What makes a monarchy different than a dictatorship?

absolutely nothing except monarchs get all that bling bling

>>132481279

>Implying there's one monarchy type

Constitutional Monarchy
Autocratic Monarchy
Parliamentary Monarchy
Federal Monarchy

>>132481279
Monarchs rule by divine right supported by the church, dictators are simply random guys that managed to usurp the power.

>>132481279
A monarchy is a dictatorship. The most extreme form of a dictatorship.

>>132482352
> divine right
A dictatorship for 75 iq retards that is.

>>132481279
Historically, the nobles keep the monarch in line.
Pic related was totalitarianism, same as the Bolshevism that rocked the Russian Empire, totally a coincidence even though Lenin was 1/4 jew just like uncle Adolf.

>>132482738
> kept in line
Except when they didn't. Not like the nobles were anything but a bunch of inbreds born into their political position too.

>>132482408
what. no brainwashing and propaganda, no regulated/planned collectivism, no politics. just one big family who isn't too strict

>>132481279
Monarchy is a hereditary system, and needs the support of the nobles.
Dictatorship is whoever controls the military, and only really needs the support of the military.

>>132481789
Well there are multiple types of dictatorships as well, I'd argue there are even things called dictatorships at least which have levels of constitutional checks and balances, etc.
>>132482352
What exactly about church support makes it different fundamentally? Is that literally all there is to it?
>>132482738
Adolf Hitler wasn't Jewish no matter how much conspiratorial garbage you want to spout.

>>132482352
>dictators are simply random guys that managed to usurp the power.

Hitlers rule was supported by the people. They loved him (most of them).

File: 1400877825000.png (208KB, 512x467px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 512x467px

>>132481279
Idk, "dictatorship" is a much-abused and not very clearly defined term.

National socialism was a form of meritocratic republicanism, i.e. the leader was a representative of the whole nation, and any member of the nation was supposed to be able to become the leader if he was capable enough. In a monarchy on the other hand rulership is restricted to hereditary nobility, and in a historical context based on a divine mandate from God.

>>132484637
> Hitler was representative of the whole nation of Germany
lol what, even as a person with NatSoc/Fascist tendencies I know that's completely wrong/retarded. Most Germans were devout Christians, Hitler was not, most Germans weren't ideological autists, Hitler was, there were massive differences between the average German and Hitler.

>>132481279

poor US education system.

>>132485414
>Germans weren't ideological autists

and who elected him? who joined the NSDAP?

Did you sit near the window in history class or why are you talking in memespeak out of your ass, son?

>>132481279
Monarchy just means there is a king. It doesn't signify his power. Sometimes the king was absolutist, meaning he was a dictator. Other times power was separated (a bit like the US) between king and parliament. And of course in modern European monarchies the king has little or no power (or has power but chooses not to use it).

>>132485742
You severely overestimate normal people. Go talkt to normal people for once, maybe your parents.

File: 1492756716670.jpg (92KB, 850x400px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 850x400px

>>132485414
Doesn't matter, the best should lead.

>>132484141
He fucking changed his name to hitler. His real surname is shicklgruber (shekel grabber).

>>132486736
> Who is Alois Hitler