Is the two party system the best system anon?

>>132936412
all political ideas and choices come down to two options. so yes

No. A conservative monarchy would be the best system.

>two party system

an illusion, it's really the Jew party system.

>>132936550
What happened to muh revolucion?

>>132936784
Liberal atheist coup by sub-80 IQ butthurt chimps who literally built a miniature guillotine to kill a parrot for saying "long live the king."

>>132937073
Which house do you bring back? De Bonaparte or de Bourbon? Or de Valois?

>>132937317
A good Bonaparte emperor would be badass enough to submit all the Euro cucklets, but they were closely linked to Freemasonry.
Bourbon is probably the safest choice, and Louis XX is actually alive and antisecular, but I bet he would lack the spine to make us more than a slightly richer copypasta of Spain.
Valois has been irrelevant for so long, I bet all its descendants are now turbo SJWs on steroids. Also, it hasn't been the house to lead the pinnacle of French scientific progress.

>>132936550
But Pierre, you had that and beheaded it

>>132936412
In order to enslave the populous and bid them in a fight against each other, radicalizing both people behind blind ideologies; run by group plutocrats who are not in the best interests of the nation but are in bed with the banks? If that is the goal, then yes.

>>132936412
No a three party system or a system of a greater prime odd number is.

>>132936412
>two party
you spelt one party wrong