Problem

File: european-union-population-pyramid-2014.gif (64KB, 610x425px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 610x425px

>>132530089
Not really.

If the Net Neutrality resulted in the "worst case scenario" then people would cause an uproar and get it fixed. The people may not care about much, but they're pretty touchy about the Internet.

There's nothing we can do (short of genocide or decades of worldwide depression) that can have any worthwhile effects on climate change. The impact of humans is enormously over-exaggerated and we will adapt to whatever comes like we always have done.

Those issues are boring because they are not ACTUALLY that serious. They won't go to far with NN because there would be pushback, and climate change is over-exaggerated and largely out of our control.

We've got bigger fish to fry, your entire continent is about to entire a demographic disaster, and the plan to solve the issue by importing hordes pf unskilled illiterate fundamentalists who hate you was....not very well thought out. You literally just had to look at us to see how dumb that was. We're barely keeping it together, and we imported mostly Christians who (for the most part) actually value working.

You need to sort our your insanely ineffective, corrupt and downright traitorous politicians before you even think about how to cool down the damn planet.
>tic toc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9zH1dWeKE0

>>132530089
>climate change
Fucking retard.