Question....is this constitutional?
>>131961835
>Affirmative action
Just classify it affirmative action and I'm sure you can justify anything
>>131961835
In DC whites are minorities so it's all good.
>>131961835
It's for the best, minorities already have plenty of experience in that industry
>>131961835
>reenforcing racial stereotypes
ok
>>131961835
Seems to be just an extension to Affirmative Action. So I guess then the question becomes is if AA is constitutional. And based on the Fisher v. University of Texas decision, the Supreme Court seems to state that AA is broadly constitutional, with certain narrow implementations that could be unconstitutional.
>>131961835
>131961835
Dafuck is this
>>131961835
Nope. Not that it will stop them.
They know minorities are more experienced with drug use and dealing. Seems pretty logical to me
>>131961835
No, but it's logical
Minorities are more qualified than anyone to be selling drugs.
>>131962203
Has AA ever been challenged?
>>131963851
why do you think the UC schools are 70% asian
>>131961835
City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co
Comes to mind immediately
>>131961835
aren't "minorities" the majority in D.C.???
????
????
????