I think I just realized something. I recently read about this story by Montesquieu about two Persian men who travel around Europe and write their opinions about European society and religion.
It was a way for Montesquieu to criticize and analyze his society by giving an appearance of impartiality and detachment to these opinions.
This a total shot in the dark but do you think this method could be developed as a way to redpill people somehow?
>try to have a serious discussion
>get ignored
Maybe it's not a interesting topic, too bad, I think it had potential
>>132867687
You didn't write jews, donald trump and a picture of some transsexual in the op post.
>>132867276
Yes. Perhaps from a liberal perspective critiquing other groups. E.g. Jewish privelege, African supremacy, Hispanic xenophobia
>>132867687
Hate to tell you, but you'll probably get more traction on double chins.
>>132867276
Yeah it's a nice tactic to keep in mind, but who will read your story? How will you get it in front of people?
I guess you could do the same, get some 'based Iranians' to travel around, commenting, and put it on youtube. Or any other 'based' minority. I can't think of any besides Iranians though (not Indians - no-one would want to watch Indians' opinions). But maybe try to find some. Rich African visitors who despise their poor countrymen, like true Mexicans here on /pol/ despise the illegals who've crossed into America?
>>132867899
Still not as bad as necklacing the cat doesn't give a fuck.
>>132867276
>you think this method could be developed as a way to redpill people somehow?
Regarding what issue?