Redpills: Gay Marriage?

>>131881961
fuck you

>>131882032
>inb4 gay people coming to insult me
okay i can see why you would insult me but pls explain to me why you NEED marriage, im open for counterarguments

>>131881961
The purpose of marriage is to regulate (keep regular) human reproduction, and to prevent the natural tendency of 80% of women to gravitate toward the top 20% of men. Fags don't reproduce (or at least they shouldn't), and they can only come close to that by adoption (or buying semen). The purpose of gay marriage is to allow that, but the problem is something like 40% of child molesters are gay. Very high rate of child abuse by gay men. They will groom kids to be consumed by pedophiles. Lesbians, dispite being much less common than gay men, are always the face of such political agendas to trick men into not voting against it. And they are nearly as bad-a child raised by them is basically getting hit with twice the bullshit and problems of single mothers, and if its a boy, he'll be severly hurting for a father figure.

Furthermore, gay men are not monogamous, and Lesbians beat each other up a lot more often. Their marrages are going to be shams, exploiting the law to accomplish something.

Then there is the fundamental problem-its a biological error. The sexual orientation paradigm is just plain wrong.
In men, its caused by bad hormone levels, especially prenatal, and exposure to chemicals, especially exenoestrogens which feminizes a part of the brain that controls attractions (in extreme cases, the feminization spreads to other parts of the brain causing transsexualism). A mother with toxoplasmosis also causes it.
In women, hormone problems also contribute but xenotestosterone is less of a problem than xenoestrogens. Mainly, its just women who don't realize that women can get off on seeing other women aroused, empathetically, in a way that men usually cant. They mistake this instinct that lets them cope with being in a harem for genuine attraction and if they've never been in love they get caught up in the hype and assume its their destiny to masturbate with the bodies of other women.

>>131884544
By the way, you probably won't be able to say any of this without getting charged with hate speech unfortunately. I would give you some sources since I hope they won't ruin your life for linking to a journal article but I'm on my phone.