Globalization

Since you asked so nicely:
1) Globalism is - as it is usually - an ideology after the fact. Globalization is not willfully created by participating individuals but the average of forces - technocratic socio-evolution, fossil-fuel based economy and financialization. It is as an inevitable course of history as the planet's course around the Sun.
2) The main beneficiaries of globalization are the supranational entities - global corporations, who wield tremendous influence over national governments, thus subverting the 'will of the people' in their own interest. Hence, it is they, who have the final word on the set of laws.
3) cultures and populations merge will not merge to show the best traits, but weakened in their small-scale self-determinatory capabilities will fall easer to propaganda.
4) Civilization was born out of mankind's suddenly increased resource usage capabilities by introducing fire and later, agriculture. In the end, it will destroy the ecosystem it relies on.

Further reading:
http://peakoilbarrel.com/energy-human-evolution-2/

>>132611808
>when cultures and populations merge

kek tell that to your muslim friends

>>132613740
>technocratic socio-evolution, fossil-fuel based economy and financialization
but those are all individually driven forces.
>The main beneficiaries of globalization are the supranational entities
At the current state, yes, but eventually if a global government is formed it wont be.
>But weakened in their small-scale self-determinatory capabilities will fall easer to propaganda.
That's provably false just by looking at history and cult mentality, it's always isolated and homogeneous groups that are easily swayed by propaganda. Just look at how Scientology works.
>In the end, it will destroy the ecosystem it relies on.
It will change it, not destroy it. it's always been that way and it doesn't only apply to humans.
>>132613740
Granted I've no experience with "Arab muslims" but one of my best friends is a Balkan muslim and they are very well integrated with society.

>>132611808
All you say is true, the fact is that if we all shared the same culture everytbing would be better.

We are not against the idea of globalism, but against the fact that it isnt our culture the one being imposed upon the rest; but its a foreign culture of degeneracy and hedonism that wants to rule us all.

>>132611808
There are fifth generation Italians in this country who have zero loyalty to it or to the host population
Five generations at least
There are 70 year old Italian migrants here who still don't speak English
When Italy vs Australia at football, the Italians choke the streets waving Italian flags and beeping their horns, screeching in Italian as if they're already won
And you want to preach globalism?

>>132614973
>but those are all individually driven forces.
No, those our sociologically-biochemically driven forces. Who you think you are and who you really is - the unconscious, hormonal and neural parts have far greater uncontrolled influence on you existence than your gossamer-thin 'self'.
> global government is formed
And who do you think it will be formed from. The billions of poor or the very few very rich?
> how Scientology works.
By atomizing the people, forcing them out of their previous social context and indoctrinating them. Like consumer society.
> It will change it, not destroy it
The ecosytem's internal logic is based on the paradigm of the limitation set by the primary energy source captured by the autotrophes. Everything else has to pay metabolic energy (digestion) to gain somewhat more energy to thrive and reproduce. Humankind burns the shit out of everything, effectively putting the internal energy cost of digestion out on it's environment. That paradigm change is unprecedented, it's consequences are fatal.

https://collapseofindustrialcivilization.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/pnas-2015-schramski-1508353112.pdf

>>132611808
>when cultures and populations merge the "best" traits of each tend to merge with them and the worst tend to be left behind creating a better civilization.
On the contrary, when cultures and populations merge, the more insidious and violent one always wins.

if globalization is to happen it should happen while causing as little damage as possible and for the benefit of the people and the earth itself

it is being forced to happen and its being forced incorrectly.