/NLG/ Neo-Liberal General

>>133003057
Bad bait

File: baathism.jpg (267KB, 1557x984px) Image search: [Google]

267KB, 1557x984px

>"No!"

Ba'athism is the true redpill. Why haven't you accepted it yet?

>>133003057
>starbucks

Thank you based neoliberalism

>>133003057
Hans, get the gas

>>133003268
>everything i don't like is bait

>>133003057
This is /pol/, OP. No one cares about ''evidence based policy". Sitting back and fighting meme wars together with other anons to make each other feel like we're less of a failure.

File: world-leaders-visiting-antarctica-1140x488.jpg (57KB, 1140x488px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 1140x488px

>>133003057
>alright everyone, the neoliberals are at it again protesting Trump's deregulations of industry. That's about all. Peace out.

File: dbf9afa914ac4c61b53e0357c8074977_18.jpg (41KB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 800x450px

>so what's wrong with evidence based policy
>implying neoliberalism is evidence based policy

http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2017/07/g20-desperately-save-failed-world-order-170708082115603.html

This sums up my hate for it pretty well.
It's obnoxious when people pretend Trump isn't a neolib though.

File: 1465924773711.gif (57KB, 500x313px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 500x313px

>>133003057
You are the same materialists as marxists. People won't be happy because they can buy more stuff you know.

>>133004531
Straight to archive
https://archive.is/Zm2iK

>>133004821
>People won't be happy because they can buy more stuff you know.
isn't that what the marxists say, though?

File: the hypocrisy of empiricism.jpg (63KB, 480x608px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 480x608px

>>133003057
>evidence based policy

>>133003057
>Neoliberalism
>government bailouts
top fucking kek at least you're not hiding it

File: lrg vs lp.png (348KB, 1437x908px) Image search: [Google]

348KB, 1437x908px

>neoliberalism
>free markets, free trade

Holy shit, you fucking piece of human garbage

>>133005375
>aristocracy
>free market
>conservatism
Conservative values will always be undermined by the free market, anon.

>>133004890
wew, go actually read some marxist texts

>>133004890
Marxists(communists that is) have the same eng-game as capitalists on a societal level. Little Last Man going on with their petty work during the day and consuming their petty needs during the afternoon/night. No greatness, no danger, no marvel, just mechanical cuck-ed living.

>>133005263
>not letting the industries that are the corner stone of your economy fail
>somehow this is a bad thing

>>133003057
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mcf9CLMQuRQ

>>133005629
No, they wont, anon.

>>133003057
That moment when starbucks is one of the best arguments you can make on why liberalism is good. Seriously op. Kys

>>133005636
>Marxists(communists that is) have the same eng-game as capitalists on a societal level
Please explain further without muh Nietzsche.

>No greatness, no danger, no marvel, just mechanical cuck-ed living.
Someone's projecting.

>>133005801
If the history of capitalism teaches us anything, it's that it always ensures class antagonism and social upheaval.

>>133005993
that is just an argument for the spoiled millennials
Neo-Liberalism has something for everybody :)

>>133005695
it's not about wether it's a good thing or bad thing, it's just inconsisten with a neoliberal worldview you fucking asstard.

>letting millions of people live in misery is ok
>letting one company fail leaving a couple thousand unemployed is terrible

File: 008.jpg (21KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 480x480px

>>133006368
>spot the commie
cry more, faggot

>>133003268

/Thread

>>133006656
kys statist

File: MussoliniFuturist.jpg (17KB, 340x420px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 340x420px

>>133006042
As far as I see communism wants us to have ours needs fufilled despite any innate hierarchy, so we can spend the day doing things we want without having to work just to make a living(marx would have wanted people do to more art or something similar). The problem I have with it is that these full-time hobbies won't reach the greatness and marvel of the more rough eras because there won't be any struggle or suffering. As far as neo-liberalism being the same, read Fukuyama. I am actually very happy that the only thing that can shake up our petty materialists lives will be new barbarians knocking at the door.

The space-communism of star trek is only a desire of generations of nerds exactly because it has struggle, even if the needs of the populace are fufilled.

>>133007241
You don't like autonomy and self governance? I bet you think the best path to a moral and just world is the government seizure of private assets

>>133006042
Just read Hoppe or Rothbard, they explain why the opposite is true. But I have a sense my only reply from you now will be: (((Rothbard)))