Shkreli

>>131637285
unless patients want to come out and say they got them for free, he won't provide proof because of confidentiality

>>131637285
I don't. All I heard is that he screws over insurance companies to make them pay the overly expensive drugs for the patients. Again, that's hear-say. I can't prove that. If you want proof you probably need his company's statutes and a good book keeper.

>>131637285
no

>>131637285
No, but that has nothing to do with why he's been charged.

He's been running a Ponzi scheme for years. The fact that he's an asshole just makes him a tempting target for prosecutors, but his price-gouging is not why he's been charged. It has nothing to do with the case.

>>131640371

So why did the allegations and indictment come out after he became the most hated man in America? Admit the Obama admin was out to get him and make an example out of him, guilty or not.

>>131637285
No, he just pays shills to repeat it on social media websites like 4chan/reddit.

I've never seen any proof that it's true, and based on the type of person Shkreli is (i.e. a sociopath), I see no reason why it would be true.

>>131640371
>but his price-gouging is not why he's been charged.
Define "charged" please and what has he been charged with? Running a Ponzi scheme. People always went around saying Assange was charged with rape. He never was charged.