Thread replies: 9
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
File: 5978634+_213e203a54bf97fb54a962eda09e421a.png (90KB, 325x223px) Image search:
[Google]
90KB, 325x223px
If being gay is 100% acceptable, then if everyone on Earth was gay and refused to grow up and have kids, would that mean people are fine with ending the human race? And if the answer is no, does that mean only a certain amount of people can be gay? That would make gay people look like assholes and inclusive, right?
>>
>>131800460
Everyone on Earth isn't going to become gay and not reproduce you autistic faggot. And besides, artificial wombs will mean that they will be able to reproduce eventually anyway.
>>
>>131800926
I know it isn't fucktard. I'm being theoretical. Did you seriously not read my post at all?
>>
>>131801582
Kys faggot.
Faggots are only lazy fucks that want a network of daddies that will take care of them
>>
>>131800460
Xq28 gene. Surrogacy. Artificial eggs made from ONLY male skin cells. Or from male sperm. Ingest pussy fluids bls
>>
>>131800926
>artificial wombs
Literally an excuse to be a raging faggot given your argument, Jesus Christ.
>>
File: IMG_4158.jpg (49KB, 500x351px) Image search:
[Google]
49KB, 500x351px
>>131800460
Only a certain number. It's limited by genetics and in theory increases as a population size becomes too large. Globalists believe it's acceptable to force the numbers in desired directions
>>
>>131800460
>If being gay is 100% acceptable, then if everyone on Earth was gay and refused to grow up and have kids, would that mean people are fine with ending the human race?
no
>does that mean only a certain amount of people can be gay?
yes
Thread posts: 9
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3