No, seriously /pol/

>>133032537
We don't have net neutrality and companies know that if they started throttling traffic they'd lose customers, the free market fixed the "problem" without needing government to regulate the internet, so no, don't care.

>>133032537
most of /pol/ doesn't want net neutrality because it's the edgy thing to do, plus it spites the democrats, but in reality 4chan would be one of the sites to suffer from it because no sane internet provider would want to be associated with giving "fast lanes" to a "racist" website, so 4chan would suffer.

John Oliver and Reddit assured me I should totally care about this! It is an important issue!!

>>133034281
I'm pretty sure that is false
I remember hearing Comcast throttling Netflix's traffic until they payed them a hefty fee
but that doesn't affect the average consumer so net neutrality really doesn't matter

>>133034584
Case and point

>>133032537
Pretty sure this gif makes a better case against then for net neutrality. At least to those that have half a brain.

>>133034281
If we had more ISP's, then this would work. But we really only have the choice of 3-4 providers. Even less for rural communities.

>>133035532
then laws should be changed to make the market more competitive
but there is no need for net neutrality

What do I care about Netjew or Amawhore. I pirate Wifi from the 80 year old above and do online business in buttcoin on TOR plattforms. Will not really affect me

>>133035515
You may be retarded

yes, i want to give control of the internet to an entity that will fine you thousands of dollars for saying "fuck" on fm radio

>>133035848
Plausible deniable if they go after granma death

File: 1492540765383.jpg (160KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 1280x720px

>>133035515

>yfw

>>133035736
>then laws should be changed
Well good luck trying to get the old fucks in congress to agree on laws about shit they can't comprehend. Net Neutrality will have to do until Millennials and Gen Z get into Congress.