Why do racists pervert the nazi ideology?

This does not excuse the globalist agenda, however, nor does this mean that any race can be expected to integrate with one another in a multi-ethnic society. It is unrealistic to expect r-selection organisms to integrate into a K-selection society, as their differences are too great to merge. What you actually end up with, and liberals will deny this, is something akin to competition similar to what you see when an invasive species is introduced to a nonnative area. (which environmentalist liberals will not deny) For example, you see this with anole lizards in Florida. Green anoles are the only anoles native to American soil, however, Cuban anoles have made their way to the U.S. mainland as a result of the horticulture trade, and the new Cuban anoles reproduce more rapidly and are more territorially aggressive, and as a result consume more resources that would otherwise be consumed by the native green anoles. This causes them to push out the green anole population, and the population of these small green lizards decline in areas where there are Cuban anoles.
Understandably, it isn’t unreasonable to apply this same concept to the different ethnicities of humankind. Immigrants with vastly different lifestyles and behavioral adaptations, if having some sort of favorability by the environment, (whether natural or artificial) will push out the locals. They will not integrate but rather take-over. Meanwhile, it is completely understandable that the local race will take defensive actions to preserve their own people and society. (cue racism)

>>132847657
However, and what brings up the point of this post, is that the nature of complex organisms such as ourselves is more complex than that. Symbiotic relationships also occur in nature. The most famous examples of this are the relationships between a clownfish and an anemone, or man and dog. What isn’t really mentioned ever are also the symbiotic relationships held by different racial subsets of humans. For example are African volunteers fighting alongside he Nazi regimen during World War II, mestizos and American whites both fighting for Texan independence, or literally every international alliance between two countries ever. Alternatively, even a black male and a white male, for example, who associate as “best friends” may be an example of this. As the nature of mankind goes, all (non-autistic) humans are naturally social in nature, and different ethnicities may be expected to inevitably socialize and find that another may be beneficial to their own survival, much like how different parrot species that are introduced to one another in captivity can nonetheless form a bond akin to companionship. Different ethnicities may have different strengths that can help block the different weaknesses of another race in a given environment in exchange for help by the other’s strengths. In other words, where one race lacks, another can help make up for it, and the basis of a symbiotic alliance is formed. As such, the survival of another race may be influenced by the continual survival of a different race.

Every race is different, and many may be somewhat lower or higher in a hierarchy in certain societies, but the concept of supremacy is a deluded one. Every race has strengths and weaknesses in their environments that affect their ability to survive and propagate. What works for some may not work for others. There is never anything wrong with nationalist views, or one’s own passion in defending their people. However, it is better to base this belief on logic and realism as opposed to an emotionally fueled, deluded belief in a hatred for an entire race. Because simply put, if this were true, all humans would be the same and would be more or less truly equal, but this is simply not the given case, because that is simply the nature of things.

>tl;dr having a realistic mindset about human races is ideal; having a emotionally fueled hatred for every other race is not. One is how an alpha would believe, whereas the latter is how losing beta would believe