Should the government be allowed to outlaw certain items?

>>132046314
Niggers should be banned.

No limits.
Nukes are too expensive and getting people to mine, refine, manufacture then sell you the parts would expose them to incredible amounts of liability. The price would be astronomical.

Armed stealth bomber, same thing.

Last two questions: no limits.

>>132046614
The first point you make says that it's pointless to ban nukes because it's too expensive for an individual to own one, butcwhat about people like Elon musk or other self made billionaires where money and resources aren't an issue. Rich people should all be allowed a nuclear arsenal?

>>132046314
There is a certain point where you will be considered a risk to national stability and secruity. Then they will invade

no, the government should enforce the basic laws of human rights like murder, theft of property, etc. and the rest will sort out

the problem is they dont enforce fucking shit. how many drug traffickers would there be if the penalty was death by hanging within a week of being caught, China style? how much nigger gang violence would there be if we put gang members caught doing drivebys with guns on the gallows within days of being caught? take away the reward of crime and crime all but disappears

>>132047303
punish violent crime with extreme measures and you will have a much less violent society

>most violent offenders are removed from society completely by rapid death
>lesser violent offenders are sentenced to hard labor for years

oh wow, all of a sudden its not worth strong arm mugging that guys ipod on the street because if i get caught im going to be breaking rocks and building roads in hot, shitty conditions for the next 5 years, and if i used a weapon of any sort, im getting put to death next week in public for all to see and realize the consequences

>>132047059
The US spent over 6 trillion for its nukes. Billionaires? They're not rich enough.