Thread replies: 7
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
Anonymous
Should women have rights? 2017-07-09 10:37:33 Post No. 132977610
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Should women have rights? 2017-07-09 10:37:33 Post No. 132977610
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: 2E71698700000578-3318841-A_housewife_is_amazed_she_can_open_a_ketchup_bottle_all_by_herse-a-122_1447549213418.jpg (167KB, 634x781px) Image search:
[Google]
167KB, 634x781px
Women. Love or hate them, equal under the law is unfortunate when 95% of everything was created by men. Every vote they ever made was off of feelings and has ruined the west. What are the opinions about reverting to 1940-50's traditionalist wats?
>>
>>132977610
We need to revert back further than that if you don't want them to have equal rights.
>>
Yes, but we should stop with marxist crap you see irl, like women in army, or women leaders or anything like that.
>>
File: 20170524_140613.jpg (2MB, 3264x1836px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 3264x1836px
Marx is an awesome role model.
>>
>>132977610
Not far enough. Women are the property of their fathers until married off. Modern society is just a brief period of insanity before we return to having women as baby-producing objects just as they have been for all of human history.
>>
The only rights are property rights, and he who secures that right is called sovereign. No, women are just property. In modernity instead of being owned by their father or husband they are the property of the state and thus become a commons like a public restroom, running feral so long as they vote more power for daddy.
>>
>>132977610
1940/50s is also way too progressive, they had voting rights back then.
Thread posts: 7
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2