Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
Anonymous
How would I verbalize this in open court? 2017-07-04 02:34:36 Post No. 132302024
[Report] Image search: [Google]
How would I verbalize this in open court? 2017-07-04 02:34:36 Post No. 132302024
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: lawquestion.jpg (27KB, 379x194px) Image search:
[Google]
27KB, 379x194px
If I were reading this out loud how would I phrase it? For example, I know it's: Section 834c, but how about the "(a)" and the "(1)"?
What would would those be called? Subsection (a)...Subparagraph(a)? And how about the (1)?
Legalfags help me please. And I know there's a lot of you in here.
>>
>>132302024
It would be "subsection" and "paragraph". And I don't recognize the thing you're referencing but if there's only one subsection and paragraph you don't need to refer them since there's only one.
But you shouldn't say anything in court, ever. That's what an attorney is for.
>>
>>132302024
Lawfag here. Try section (a)(1). No subsection. "Under section (a)(1)."
>>
File: 1478096214459.png (232KB, 547x1198px) Image search:
[Google]
232KB, 547x1198px
>>132302024
If you need to verbalize it you will have learned it in law school. If you haven't been to law school then you definitely don't need to verbalize it. Pro se is assured condemnation for retards, even seasoned lawyers don't represent themselves in court if they are smart.
>>
>>132302024
You got your answer in /k/, how many times do you need to ask this?
>>
>>132302024
Fellow lawfag here. I would say:
Section 834 lowercase c subsection (a) subparagraph (1) of the OP is a Fag Act of 2017.
>>
>>132302024
Section 834c subsection (a)(1)
>>
File: 1478031839042.jpg (232KB, 1920x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
232KB, 1920x1080px
>it's an idiot represents himself in court episode
Enjoy your jailtime/fine.
Thread posts: 8
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3