#NotAllGorillas Redpill

File: HumanZooGermany.jpg (18KB, 225x300px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 225x300px

Why are black people accepted into society if gorillas are not?


THE CASE FOR GORILLAS

There are gorillas that are smarter than people. There is a gorilla named KoKo that can communicate with sign language.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koko_(gorilla)
> Koko's training began at the age of 1, and now, according to Patterson, she can use more than 1,000 signs.

The simple act of communicating, albeit through sign language, is a feat that many human beings, in particular those with down syndrome or severe autism, will never be capable of. This gorilla is more capable of being a part of society than MANY people. Notice: I said "people," not "black people." So, I have not even brought up fucking race yet!


INTRODUCING THE ANALOGY

If this gorilla is more capable of being a part of society than so many people, then why is it sitting in a cage, as an outcast from society, where it very well could be getting ogled at by degenerates much less intelligent than itself?

If #NotAllGorillas are incapable of being a part of society, then why are all gorillas kept in cages when many "human beings" are not?

If a subset of africans being capable of participating in society justifies letting all africans participate in society, then why aren't all gorillas allowed to participate under the same logic?


THE CASE AGAINST AFRICANS

Africans weren't always considered "human beings." They used to be used in exhibits at zoos.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Baartman
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_zoo
> Some of [the human zoos] placed indigenous Africans in a continuum somewhere between the great apes and the White man.

Africans really were viewed simply as animals. Think about it -- US citizens were even importing them as CATTLE. They would not have made it to the US in the 1700s and 1800s without the intent of being used in cotton fields.