Idea for CNN take down:
1. Have Trump or one of his children tweet or retweet pic related (hard part)
2. Media will do research on Ben Garrison and cover his antisemitic edits on the web to try to link it to trump.
3. Ben Garrison will have a huge lawsuit on CNN for false defamation.
4. ???
5. Profit
What do you think?
>>132797441
hella gay
>>132797563
>hella
Start a presidential petition to have CNN removed from any involvemen with the commission on presidential debate. They were Hillary's 7th largest campaign contributor and yet they had say in who got into the debates via their polls and the CPD. This is a clear conflict of interest. They will have to either stop funding democratic candidates or be removed from their biggest network events. Thats how you hurt them.
At least post the original
>>132797441
hey pedes this is Barron Trump AMA
>>132797441
>>132797964
That's your response? Typical Canadian.
>>132797441
>8ch and 4chan logos
Remember when he was so fucking butthurt about our edits a while ago? What made him completely turn around like this?
>>132798149
>They [CNN] were Hillary's 7th largest campaign contributor
Source???
CNN IS ELMO'S FRIEND! WHY DO YOU HATE ELMO'S FRIEND?
Who has the real original?
>>132797441
>"We Kek Ass""
>Everyone saying shit.
>Not everyone screeching "RRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"
>>132797441
Stinger Pepe
t
i
n
g
e
r
Pepe
>>132800166
http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.php?cycle=Career&cid=N00000019&type=I
Numbers very a little. open secrets have them at 10th. CNN is Owned by Time Warner.
>>132800993
Those numbers are her entire career.
https://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/contributors?id=n00000019
This one is from her 2016 cycle.
Isn't there a big difference between her entire career and just her 2016 cycle (her campaign)?
>>132798561
>retard flag
Kill yourself
>>132797441
Ben Garrison doesn't do subtlety I guess.
>>132799008
He hated m00t, and now he's gone.
Let the meme jihad begin!
>>132797441
uh..no.
>>132801732
>https://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/contributors?id=n00000019
True enough. You can look up time warner directly and see. It's gets muddy when you have to start adding in their superPAC contributions as well since they have several. And you also have to figure in Charter communications as the buyout happened halfway through the election year so even though it was Time Warner making contributions it got added to Charter communications logs for the year. Here are 2 other links.
https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/summary.php?id=D000000094
and
https://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/lookup2.php?strID=C00431551
Regardless, the fact that they are contributing to a candidate while having a say in who gets to debate is a conflict of interest and can be argues as garymandering.