Not necessarily an EWO general, but we all know that (((they))) are heavily involved in pedophilia, human trafficking, and the occult. Especially the Podestas/Clintons/Abramovic. Is this group that is entrenched mainly in US Gov. also connected to the Vatican horrors? The symbolism is shared. No one has made a video on this but with the Pell case, my almonds activated. Some background:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Azgo9NNMqno
What do you think /pol/? The pope did shill for Hillary. Are they interconnected? Would gutting the root of one lead to convictions in the other? Curious anon.
curious bump
shameless bump. Come on pol
why doesnt someoen do something about them
>>131780728
https://youtu.be/aG1Jd3PF-JU
>>131781172
mainly because of the actor they paid to false flag comet ping pong. The normie view is that it is a conspiracy. I really don't understand how. Especially with the podesta emails. Not one credible news organization, aside from the one gentlemen that got suicided, decided to report on those emails. If everyone's talking about it, they can't kill all the MSM. Unless they do which might also be a win.
>>131781346
why do you spam the same ad and image in every EWO related thread
justice bump for seth rich
Yes they are. Look for the CIA contacts lists that got leaked some time ago.
There's like several hundreds of people from the Vatican there. Their Vatican pages outnumbered all other countries pages by several hundred contacts.
They are connected as fuck with the CIA. So yea, I'd say they are in it.
>>131780728
New Knights of Malta leader
Fra’ Giacomo Dalla Torre del Tempio di Sanguinetto, the Lieutenant of the Grand Master of the Knights of Malta, genuflects before Pope Francis during their meeting June 23.
>>131782161
Juicy info anon, I appreciate the response. Question. If this is true why did we not find this type of communication between the CIA/Vaticaniggers and Podesta? He was very brazen with his comms. Maybe the CIA were smarter than that and used backchannels? Do (((they))) have a history of meeting with Vaticaniggers?
>>131781708
I don't recall.
>>131782503
That kind of stuff is back channel stuff. Or at the very least without traces.
Remember we got emails, not phone logs or anything like that. Though search for vatican and I'm sure you can find talk of a meeting or two being set up.
Pity bump