Thread replies: 19
Thread images: 9
Thread images: 9
Anonymous
AP publishes correction 2017-06-30 11:49:36 Post No. 131944558
[Report] Image search: [Google]
AP publishes correction 2017-06-30 11:49:36 Post No. 131944558
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: Associated Piss.png (2MB, 1958x2269px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 1958x2269px
>WASHINGTON (AP) -- In stories published April 6, June 2, June 26 and June 29, The Associated Press reported that all 17 U.S. intelligence agencies have agreed that Russia tried to influence the 2016 election to benefit Donald Trump. That assessment was based on information collected by three agencies - the FBI, CIA and National Security Agency - and published by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, which represents all U.S. intelligence agencies. Not all 17 intelligence agencies were involved in reaching the assessment.
The fucking state of US media.
http://archive.is/1Gjf7
>>
File: Screenshot from 2017-06-30 19.51.13.png (211KB, 965x817px) Image search:
[Google]
211KB, 965x817px
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6vvPx7AqDl8
>>
File: 1498835520116.jpg (196KB, 900x900px) Image search:
[Google]
196KB, 900x900px
>>131944558
>oops sorry guys :^)
>>
File: 1497490297031.png (296KB, 624x336px) Image search:
[Google]
296KB, 624x336px
>OOPS WE LIED
>>
File: 1362930268891.jpg (41KB, 604x604px) Image search:
[Google]
41KB, 604x604px
>>131944558
We don't have time to worry about Russia undermining US democracy, we're too busy quibbling numbers.
>>
File: 1493666737322.png (598KB, 960x960px) Image search:
[Google]
598KB, 960x960px
Why are so many corrections coming now?
>>
>>131944558
what if none of the alphabet agencies made the assessment and a third party just gave something to the AP?
>>
>>131945320
Yeah that was crowdstrike that the DNC paid
Maybe all this Russia stuff is coming crashing down
>>
lol jk guys we just absolutely lied but it's okay because we published a tiny retraction half a year later
Fuck the media to death.
>>
>>131945320
>Clapper further acknowledged that the analysts who produced the Jan. 6 assessment on alleged Russian hacking were “hand-picked” from the CIA, FBI and NSA.
They were handpicked assessments just like the ones for Iraq WMD's.
>>
>>131944558
(((AP))) does most of the investigations for other (((news))) outfits. Destroying and silencing them will do much to cripple and forever damage credibility, trust, and even legitimacy of (((news media))). No voice, no influence.
>>
File: Screenshot from 2017-06-30 20.09.03.png (117KB, 342x469px) Image search:
[Google]
117KB, 342x469px
>>131944742
HIS NAME WAS SETH RICH
>>
>>131945238
littany of libel suits HIS lawyers are preparing for assorted courts
>>
>>131944558
Part of the conspiracy of liars.
>>
I thought it was a memo that came from the Obama white house?
>>
The bigger thing here, is that if you look at that DNI report.
Majority is old from 2012 critical of RT.
The only agency that could really tell about electronic hacking / manipulation, the NSA gives the weakest recommendation, basically a 50/50 tossup.
Only CIA and FBI are dick hard for the RussaGate narrative, and we now know Comey was a partisan director.
The jig is up.
>>
File: dogless.jpg (85KB, 500x767px) Image search:
[Google]
85KB, 500x767px
>>131944558
>We just were prepairing TV watching dummy portion of population for the ww3. And it's all based on bullshit pulled out of thin air.
Seriously, why amerifarts love ZombieBox so much?
>>
File: fact_checkers_corrected.jpg (724KB, 1500x4255px) Image search:
[Google]
724KB, 1500x4255px
>>131944558
Don't be anti-journalist
>stelter
>>
Shameless by the AP.
Thread posts: 19
Thread images: 9
Thread images: 9