So i debated a friend of mine (acquaintance more like) about sexual degeneracy like polygamy, cuckolding and so on.
His position was essentially
>sex is harmless in the 21st century
>stds, pregnancies are all easy to avoid
>it's our societal dogmas that treat sex as something bad
>therefore all acts of sex should be allowed
and more importantly
>BURDEN OF PROOF is on me to prove conclusively otherwise if I want to forbid anything
which to be honest with you I couldn't
I only know of a couple studies which show that promiscuity leads to failed marriages and that faggots are usually molested or have way more stds (if you got more proofs post em), but his rebuttal was basically
>correlation doesn't mean causation
>there are happy polygamous couples and gay couples and families blah blah
and again you CAN'T really prove otherwise because as long as there are these outliers like happy sluts, happy fags married and with kids, happy racemixers or trannies that don't want to off themselves, (((logically))) it follows that you can't universally forbid the degeneracy but partially allowing it WILL lead to its spread as we see today
1/2
I also once debated a pedophile online and his points were pretty much the EXACT SAME "sex does no harm, your worldview is dogmatic" BULLSHIT, he posted studies which show that there are many cases of pedophilia with no harmful consequences (which again to be fair I could not disprove conclusively) AND he shifted the burden of proof like the first guy
I'm 100% certain now that the argument for legalizing pedophilia will be the exact same #NOTALL bullshit and shifting the (((burden of proof))) on conservatives
So i'm having a dilemma here, what is the problem with "muh feelings"? SO WHAT if we have a dogmatic worldview? The thing is it's worked JUST FINE for us so far so why should we change our dogmas? For hedonism?
And how can we debate the degenerates if they have the upper hand with (((burden of proof)))??
TLDR
>(((they))) will shift the burden of proof on us to show CONCLUSIVELY why degeneracy is bad and shouldn't be allowed (which is IMPOSSIBLE)
>dogmatic ideology (Christian morality) beats (((rational))) thinking which leads to a slippery slope ending with pedophilia and beastiality and other forms of degeneracy
>dogmatic "muh feelings" worldview isn't bad and it JUST WORKS so there's no reason to change it (only hedonists want to change it)
2/2
white man nedd bbc
>>132858027
save us poland
>being degenerate has no consequences
>now excuse me while I rub shit on my dick while watching cuck trap porn because that's the only way I can achieve an erection without medication thanks to my hedonistic lifestyle.
The burden of proof is actually on them to constantly explain to people why they need to keep pushing the limits of human decency. They are incapable of seeing that their degeneracy feeds off of others degeneracy. It's a constant downward spiral. Which is why it's called DEGENERATE.
>>132858692
>>132857936
>>132857904
>I need a safe space
grow the fuck up libtard
There's enough BBC for white men too
>>132857904
Enough of these tired threads. Nobody likes niggers, especially white women. They are the least chosen of all races. They can have the fat white women and the ugly ones, and even the odd hot one. But the vast majority of white women don't want anything to do with nigg nogs. Face it buddy. Muh dick and sheetz......
I think your main point should have been how sexual degeneracies lead to degradation of traditional values, identity crysis and low self-esteem, self-value of males (who are being cuckolded or being cheated on). Not to mention gay, tranny acceptance decreases testosterone in general male population.
Fuckign white tranny is for fun.
nazi scums die