Thread replies: 7
Thread images: 5
Thread images: 5
Anonymous
Reminder that most whites in South Africa were AGAINST apartheid 2017-07-03 04:12:29 Post No. 132241334
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Reminder that most whites in South Africa were AGAINST apartheid 2017-07-03 04:12:29 Post No. 132241334
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: census_2.jpg (57KB, 800x489px) Image search:
[Google]
57KB, 800x489px
Reminder that most whites in South Africa were AGAINST apartheid
Anonymous
2017-07-03 04:12:29
Post No. 132241334
[Report]
Even when the prospect was to become an oppressed minority, they embraced racial equality with open arms. International pressure and sanctions, sure. But it was only a matter of time before the apartheid government would collapse, and when it did, the boer hailed it as an achievement, despite the virulently anti-white society they now found themselves in.
Tens of thousands of white farmers have been slaughtered, and the laws are designed to discriminate against whites, while the black population is fueled by gibs and recreational rape. They're not going to reclaim their country, so what makes you think that Europeans will start to reverse the trend we're seeing before things are too late? Keep in mind that when apartheid was abolished, the Boer mind hadn't been inundated with multicultural/marxist propaganda to nearly the same extent that Europeans have. What will prevent the white man from rolling over onto his back once again, when he's clearly grown to love being metaphorically BLACKED.
>>
File: Please nigger.jpg (5KB, 205x250px) Image search:
[Google]
5KB, 205x250px
>>132241334
>Reminder that most whites in South Africa were AGAINST apartheid
Reminder that just because you think something it doesn't make it true.
>>
>>132241334
I keep hearing racists claim that the black people in South Africa aren't the true natives and those blacks slaughtered the actual natives. Is there any truth behind this?
>>
File: 0ee64b04288eb080ee564dda8fd1ce5d25e0142c5e88131d85898dca1b2a51f9.jpg (55KB, 620x387px) Image search:
[Google]
55KB, 620x387px
>>132241464
http://publishing.cdlib.org/ucpressebooks/view?docId=ft0f59n6zd;chunk.id=d0e5695;doc.view=print
>Although very few Whites want a single, majority-controlled parliament, only a minority favors White rule or the current three-chambers variant of White rule. Most Whites—in fact, close to two-thirds—prefer some form of power-sharing accommodation of Blacks (though the options to which the respondents subscribe have been framed by researchers in a variety of ways).[49] Majorities of Whites appear to be ready for an end to apartheid in schools, group residential areas, and public accommodations.[50] There is also considerable support for fundamental political change. In 1988, two-thirds of White voters in Natal agreed with the statement "Until black people are included in Parliament, I don't think there will be peace in South Africa"; only one-fifth disagreed.
>>
who gives a fuck. get the fuck out of africa
>>
File: South African Gun Sign.jpg (81KB, 480x640px) Image search:
[Google]
81KB, 480x640px
>>132241334
They thought the vote was about "reforming" apartheid, not ending it. That's how they were tricked. Why do you think De Klerk rides in a bulletproof limo courtesy ANC?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_-7yrAAVHY
>>
File: Feels Boer.png (74KB, 600x367px) Image search:
[Google]
74KB, 600x367px
>>132242046
The Bantus were different than the Capoids who were the old Blacks of Southern Africa. They were more like bushmen instead of Congoids.
The Western Cape was practically uninhabited before the arrival of the Boer, ergo all the towns have European names.
Thread posts: 7
Thread images: 5
Thread images: 5