>'Give me your child for its first seven years and I will give you the man.'
(Jesuit axiom)
M.I.T. alumni here ― undertaking a vox pop sampling study, regarding the efficacy of ideological inculcation subjected on the formative brain (≤25 years / pre- frontal cortex maturation).
I would like to garner opinions of those who have undergone circumcision in their infancy (i.e., without their consent) and ― weighed against what they have since learnt of this practice; its effects {both negative and positive}; underlying morality questions issuing from the submission of cognitively unconsciousness subjects to surgical modification (etc.) ― whether they (as mature-aged adults) would nonetheless submit themselves [again] to the same procedure―were they hypothetically given a choice.
I am also interested in documenting the prevalence of those who would mandate circumcision for their own child ― as such, whether those sampled consider themselves adherents to one or more of the applicable Abrahamic superstition sects (e.g., Christianity, Catholicism, Judaism, Islam, derivations thereof); or are, in fact, secular-minded, free-thinkers.
Lastly, opinions germane to the reconciliation of what is perceived / promulgated / proselytised as the 'perfect entity', or "God" (*attached image related), either (i) being fallible (i.e., the [mis]creation of the male pudenda) or (ii) evincing anthropomorphic vanity (i.e., "Its" prescribed 'flesh tributes' from the most vulnerable―at the hands of those "It" imbues with comparative power), are welcome.
>Bonus points:
Comparisons made or qualified between male circumcision and its female counterpart (a.k.a. "FGM" ― female genital mutilation).
(NB: The removal of the LABIA (minora / majora) [only]; nay excision of the clitoral protuberance―which corresponds to the male penile GLAND, as distinct from dermal prepuce / foreskin.)
In advance, I thank all participants and apologise for any hereinbefore typographical errors.