Devil's advocate here, can anyone present the current CNN version of happened as a reasonable interpretation of what they said before they were accused of coercion?
any possible, conceivable way? preferably one that doesn't involve replacing "before"s with "after"s
>>132449503
Not spinnable. All they can do now is deny. But the internet never forgets.
>>132449778
any way you could give it the ol' college try?
You cannot say an idea is certainly true until you have failed an honest attempt to disprove it