Is equality a worthwhile social/political goal to pursue? Or

>>132917171
pointless. we live under a power rule, ie 10/90, 20/80, etc.

>>132917171

It's an impossible goal that will massively punish those that strive to improve themselves and their familes at the expense of the lazy and stupid

Equality of outcome is bad for all.
Inequality is a problem but extreme actions to alleviate that problem cause extreme problems.
Capitalism works well with some common sense and limitations.

> Is equality a worthwhile social/political goal
Depends on the fact whether you live in an ant colony

>>132917171

You are talking about equity, not equality.

Capitalism is about equality; everyone rich or poor treated equally before the law

Socialism is about equity; perceived under achievers will be treated with special privilege before the law to bring them up-to-par with their more talented peers

Photo: A Jew that came up with a plan for equality.

I mean, just ask yourself a simple question: is it immoral or bad to start a business and employ few people?
According to many communists it is. That's just retarded extremism.
In my opinion small and middle business should be encouraged. Corporations and such should be seen with extreme prejudice though.

>>132917171
its probably a good thing to strive for equality of opportunity.

File: image.jpg (163KB, 1200x520px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 1200x520px

>>132917171
Karl marx never supported equality for people. Only sharing and working less.

Workaholics are just as bad as lazy people.

File: image.jpg (236KB, 801x768px) Image search: [Google]

236KB, 801x768px

>>132918717
Most communists didn't like homosexuality. They still had a hierarchy system in what people are above.

>>132917171
Karl Marx didn't want equality.
He wanted a system where a lazy parasite like him could conceivably run the government.