BTFO FAKE NEWS

File: Bakachan.org_1406416641183.png (907KB, 1500x1430px) Image search: [Google]

907KB, 1500x1430px

>>132981234
If trump says it, it is true

>>132981234
And we're just suppose to BELIVE DRUMPF I don't fucking think so IMPEACH!

>>132981234
>get elected into power with help from X nation
>become president
>get mad at X nation for helping you get elected into power

This orange nigga dumb asf

>>132981356

Aussie fag, or bait. :/

>>132981597

I wish it were true. I genuinely know shitty 30+ idiots who say Drumpf.

faggot.

>russian hacked the election!
That just means your security is fucking garbage.

File: Screen Shot 2017-07-09 at 4.59.39 AM.png (175KB, 1282x754px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 1282x754px

nice.

>>132982204
Blame Obama

>>132981356
are you actually so retarded you think misspelling the guys name is funny somehow?

>>132982204
hacked how?

>>132982346

Imagine being this dense

>>132982254
Anyone have analysis on this?

Hate to admit but it sounds like baloney to me

>>132981356
It's the original Germanic spelling.
UN anglicised.

>>132982254
translation: "i will put russians in charge of our cyber security so it can't happen again." the troll never stops - it is beautiful

File: 14639804.jpg (67KB, 920x810px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 920x810px

>>132981296
>There's no tangible evidence that proves Russia meddled with elections
>We still do not believe Trump
Ultimately you choose whom to believe, but don't be sarcastic at someone else's choice because that's extremely hypocritical.

>>132981234
has anyone yet bothered to define what 'meddling in the election' is even supposed to mean in concrete terms after all this months of talking about it?

>>132983431
Propaganda against Hillary.

>>132983431
giving wikileaks shit you stole from the DNC during a campaign

>>132983788
But every government tries to sway elections, anon

>>132983899
>Skippy falls for a phising scam
>RUSSIA HACKED THE ELECTION

File: 4L_LAKvlvyJ.jpg (26KB, 459x278px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 459x278px

>>132982656
This is fucking hilarious. The man is an actual shitposting troll

>>132983899
Wikileaks says it wasn't Russia. And I see no reason to doubt them. It doesn't take l33t h@ck3rz in the Kremlin to phish some idiot's Gmail password.

The ploy was so obvious that the DNC's IT guy told Podesta it was bullshit and Podesta opened it anyway.

>>132983899
so basically fullfilling the failing msm's job

What * exactly* are the Russians supposed to have done?
1/ Podesta emails were acquired by phishing. Wikileaks states categorically they were not obtained from Russians or any state actor.

2/ Hillary's server. The emails were *leaked* not hacked.
DNC insider Seth Rich had access and motive to leak, as he was aware of the DNC favoring HRC over Bernie (who he supported)
Podesta in his emails states an "example" needs to be made of the leaker.
Seth Rich was murdered. There have been many and serious inadequacies in the investigation of this crime.

3/ the DNC refused to allow its servers to be investigated by the FBI.
The DNC engaged Crowdstrike a private company to access the servers, and the FBI relied on this _ failing to access the severs. this is an astonishing lack of due diligence given the allegations re the incorrectly ascribed "hacking"

4/ the "17agencies" say the Russians hacked is a HRC fabrication. Repeated mindlessly and erroneously by the Lamestream legacy media. Testimony given under oath to Congress is that 3 agencies reviewed. None were able to assert any "hacking" had taken place. Last week AP, NYT and WaPo issues retractions to their "17 agencies" fabrications and acknowledged only 3 agencies had reviewed the "intelligence"

4/ Obama authorised electronic monitoring/surveillance of Trump, family members and campaign based on the #pissgate farcical fabrication. This piece of fiction is so ridiculous and thoroughly debunked.

5/ the #pissgate fabrication was generated by a private company that has long provided research to discredit opponents of the DNC.

The "Russians" have nothing to do with any of this - it's all internal DNC bullshit and criminality.

File: 1499195939721.jpg (17KB, 253x343px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 253x343px

>>132984028
Shit. Someone tell CNN this is breaking news.

File: 1499275648719m.jpg (78KB, 713x1024px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 713x1024px

>>132984191
>Assman threatens a massive leak of Russian documents

>cucked so hard he gets his own show on Kremlin mouthpiece

>>132981519
Calling him orange isn't funny. You leftist need to step up your game. It's getting too boring.

>>132983788
Why? Hillary is fully capable of that herself you know. No russian expertise needed there.
> occam

>>132984191
There you go, intentionally obfuscating the two separate hacks, just like Trump. Tell me, do you like your bears fancy or cozy?

File: image.jpg (102KB, 400x527px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 400x527px

2016: US presidential campaign. Buddy, THST. Was *not* interference in an election.
What the Yanks did in Russia in the 1990s _ now that is first -gold class _ pure election manipulation.
Yeltsin had a 6pwr cent popularity rating - but *thanks* to his USS / state department and CIA *friends* he won the fake Russian election.
The Yanks were so pleased with themselves they bragged on the front page of Time magazine.

>>132981356
THIS!! FUCK BLUMPFT

>>132984436
Why would any country try to influence any other country's elections? To increase the odds of a favourable outcome for themselves.

File: IMG_0012.jpg (196KB, 819x632px) Image search: [Google]

196KB, 819x632px

>>132984514

>hacks

Um no, sweetie. Just. Stop. It. With. The. Fake. News. Hon.

File: 1496314327177.jpg (58KB, 692x506px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 692x506px

>>132984679
No one has ever faked a macro. Nice!

File: IMG_0034.jpg (546KB, 1536x1989px) Image search: [Google]

546KB, 1536x1989px

>>132984733

Just.

>>132984514
The fancy and cozy bead bullshit has been thoroughly discredited.
And sourced to Crowdstrike. Who the DNC engaged to "investigate" it's servers after the alleged *hacking*. The same servers Podesta is refusing to release to the FBI.

File: IMG_0035.jpg (556KB, 1536x1993px) Image search: [Google]

556KB, 1536x1993px

>>132984733

Sweetie.

File: ay.jpg (9KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 250x250px

>>132981234
Oh boy well if Putin denied it then obviously he didn't do it

>>132981356
not only Trump, but from Putin itself? Do you want more evidence than that lmao kid

>>132982254
ahahahaha.
THAT FUCKING TIMELINE

File: 1496313680393m.jpg (100KB, 1024x538px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 1024x538px

>>132984795
>>132984834
More macros that can't be faked! What's next, greentext stories? Tripfag larps?

>>132981234
> Hey dude, are you the murderer?
> Oh no ! it's impossible, I'm a good man!

Well, he is not the murderer.

>>132984284
i'd suspect the russians to have hade some access to hillarys garden shed email provider though. among other parties.

>>132981519

DNC Server: Most Critical Evidence To Proving "Russian Hacking" Is Being Withheld From Mueller, Why?

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-07-06/dnc-server-most-critical-evidence-proving-russian-hacking-being-withheld-mueller-whys


If there were any actual crimes committed during the 2016 presidential election, then the origin of those crimes can be traced back to a single piece of hardware sitting at the DNC which housed the emails that were stolen and subsequently shared with WikiLeaks.
Ironically, despite the fact that they're apparently sitting on perhaps the most critical evidence available to prove that Russia "hacked the election," an allegation that has been hammered 24/7 on CNN for the better part of a year now despite a lack of actual tangible evidence to support the allegation, the DNC has completely refused to cooperate with the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security and/or Robert Mueller's independent investigation. Which begs one very simple question, why?

>>132985397
it really is amazingly stupid, isn't it.
It was clear from august last year that this russian boogeyman narrative was placed ready to be nurtured just in case.
The original 'proof' cited back then was moscow office hours
> hackerz
> office hours
kek

File: image.jpg (96KB, 730x716px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 730x716px

What has remained un investigated and not explained is the financial links between Podesta and Russian oligarchs and donations and lucrative business arrangements.

>>132981234
But what if putin had his fingers crossed behind his back?

>>132985709
nah. too easy.

File: shirtless trump.jpg (120KB, 542x467px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 542x467px

>>132981296
I trust Trump. He is the most honest man in Washington.

>>132985741
what if he had his hands on donalds scrotum?
gently cupping? squeezing?

Isn't it basically a Geneva convention for cyber?

>>132985014

Short answer: No. Non-technical answer: For one thing, we can cross-reference the actual authors from the Wikileaks dump. 1.doc is in the "verified" Wikileaks release as the attachment which can be downloaded from here which has the original author of "Lauren Dillon." So, wait, who is Warren Flood et al? Each of these documents had a creation date of June 15, and were modified by "Фeликc Эдмyндoвич" a few minutes later.


In Office 2007 format specification, there is a certain stylesheet template which dictates overall formatting for the document. In three of the documents by Warren Flood, we find the identical metadata.

{\s108\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\contextualspace \rtlch\fcs1 \af1\afs20\alang1025 \ltrch\fcs0\f1\fs20\lang1049\langfe1049\cgrid\langnp1049\langfenp1049\sbasedon0 \snext108 \slink107 \sqformat \spriority1 \styrsid11758497 No Spacing;}

>>132984733

The above line appears across all three of Warren Flood's documents. styrsid11758497 is an unique identifier that is session-associative. The fact that it does not appear in the other documents indicates it's associated with Warren Flood and not Фeликc Эдмyндoвич.


Why is this important? Well, the \langfe1049 portion is a setting saying that Russian language should be used as the default language for the document.


Had Фeликc Эдмyндoвич been setting the "watermark," it would be the same across all documents. But instead, distinct watermarks were created for each document creator, suggesting inconsistent application or three different creators applying their own watermark.
In other words, document creators set the document properties to use Russian language and created three distinct so-called 'watermarks' in doing so, not 'Фeликc Эдмyндoвич.'


Also, cross-reference to Wikileaks shows that Warren Flood did not author any of the documents. And given that the timestamps are all on June 15th, this is the sequence of events:


A worker using a computer registered to Warren Flood opens a DNC document, copies it, and pastes it as a new document to his computer.
A worker using a computer registered to Warren Flood sets the theme language to Russian in some way (this process is different for all authors).
A worker using a computer registered to Warren Flood modifies the document's author to Фeликc Эдмyндoвич.
The modified document is then uploaded to the Guccifer website and publicly published a short time thereafter.

>>132985014

Who is Warren Flood?
Warren Flood is a high-ranking technology official for Democratic operatives, having worked for Obama for America, DNC, and Joe Biden. It's a unique name.


His name does not appear in any of the Wikileaks emails, meaning that he appears to be a third party as far as the DNC email leaks are concerned.

Other than his (professional Internet) profile, he is a virtual social media ghost, never having made any Tweets nor any evidence of real social media activity.

The pertinent point is that: the metadata forensic proof is irrefutable that Warren Flood, or someone who used a copy of Word registered to Warren Flood, shoehorned in obvious "Russian" fingerprints all over the documents.


UPDATE (5/27): The owner of g-2.space suggests it was not Warren Flood who personally did poisoning of document with Russian metadata, but a far more sinister agent of DNC using Word applications registered to him, possibly for the express purpose of creating rationale for unmasking: http://g-2.space/jb/

Guccifer 2.0 is none other than a botched DNC creation to create a false flag for Russia.

>>132981296
>dude lets to go to war with Russia because John fucking Podesta got his email phished
This.

File: 1497723608875.jpg (24KB, 360x480px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 360x480px

>>132985817
yes goy keep trusting (((Trump))) he is not totally one of (((them))) also cringey kekistan fag

>>132982204
>John Podesta is a retard
Ftfy

File: image.jpg (48KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 400x400px

>>132984834

“The DNC,” Mr. Johnson said at the time, “did not feel it needed DHS’ assistance at that time. I was anxious to know whether or not our folks were in there, and the response I got was the FBI had spoken to them, they don’t want our help, they have CrowdStrike.”

In January, Mr. Comey told the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence that the FBI issued “multiple requests at different levels” to assist the DNC with a cyberforensic analysis. Those requests were also denied.


All of which brings us back to our original question: If the DNC is in possession of actual tangible evidence that could prove once and for all that Russians hacked their servers and attempted to undermine the campaign of Hillary Clinton, why not share that evidence with investigators and enjoy the blissful vindication that its public release would provide?

Might it have something to do with this "purely coincidental' meeting on a tarmac in Phoenix and/or Loretta Lynch's 'assurances' that the FBI's investigation (or, "matter" if you prefer) of Hillary Clinton "wouldn't go too far"?

File: 8f547b71566754116de448b68b6ac49524b3945df06e3df23d356b81e43dfe57.png (285KB, 799x742px) Image search: [Google]

285KB, 799x742px

>>132984284
Quality post.

If pasta, please add the part where the DNC leak was timed to rob Hillary Clinton of her party's nomination - an event which would have pitted Donald Trump against a far more formidable, well-liked, and hard working opponent.

Many Trump supporters, and Trump himself, wanted Hillary to receive the Democratic nomination because her record of sleaze and imperialism - along with her total lack of a work ethic and pitiful campaign schedule and turnout - made her the weakest major candidate her party had produced in decades.

File: images (35).jpg (5KB, 254x198px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 254x198px

>>132981234
What THE actual fapp???
>knows difference between fact and opinion
Revilutionary

>>132986374

Impact of Guccifer 2.0 being a DNC creation
The "Russian influenced the US election" campaign all started from the DNC leak.


Allegations of Russian influence was built on a completely fabricated foundation of lies.


In hindsight, we now know that Obama administration unmasking of US campaign officials on the pretext of "Russian interference" started in June 2016, same date as when Guccifer 2.0 began. The implications that the unmasking all was predicated on a DNC psy-ops is staggering.

Who cares why the DNC did it?
Because it proves that "Russian interference" started as a total DNC fabrication that persists to today. The whole Russian campaign started before Trump made his infamous joke about Russians getting Hillary’s emails.


Illegal unmasking of Trump campaign officials over Russian interference began June 2016. Was this predicated on Russian interference with the DNC hacks? If so, this means that the leaks not only implicate DNC and plague President Trump himself, but also implicates Obama administration officials and all the involved intelligence agencies.


Why did DNC leak their own documents?
It’s right in Guccifer 2.0’s blog. Pertinent quote: "The main part of the papers, thousands of files and mails, I gave to Wikileaks. They will publish them soon." The DNC knew they were having their documents leaked to Wikileaks, and wanted to make sure a Russian hacker took credit for the leaks.


How did the DNC know Wikileaks was going to release the DNC emails?
Great question. It’s hard to imagine them knowing without assistance from intelligence agencies – and indeed unmasking of campaign officials started in June 2016.


This is, of course, highly illegal, and would mean that the Russian disinformation campaign wasn’t just a DNC operation, it was also created from collusion with the Obama administration using highly illegal means including violations of the Fourth Amendment.

Trust a Russian puppet to say that

>>132986633

Since Guccifer 2.0 was a botched operation, that might make the continued existence of the real leaker who might draw scrutiny that much more precarious…

What about Crowdstrike report?
The metadata I described above can be independently verified by a non-technical person with access to any text editor like vim (which is available on Mac OS terminal command line). It does not require special forsenic analysis to identify. There are only two explanations: staggering incompetence, or DNC collusion.


I cannot say if Crowdstrike is competent, but I can say that their co-founder and CTO, Dmitri Alperovitch, is a senior fellow with the Atlantic Council, a think tank whose policies could be termed as anti-protectionist.

>>132986633

Who leaked the DNC emails to Wikileaks?
In short, all circumstantial evidence points to Seth Rich.


Seth Rich was killed on July 10, after the Guccifer drops and before the Wikileaks release. Wikileaks offered a 20,000 reward for information on Seth Rich’s death.


Craig Murray, a British national connected with Wikileaks, claims a disgusted Democrat insider was the leaker and he personally flew overseas to meet one of those connected.


Was Seth Rich murdered by the DNC?
We are getting in speculative territory here. The circumstances of his death are suspicious – there had never been a homicide prior or after in his area. The assailants did not steal any of his valuables. Furthermore, Seth was on the phone with his girlfriend at the time of his death and is allegedly to have ended the conversation with "I have to go," which is an unusually calm thing to say at a gunpoint robbery.


Conspiracy theorists assume Seth Rich was murdered by the DNC to "set an example."
Personally, I think that as long as Seth Rich existed, he could have spoken up as the leaker at any moment and drawn scrutiny to Guccifer 2.0 being a DNC operation. To our knowledge, the unmasking of Trump and related officials started in June 2016 using the DNC hacks as a pretext. Seth Rich’s continued existence could have lead to the fall of the White House and intelligence agencies.


Is that motive enough for a political hit? You tell me.

dang It was just a shitpost mate

>>132986792
In all the "Russians ate my election" bullshite, THIS: got drowned out.

UK Ambassador Craig Murray: “I’ve met the person who leaked them [Podesta emails], not Russian – it’s an insider”

http://theduran.com/uk-ambassador-craig-murray-ive-met-the-person-who-leaked-them-podesta-emails-not-russian-and-its-an-insider/

ALEX CHRISTOFOROU
December 12, 2016.
The irony is that the CIA is accusing another country of interfering with local elections.

Craig Murray, Britain’s former ambassador to Russia and a close friend of Julian Assange, has now confirmed that he knows the identity of the person who leaked the DNC and Podesta leaks to Wikileaks, and that this person is not Russian and has no connection to the Russian government.
On the contrary, he is a Washington insider.

.....So the CIA is simply lying about knowing what’s happening and knowing who the people are. They don’t know, if they knew they would act.”
Murray made the point that the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has declined to support the CIA’s allegation that a hack took place.....

“It is extremely amusing for the CIA to be accusing another country of interfering in domestic elections, when interfering in other country’s domestic elections on scores of occasions is what the CIA has done to effect regime change for the last 70 years so really; this is almost beyond satire.”

>>132986792
Crowdstrike's hacking attribution analyses have been questioned before, as have their ties to Ukranian funders and the Clinton Foundation.


Mr. Alperovitch is also a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, a Washington-based think tank focused on international issues that is partially funded by Ukrainian billionaire Victor Pinchuk, who reportedly has donated at least $10 million to the Clinton Foundation.

Late last year, the International Institute for Strategic Studies, a respected British think tank, disputed CrowdStrike’s analysis of a Russian hack during Ukraine’s war with Russian-backed separatists. CrowdStrike later revised and retracted portions of its analysis.

File: yrshrbO7TAJkoD4XB77gV4yKQjnZ33tkHaa7HHKZtE.jpg (107KB, 788x708px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 788x708px

>>132981234
Why should we take trump's word? He lies all the time.

File: E6D8251C-D39E-4433-A93F-5B300DEEFA1C-489-00000136DE0211D8.jpg (60KB, 634x394px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 634x394px

>>132987488

What's sickening is how incurious the Senate and House Republicans are to get to the truth. How many have been blackmailed with hard evidence of their pedophilia?

>>132981356
Did you forget to take your pills again, Maxine? You know you wander into strange places when you forget.

>>132981597
Or you know, it could be, like, a joke

>>132987639
Hillary's server had spyware installed on it.

"With each new WikiLeaks dump, the rabbit hole in the feud between Chelsea Clinton and Doug Band seems to grow a little deeper. The most recent disclosures included a November 11, 2011 email from Chelsea to John Podesta, Cheryl Mills and the Clinton Foundation lawyers at Simpson Thacher in which Chelsea clearly lists out her issues with Clinton aides Doug Band, Justin Cooper and someone referred to only as "Hannah," which is presumably Hannah Deletto, Director of Membership at the Clinton Foundation. Among other things, the email alleges that Justin Cooper installed spyware on Bill Clinton's computer in order to monitor his email traffic, that both Justin Cooper and Hannah Deletto stole "significant sums of money" from the Clintons and that Doug Band / Teneo "hustled business at CGI."

http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/17/aide-who-helped-set-up-hillarys-server-was-accused-of-loading-spyware-on-clinton-foundation-computers/

http://www.thompsontimeline.com/tag/justin-cooper/

Mr. Justin G. Cooper served as a Senior Advisor to Teneo Holdings and Decision Sciences Corporation until December 22, 2016. Mr. Cooper served as Senior Advisor to President William J. Clinton

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/clinton-aide-no-show-email-hearing-228090

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-17/backstabbing-spoiled-brat-chelsea-lists-her-grievances-against-doug-band-and-justin-

>>132988071
Archive or screenshot please

>http://politico com/story/2016/09/clinton-aide-no-show-email-hearing-228090
https://archive.is/x5tMH

>>132987702

>a decrease in the rate of growth is the same thing as a cut

get your commie retard shit outta here

>>132988095

Thanks noranon.

File: 1455586604509.jpg (58KB, 481x600px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 481x600px

>>132986583
I remember noticing a pattern of Russia-baiting back in June of 2016, in articles that went back a month or two but which seemed to be based around a common set of talking points. It will take some doing to dig them out, but in hindsight it's interesting that the campaign seems to have been coordinating with the press that early. Somewhere out there, the MSM edition of GameJournoPros continues to churn.

Before all that, there was a volley of articles suggesting Trump had illicit ties to Libya. I wonder what spooked them away from that storyline.

>>132986913
His name was Seth Rich and he was a hero.

File: 1492388393684.png (138KB, 275x263px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 275x263px

>>132982656

>>132988324
who is starving this boy to death and why?

>>132984914
"That"? Don't you mean "this"?
Vous etes vraiment nuls en Anglais. Even the fucking basics.

File: DT3.jpg (229KB, 800x488px) Image search: [Google]

229KB, 800x488px

>>132981234
THAT FUCKING SEALS IT, PUTIN IS NOT GUILTY!!!! MAGA! SHADILAY!!!

>>132988153
Nice spin. Too bad that isn't what's happening. It's being cut.

>>132981356
IMPEACH PUTIN BUTTBOY DONALD BLUMPFKIN

File: cheetos-crunchy-cheese.png (185KB, 334x483px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 334x483px

If the cheeto-in-chief said it, it must be true!

>>132981296
This

>>132985817
This as well. Not a high bar to pass anyways.

File: ECB82D9E-B7B9-4D9B-B707-DC26676F0290-219-00000094963FFDA8.png (17KB, 1257x391px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 1257x391px

>>132988324

Here is the russia, russia, russia talking point dated 2015.

Russian meddling in election = 4chan /pol/

shit even shareblue will say shit like "hurr you are being influenced by putinbots". they just dont want to admit getting btfo by random young guys

>>132989444
Hey, I get it Trump uses self-tanner. We didn't mention that Obama was a gay, muslim in every political discussion.

File: image.jpg (26KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 300x300px

>>132986374
Podesta emails have HRC campaign wanting Trump as the "pied piper" candidate.
They believed he was so "unelectable", so #nevertrump he would drive even hard-core GOPs to HRC. So DNC wanted Trump as THEIR "easy" mark. It's all a game. All kabuki.

>>132988324

Libya was nixed because hard evidence is readily available in the public domain that will end the deep state and its banker overlords forever.

>>132982656
wew

>>132981296
>If the media says it, its true

File: 648314C7-892C-4680-94A9-2135C07299E8-231-0000003801C977D4.png (184KB, 1521x539px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 1521x539px

>>132990006

File: F6866EF9-B9F1-4BCE-B662-AE966B7F7EEC-231-000000380B3DBCF1.png (137KB, 1835x464px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 1835x464px

>>132989899

>>132983899
His name was Seth Rich.

File: 22E2D57F-DCD3-4E40-9D9B-BBCF02EF8D7B-231-0000003810B02843.png (139KB, 1865x634px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 1865x634px

>>132989653

File: 3E5B1E00-E994-435A-9193-E0D4966ED11D-231-000000381A4E02B8.png (42KB, 1181x319px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 1181x319px

>>132990341

File: image.jpg (25KB, 443x332px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 443x332px

>>132986633
Anyone still blinding drinking the Muh Russians koolaid is _ well _ just go back to watching CNN -

File: 1493188627339.png (65KB, 420x367px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 420x367px

>>132981356
IN
BEACH

GROSBALD
BLOMPF

NO
TWO
TERMS

File: image.jpg (68KB, 532x509px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 532x509px

>>132987259
MFW

>>132986913
Assange broadcast Seth's name to the world with heavy implications.
Why did he do that?
I can think of more than one reason.

File: image.jpg (24KB, 236x301px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 236x301px

>>132984679
Patronising. And wrong.

>>132990966

Prove it wrong.

File: image.jpg (14KB, 239x211px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 239x211px

>>132985886
What if he did this

>>132981234
Long before that tweet the russian collusion accusation was dead.
Sorry.

>>132984514
That's just another point that makes the Russian hacking story so stupid.

>Comrade, what shall we name our super secret hacking units?
>Ah yes Comrade, how about Fancy Bear and Cozy Bear? Get it cause the Russian bear?
>Brilliant Comrade! No one could possibly know it was us Russians!

Just stop.

>>132988324
What spooked them away from a Libya fabrication?
My money's on the We came we saw he died and the fiendish cackle.
Oh. And the 400 tons of Central bank gold that was heisted at the same time Gadaffi was being sodomised with a bayonet. CIA photographer on hand to capture said gory demise

File: image.jpg (140KB, 900x500px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 900x500px

>>132991388
Evidence. You can either see what's right in front of you. Or you can't.
There's no verifiable authentic evidence of Russian hacking. There's significant evidence of tampering, collusion, obstruction. And there's significant circumstantial evidence pertaining to the murder of Seth Rich.

>>132993712

What point do you think i have been making this entire thread?

>>132990805
Absolutely wrong. A total and serious misrepresentation. Assange has NOT confirmed Seth Rich as the leaker.
Assange has been pressed on this issue repeatedly, but maintains he will preserve the anonymity of his sources.
However. Wikileaks offered a reward for info pertaining to Seth Rich murder. By a process of assumption and deduction it has been "understood" that Seth was the leaker.
But Assange has NEVER " broadcast to the world" Seth's name.
That is a seriously erroneous assertion

>>132992192

1. It is a provable thread that ties the bad actors to gun running, arming ISIS, staging the Arab Spring (aka the CIA Spring), many coups, war crimes.

2. Hillary's and Obama's fingerprints are all over it.

3. The puppetmasters' fingerprints would be easily lifted.

4. It would permanently redpill black Americans.

>>132994186

Agreed. The Seth Rich aspect is speculation. And it's is not a prerequisite of definitive proof of the hoax- after all, the hoax is exposed- yet no irrefutable evidence of Seth Rich being anyone connected to any of this.

File: image.jpg (92KB, 720x412px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 720x412px

>>132993886
This?

File: Screenshot_141.png (150KB, 305x250px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 305x250px

HOW QUICKLY THE TIDE TURNS!

>>132994845

Where?

File: image.jpg (20KB, 243x207px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 243x207px

>>132994979
Where, what?

File: IMG_3622.png (198KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 300x300px

>>132982286
"Cut it out!"

>>132996223

Where have i indicated anything but that the DNC was not hacked and that the whole Russia russia russia narrative is a despicable fabrication and a sick, dangerous hoax?