There Is Literally Nothing Wrong With Redpilled Homonationalists

File: GayWeddingCake2.jpg (73KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 600x800px

The only question is how to make more of us go from red to redpilled.

https://youtu.be/coBIZle18kM

I guess the issue here is if a baker is declared to be an "artist" and therefore exempt from anti-discrimination provisions in Colorado state law, to what extent would such a ruling systematize discrimination against homosexuals in general and weaken state laws against such discrimination.

You can say that businesses should be able to serve anyone they choose, but that hasn't been true since 1964 with the passage of the Civil Rights Act.

You cannot refuse to serve a Black person or a Christian on account of those traits (you can, of course, refuse to serve them if they are disruptive or inappropriately dressed), since 1964 on a federal level.

You may not like such a law but it has stood the test of time. The question before us is to what extent do states have the right (and also more liberal municipalities in conservative states such as Texas) to extend anti-discrimination provisions to groups not included in the 1964 law.

I am not overly concerned about getting a wedding cake in a particular bakery, but I would worry that a ruling allowing this would limit my access to other things as a gay person such as housing or employment. Country clubs and churches can refuse to serve homosexuals, that isn't at question here.

The compromise we have had since the 1960s has been that businesses open to the public are expected to serve all members of the public, whereas private clubs and explicitly religious organizations are allowed to discriminate.

The Supreme Court currently has 5 justices, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan, and Breyer that I would expect to rule in favor of the gay couple in this dispute.