on this list.

>>133062632
fpbp

>>133081242
>Free market
It is illegal to start an ISP. You need government approval.

>>133081505
That's averages if you can read. I have a 300mbps/150mpbs connection for 45 euros a month without caps.

I used to have, when I lived on the continent, a 1gpbs fiber connection for 27 euros, without caps.

>>133062535
>They will also be able to collect and sell your Internet history to anyone.
That's not what net neutrality is about. Net neutrality is something that has managed to exist without government regulation. And you know full well that the more they regulate about the internet, the less free it will be.

Change you flag next time you drop bait.

>>133080784
>>133080717
>government
>corporation
What's the difference?

>>133080784
Uuuh... Sorry to disagree with you Anon. But compared to much of the world, we pay more for slower speeds. And I wwouldn't say withou issue.. Look at CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 for instance.. But I agree we don't need regulation.. CAN-SPAM Act again is a perfect example of how govt fucks everything they touch. We don't need the on the net!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAN-SPAM_Act_of_2003

>>133081702
Private corporation does not need to progress and protect the 1A.

>ISP sells data
>people find out
>people move to better ISP
ISPs won't sell your data if they know they will lose customers. Also:
VPN

>>133065237
The government can't break the encryption and with current technology it is impossible to just brute-force every single person who uses the internet.

>>133081790
Not for long, look up quantum computing

>>133062535
I'm more worried about the chinese take over of bitcoin

>>133081892
With quantum computing we will be able to predict human behavior before it happens with exact accuracy. Minority Report may not have been far off.

>>133062535
>We just need our government to control the internet and not those evil corporations. That way we can have more freedom to post what we want online, just like the Europeans.

kys faggot

File: what-is-net-neutrality-isp-package-diagram.0.jpg (298KB, 1113x688px) Image search: [Google]

298KB, 1113x688px

>coming to burgerfat internet soon
Also good luck to any mart-sharter out there in finding any provider who will allow for 4chan.

>>133081790
>Move to a better ISPs.
Cartel.

Let me ask one thing trumpfags. Do you seriously think trump knows anything about the internet? Why did he appoint Comcast shills to the FCC.

Can someone give me a quick rundown on how to use a VPN?

>>133062535

Net Neutrality for Everything = FORCE EVERY COMPANY TO SELL ONLY ONE PRODUCT AT ONE PRICE TO EVERYONE

Fucking communists you. I use 20gb/month and subsidize you fat addicts taking bandwidth intravenously.

>>133083161
Enjoy having (((them))) deciding what content they will promote or ban.
Enjoy fapping to BLACKED, only watching MSM media and surfing plebbit and kikebook.

>>133083161
You are retarded.

>>133083065
Find one you think you can trust.
Pay Anonymously.
Be sure they have a killswitch (no data sent unless VPN is active).
Turn killswitch on.
Shitpost from any country via a drop down menu.

pretty cool. im going to start up an isp that doesn't censor anything and gain from this.

>>133062535
you're probably going to have faster internet

>>133062535
NET NEUTRALITY =/= NETWORK NEUTRALITY

Network Neutrality
>The idea that all data, sites, and services on the internet should be treated equally, which has been the de facto standard of the internet for the last 30 years without requiring any federal legislation or regulation.

"Net Neutrality"
>Legislation signed into law under President Obama in 2015 that would grant vague, broad-reaching regulatory authority over the internet and service providers to the FCC - including the power to not only regulate the service and practices of ISPs, but potentially even censor and police online content.

Network neutrality is good "Net Neutrality" was a left wing federal government power grab to try and assert control over one of the last genuinely free mediums.

File: 1496880945220.png (23KB, 694x578px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 694x578px

>>133062535
>America, how does it feel knowing your republican government is going to let companies regulate your Internet?
Oh no, not competition for the companies, whatever shall I do?

>They will also be able to collect and sell your Internet history to anyone.
With modern encryption methods, this is hardly a concern.

>A bunch of Trump supporters kept saying "Trump will veto it don't worry"
Those supporters are retards.

Keep crying, you statist teet-leeching bastard

>>133084112
If you don't like your provider, find another one. This isn't the 90s where most cities and small towns only had one option for internet - the rise of DSL companies, small low-speed startups, satellite internet, etc has given rise to a market where even tons of a few thousand people typically have access to at least 2 or 3 different options.

They may not all be equal options - one may be a little more expensive or a little slower or what-have-you, but that is the nature of the free market: You, as a consumer, choose what you want and what you are willing to pay for and pick the service which comes closest to matching that.

>>133081790
Impossible.
Only one or two providers most places and they're all owned by the same people.
No one can get into the market anymore and all compeition is bought out.
Effectively monopoly.

>>133085387
>Only one or two providers most places
That's BS. You won't always be able to get the same service for the same price, but most cities and towns in America have access to at least one or two competitors.

File: kickbacks.jpg (172KB, 675x817px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 675x817px

>>133062535
Maybe people will finally get serious about developing competitive markets for communications. I have multiple options, as do most, but only one cable provider owns all or nearly all hard lines in most cities. That means competition is dial-up, satellite, or rents bandwidth from the primary cable company. I don't want cable to be treated as a government infrastructure responsibility, but the government can do things to encourage competition (incentives for competitor start-ups, less kick-backs for established companies, stop blocking broadband infrastructure development).

>>133062535
'net neutrality' was a scam to let the FCC inspect packets

The internet was better before it was enaced. Rebranding it as 'net neutrality' was the third attempt to push it through after sopa and pipa failed. People who opposed those but are 'for net neutrality' are a bunch of fucking morons who support things they dont understand.

>>133084830

You are so pathetic. Your entire shite ancap existence would not not even be a thing were it not for neet neutrality. /Pol/, Molykike and a bunch of other retarded trash you lap up would long ago have ceased to exist were it not for net neutrality...

>>133086611
>long ago
its only been around for a few years

>>133081153
I can't over your own laws of indefinite detention for insulting the King. Sit the fuck down and go to a brothel like your people do.

>>133062535
It would work if the fuckin libs wouldn't create monopolies for comcast and ruin the free market

>>133086869
you're just as degenerate

>>133065656
>"i dont see why you guys cant admit that you're wrong
>"i mean look at the approval ratings, they're abysmal"

that said, the donald is still fucking awesome.
the problem is we cared TOO MUCH about the world thought, so having our government do that less is important..donald gets that job done.


the net neutrality thing simply hastens the clock on the inevitable, the fact is everything is being watched, most of the websites we go to have the equivalent of a file cabinet full of our actions in a unique profile, and whats more is their security measures have been consistently breached.

The free market has a much better chance at taking care of us than the government at this point, it should just get out of the way.

>>133082053
I unironically hope this happens so I can finally quit the internet forever.

>>133092813
>I hope the internet dies because I have no self control
kys

>>133093156
It's not about self control; it's about the fact that human interaction has moved almost exclusively online. I'm not the only member of my community who will quit if we start getting jewed like that and I look forward to talking with them in person at my local park instead of trading vapid image macros about shit that doesn't matter.

>>133062535
then switch ISP dumbfuck

funny how so many lolbertarians want to preserve government regulation. you are all fucking stupid

>>133066458
this. I mean, there are still Republicans who say that George Bush was a great president. And plenty of Democrats think that Obama was a effective progressive president.

Trump can do basically anything and a big chunk of Americans will support him, because anyone who voted for him will first have to admit that they fucked up by believing in him before they can admit that he fucked up.

Also, I've noticed that about 10-20% of the population at either end of the political spectrum simply aren't connected to reality in any way. Back in the Bush years there were Republicans who genuinely believed that they were living in the Biblical end times and that judgement day was going to happen any moment. Then you've got the Democrats who're convinced that the US is a white supremacist state. Things like 'evidence' and 'logic' simply don't matter to these people.

>>133093335
This. The Internet was a mistake.

>>133062535
>1 post by this ID

I hate all of you

File: LiveLeak-dot-com-936_1489015011-hounds2_1489015021.jpg.resized.jpg (6KB, 220x165px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 220x165px

>>133062535

So Burgers who will you VPN to when everybody else has censored internet?
You are as stupid as the memes

>>133093335
>>133093956

aka you're a loser with no friends and wants to blame one of the greatest creations in human history

again kys faggot

>>133093472
When the regulation is no regulation

>>133085619
cities yes

towns no

>>133094643
typical snake tempting us with evil.

>>133062535
First murrica - tomorrow world. There are no pluses in this for consumers. Not a single one. But they now will try to sell you your old fucking internet for 2x price, because fuck you.
And since we live in shitty world, tomorrow i expect same idea from our nigs.

>>133062535
>MAGA
>Lock her up
>build le wall

>>133062535
Don't a good number of ISPs worldwide already block this site?

File: 1489960074846.jpg (101KB, 704x593px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 704x593px

>>133062535
Maybe trumpo wants to recruit /pol/acks

Your first real job /pol/ you can finally build your gaymen pc rather than surviving day by day on NEET bux

>>133094643
Pretty much this.

>>133070233
she wouldve signed it you dumb fuck

>>133071196
>>133075048
>>133077268
>>133077642
>>133078895
>>133084123
say it with me "He is my president"

>>133082053
What's the problem here? Those are good deals.

>>133062535
Please God, allow Trump to block all degeneracy, sodomite material, pedophile material, adultery material, and anything harmful to the human psyche.

>>133105102
>Please God, allow Trump to block all degeneracy, sodomite material, pedophile material, adultery material, and anything harmful to the human psyche.
byebye 4chan

>>133105250
It would weed out those who don't know how to use proxies and such, also.
>better experience

File: 1499680159242.jpg (44KB, 396x382px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 396x382px

>>133062535
Sage

>>133105102
>corporations control internet
>he thinks thaat will mean LESS degeneracy
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHA
Oh you sweet sweet naive child