So what's the deal with /pol/ and Libertarian Socialists?
Memes aside, I can't find anything wrong with it. Libertarianism, according to LibSocs (who were first to make the word, mind you), is basically minimized government, and Socialism is basically workers work for their own, not the bosses or the state. The term was first used to express the belief of the people being on their own to try to make a society uncontrolled and have the government only as a safety net for scarcity and shit. The term was suppressed by authoritarian governments who found it as a threat.
Government fund economic balance and people keep themselves busy by making the economy work with no set beliefs and practices expected by the government. Laws still apply and market works more of produce stands rather than set prices. Government obviously need money from taxes but no dumb shit like tax from everything and anything. Equality and every man for himself applies, but common courtesy and basic levels of respect are expected by society (not government made Jew cuck shit). Greed only happens when people are deprived too much of what they need (seriously, would you take much more food and shit than you'll need? It's a huge waste of you ask me. I wouldn't), also, common courtesy.
I understand that the libertarian party of America are nothing like this, it's because they're cocksucking shitheads that misrepresent LibSoc and just uses it as a name. Another thing, democracy is real democracy and not oligarchy representative democracy. So what's the problem?
>inb4 "BUT THAT'S AN OXYMORON"
No. The term was originally used by LibSoc and has its own meaning (mentioned above) and the media and government tarnish its meaning by using mainstream definitions rather than its original definition.
>inb4 "Communist Amarchist idiot"
LibSoc is neither. Look it up and make sure you read the ones that aren't dumb Jew controlled shit that say otherwise. It's not anarchism nor Communism. Equality? Yeah. Communal public shit? You bet. Government controlling the equality? Minimized government, remember?
>>131990705
This debate is getting heated