Sweatshops

>>132342790

That's just another facet of rabid capitalism looking to make the maximum profit. It's the same reason why they want to flood Europe with third world migrants (other than wanting to replace White man) because they can thereby lower wages.

These fought in any case,
and some believing,
pro domo, in any case . . .

Some quick to arm,
some for adventure,
some from fear of weakness,
some from fear of censure,
some for love of slaughter, in imagination,
learning later . . .
some in fear, learning love of slaughter;
Died some, pro patria,
non “dulce” non “et decor” . . .
walked eye-deep in hell
believing in old men’s lies, then unbelieving
came home, home to a lie,
home to many deceits,
home to old lies and new infamy;
usury age-old and age-thick
and liars in public places.

Daring as never before, wastage as never before.
Young blood and high blood,
fair cheeks, and fine bodies;

fortitude as never before

frankness as never before,
disillusions as never told in the old days,
hysterias, trench confessions,
laughter out of dead bellies.

>>132343003
>That's just another facet of rabid capitalism looking to make the maximum profit. It's the same reason why they want to flood Europe with third world migrants (other than wanting to replace White man) because they can thereby lower wages.

This is what I'm wanting to talk about, because /pol/ is often all for the hardships of others despite their hardships being used to rob us of our own artisans and producers.

In a way, we're both rendered entirely dependant on each other. Without them we wouldn't even have clothes on our back.

I've been thinking about this a lot, and have decided not to buy new clothing (for one example, I buy from charity shops so at least some good is coming of it) if it was made in a sweat shop, and only buy new if its made by those earning a just wage in good conditions.

>>132343518
Our leaders embraced the free market, and since they have ZERO loyalty to their nation or their people, they never saw the point in protecting their national institutions and assets. I am far less worried about sweatshops than I am about jobs and industries moving overseas; whether those workers in Asia toil away in sweatshops or enjoy pleasant working conditions is of secondary concern.
But today both our leaders and the corporate elite are all cosmopolitans with no allegiance other than to money. They have no scruples. They don't care whether closing a factory will decimate the local economy.

It's a spurious argument to revolt against purchasing foreign goods because of muh sweatshop."Just wage" and "good conditions" are relative terms. It's like those imbeciles who were criticising China back in the 90s and early 2000s because of child labour. FUCK THAT! Those kids worked to put food on the table for themselves and their family. Hell, our own ancestors only 1 or 2 generations ago worked as children, especially in agriculture, sometimes in factories; it was still widespread. And if you listen to them recount their experience, the vast majority are grateful for it.

>Today, men’s shirts are designed to last just 30 washes, according to trade association the International Fabricare Institute.

>Then there are the deliberate tricks to ensure clothing won’t last. ‘There are ways to ensure inbuilt impermanence,’ says Daniel.
>These include using inappropriate fabric, or coarse stitching on delicate material, which accelerates the wearing of holes in a garment during washing.

File: jesuit-jews.jpg (495KB, 1776x1209px) Image search: [Google]

495KB, 1776x1209px

>>132342790
jews = jesuits in disguise

>>132342790
Nonwhites are not really human. You can't commit a crime against them. And that includes Meds, Slavs, Jews and others