Race Realism Red Pill

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldQVWgEx5iM

>Debunking Genetic Determinism

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KR1ctWpIgts

>Biological determinism is nonsensical

>Biological Determinist Bull Shit

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGeebiEqe6g

>>133059626
>thumbnail
>that logo on the left

Do you honestly expect us to look into this shit? Unironically? Did you honestly just provide us with this link in hopes that we will use our time to hear this out?

File: 1499305081312.gif (469KB, 512x807px) Image search: [Google]

469KB, 512x807px

>>133059326
>Environmental factors cause mice to get sick over generations
>This debunks the fact that IQ differs across the races and that intelligence is 50% to 80% genetically determined

I suggest you take an IQ test yourself because it might be that you're a fucking idiot

File: republicans are smarter even whites.png (121KB, 518x934px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 518x934px

>>133059155
>IQ disparity between racists and non-racists proves that racists are inferior

The difference is that there are nearly one thousand replications of the gap between blacks and whites.

The studies about racists and non-racists are few and debunked. The most often cited uses incredibly low correlations to draw conclusions. It's something akin to "group A" correlates 0.2 with "group B" which correlates 0.2 with "racists"... and "group A" has slightly lower IQ than "non-group A"... so racists are less smart on average.

>>133059155
>Anarchist
>4 posters

File: beware of social science.png (554KB, 1791x1348px) Image search: [Google]

554KB, 1791x1348px

>>133062213
Here. The mental gymnastics to come up with a study that says racists are less smart are hilarious.

>>133059155
So you admit that blacks have lower average IQs? Which explains why they're so racist? And this somehow disproves race realism? I have no problem admitting that racists generally tend to be stupider than the average person, just like I have no problem admitting that blacks tend to be stupider than the average person. Not sure where the contradiction is. Humans are clearly very different from each other and it's retarded to think that creatures who evolved in very different climates and who obviously have very different traits are somehow all the same. What kind of retard actually looks at the real world and concludes humans are all equal when all evidence proves this to be false. I'm sure replying is pointless because you're not smart enough to realise that the average racist being stupid doesn't mean that they're wrong, nor does it mean that all racists are even stupid, but nevermind

>>133059626
>>133059432
>>133059326
Biological determinism is a strawman. There's two competing theories: 100% environment (egalitarianism) vs. mix of genes and environment (racism). Nobody believes it's 100% genes.

>>133062571
>racists generally tend to be stupider than the average person
They aren't. Look at: >>133062416

File: income-58b8928b3df78c353cc23b17.png (25KB, 768x614px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 768x614px

>>133059155
conservatives are smarter than liberals
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289614001081
happier than liberals about life
http://johnchambersslu.weebly.com/uploads/2/4/8/5/24852857/schlenkeretal_jrp_2012.pdf
and generally wealtheir than liberals (pic related)
get BTFO you disgusting cunt

File: lightaflamewhich.png (54KB, 429x410px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 429x410px

>>133059155
>http://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/pubs/pdf/rr13-803.pdf

>Hey look! It's the Candian Sociologist! Let's trust this obviously leftist bias represented in this report based on selective sampling and confirmation bias

>don't worry about the fact everything your proposing was taken as basic fact up until the late 60's

Do I have to break out those genetic determinism links again? You got beat last night. What brought you back?

>>133059626
>TheSkepticFeminist

You do know this dude was arrested for murder, right?

https://www.google.be/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=J-hiWY2bIM2E3gPPxpXgAQ&gws_rd=ssl#q=the+skeptic+feminist+shooting&spf=1499654181577

But acknowledging that black people have lower IQ's than whites isn't racist. it says they do right there in your book.

File: myth (2).png (237KB, 962x562px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 962x562px

>>133063015

File: myth (3).png (372KB, 962x578px) Image search: [Google]

372KB, 962x578px

>>133063115

File: myth (4).png (100KB, 900x558px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 900x558px

>>133063154

File: just cuck my shit up fam.jpg (107KB, 675x496px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 675x496px

>>133062918
High openness, low conscientiousness people... I'd say they're sub human, but they're really anti-human

>>133062918
http://www.craveonline.com/design/1263931-skeptic-feminist-youtuber-arrested-murdering-female-co-host

lol leftists are mentally ill

File: myth (5).png (976KB, 962x2184px) Image search: [Google]

976KB, 962x2184px

>>133063187

File: IMG_3166.png (411KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

411KB, 400x400px

>>133062213
>Conservatives and racists are smart
Sweetie
https://www.livescience.com/18132-intelligence-social-conservatism-racism.html

File: myth (6).png (117KB, 1047x625px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 1047x625px

>>133063237

>>133059155
>Racists have lower IQs

FACT CHECK: people with higher IQs are better at hiding power levels

File: in case you missed it.png (112KB, 625x959px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 625x959px

>>133063261
I already explained that study.

>racist people are less intelligent

false

http://www.salon.com/2013/08/12/study_smart_people_are_not_less_racist_than_other_people/

intelligent people just hide their racism.

>>133059326

Dude wtf. This is talking about disease not genetics effect on your IQ.

File: wew lad.png (425KB, 1317x1652px) Image search: [Google]

425KB, 1317x1652px

>>133063261
>Glad Stephanie fucking Pappas was here to clear the air for us
>centuries of biology know-how btfo

File: myth (7).png (194KB, 1056x927px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 1056x927px

You can deny and twist social science, but you can't deny genetics. Sorry.

>>133063385

https://archive.is/Yk7Rp

The genetic heritability of IQ is known but not to the precise extent. If two really intelligent people have children their child is most likely going to be really intelligent too but will regress to the mean so more than likely will be less intelligent than their parents but still above average.

If two really tall people have children the same thing applies.

>it's an "OP runs away when confronted with facts" episode

File: 1499563524624.png (430KB, 500x481px) Image search: [Google]

430KB, 500x481px

>>133059155
Define "racism". Seems to have been turned into a buzzword. Many would argue that affirmative action is racist, since it's based on color, not how hard you work or your quality of work. Many would argue that racism is whites doing anything that blacks don't like. Meanwhile, race is constant. The definition is defined clearly by outward appearance and genetics. Racism is a goal post that you can shift as far as you want, while race cannot be manipulated in such a way. This is why your argument is bullshit. Please come back with a better argument, antifa faggot.

>>133063355
Here's a different one
https://www.gwern.net/docs/iq/2014-carl.pdf
>Verbal intelligence is correlated with socially and economically liberal beliefs

File: republicans are smarter.png (116KB, 894x723px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 894x723px

>>133063866
Explained here.

protip: economically liberal in the study = economically conservative in America

File: prepp'd.jpg (152KB, 1094x920px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 1094x920px

>>133063750
Jesus Christ, you guys fucking hammered OP

Last night I popped on and they were just going at it. It was tedious. This time: btfo

OP's almonds couldn't handle it

>>133059155

JIDF bait

sage

>>133063866
>https://www.gwern.net/docs/iq/2014-carl.pdf


>watch out for this fucking powerhouse
>this lad is a black belt in sociology
>fully prepared to overturn millennia of field work in an opposing field based in hard facts. His subjective studies will enlighten the ignorant masses who think alleles and genes have anything to do with capability or any social impact whatsoever

File: 18664594_1403431886414142_3924967591153696851_n.jpg (9KB, 650x425px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 650x425px

>>133059155
Tell me, OP, what is the point of making this thread if you're not even going to try and refute our arguments?
Is this to clog up the board with shit threads so people might grow tired of going here?
Or are you secretly one of us and are presenting shitty arguments so that we might grow more sure of our own beliefs?

>>133064326
Protip: the study says Republicans are smarter than Democrats

The definition of "liberal" is basically in favor of free market, free speech and free association... i.e. a conservative in the U.S.

File: 12342345345.jpg (7KB, 238x192px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 238x192px

If anyone thinks IQ is mostly based on an enviromental factors would you be willing to have a child with a retard and expect them to be the next einstein? It's possible but unlikely and if anyone wants to volunteer I'm available.

File: 1494457375292.gif (2MB, 350x262px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 350x262px

Watching OP get BTFO'ed at every turn........fantastic. How will the ANTIFag ever recover?

>>133059155

so angry, I bet you make a good liberal

File: IMG_2490.gif (828KB, 498x199px) Image search: [Google]

828KB, 498x199px

>>133064058
Understandable, but the study also acknowledges that social conservatives have low IQs, you didn't refute that

Here's another one
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/201003/why-liberals-are-more-intelligent-conservatives%3Famp

>>133059155
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qma3uz9NlKM

>>133064462
I didn't read it, and it still means nothing to me. If I allowed this BS to actually work on me, it'd be super hypocritical, no different from the opponents side taking part in confirmation bias.

Sociology is bullshit, all these faggots are lightweights with a lot of money and extra time.

>>133064893
>social conservatives have low IQs
By the study's logic, a progressive that wants to shut down some forms of speech is a "social conservative".

You posted a blog post that cites studies that I have already explained.

File: IMG_3152.png (229KB, 559x331px) Image search: [Google]

229KB, 559x331px

>>133064462
>is basically in favor of free market, free speech and free association... i.e. a conservative in the U.S.
The only people who are against that are authoritarians. Unless, by "free market," you mean nonsensical neo-liberal policies

Show me a single person who would say that on average black people can't run faster than white people and then tell me why it is taboo to say that on average white people are smarter?

>>133059155
"The majority of anthropologists today consider race to be a sociopolitical phenomenon rather than a biological one"

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

File: Straw Man.png (200KB, 428x384px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 428x384px

>race realism and genetics implies determinism, and determinism is false. racists BTFO

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbvjdAYT0nY