whats his end game

Delicious

Same as virtually any wealthy business elite globalist, make more money and accumulate more capital via:
> Open borders
> Free unrestricted migration
> Accessible tax havens
> Universal Free Trade
> Breakdown of nationalism and things that traditionally impede materialistic international business interests
etc.

>>132381648
destroy all the jobs while right wingers suck his billionaire globalist cock

>>132381648
Take over california after the US government fails due to vibrancy. Renamed Amazon State Service.

File: trump tax cuts41.png (633KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]

633KB, 700x700px

>>132382034
he needs a tax break

File: gini_co.png (48KB, 1042x912px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 1042x912px

>>132382462
He needs Obama back in office so he can keep making money.

>>132382462
Hopefully Bannon doesn't get kiked out of power and we can see if he can actually have some influence and raise taxes on the wealthiest by a large margin.

File: obama tax hikes.png (658KB, 1019x706px) Image search: [Google]

658KB, 1019x706px

>>132382795
Obama raised his taxes. You fight for his tax cuts. It's your entire ideology. You worship him. You obey him. His agenda is your agenda. You fight for the billionaire globalist elites. Hell, you even elected one.

If you buy it, you buy it from him.

File: trump tax cuts2.jpg (76KB, 537x288px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 537x288px

>>132382882
Yeah let's see the GOP Congress vote for a tax increase on the rich when their entire ideology for the last 40 years has been cutting taxes on the rich.

Trump is there to cut taxes on himself, not raise them. Wtf did u think he was doing all this for?

Conservative Activist: Raising Taxes On The Wealthy Is ‘A Cruel Thing To Do’
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/grover-norquist-cruel-taxes_us_595b04fbe4b05c37bb7fde6f?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009

inb4 norbot

>>132381648
To ensure peaceful coexistance between mutants and humans

>>132383067
Please archive it
https://archive.is/CeE6z

>>132382907
Did the wealth of billionaires increase or decrease under Obama? See that huge jump under Clinton?

>>132381648
The death of Superman.

File: 1993 omnibus3.png (227KB, 1074x510px) Image search: [Google]

227KB, 1074x510px

>>132383140
Raising their taxes a few points doesn't ruin them or the economy. LOL That's the fucking point. That's been the Democratic argument for 40 fucking years while you GOP shills have been screaming for tax cuts for the rich.

You're making my argument for me.

>>132381648
Socialism via Capitalism

>>132383264
So Democrat policies enrich billionaires more than the poor, yet we're the party of billionaires?

>>132383067
Sadly probably true. It's too bad Americans and conservatives/Republicans have been brainwashed by propaganda so much and we could never see a populist party rise in to power which would tax the wealthy more.

File: goptaxcuts.jpg (275KB, 906x630px) Image search: [Google]

275KB, 906x630px

>>132383140
>>132383264

"It is striking to note that the best growth years for the bottom 99 percent since 1990 have taken place in the mid to late 1990s and since 2013, shortly after increases in top tax rates," Saez wrote.

http://www.tampabay.com/news/business/economicdevelopment/study-obama-tax-hikes-on-rich-didnt-hurt-economy-or-rich/2301353

>>132381648
Build the 4th temple to end the world and have Satan replace G-d forever as long as it means more foreskins and dead goyim.

Same as any Jew.

>>132383350
During that time billionaires increased their wealth at a much faster rate. Democrats are good for income inequality.

File: THXOBAMA15.8millionjobsDecember2016.jpg (315KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

315KB, 1280x720px

>>132383332
The economy does better under Democrats so yeah everyone does well. Now you're bragging that when you GOP shills crash the economy, everyone gets hurt?

Are you now saying that you're throwing away 40 years of GOP ideology and you're FOR higher taxes on the rich? No of course not, you will dodge that question because you're a GOP shill. You are ALWAYS for tax cuts for the rich. That's your ideology. You can't deny it. That's what you fight for.

>>132382795
>>132382907
I don't really see Bezos as someone that cares about money or luxuries. He legitimately wants to transform the world to his view.

File: hillary tax hikes on rich.png (73KB, 624x504px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 624x504px

>>132383489
You know what I love? You get btfo by me so hard that you can't argue from the right anymore. You have to larp as a Bernie fan who cares about income inequality. I assume Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren are your 2 favorite senators?

I assume you favor Hillary's tax hikes on the rich?

You will keep dodging because you know I destroy you.

>>132381648
Defeat Superman

File: HES WITH YOU AHAHAH.png (458KB, 649x566px) Image search: [Google]

458KB, 649x566px

>>132383489
You're advocating for higher taxes on the rich. Care to discuss Trump's tax plan? No of course not. You're a GOP shill larping as a Bernie fan because you get fucking annihilated by me.

$123.47 stock price

>>132381648
Being forever in Elons shadow and staying a manlet for the rest of his long life.

>>132383665
>totally not jewish
>totally doesn't focus on money to get it done

>>132381648
Killing superman

File: gini coefficient1.jpg (114KB, 1157x815px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 1157x815px

>>132382795
you got btfo hard. yet again. why do u even try to fuck with me you dirty gop shill?

btw at least try to post a more accurate, less skewed chart.

you're done shill

you're done

>>132382907
>>132383067
>>132383264
>>132383350
>>132383591
>>132383738
>>132383842

I fucking annihilate you every time. Don't you ever forget it.

File: 1414170148151.jpg (16KB, 292x257px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 292x257px

>>132383180
>>132383799
>>132384001

>>132383738

You sound like a total twat.

>>132383350
>The best growth years were at the height of a massive economic boom that remade the global economy and during an economic expansion after a financial crisis.

Really gets the ole noggin' a joggin'. What's next, water is wet?

File: OBAMA LEAF WINS AGAIN143 compli best poster ever.png (8KB, 581x78px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 581x78px

>>132384189
>1 post by this id

File: demswaymorejobs.jpg (114KB, 475x263px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 475x263px

>>132384318
Republicans crash the economy. Democrats thrive the economy. Lol that's my argument dumbass.

>>132381648
A world of slaves under his Jewish rule. Sadly he's won at this point.

>>132383067
You've got to be autistic to fall for that chart.

File: trickledowneconomics.jpg (165KB, 550x405px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 550x405px

>>132384462
You've got to be a right wing retard to fall for trickle down for 40 years

File: OBAMA LEAF OUT4.gif (780KB, 370x227px) Image search: [Google]

780KB, 370x227px

Obama Leaf out

>>132384137
Ironic that that biggest blip at the end there happened just after Bush Sr. broke his pledge of "read my lips, no new taxes" and killed his political career and inspired Bush Jr to never make the same mistake. I guess tax hikes == more inequality? What no way!
Really makes me think.

>>132383905
criminally underrated

>>132381648
fixing his eyeballs

File: trump tax plan for the rich.png (80KB, 552x924px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 552x924px

>>132384581
GOP shills arguing for more tax cuts for the rich

you can't make this shit up

you poor broke ass retards truly are cucked beyond repair you know that right

>>132381648
His endgoal is to get a seat on Bilderburg

File: IMG_4018.png (41KB, 723x239px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 723x239px

>>132383738
K

>The net worth of the world's billionaires increased from less than $1 trillion in 2000 to over $7 trillion in 2015
I'm sure they all made that money from hard work and it's not all from destorying the middle class and definitely not riding an economic bubble.

File: Bezos the sailor man.jpg (21KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 320x320px

>>132384630

>>132383264
>>132384396
I didn't know liberals on pol existed. I hope you aren't one of the insane ones that support social justice

File: seattle18 - 2.8%.jpg-large.jpg (267KB, 2048x2048px) Image search: [Google]

267KB, 2048x2048px

>>132384581
Watch this. I assume you support a $15/hour min wage for American WORKERS in order to reduce income inequality?

After all, Seattle's unemployment rate is 2.8% and employment is booming.

Now watch as the corporate shills can't help themselves.

inb4 debunked corporate shill fake news study

The Seattle Minimum Wage Study Is Utter B.S.
http://fortune.com/2017/06/27/seattle-minimum-wage-study-results-impact-15-dollar-uw/

>>132381648
Amazon Prime watching you in every household

>>132384723
I guess you can't refute my claim.
Damn you got BTFO man.

File: gop cant economy10.jpg (52KB, 800x400px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 800x400px

>>132384790
k

File: mgga.jpg (169KB, 580x743px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 580x743px

>>132384826
/pol/ are the fat acceptance movement SJWs now

File: special kind of stupid.jpg (53KB, 620x447px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 620x447px

>>132384936
You're arguing for tax cuts for billionaires. There are no bigger cucks on this planet than shills like you.

>>132381648

Bezos became part of an elite group of tech barrons whos only goal is to make crazy money by replacing human workers with code.

Once they achieve AI, or semi-AI enough to write code without humans making it, everyone will realize how none of the tech boom was worth it.

End goal is a world where communism is a must because there won't be any jobs between wealthy baron and homeless person.

File: OBAMA LEAF OUT2.png (1MB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 750x1334px

g2g i'll catch u shills later

>>132381648
Suicide, I hope.

File: 1483377169685.jpg (36KB, 297x365px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 297x365px

>>132382047
I was hoping for an interesting thread. Instead I got you, a fucking leaf leftist, sperging out and shitting up the thread.

Canada can't die soon enough.

>>132384723
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GINIALLRH
Bush Jr actually did the best job at preventing inequality of all the Presidents.
Average GINI increase per year and total GINI increase over term
Reagan: 0.003125, 0.025
Bush Sr: 0.00575, 0.023
Clinton: 0.0015, 0.012
Bush Jr: 0.00025, 0.002
Obama: 0.0018333, 0.011

File: THXOBAMA15.6millionjobsNovember2016.jpg (83KB, 1200x675px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 1200x675px

>>132385295
>Bush Jr actually did the best job at preventing inequality of all the Presidents.

AHAHHAAHHAHAAHAH HOLY SHIT

Right wing retards are now arguing that it's good that Republicans crash the economy because it reduces income inequality. Holy shit u retards have fucking lost it.

gg

>>132385658
I thought you had to go per >>132385141

Before you tell me you're back already, why not say something about the banks?

File: OBAMA_GREATEST_PRESIDENT.jpg (28KB, 512x422px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 512x422px

>>132385295
>>132385658
catch u later

u failed hard

It's now official. It's now confirmed. What I've been saying for years. Republicans actually crash the economy on purpose. Every fucking time.

>>132385223
Thank You Based Poseidon

>>132385658
GINI coefficient usually rises, only slightly though, during a recession. It remains mostly unchanged.
Just look at the FRED data.
Plus I'm not even right wing or Republican m8, why are you calling me that?
It's okay though, keep ignoring reality you can live in Narnia longer if you want <3

>>132385005
What the fuck, when did this happen?

File: BASED BILL GATES.png (420KB, 757x764px) Image search: [Google]

420KB, 757x764px

>>132385903
You're bragging about the Bush GOP economy. You're actually bragging about the worst Republican Recession since the Great Republican Depression.

It is sad how badly you have btfo yourself.

Look I know you're larping. You're fighting for tax cuts for the rich and pretending to care about income inequality but your entire ideology is having workers earn as little as possible.

I have 1 question for you which you will dodge. This entire decline in income inequality. >>132384137

From 1935 to 1970. What was the top tax rate?

GG. Case closed. You lose.

>>132385223
Good luck based Poseidon!

>>132385658
Ironically also, more jobs is likely to cause more inequality unless you can increase the demand for jobs (and thus raise wages).
When politicans create jobs, they usually do so at a cost of wages (as Keynesian economics relies on so called "sticky wages") thus more jobs may actually create more inequality.
A labor tax (aka the Income tax) is actually one of the worst things for labor. Most wealthy people don't make their money from labor, they make it from capital. It's like you haven't even read Marx m8.
Labor taxes, which is what income taxes are, only hurt the labor class. You need capital taxes in order to tax the rich.
Even CEO salaries are fucking nothing. People at the top make their money in the equity in the company, or equity in real estate, etc.
By increasing taxes on labor, companies will look to substitute labor with capital, putting downward pressure on wages.
>>132386248
>posting data from French blogger
Can you post similar data from a legitimate source for data pre 1967?

>>132385082

As usual, socialists deny personal freedom and personal responsibility. The system did not make them billionaires, so your argument is not valid.

>>132384396
Al Gore invented the internet and Bill Clinton was the CEO of Microsoft, gotcha! The 90s tech boom was a result of investments in the military industrial complex being commercialized. ARPANET was started in 1969 and advanced for decades until being commercialized as the internet and the Dot Com Boom. Clinton was lucky that it happened on his watch.

You have to be a special type of stupid to think that raising taxes actually makes economic growth stronger. If there's a booming economy, then raising taxes will increase government revenue, but raising taxes takes money directly out of circulation and decreases economic activity. Even Obama temporarily cut taxes to spur economic growth.

>>132386248
>implying that raising taxes will allow you to raise spending to infinite
>implying that the government hasn't already increased tax revenues without passing new taxes anyways by hiding taxes
>implying that you can say 'case closed' and act like you've won when the federal government hasn't had a 0% growth rate for over 30 years
>implying raising taxes fixes policies which don't work like in california and illinois while texas is booming economy attracting people the world over
>implying raising taxes in new york probably the most liberal city on earth actually did anything to benefit it's citizens and didn't end up in the hands of tax thiefs, pensioners, and welfare recipients
>implying raising taxes means you get more revenue
>implying this would work on state level, which is impossible
>implying california didn't reject singlepayer healthcare because they knew they couldn't pay it
Your goals just shift opportunity from the middle class to the corrupt and lazy. Rich people pay the taxes, yes, but they pay less percentage when taxes are raised because of how revenue works. However, middle class people are hurt the most because corporations/rich entities can easily pass the costs onto them when they are forced to raise prices.
Do you expect them to just diminish their profit margin to zero? The government and competition already have them on the ropes in most industries, they can barely stay above water even when they're the best in the business.

>>132381648
>whats his end game

Obvious control the global supply chain for toilet paper and then have you monitored 24/7 by microdrones and sold as the truman show

File: BASED_BILL_CLINTON5.jpg (105KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 600x600px

>>132387675
Right wing retards have somehow convinced themselves that Based Bill Clinton is the first and only president to have technological innovation during his presidency. This is hilarious to me. You people are so fucking stupid.

Lol right wing retards with their most retarded meme ever. Muh dot com. Who programmed all u retards with this meme?

The Based Bill Clinton economy created 23 million jobs. How many are you claiming were lost in the first 6 months of 2001 because of muh dot com?

Bush had much faster computers, internet and "dot coms". He still crashed the economy.

As always you will dodge the question.

Also... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Gore_and_information_technology

File: BASED DEMOCRATS.png (50KB, 1168x450px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 1168x450px

>>132387119
Wages go up under Democrats and crash under Republicans. Republicans oppose higher wages for Americans at all times. Remember. Your entire cuck ideology is that workers should work for as little as possible so that your billionaire globalist overlords can have it all.

Also, it's hilarious to me how you right wing retards miss something so fucking fundamental about the labour market. Honestly none of you retards know this. When unemployed get jobs and the unemployment rate goes down (not a conspiracy), and the labor market tightens up, wages rise. Wow! ECON101

As predicted you dodged the question.

Last post. I'll catch u shills later ok.

I have 1 question for you which you will dodge. This entire decline in income inequality. >>132384137 (You)

From 1935 to 1970. What was the top tax rate?

File: unemployment rate goes down when unemployed get jobs1.jpg (228KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 1000x667px

>>132388134

File: OBAMA BEST WAGES!.png (247KB, 839x486px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 839x486px

>>132388180
catch u tards later

>>132387934
Obama leaf fag detected!

>>132388243
b sure 2 come back again

File: Clintonbudgetsurplus.jpg (23KB, 483x315px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 483x315px

Never trust Republicans with money. >>132383350

>>132381648
Enjoy capitalism to its fullest.

>>132388180
"Seasonally adjusted"

I.e. untruthful graph.

Please provide real info, and not something that explicitly states that it is untrue.

Currently unemployment is down, but there was quite a long time they reported 5% unemployment when EVERYONE pointed out that it was much higher. I don't trust these "jobs numbers" from the feds.

to grow hair

File: 170405-blue-origin-1-630x544.jpg (99KB, 630x544px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 630x544px

>>132381648
moonbase

File: THANKS OBAMA 4.6% UNEMPLOYMENT.png (440KB, 593x574px) Image search: [Google]

440KB, 593x574px

>>132388429
Lol you right wing retards are fucking hilarious.

Jobs reports have been seasonally adjusted since the 1940s you absolute fucking morons. Otherwise you would have wild swings from month to month. Holy shit u retards fucking know nothing.

You embarrass yourselves with your stupidity. Unemployment wasn't fake just because you got triggered by a black president.

Quick retard! What does U4 measure? Tell me.

that's last post i promise lol

these retards keep drawing me back

>>132388134
That data is very questionable.
Census data for economic inequality stops at 1967.
Hence the data pre 1967 is likely fabricated by French blogger Berruyer and American journalist Henwood. Do you have a better source of data m8? Data from bloggers is not real data. So any pre 1967 data should be cut out completely unless you can corroborate the data.
Yes top tax rates were higher, however that isn't of itself conclusive, as you have to look at the effective rate, and capital gains rate (which was also higher, but not higher than 35%)
https://www.fool.com/retirement/2017/02/11/a-95-year-history-of-maximum-capital-gains-tax-rat.aspx
There is also basically no correlation with Presidential party and capital gains tax rate. Even Reagan cut capital gains taxes only to raise it back, while Clinton cut the rates and Bush cut them further.

>>132388837
Ironically also, capital gains rates were actually HIGHER UNDER REAGAN, than under New Deal Democrats.

File: WTF I LOVE ELIZABETH WARREN NOW!.png (378KB, 1006x612px) Image search: [Google]

378KB, 1006x612px

>>132388837
So you're advocating for higher taxes on the rich and higher wages for workers to combat income inequality?

No of course not. You're a shill who is larping. You advocate for lower taxes on the rich and lower wages for workers.

File: trump tax cuts38.png (188KB, 611x798px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 611x798px

>>132388837
>>132389286
And it's not just that 1 chart.

All charts show the same pattern when top tax rates were 70 and 90%.

But you don't want to talk about that because you're a shill who fights for the billionaire globalist elites.

>>132383435
sorry goy, Jeff Bezos isn't Jewish... neither is Bill Gates or Warren Buffet or the Walmart family...or the Koch brothers...nor Phil Knight

File: BASED_BILL_CLINTON15.jpg (73KB, 602x399px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 602x399px

>>132388837
>>132389286
>>132389418
Based Bill Clinton raised taxes on the rich and the economy soared >>132383264


You're literally arguing in favor of the Republicans because they crash the economy.

We're done here.

>>132384723
this

File: OBAMA LEAF ETERNALLY BTFO BRITISH RETARD2.png (3MB, 2586x1550px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2586x1550px

>>132388837
>>132389180
funny how u dodged this >>132384880

you don't want higher wages and lower unemployment for workers.

Obama Leaf out

File: warren buffett.jpg (55KB, 720x480px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 720x480px

>>132389469
Part 2 — Billionaire Warren Buffett says GOP health reform bills are relief for the rich
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/part-2-billionaire-warren-buffett-says-gop-health-reform-bills-relief-rich/

File: HowToDealWithCanadians.gif (3MB, 400x225px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 400x225px

>>132382047
>>132382462
>>132382907
>>132383067
>>132383264
>>132383350
>>132383591
>>132383738
>>132383842
>>132384137
>>132384287
>>132384346
>>132384396
>>132384526
>>132384569
>>132384723
>>132384880
>>132384961
>>132385005
>>132385082
>>132385141
>>132385658
>>132385785
>>132386248
>>132387934
>>132388134
>>132388180
>>132388243
>>132388349
>>132388740
>>132389286
>>132389418
>>132389518
>>132389628
nice autism

>>132389469
>Jeff Bezos isn't Jewish

>>132383842
>Care to discuss Trump's tax plan?
You do realize that tax plans in the USA don't effect you right? I'd like to debate you on minding your own country's business.

File: 1426749346357.jpg (13KB, 269x338px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 269x338px

>>132389469

>>132388134
can you even read your own graph

>>132389899
yes can you

File: trump tax cuts13.png (76KB, 759x416px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 759x416px

GG billionaire globalist supercucks and GOP establishment shills eternally btfo

Obama Leaf out

File: 1462897658951.png (302KB, 1577x1269px) Image search: [Google]

302KB, 1577x1269px

>>132381648
At least he's being adventurous with his wealth. Spending his money on that space company. He's way better than gates on that respect.


I had a liberal teacher in college one year who for some reason told the class she bought her toothpaste on Amazon. Her TOOTHEPASTE. She was some superobese beaner so it wasn't that much of a shock to me, but I really am surprised by how much Amazon has grown lately.i haven't bought a thing from their in well over a year.

>>132381648

developing a sequel to destroy all humans 2

>>132381648
He's got the look of a kid-diddler and blood drinker. Look at that crunkeye. He's had... "the procedure."

He's one of the 40 billionaires that run this piece.

Global economy and trade isn't bad...

It's when the trade is a one way street, that's when it's not good.

Anyone complaining about shutting off all trade from other countries is an idiot.

Right now China is hot for importing products, but Amazon isn't based on Chinese products alone. They offer products from all over the world.

You can sell your own products on Amazon created from your own house.

Amazon is pretty much the capitalist opportunity as a service to sell your products anywhere in the world as an online retailer.

They are in a big part why the economy has grown so healthy and steady over the past several years.

When a rabid liberal asked Jeff Bezos if he would fire Peter Theil for supporting Trump, Bezos said no and the liberal got all huffy and offended.

> "We don't want to live in a country where you can't associate with people who have wildly different political opinions than yourself "

I am unable to find the video interview but it exists.

http://mashable.com/2016/10/20/bezos-comments-peter-thiel/#PdVuJZ4Z_qq3

Zuckerberg recently said the same and stated "we can't create a culture that says it cares about diversity and then excludes almost half the country because they back a political candidate."

>>132389286
Not an argument.
>>132389418
Can you post the raw data for the graph instead of a screenshot of the tweet?
C'mon this is your evidence seriously? Screenshots of tweets and blog posts, nice. Definitely reputable economic sources.
>>132389518
Bill Clinton actually cut taxes on the rich. Since the rich mostly make their money from capital gains, and he cut capital gains, I see you dodged this>>132389180
>>132389628
FiveThirtyEight already BTFO you and disproved the Berkelely study with the study by University of Washington.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/seattles-minimum-wage-hike-may-have-gone-too-far/
I'm not a fan of minimum wage hikes. I prefer the Scandinavian solution of instead bolstering Labor Unions. Labor Unions don't hurt the economy as much and are actually a free market solution.

You literally make yourself look retarded, and lose your case every single post you make. Keep trying m8

>>132393916
>>132389418
I should also add that you can't just say "All charts show the same pattern"
This makes the fundamental fallacy of correlation implies causation.
How do you know it is low tax rates causing Rich people to have a larger share of the total wealth?
Maybe it works in reverse, Rich people having a larger share of the total wealth causes lower tax rates on them (as they get more lobbying power, seems plausible)
Or maybe a third cause is causing both lower tax rates and more of a share of welath to rich people simultaneously.
It's very ignorant and shows you have no clue what you're talking about.
But yea, I'd still be interested if you posted some raw data that I could work with and analyze.

>>132381648
>there are /pol/ posters not investing in this man
Buy the fucking dip faggots