Let me explain to you, in no uncertain terms, why the transgender movement is bullshit. No rhetoric, no emotional appeals -- just logic.
The world we live in is full of social protocol. Laws allow everyone to coexist peacefully. Social manners and etiquette allow people to interact pleasantly. Language is standardized so that everyone can communicate unambiguously. So really, social protocols are rule-sets that allows humans to interact with each other effectively and efficiently.
One facet of social protocol is self-identification. Self-identification serves as a signal to communicate how people should interact with one another. Self-identification is simply a rule-set that aids social protocol.
The transgender movement seeks to create a new social protocol, wherein an individual has full and unfettered control over gender self-identification. The problem is that there are no clear-cut or universal rules for gender self-identification. Individuals can seemingly change gender at will, and the distinctions between genders are blurred. Under this new transgender order, gender self-identification does not effectively communicate how people should interact with one another. The identification system itself is chaotic and without rules.
The point I'm trying to drive across:
Transgenderism is a social protocol with no formal rule-set -- ergo not an effective protocol at all. Therefore, transgenderism is -- by nature -- an inconsistent and contradictory rule-set.
You can't have a protocol system with no protocols!
>Am I wrong?
>all this reasoning
Dude, it's just r-selection.