https://archive.is/nhVVt
> This reminds me of all the people who say, “If you only knew the Hillary Clinton I know . . . ” As I’ve written before, this is a clever Washington technique for signaling that you get face time with the principal. But it’s also an example of how people can be fooled by a little charm and attention. I’ve talked to dozens of people who tell me that in person Trump is charming. So what? So is Al Sharpton. Some of the most charming people I’ve ever met have been scam artists. Charm and integrity aren’t highly correlated as far as I can tell.
> None of this changes the fact that Trump’s tweet is indefensible, particularly once you deny any authority to the schoolyard logic used to justify so much of Trump’s behavior. Every single time Trump does one of these things, the same juvenile horsesh*t gets trotted out: He’s a counter-puncher! He hits back twice as hard! They started it!
> The first is that the president should walk away from Twitter. A new Fox poll says that 71 percent of Americans think the tweeting hurts his agenda. I’m amazed that number is so low. If you think his tweeting is brilliant and strategic, you’re arguing that it’s all part of his plan to annoy seven out of ten Americans with his tweets.
> The second thing is the more bitter pill. The president of the United States really just isn’t a very good person. There is no definition of good character that he can meet. You certainly can’t say he’s a man of good character when it comes to sexual behavior. His adulterous past is well-documented. You can’t say he models decency in the way he talks. He’s not honest (you can look it up). He brags about whining his way to winning. He boasts of double-crossing business partners. If you want to say he’s charitable, you should read up on how he used his “charities” as leverage or for publicity stunts. I think we can all agree he’s not humble or self-sacrificing.
>>132074951
>don't bypass our filter! we're in charge here!
Love how he mentions Roy Cohn, not even aware that back during the 80's literally everyone was afraid of HIV/AIDS.
>>132074951
>A new Fox poll says that 71 percent of Americans think the tweeting hurts his agenda. I’m amazed that number is so low. If you think his tweeting is brilliant and strategic, you’re arguing that it’s all part of his plan to annoy seven out of ten Americans with his tweets.
That's illogical. Just because people think tweeting hurts his agenda, it doesn't neccessarily annoy those people. This make the author's opinion either disingenuous or out of touch with reality. Either way, into the thrash it goes.
>>132074951
>(((Goldberg)))
>He keeps baiting us and its his fault we keep falling for it
I doubt the real Trump has tweeted in months, years even. Staffers have his idiosyncrasies down to a science and keep putting on the dog and pony show while he's shaking hands and moving shit along. Never, under any circumstances is it strategically viable for anyone to devote this minute time to hanging on their opponent's every word while off employing scorched earth, especially not when said opponent has proven time and time again that negative press does JACK SHIT to stop him.
>>132074951
>Goldberg
every time
90% of allied commanders didn't think Patton could capture Banstogne.
He did, and the war was over.