Woke lvl 100

>>132925415
(((They're))) bringing down the clever individuals.

Media is intertwined with undeniable censorship.
Anonymity makes it hard to tell whether it's the Jews behind it, liberals or just trolls.

Why are we not making technological leaps?
Because the banks can't always profit on them.

Governments are not the most powerful institutions.
Above the governments are the central banks.
Almost every country thas a central bank, but the few that don't (Cuba, North Korea and Iran) have trouble. Coincidence? I think not.

Finally, above the central banks is the BIS, Bank of International Settlements.

Almost NOBODY has heard of this bank
It is the BANK OF CENTRAL BANKS.
It is the MOST POWERFUL INSTITUTION ON THE WORLD. (google it)

File: TreatsCensoredforPOL.png (2MB, 1332x839px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1332x839px

>>132927734
I think by systemic he means legal advantages to minitories, and societal allowances for race

File: 3Deffect.jpg (542KB, 1325x832px) Image search: [Google]

542KB, 1325x832px

>>132927734

>And in fact their attitude is that we are incredibly weak and naïve, and they will simulate belief in our ideas when they want something from us, but when we want something from them, they’ll say, “Oh yes, yes,” but what they’ll end up doing is practice very ruthless ethnic nepotism.

>>132927734
>no one has heard of it
>google it
yeah sure buddy, anyone thinking they know the hidden truth are full of shit, its not hidden if some random autist online can just google it
no one on /pol/ knows whats really going on

File: ElenaGranca.jpg (572KB, 2000x1476px) Image search: [Google]

572KB, 2000x1476px

The flip side of that is the guilty, Leftist, anti-colonialist white mentality, which is just as grandiose, because instead of assuming that all good things come from whites—and basically non-whites don’t have any agency of their own and have no worldview and no way of life that they are right to want to hold on to—this Leftist mentality basically blames us for all the bad things that happened in the world to non-white people. It’s our fault. And underlying that, though, is the same grandiose notion that really we’re the only people who matter, for good or evil, in the world, and other people are somewhat negligible as agents, and that assumption is very deep and a sort of bedrock assumption in a lot of Leftists.

And really, I stopped the projection and decided I need to try and understand the world as these people see it, and I came at a certain point to realize that a lot of peoples, in fact the majority of peoples on Earth, do not have a sort of transparent and trusting relationship to other groups. In fact, they have suspicious, hostile, and manipulative relationships to other groups, and that what’s going on in white countries is we’re inviting in people on the assumption that they’re going to be just like us; that we’re going to be generous to them and open to them, and they’re going to be open and generous to us.

File: Hnnnnnnnngg.jpg (118KB, 470x498px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 470x498px

Well, I think that our civilization today is ruled by people who are promoting multiculturalism. They’re promoting it through entertainment, through education, through the news media, through every channel. Every authoritative channel that molds opinions in our society today, whether news or entertainment media, education, and so forth is pushing this multicultural agenda.

They’re pushing this idea that white people are guilty for all the world’s ills, and that if we’re having difficulties with immigrant groups, that’s somehow our fault, that we better keep quiet about it, that the worst possible sin is to be racist or ethnocentric. And a lot of people are simply intimidated by this.

They’re intimidated into silence over this, and the thing that helps them maintain their silence, though, is the naïve assumption that somehow if they make their separate peace with this system, that things will sort of work out all right for them.

Our individualism, our kind of “devil take the hindmost” attitude, and our unwillingness to confront the fact that this game is rigged against us—and that the long-term trends are quite dire, and that we simply will cease to exist as distinct nations and as a biological race in a couple hundred years if we don’t stop this—so we’re individualistic, we’re guilty, we try and make our own peace with the system, we’re afraid of joining together and actually trying to change it, and I think a lot of us are just evading or ignorant of the long-term consequences of staying on this path. And so, I think all of those things combined together prevent people who are on some level aware that there’s a problem from actually drawing the right conclusions that we’ve got to do something about it.

File: stock-photo-181578487.jpg (116KB, 748x1000px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 748x1000px

The United Nations in the aftermath of the Second World War was drafting its conventions of genocide, which said that genocide can also include simply the slow demographic erasure of distinct peoples. How does that happen? Well, it can happen by invading their homeland and colonizing them and making it impossible for them to reproduce themselves.

And that’s really what’s going on in practically every white nation today, with the exception of a few like Hungary and Poland that are trying to maintain their borders and maintain their ethnic integrity. Virtually every white nation is facing a situation where their long-term prospects are bleak. Even in Hungary and Poland, their long-term prospects are bleak because their reproduction rates are below replacement. And when you have a situation where more white people are dying than being born every year, eventually there will be no white people.

And the reason why we have this situation is that it’s not some strange, mysterious thing that’s inevitable. It’s not some cosmic catastrophe. It’s not a comet hitting the planet. It’s the product of a culture and of a set of policies—political policies—that were enacted in the aftermath of the Second World War.

File: stock-photo-181578267.jpg (113KB, 857x1000px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 857x1000px

And I discovered very quickly that that’s not the attitude of many minorities in the United States. Many of them have a great deal of distrust and hostility toward whites and basically look at us as people that they would like to victimize, and if not victimize, at least there’s a lot of sort of subtle mockery and passive aggression in day-to-day interactions.

And so eventually, I started realizing that this is not actually working, and I realized that basically my multicultural phase, if you will, was rooted in projecting my own mentality on the rest of the world. There’s a deep form of hubris and ethnocentrism that is present in multiculturalism.

The old form, sort of mark of multiculturalism is basically the white man’s burden idea. It’s the imperialist idea that all of these people really want to be like us. And we’re going to go out, and we’re going to give them all of the benefits of our civilization, because all the good things come from white people, and we’re going to share those gifts with them, and that’s the white man’s burden.