Holy fucking shit mods

>>131982981
I actually 100% agree with this. Shit like "IS LACI GREEN /OURGIRL/ KEK" is fucking awful and ruining this board and needs to go

Half the time this e-celeb posting faggotry has nothing to do with politics and like you said, has to do with Youtube drama.

>Not to mention the constant racemixing threads with lewd pictures and little to no content in the OP.
This shouldn't come into question on whether it should be banned or not

>>131982981
/pol/'s been ruined

>>131982981
I agree, if you need a e-faggot to form your opinion then you're doing it wrong and showing your age.

File: vlcsnap-2017-07-01-01h39m51s170.png (1MB, 1280x738px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x738px

>>131982981
>>131983189
agreed

half the posts are about literal who people i've never heard of.

>>131982981
Be on the interest. Hate people for using the internet to get their opinions out.
Please Mods, only allow TV News here.
Thanks mods.
signed faggot.

>>131982981
E-Celeb Cancer and BTFO threads need to go.

File: IMG_5313.jpg (34KB, 185x199px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 185x199px

>>131982981
I agree that we should ban e celeb postings except not for the reason you stated. I think we should because it's been full of shills shit talking them constantly trying to split us all apart. Shareblue has made that their main goal. Petersen and Southern being their two main targets to knock down.

So yeah let's ban that shit all together. Getting sick of shills.

>>131983392
Heck yes, from now on only Movie Stars, TV News, and Liberal College proffesors should have their voice heard.
Get all the right wing E-Celebs out of here.
Signed faggot.

File: KKK-hoax-Trump-2.jpg (84KB, 600x742px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 600x742px

Shill,you hate YouTube e-celeb because
They're taking the SJW narrative away from your
Corporate Media overlords & getting the youth
"Any-color-pill/WOKE".
Scary for you,fun for us!

>>131983291
>>131983494

YouTube opinions are not news.

>>131983459
Giving in to shills means we win.

File: IMG_2452.png (531KB, 565x674px)

531KB, 565x674px

>>131983291
This is kind of funny and true. If you are openly advertising for views or clicks it should be deleted. Otherwise as long as the thread is concerning politics it should stay even if it's unpopular

>>131983655
Neither is tv "news"

>>131982981
It wouldnt be a problem if people didnt reply to it

>>131983683
>If you are openly advertising for views or clicks it should be deleted
That's the problem with an anonymoose imageboard. You can't prove who's shilling for whom.

That's why you ban YouTube opinion givers altogether.

member when op had an actual topic with sauce from multiple sources, and we debated stuff? Now its all twitter and youtube "BTFO" crap, one post by op

>>131983788
Youtube is one of the only means that right wing people have for getting views out.
The liberals own Hollywood, the Media, Colleges, everything.
Right wingers own Youtube.
There is only one type of person that would want to get rid of it.

File: IMG_2295.jpg (89KB, 659x469px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 659x469px

>>131983788
So we let the biggest shills of ALL TIME post instead?

>WAPO
>NYT
>BASED Huffpo

Anon... We need to talk...

>>131982981
Agree fully with OP. Since when are politics about feminists calling brainlet names at nerd conventions

File: 1498812356096.jpg (110KB, 540x592px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 540x592px

>>131982981
Yes please.

>>131983739
Remember we have t_d people here now

>>131983709
I would rather make fun of tv news than watch some person give their opinion on YouTube about Islam and race mixing and so they can potentially be /ourperson/

File: IMG_5309.png (427KB, 400x538px) Image search: [Google]

427KB, 400x538px

>>131983680
The point is all they do is shit talk these e celebs everhtime they're posted. And they post the same shit so much that it turns /pol/ against the e celeb in question. So they end up winning as it is.

It's a shame because the e celebs have their role to play which serves us well. They attract many normies now who would never hear right wing views otherwise. Shit Milo and Lauren redpilled my best friend.

>>131983494
Make a topic related to politics not related to E-Celeb talking about politics, they are attention whores who just want to become the news. Post tits or fuck off.

>>131983288
>half the posts are about literal who people i've never heard of.

This is another thing, I have never heard about these people most of the time and when I go to look them up what they talk about is barely ever politics

>>131984044
>It's a shame because the e celebs have their role to play which serves us well. They attract many normies now who would never hear right wing views otherwise
Exactly, they are useful.

>>131982981

yep, no idea how these fuckwads think that they are providing any sort of content.

I was angry at the first post of "hey pol what do you think about Paul Joseph Watson" and it never stopped.

absolute garbage tier social networking tier posts about celebrity worship, it's like following hollywood reporter magazine or something

>>131984093
If that would be a rule it better be the same for anything.
No OP's based off a tweet. No OP's based on a news clip. No Op's with a tv personality or News anchor. No OP's with any giving any opinions or saying anything ever.

>>131983912
Sure, but they don't need to take up catalog space here. YouTube does a good enough job grouping people together and pointing them to related content (based on what similar users have watched) on their own website.

>>131983949
No, you put all links through archives regardless.

>>131982981
This please.

>>131984044

there are a billion websites for normies, we dont need this crap on 4chan pol of all places

>>131982981
Sorry to break it to you friendo.
But /pol/ has been ruined for years.
You can try to resist but this shit is irriversible.
Look at what happened to /b/.
Soon this place too will be nothing but a trap porn board.

File: keemfag.jpg (10KB, 320x180px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 320x180px

BUMP

File: pol reading.jpg (283KB, 670x510px) Image search: [Google]

283KB, 670x510px

>>131982981
The mods dont give a shit about the board. Thsi is why this crap is not only allowed to exist but also to flourish.

>>131984302
>YouTube does a good enough job grouping people together and pointing them to related content (based on what similar users have watched) on their own website.


I want to add to this by saying that YT analytics also shows where watched videos are embedded from so if a video gets a ton of views on certain websites it encourages creators to post more videos to said websites.

>>131982981
>x is ruining /pol/

Haven't heard this one before. How brave.

>>131984281
Yes this is the way it should be, Anons discussing politics with Anons we don't need a third party celebrity for this they are only useful for the following.
a) posting pictures of their tits
b) posting pictures of their snatch
c) posting pictures of their pooper

everything else that pours out of their cunt mouths is irrelevant. Anons are the master of this house not E-Celebs or click bait journalists with pre approved ideas. We don't need them they need us.

>>131984358
I agree that's why I said we should ban them from here. Because it does us no good. It just makes people hate the e celebs and then visiting normies hate them too. It's all done by shills to creAte division.

>>131983241
ever since June 2015....

>>131977428
>>131981615
>>131965139
All fucking cancer.

At least they criticize crowder in his thread but they don't specify how.

>>131984943
>mfw

>>131982981
Let the threads slide to infinity anon. I assume most people on this board can distinguish between genuine information and wannabe Cult leaders .

>>131982981
I agree get these normal faggots off my board.

>>131985234
I fear that's all we can do, my weed smoking friend.

I guess let's see where nu-/pol/ takes us.

Hiroshimoot is getting a cut of the revenue

>>131983912
>Youtube is one of the only means that right wing people have for getting views out.

>Jewtube is one of the only means (((they))) have for creating an air of authenticity around controlled opposition.

Youtube is censored as fuck. It's owned by literally the biggest force for controlling the narrative out there. Youtube is TV 2.0. If ((((((((((((Google)))))))))))) allows you to say something on Youtube it's because (((they))) want it said. (((Hollywood))), (((liberal arts professors))), etc. aren't shit compared to ((((((((((((Google)))))))))))). We're talking several orders of magnitude here. Going to Jewtube for right wing opinions is going to the ADL's website to hear about the atrocities committed by Israel.

It's not shills looking for adbux coming here posting alt-lite race mixers. It's people trying to trick you in to control the opposition.

>>131982981
whatcha sliding, chaim?

>>131982981
>Can we ban threads about right-wingers unless they're criticizing right-wingers?

KYS

We need to get back to 4chans CP roots.

File: laurensouthernjewess.jpg (143KB, 690x402px)

143KB, 690x402px

>>131982981
most of e-celeb that are pushed refuse to name the jew or are jewish or zionists

>>131982981
>>131983189
>>131983241
>>131983264

Pol was ruined when they gave blacks here an identity.

The new (old) flags made this a place for identity politics.

kike gook owned thought he would try going full like and give everyone a voice here with the nigger and commie and rainbow and tree hugger flags... He prays the normies will come here and make him mr big gook....

Faggots

File: DBBAkI3V0AAeWo3.jpg (84KB, 639x823px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 639x823px

But race mixing is good anon!

>>131982981
>Holy fucking shit mods
>>>/bant/ yeah what the fuck moot chink /trash/

File: 1460306892482.jpg (106KB, 464x404px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 464x404px

>>131982981
Sorry shlomo. All the jewtube threads as of late have been kikes d & c threads saying this bitch or that is a jew or coalburner bc she dares to say niggers are less than human. How dare anons be informed? God knows you bury redpill threads here faster than the holocoaster pic show up in your holohoax threads. Seems like typical jewish shit to me.

File: GasYourself.jpg (24KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 400x400px

>>131982981
>unless they are criticizing content creators
YOU CAN ONLY POST IF YOU AGREE WITH ME t. JIDF

>>131983189
True. OP is right. Shit is cancer. It's like high school drama

>>131982981
PLEASE. E-celebs are cancer

>>131989183
No, he's not right. He wants to keep the anti-eceleb threads that are just as void of content. As long as you agree with him that everyone not as popular as op needs to go then you can make e-celeb threads.

File: image.jpg (28KB, 800x792px)

28KB, 800x792px

>>131982981
Agreed. Same shitposting threads, some of which have been posted for over a year.

Reporting them does little and they usually get 200+ replies.

There needs to be mod coverage for the most prominent time periods.

"What does pol think of X" threads needs to be a bannable offence.

Posting threads with little to no actual information, while not promoting any sort of critical thinking or intellectual discussion, needs to be a bannable offence.

Fascist mods needed.

>>131982981
True, /pol/ is getting worse every day. I only go to /pol/ to find pics of black dicks.

I always bump these threads in hopes that mods will deal with the advertising problem. I'm pretty sure they're aware and just don't care.

I wonder if Hiroshimoot knows that /pol/ is infected with leeches that should be purchasing ad space instead of spamming /pol/ with their ads.

>>131989269
Well it depends... Political discussions involving politics are cool, no matter who the creator is. However, there's been high school drama shit lately. Take for example the Sargon vs DesTINY debate versus the Sargon vs Anita Sarkeesan. The desTINY debate had shit we could break down and discuss and debate politically. The shit with Anita is some fucking drama-queen teir shit that shits up the board.

Can we bAN THE PEOPLE CONSTANTLY ASKING TO BAN PEOPLE BECAUSE THEIR ASSHOLES HURT TOO MUCH????? ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????/ ?????????????/ ?/ ?/// / /////// /?????????????????????????? /?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????