I believe I solved all political turmoil

File: energy_0.jpg (45KB, 480x320px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 480x320px

>>132856622

The first option, if you have been following correctly and given some thought, is of course the far left. These individuals are why the right often find so hard to deal with because they simply cannot accept the hard truths of reality on any given issue to any slight degree. They deny any proposition that "You can't change the nature of X you must do the correct Y even if it is a painful truth". The left will choose to ignore the harsh reality of live and will continue to blame the collective. That instead of accepting that there will always be a suicide bomber or psycho killer, the left will always deny this reality. They would rather continue to say that that individual turned out that way because they just weren't treated right. This is their eternal struggle. This is their communist manifesto.

File: God-creation.jpg (24KB, 482x376px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 482x376px

>>132856694

2) Is that of the right wing. These individuals have literally have taken the red pill but since realizing the gravity of their situation, they must resort to later accepting the blackpill. Now some of you traditionalists are screaming your head off right now, but you must understand that I do not think traditionalism is wrong. I think traditionalism is more of the middle, and ill explain why later. But a true individual who sees reality as for what it really is, without looking towards anything above for hope(that being a window out of the box) is doomed to fall into nihilism. And as I'm sure many of you who experienced this, the abyss truly stares back.
The 3rd option, the window, is where one sees the meaning of oneself in relation to both aspects of coping with out internal struggle in relation to our surrounding. The thrid option accepts the following premise "I understand my need as a human to be free, even though I know that I cannot. The idea of hope, as a feeling and concept, is a reflection of my human nature. To Embrace the role of hope, in the midst of all hell, is to embrace oneself. The reason for this is because if one individual says they would rather have 1 over 2, or vice versa, they simply have not gone down the rabbit hole on either side. Both lead to the same torment, for at the core the problem still remains. Neither accurately solves the problem, but rather it emphasis the two extremes of our understanding to dealing with struggle:
1 is with the value of struggle
2 with the value of truth
But it is in unison in the realization of hope, manifested in the 3rd option do we come to find everlasting peace. God bless and good night.

Oops silly me I fogot to explain why traditionalism is in the middle as it pertains to the existential mindset of political philosophy. But anyways I feel you all get the point. Those religious truths that traditionalism emphasis are correct. Traditionalism simply represents a method of realizing the divine truth or the synthesis of value 1 and 2 as mentioned in >>132856749. That method being, of course, the internal moral struggle. But the truth is, is that the moral struggle is what leads up to discovering the truths mentioned above. The path of traditionalism is the path of the narrow gate. But the truths mentioned above are further than that only in the sense that it explains why the narrow gate works. Perfect morality is assumed to be a condition on both political sides. The left does so with their dogmatic belief in the value of collectivism, the right does so with traditionalism.

Nice blog post. People are allowed to change their minds and outlook when new information is presented. They won't always be pessimistic or optimistic. There are near infinite paths to the future including one where humans solve all the world's problems if we are allowed to observie nature for long enough without being forced to fight the meme wars for the elite ruling class. Religion is just more disinfo spread around meant to foster divide between you and your neighbor. There's a difference between being spiritual and being tied to religious beliefs. If your "religion" isn't allowed to evolve with you then its just more mind control meant to keep you and your intellect suppressed and stupid.

>>132858067
Thanks man, I appreciate at least one person read the post. And ya I agree. Most people have a sense of mixed optimism and pessimism and because of so are able to change their beliefs if enough perspective is brought forth.