WTF Does This Mean?

>>132759377
it means you're reasonable and capable of weighing multiple concerns at once

>>132759377
you can walys try: http://www.celebritytypes.com/political-coordinates/test.php

and https://8values.github.io/

>>132760221
You could also try not being retarded, and articulate your ideas to others for feedback instead of taking retarded online tests to get a fake identity.

>>132759523
>>132760221
Thanks.
I'm wondering if that's a regular score for someone like myself, who is a self-proclaimed Nazi Sympathizer.
Although on the left-right spectrum I'm the same as Hitler, on the north-south axis I'm way down.

>>132759377
if you're one pixel to the right then you're literally hitler
welcome to the club

>>132760629
"Nazi sympathizers" occupy all quadrants except the far top-left and far bottom-left, in part because it's a heterogenous ideology itself

what do you sympathize with about national socialism

>>132760592
/thread

>>132760776
Well I think Hitler has been unjustly painted as the definition of pure evil when in fact he loved his people more than anyone else I can think of.
I think they wanted peace many times but it was not to be because of the Allies.
I think he was more right than wrong when it came to Jewish plots.
And while I'm wary of socialism, his nationalistic style seemed to be a glowing example of how it can work if everyone is on board (which is the toughest part)
And although I consider myself a Libertarian I think part of that ideology lends itself to the idea that if you chose, as an individual, to follow a leader, a dictator even, than that is to be respected.
Those are just a few of my sympathies, mix in my adoration for Nietzsche, my distaste for degeneracy, my disgust w/ cultural marxism, and you get a guy one hair short of a full head of 14/88.

>>132761450
you sound like a regular centrist libertarian. while the NSDAP was founded with Strasserist/socialist ideals, the party went on to coalition with the aristocratic conservatives of the day, including people with something akin to a modern "libertarian" bent. while Hitler's Germany was heavily statist, the prevailing ideology fundamentally valued "natural law/order," which is very compatible with libertarianism. Hitler's rhetoric was basically "international Jews have upset the natural order of things through finance controls and complete media dominance, I need absolute power to restore the natural order"

"dark enlightenment" thinkers on /pol/ tend to agree with this type of logic, and view democracy as inherently corruptible. I agree on that point, but obviously statist authoritarianism is similarly corruptible over time (and far more capable of doing harm if the corruption is severe)

>>132759523
Being centrist does not make you like that.

File: Screen Shot 2017-07-07 at 10.04.45 AM.png (204KB, 455x388px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 455x388px

>>132762094
thanks for your input Suprdo

I usually get the same, my general opinion is the government should only exist to protect our rights,