How exactly was this sexist?

I dunno. A bunch of my liberal friends on kikebook share shit like "If trump isn't a misogynist how come he said THIS!?:" with an attached screenshot of one of his tweets calling some woman horrible

>>131809521
it's because we already know he's a misogynist and these tweets are good displays of his feelings towards women

>>131809521
It isnt. btw Why isnt there a Neutral option for the new shit they implemented for the flag posts?

Saying anything bad about a left-leaning woman = muhsoggyknee
Meanwhile the media and the left routinely attack Kellyanne Conway and Ivanka with the kinds of things that would make them scream sexism if they were said about Hillary or Pocahontas and were silent about female Trump supporters getting harassed by liberals at Trump rallies during the campaign

>>131810524
>Neutral option
Just use you geographic location, dammit

>>131810396
How is Trump a misogynist? When has Trump ever expressed hatred towards women as a whole?

>>131809521
>Insults both a man and a woman
>"Mysogynist pig!"
The delusion is astounding

>>131811004
nothing I give you will ever be enough proof, so why should I bother?
it's like if anon considered every black person he met to be a dumb nigger, and he said so out loud, I still couldn't prove to you that anon is a racist

>>131811387
>I totally could but I'm not going to xD
good argument

>>131811611
you didn't even read the post, so I made the right call

>>131809521
Saying anything negative about a member of a protected class is sexist/racist/whatever.

>>131811720
You imply you totally have the proof but anon just totally wouldn't believe you so you won't bother even making an attempt even though you totally could
good argument :)

>>131812163
>You imply you totally have the proof
kek you still didn't read the post
I literally said the exact opposite

>>131809521
He made fun of two women in the same sentence. That's pretty sexist imo.

>>131812311
Sorry anon I gave you the benefit of the doubt that you weren't retarded enough to make a claim without evidence :)

>>131812586
evidence is what I have, proof is what I don't
you just choose not to accept the evidence

File: Giant-Crisco-and-Detroit-Joe-Louis-Fist-665x385.jpg (71KB, 665x385px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 665x385px

>>131812455
lel

File: 280854324211482624.png (11KB, 1052x805px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 1052x805px

>>131812701
>evidence is what I have, proof is what I don't
>I believe it but I can't prove it

>>131809521
its because she got so often lifted her actual pussy is her mouth...

>>131812972
refer back to the example of racist anon that you still haven't read

>>131813032
Not sure why you'd make 6 posts just to say "Hey everybody I'm retarded"

>>131813117
>still didn't read it lolololol xD!!!1!

>>131813156
Not sure why you'd make 7 posts just to say "Hey everybody I'm retarded"

File: ChonGorda.jpg (78KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 1280x720px

Remember the famous quote, "To find out who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize." Women have controlled the political arena for a long time. They've become the protected ruling class where anything bad you say about them is automatically a hate crime. They love to play the victim card and claim they never had any power, but if you examine history youll see its the opposite, they had no problems pushing through things like alcohol prohibition and womens suffrage. They've been in control of the direction of the country for a while. The "patriarchy" is the big boogeyman they love to blame, but really it hasn't existed for a long time here.

>>131813231
k guess you don't want to have any kind of discussion, then

>>131813303
Not sure why you'd make 8 posts just to say "Hey everybody I'm retarded"

clown in chief who has the nuclear codes and the alien information being a bitch in twitter

how people can respect this babydick douchebag drumpf?

>>131810043

"Treat women as equals!"
>"Oh, so I should criticize them the same way I would a man?"
"OH NO, THAT WOULD BE SEXIST AND WOMEN ARE FAR TOO FRAGILE TO HANDLE IT!"

>>131813284
Well it's also not very nice to call a guy who is not a psycho a psycho
but big and strong men like Joe Scarborough (lol) are expected to just grin and bear it

>>131813545
I don't think anyone's defending these obviously inane and disrespectful tweets

...but to claim they're sexist is bogus

File: IMG_0307.jpg (384KB, 846x1024px) Image search: [Google]

384KB, 846x1024px

Does it matter if they call him a soggy knee man?

I thought he was literally hitler, where do you go from there?

>>131809521
It's not. The better point is that they've done nothing but shit on trump for his appearance since like the mid 90s with the whole muh hair piece thing up until now. It was never about muh pussy grab. They just feel it's ok to shit on men for their looks but it's taboo to do the same on a woman.

For as dislike as Hillary was here, it was never really about her looks. More on her shit policy.

File: 1490154130579.jpg (96KB, 600x507px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 600x507px

>>131809521

Criticizing any womyn is sexist because they are truly superior with their inherently peaceful nature.

If we had a womyn president no wars would ever occur and ISIS would give up out of love.

File: 1474168950332.jpg (88KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 500x500px

>>131811387
>I don't have to back my baseless accusations because you wouldn't believe it anyway
OK.

>>131813765
I'll defend them. Trump did absolutely nothing wrong. Are you a californian by any chance?

>>131809521
Because people are lazy and take mental shortcuts whenever they can. This tweet is presented as evidence because a large group of people claim it is such. So people will just accept it as evidence without even bothering to read it themselves. It's just like his pussy comment.

>>131809521
I don't even get it, he didn't even make fun of her surgery so how is this even supposed to be "misogynist" or whatever?

>>131810396
Half the tweet is making fun of a dude lol

>>131814562
well, you've seen all the same evidence I have
probably more evidence since you probably follow Trump more than I do

>>131817364
I don't follow him and I don't watch the news too often. In all honesty, what are you referencing?

>>131817798
again, refer to the post about the racist anon
I can't prove it, I can only point to a hundred of these types of instances that any reasonable person would look at and accept that the guy is a misogynist
I frankly don't even see why this is such a problem to trump supporters; so what if he's a misogynist? we've likely had 20+ misogynist presidents

>>131818214
I'm not a religious man anon, you're not going to get me to believe anything on faith. Prove it or move on. Just don't feel bad when people call you out on making baseless accusation.

I BELIEVE you raped and murdered a small child last week. I can't prove it, but your shady behavior leads me to believe it.

File: image.jpg (149KB, 570x458px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 570x458px

I will enlighten you /pol/

The people calling this sexist are collectivists
>say something bad about one woman = saying something bad about all women

They are also Neo Marxists so if you applied the same situation to a man it wouldn't matter because
>men are the oppressors

This situation fits the mainstream narrative that trump is bad so it is propagated further

>>131818498
the issue at hand is that supporters can infinitely dismiss any evidence until there is mind reading technology that is 100% accurate and Trump submits to a brain scan

until that happens, people like you will continue to behave the way you are

>>131818781
Do you believe it's sexist to make fun of trump for being fat old ugly bald and orange every day all day for the past 9 months? No. It's just bantz. Get the fuck over it.

"You can't make fun of women" - feminists 2017

>>131819162
I'll give another example
Trump supporters say that the Muslim ban is not a Muslim ban
even though trump himself called it a Muslim ban
therefore, even if I had the perfect tweet where Trump says
>I hate all women.
it still wouldn't be proof, only another piece of dismissible evidence

>Get the fuck over it.
like I said, I don't even know what the problem with it is. there's nothing for me to get over

>>131809521
but they are (((comedians)))

>>131819345
Consider the following since you want to move the goalpost to muh muslim ban.

The original list included Iraq. It no longer includes Iraq. You think it's because all the muslims in Iraq died over night?

The real answer is the countries are on the list because the lack a real system to vet the people they send to our country. They lack proper security in air ports.

Iraq made changes to their security and were removed from the ban list. I'd say them being removed has literally nothing to do with their belief system.

Why isn't Indonesia banned??

>>131809521
You're not a misogynist pig. And neither is Trump (duh)
From a woman's pov, what was up with her even getting a facelift- I mean seriously? She's a wreck. And there's not much there to work with anyway.
A hairdresser and a stylist would have been a lot cheaper places to start.
What got fixed?

>>131819713
see? The guy comes up with a ban on Muslims, calls it a ban on all Muslims entering the country, tries to get it into law, and you still say it's not intended to be a Muslim ban.
like, what the fuck. Come on.

>>131819713
because trump is exclusively using bathouse barry's list, purely to show the Democrats as hypocrites

>>131819894
You're not making sense.

Did he campaign with talking points of a muslim ban?
Sure did.

Did he institute said muslim ban?
Nope. He created a ban for travel from 7 countries identified by the Obama administration as security threats. That list was later cut to 6 countries when Iraq made changes to comply with the law.

Hell, you can't even enforce a "muslim ban".

>come to America
>interviewed by customs
>>sir are you a muslim
>>nope
>>XD good enough for me enjoy your stay

It makes no sense. This is a ban from unstable countries that have no means of vetting the people leaving.

>>131811270
Also he complemented a woman, which was also sexist apparently.

File: CNN 59.jpg (73KB, 427x767px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 427x767px

>>131819894
If 98% of muslims aren't banned it's not a muslim ban. Also temporarily shutting down immigration is not a "ban". You're speaking as if he banned muslims - is he arresting/deporting all US muslims? No.

MSM brainwashed you and convinced you others were brainwashed.

>>131820529
>Did he institute said muslim ban?
tried and failed (so far)
>Hell, you can't even enforce a "muslim ban".
doesn't matter

now look at it from my perspective
how am I supposed to prove anything to you when the guy himself saying the words directly and clearly on camera is not enough proof?

File: Bohemian_club.png (836KB, 4537x3871px) Image search: [Google]

836KB, 4537x3871px

>>131809521
>How exactly was this sexist?
It's not, it's just a way to ignore all of Mika Brzezinski and her father's inside knowledge and connections.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/controlling-the-global-economy-bilderberg-the-trilateral-commission-and-the-federal-reserve/14614
https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/foreign-policy/item/1213-council-on-foreign-relations
https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/asia/item/10367-organized-chaos-behind-the-scenes-in-the-middle-east
http://canadafreepress.com/article/flashback-the-domination-of-barack-obama-by-the-trilateral-commission
http://www.williamengdahl.com/englishNEO26Mar2017.php
http://truthstreammedia.com/2017/03/02/trilateral-commission-superseded-control-u-s-economy-1970s/
http://www.reformation.org/rockefeller.pdf
http://www.bilderberg.org/roundtable/emhist.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-cia-and-the-media-50-facts-the-world-needs-to-know/5471956
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11409
http://www.snopes.com/you-had-a-hunch-the-news-system-was-rigged/
http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/apr/11/meet-the-liberal-press/

>>131809521
Female anon here.
> Its not sexist
Also
> Mika is a whore

>>131809521
Anytime you attack a woman, it's supposedly misogynist

Reality is it's just the equality they asked for, men get attacked like this all day and never complain

Poor feminist retards are getting karma

File: giv.png (45KB, 778x512px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 778x512px

>>131823082
giv /pol/ gf

>>131819833
Did she even actually?

File: DUDE.jpg (18KB, 304x293px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 304x293px

>>131809521
It's 2017, any criticism of a woman for any reason is sexism.